`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`Before the Honorable Debra Morriss
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter Of
`Certain HSP Modems, Software and
`Hardware Components Thereof, and
`Products Containing Same
`
`j
`)
`1
`)
`)
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-439
`
`0
`C?‘
`t n C J
`
`52
`5
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 0 2 10.15(c), Complainant PCTEL, Inc. (“PCTEL”) requests leave
`to file the attached Reply in support of its First Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence
`
`Concerning Previously Undisclosed Inequitable Conduct Allegations and Prior Art References.
`PCTEL’s reply addresses certain factual inaccuracies and misleading statements in Respondents’
`
`Opposition to PCTEL’s Motion. As set forth in the attached Reply, Respondents mischaracterize
`
`their behavior in withholding evidence concerning their inequitable conduct allegations and prior
`
`art references and wrongly state that PCTEL will suffer no prejudice.
`
`DATED: May 10,2001
`
`SKJERVEN MORRILL MACPHERSON LLP
`
`BY
`
`Edward V. Anderson
`Robert B. Momill
`Steven M. Levitan
`SKJERVEN MORRILL MACPHERSON LLP
`25 Metro Drive, Suite 700
`San Jose, CA 95 1 10
`(408) 453-9200
`
`Attorneys for Complainant PCTEL, Inc.
`Raphael V. Lupo
`Donna M. Tanguay
`Mark G. Davis
`MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY
`600 13th Street
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3096
`(202) 756-8000
`
`755713 v l
`
`
`
`I
`
`.
`
`.:>
`*
`1 c;i
`(;io
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
