throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`BEFORE THE HONORABLE PAUL J. LUCKERN
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN PLASTIC GROCERY AND
`RETAIL BAGS
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-492
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`
`THE INVESTIGATION AS TO PAN PACIFIC PLASTICS MFG., INC.
`ON THE BASIS OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`
`Complainant Superbag Corp.
`
`(“Complainant” or “Superbag”) and Respondent Pan
`
`Pacific Plastics Mfg., Inc. (“Pan Pacific”) move, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 2l0.21(b), for an order
`
`terminating this investigation as to Respondent Pan Pacific based on the parties’ settlement
`
`agreement. The parties request that this Joint Motion be granted.
`
`1.
`
`The parties’ agreed Termination by Settlement Agreement is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 1. The Termination by Settlement Agreement submitted herewith represents the entire
`
`agreement between Superbag and Pan Pacific, and there are no other agreements, written or oral,
`
`express or implied, between Superbag and Pan Pacific concerning the subject matter of this
`
`investigation.
`
`2.
`
`Pan Pacific stipulates to the validity and enforceability of the ‘235 patent during
`
`the remaining life. Pan Pacific agrees that it will not seek to (or assist others, directly or
`
`indirectly, who seek to) challenge the validity or enforceability of the ‘235 patent
`
`in any
`
`administrative or judicial proceeding. Pan Pacific further agrees not to sell for import into the
`
`United States,
`
`to import
`
`into the United States, or to sell within the United States after
`
`importation any bags or bag packs covered by any of the claims of the ‘235 patent, or otherwise
`
`infringe the ‘235 patent during the remaining life of the ‘235 patent.
`
`

`
`3.
`
`The parties agree that
`
`the termination of this investigation pursuant
`
`to the
`
`Termination by Settlement will not have any adverse effect on the public health and welfare
`
`and/or competitive conditions in the United States.
`
`4.
`
`The parties hereto respectfully submit
`
`that
`
`the requirements of 19 C.F.R.
`
`§210.21(b) are satisfied and respectfully requests that
`
`this Joint Motion to Terminate the
`
`Investigation as to Pan Pacific Plastics Mfg., Inc. on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement be
`
`granted.
`
`5.
`
`The parties further agree that an order of tennination herein does not constitute a
`
`detennination as to violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act 0 1930.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` Steven R. Borgman
`
`Stephen S. Hodgson VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
`
`2300 First City Tower
`1001 Fannin Street
`Houston, Texas 77002-6760
`Phone: 713-758-2002
`Facsimile: 713-615-5758
`ATTORNEYS FOR COMPLAINANT,
`SUPERBAG CORP.
`
`(415) 439-4868
`Phone:
`Fax:
`(415) 439-4968
`ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT,
`PAN PACIFIC PLASTICS MFG., INC.
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Joint Motion to Terminate
`the Investigation as Pan Pacific Plastics Mfg., Inc. on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement was
`served by facsimile transmission, except as indicated below:
`
`Filed via EDIS
`
`Hon. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary United States
`International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 112A
`
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Two Copies by Hand Delivery
`The Honorable Paul J . Luckem
`U.S. Intemational Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`By Hand Delivery
`David H. Hollander, Jr., Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. Intemational Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, S.W., Suite 401
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`John M. Peterson, Esq.
`Neville Peterson LLP
`
`1900 M Street, N.W., Suite 850
`
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`
`Karl G. Schwappach, Esq.
`Faegre & Benson LLP
`2200 Wells Fargo Center,
`90 South Seventh Street
`
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901
`
`David A. Belasco, Esq.
`Belasco Jacobs & Townsley, LLP
`100 Corporate Pointe, Suite 330
`Culver City, CA 90230
`
`5+
`on the Z’ day of January, 2004.
`
`1491277
`
`By Hand Delivery
`John Kao, Esq., Attomey at Law
`580 California Street, 5th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94104-1000
`
`Joseph J. Zito, Esq.
`Zito & Grandinetti
`
`26005 Ridge Road, Suite 203
`Damascus, MD 20872
`
`Roger A. Gilcrest, Esq.
`Standley Law Group LLP
`495 Metro Place South, Suite 210
`Dublin, OH 43017-5315
`
`Via Air Mail
`Polson Products Limited
`
`Harbour Commercial Bldg 19/F
`122 Connaught Road Central
`Hong Kong
`
`Via Air Mail
`
`Nantong Huasheng Plastic
`Products Co.
`
`Jiangzao, Tongzhou City
`Jingsau Province 226315
`People’s Republic of China
`Via Air Mail
`
`Bee Lian Plastic Marketing
`PTE Ltd.
`
`67 Begonia Drive
`Singapore
`
`Stephen S. Hodgson
`
`Q
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable Paul J. Luckern
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`1"“ N°- 337'TA'492
`
`
`
`CERTAIN PLASTIC GROCERY AND
`RETAIL BAGS
`
`
`
`TERMINATION BY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`
`WHEREAS, Superbag Corp.
`
`(“Complainant”)
`
`filed a complaint with the U.S.
`
`Intemational Trade Commission (“Commission”) alleging unfair acts in the importation into the
`
`U.S., and sale in the US. after importation, of certain plastic grocery and retail bags that are
`
`alleged to infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,188,235 (“the ‘235 patent”); and
`
`WHEREAS, Complainant filed a complaint requesting an investigation of an alleged
`
`violation of 19 U.S.C. l337(a)(l)(A)(i) by Pan Pacific Plastics Mfg., Inc. (“Pan Pacific”) as a
`
`respondent in this proceeding; and
`
`WHEREAS, the Commission instituted this investigation under Section 337 of the Tariff
`
`Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. § 1337) based upon the allegations in the complaint filed by
`
`Complainant;
`
`WHEREAS, Pan Pacific disputes all such allegations;
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Commission Rule 2l0.2l(b), Complainant and Pan
`
`Pacific stipulate and agree as follows in connection with their joint motion to terminate this
`
`investigation as to Pan Pacific based on settlement:
`
`1. Complainant and respondent Pan Pacific stipulate and agree to the entry of this
`
`Termination by Settlement Agreement.
`
`

`
`2.
`
`Pan Pacific stipulates to the validity and enforceability of the ‘235 patent during
`
`its remaining life. Pan Pacific agrees that it will not seek to (or assist others, directly or
`
`indirectly, who seek to) challenge the validity or enforceability of the ‘235 patent
`
`in any
`
`administrative or judicial proceeding. Pan Pacific further agrees not to sell for import into the
`
`United States,
`
`to import
`
`into the United States, or to sell within the United States after
`
`importation any bags or bag packs covered by any of the claims of the ‘235 patent, or otherwise
`
`infringe the ‘235 patent during the remaining life of the ‘235 patent.
`
`3.
`
`This Termination by Settlement Agreement represents the entire agreement
`
`between Superbag and Pan Pacific, and there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or
`
`implied, between Superbag and Pan Pacific conceming the subject matter of this investigation.
`
`4.
`
`Superbag agrees to reimburse Pan Pacific for reasonable travel expenses of
`
`counsel for Pan Plastics incurred in connection with the resolution of this matter in an amount of
`
`$5,000.00, payable forthwith.
`
`In light of the foregoing Termination by Settlement Agreement, the Administrative Law
`
`Judge hereby orders that this investigation be terminated as to Respondent Pan Pacific Plastics
`
`Mfg., Inc. and that Pan Pacific be excluded from any further remedial action taken by the
`
`Commission in this investigation.
`
`The Administrative Law Judge further orders that
`
`this
`
`termination does not constitute a determination as to violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of
`
`1930. Nothing in this Termination by Settlement Agreement, however, shall be construed as
`
`precluding further remedial action by the Commission in this investigation, including the grant of
`
`a general exclusion order covering all relevant plastic grocery and retail bags made, sold for
`
`import into the U.S., imported into the U.S., or sold in the U.S. after importation, including such
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`bags made, imported into the U.S., sold for import into the U.S., or sold after import into the
`
`U.S. by Pan Pacific.
`
`IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned of the United States International Trade
`
`Commission has hereunto set his hand on this
`
`day of
`
`, 2004.
`
`SO AGREED:
`
`Superbag Corp.,
`Complainant
`
`The Honorable Paul J. Luckem
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`Pan P ific Plastics Mfg., Inc.
`Respo dent
`
`
`Stephen S. Hodgson
`
` Steven R. Borgm
`
`VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.
`
`2300 First City Tower
`1001 Fannin Street
`Houston, TX 77002-6760
`Phone: (713) 758-2002
`Facsimile: (713) 615-5758
`
`1491277_l .DOC
`
`580
`
`alifornia Street, 5th Floor
`
`San Francisco, CA 94104-1000
`Phone: (415) 439-4868
`Facsimile: (415)482-4968
`
`Page 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket