`
`Respondents Kangxi Communication Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Grand Chip
`Labs, Inc. (collectively, “KCT”) respectfully move to reopen the evidentiary record in this
`Investigation for the limited purpose of requesting admission of demonstrative slides used at the
`evidentiary hearing.
`
`On July 11, 2025, both KCT and Complainants presented RDX-0010C during the
`examination of Dr. Wentzloff. See, e.g., Hearing Tr. at 518:2-4, 520:23-24, 523:17-524:2, 526:23-
`24, 528:11-12, 538:15-16, 542:17-18, 613:11, and 613:24. This exhibit’s omission from the list of
`exhibits to be admitted was inadvertent, and its admission is warranted to ensure that the ALJ and
`Commission have a complete record. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.42(g), which states that “[a]t
`any time prior to the filing of the initial determination, the administrative law judge may reopen
`the proceedings for the reception of additional evidence,” Respondents request that the evidentiary
`record be reopened for the limited purpose of admitting RDX-0010C.
`
`Ground Rule 2.2 Certification
`
`KCT certifies pursuant to Ground Rule 2.2 that it has met and conferred with counsel for
`
`all parties on July 29, 2025 and August 1, 2025 regarding the subject matter of this Motion. All
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1413
`’s Unopposed Motion To Reopen The Evidentiary Record
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parties have waived the two business day requirement of Ground Rule 2.2. Counsel for
`Complainants, counsel for Respondent Ruijie Networks, and the Commission Investigative Staff
`
`have indicated that they do not oppose the relief sought in this Motion.
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1413
`’s Unopposed Motion To Reopen The Evidentiary Record
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1413
`’s Unopposed Motion To Reopen The Evidentiary Record
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Ltd. and Grand Chip Labs, Inc. (* ) filed a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D
`
`D
`
`=
`
`OOHHX
`
`OOHEX
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
