25768
`
`Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 7, 2008 / Notices
`
`Dated: April 18, 2008.
`Carl J. Artman,
`Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
`[FR Doc. E8–10064 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
`
`Bureau of Land Management
`[UT–060–08–1430–EQ; UTU–81536]
`
`Notice of Realty Action; Re-Issuance;
`Noncompetitive Lease of Public Land;
`Grand County, Utah
`AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
`Interior.
`ACTION: Notice of Realty Action; Re-
`issuance.
`SUMMARY: This notice announces the re-
`issuance of the Notice of Realty Action
`published in the Federal Register on
`March 14, 2006 and cancelled by notice
`published on July 21, 2006.
`DATES: Interested parties may submit
`comments to the BLM Acting Moab
`Field Manager, at the address below.
`Comments must be received by not later
`than June 23, 2008. Only written
`comments will be accepted.
`ADDRESSES: Address all written
`comments concerning this notice to the
`BLM Acting Moab Field Manager, 82
`East Dogwood Avenue, Moab, Utah
`84532. Please send e-mail comments to
`the following address:
`momail@ut.blm.gov.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Mary von Koch, Realty Specialist, Moab
`Field Office, 435–259–2128.
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
`decision to cancel the Notice of Realty
`Action was based on the comments
`received during the 45-day comment
`period. Since July of 2006, all the
`impediments that led to the cancellation
`of the Notice of Realty Action have been
`removed. BLM has determined that the
`following 2,808.67 acres of isolated
`public lands in Grand County, Utah, are
`suitable for lease pursuant to Section
`302 of the Federal Land Policy and
`Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (90
`Stat. 2762; 43 U.S.C. 1732) using
`noncompetitive (direct) lease
`procedures.
`Salt Lake Meridian
`T. 20 S., R. 16 E.,
`Sec. 25, S1⁄2;
`Sec. 26, SW1⁄4SW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 27, SE1⁄4SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 28, E1⁄2SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 34, W1⁄2NW1⁄4.
`T. 21 S., R. 16 E.,
`Sec. 1, lots 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 16.
`T. 21 S., R. 17 E.,
`
`Sec. 4, lots 11, 12, 13, 14, N1⁄2SW1⁄4,
`SW1⁄4SW1⁄4, and NW1⁄4SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 5, E1⁄2SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 6, lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10;
`Sec. 7, lot 4, SE1⁄4SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 8, NW1⁄4SW1⁄4, SE1⁄4SW1⁄4, and SE1⁄4;
`Sec. 9, N1⁄2N1⁄2, S1⁄2NE1⁄4, SW1⁄4NW1⁄4, and
`S1⁄2
`Green River Farms, a domestic
`corporation, has proposed to file with
`BLM an application to lease the above
`public lands, located near Green River,
`Utah. The lands would be used,
`occupied and developed as a
`commercial agricultural farm in
`conjunction with adjoining private
`lands owned by Green River Farms and
`lands leased to Green River Farms by
`the State of Utah School and
`Institutional Trust Lands
`Administration.
`After review, the BLM has determined
`that the proposed use of the above
`described parcels is in conformance
`with the Grand Resource Area Resource
`Management Plan, and that the above
`described land is available for that use.
`Therefore, pursuant to section 302(b) of
`the Federal Land Policy and
`Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C.
`1732(b)) and the implementing
`regulations at 43 CFR part 2920, the
`BLM will accept for processing an
`application to be filed by Green River
`Farms, or its duly qualified designee, for
`a non-competitive lease of the above
`described lands, to be used, occupied,
`and developed as stated above. A non-
`competitive lease may be employed in
`this case because all of the subject tracts
`of public land are adjacent to lands of
`the same proposed farming project. A
`detailed description of the negotiated,
`non-competitive process was provided
`in the original notice.
`On or before June 23, 2008, interested
`parties may submit comments to the
`BLM at the address stated above with
`respect to:
`(1) The decision of the BLM regarding
`the availability of the lands described
`herein and
`(2) The decision of the BLM to accept
`for processing an application from
`Green River Farms for a non-
`competitive lease.
`Facsimiles, telephone calls, and
`electronic mails are unacceptable means
`of notification. Comments including
`names and street addresses of
`respondents will be available for public
`review at the BLM Moab Field Office
`during regular business hours, except
`holidays. Individual respondents may
`request confidentiality. Before including
`your address, phone number, e-mail
`address, or other personal identifying
`information in your comment, you
`should be aware that your entire
`
`comment—including your personal
`identifying information—may be made
`publicly available at any time. While
`you can ask us in your comment to
`withhold your personal identifying
`information from public review, we
`cannot guarantee that we will be able to
`do so.
`Any adverse comments will be
`reviewed by the BLM Utah State
`Director, who may sustain, vacate or
`modify this realty action. In the absence
`of any objections, or adverse comments,
`the proposed realty action will become
`the final determination of the
`Department of the Interior.
`Authority: 43 CFR 2920.4.
`Dated: April 30, 2008.
`Selma Sierra,
`State Director.
`[FR Doc. E8–10051 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Inv. No. 337–TA–565 Consolidated
`Enforcement Proceeding]
`
`In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges
`and Components Thereof; Notice of
`Institution of Formal Enforcement
`Proceeding
`AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission has instituted a formal
`enforcement proceeding relating to
`exclusion orders and cease and desist
`orders issued at the conclusion of the
`above-captioned investigation.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Michael Haldenstein, Office of the
`General Counsel, U.S. International
`Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
`Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
`205–3041. Copies of all nonconfidential
`documents filed in connection with this
`investigation are or will be available for
`inspection during official business
`hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
`Office of the Secretary, U.S.
`International Trade Commission, 500 E
`Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
`telephone 202–205–2000. General
`information concerning the Commission
`may also be obtained by accessing its
`Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).
`The public record for this investigation
`may be viewed on the Commission’s
`electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
`edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired
`persons are advised that information on
`
`VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:00 May 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1
`
`sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
`
`

`
`Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 7, 2008 / Notices
`
`25769
`
`the matter can be obtained by contacting
`the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
`205–1810.
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
`Commission instituted this investigation
`on March 23, 2006, based on a
`complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc.
`of Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of
`California; and Seiko Epson Corporation
`of Japan (collectively ‘‘Epson’’). 71 FR
`14720 (March 23, 2006). The complaint,
`as amended, alleged violations of
`section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
`(‘‘section 337’’) in the importation into
`the United States, the sale for
`importation, and the sale within the
`United States after importation of
`certain ink cartridges and components
`thereof by reason of infringement of
`claim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,615,957;
`claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 164 and 165 of
`U.S. Patent No. 5,622,439; claims 83 and
`84 of U.S. Patent No. 5,158,377; claims
`19 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148;
`claims 29, 31, 34 and 38 of U.S. Patent
`No. 5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent
`No. 5,488,401; claims 1–3 and 9 of U.S.
`Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31 and
`34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,550,902; claims
`1, 10 and 14 of U.S. Patent No.
`6,955,422; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No.
`7,008,053; and claims 21, 45, 53 and 54
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,011,397. The
`complaint further alleged that an
`industry in the United States exists as
`required by subsection (a)(2) of section
`337. The complainants requested that
`the Commission issue a general
`exclusion order and cease and desist
`orders. The Commission named as
`respondents 24 companies located in
`China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and
`the United States. Several respondents
`were terminated from the investigation
`on the basis of settlement agreements or
`consent orders or were found in default.
`On March 30, 2007, the presiding ALJ
`(Judge Luckern) issued a final ID in the
`investigation finding a violation of
`section 337 with respect to certain
`respondents. He found the asserted
`claims valid and infringement by certain
`respondents’ products. He
`recommended issuance of a general
`exclusion order and cease and desist
`orders directed to certain respondents
`and bond in the amount of $13.60 per
`cartridge during the Presidential review
`period.
`On October, 19, 2007, after review,
`the Commission made its final
`determination in the investigation,
`finding a violation of section 337. The
`Commission issued a general exclusion
`order, limited exclusion order, and
`cease and desist orders directed to
`several domestic respondents. The
`Commission also determined that the
`
`public interest factors enumerated in 19
`U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), and (g) did not
`preclude issuance of the aforementioned
`remedial orders, and that the bond
`during the Presidential review period
`would be $13.60 per cartridge for
`covered ink cartridges.
`On February 8, 2008, complainant
`Epson filed two complaints seeking
`enforcement proceedings under
`Commission Rule 210.75. One
`complaint alleges that Ninestar
`Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninestar
`Technology Company, Ltd.; and Town
`Sky Inc. have violated the general
`exclusion order and that Ninestar
`Technology Company, Ltd. and Town
`Sky Inc. have violated the cease and
`desist orders directed to them. Epson’s
`second complaint alleges that Mipo
`International Ltd. and Mipo America,
`Ltd. have violated the general and
`limited exclusion orders and that Mipo
`America, Ltd. has violated the cease and
`desist order directed to it.
`Having examined the complaints
`seeking a formal enforcement
`proceeding, and having found that the
`complaints comply with the
`requirements for institution of a formal
`enforcement proceeding contained in
`Commission rule 210.75, the
`Commission has determined to institute
`a consolidated formal enforcement
`proceeding to determine whether the
`five respondents are in violation of the
`Commission’s exclusion orders and
`cease and desist orders issued in the
`investigation, and what, if any,
`enforcement measures are appropriate.
`The following entities are named as
`parties to the formal enforcement
`proceeding: (1) Complainant Epson, (2)
`respondents (Ninestar Technology Co.,
`Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Company,
`Ltd.; Town Sky Inc.; Mipo America Ltd.,
`and Mipo International, Ltd.) and (3) a
`Commission investigative attorney to be
`designated by the Director, Office of
`Unfair Import Investigations.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
`section 210.75 of the Commission’s
`Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
`210.75).
`Issued: May 1, 2008.
`By order of the Commission.
`Marilyn R. Abbott,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. E8–9984 Filed 5–6–08; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
`
`Drug Enforcement Administration
`[OMB Number 1117–0010]
`
`Agency Information Collection
`Activities
`
`ACTION: 30-day notice of information
`collection under review.
`
`Proposed collection; comments
`requested:
`U.S. Official Order Forms for Schedule
`I and II Controlled Substances
`(Accountable Forms), Order Form
`Requisition—DEA Form 222 and 222a
`The Department of Justice (DOJ), Drug
`Enforcement Administration (DEA) will
`be submitting the following information
`collection request to the Office of
`Management and Budget (OMB) for
`review and approval in accordance with
`the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
`The proposed information collection is
`published to obtain comments from the
`public and affected agencies. This
`proposed information collection was
`previously published in the Federal
`Register Volume 73, Number 42, page
`11443 on March 3, 2008, allowing for a
`60 day comment period.
`The purpose of this notice is to allow
`for an additional 30 days for public
`comment until June 6, 2008. This
`process is conducted in accordance with
`5 CFR 1320.10.
`Written comments and/or suggestions
`regarding the items contained in this
`notice, especially the estimated public
`burden and associated response time,
`should be directed to the Office of
`Management and Budget, Office of
`Information and Regulatory Affairs,
`Attention Department of Justice Desk
`Officer, Washington, DC 20503.
`Additionally, comments may be
`submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202)
`395–5806.
`Written comments and suggestions
`from the public and affected agencies
`concerning the proposed collection of
`information are encouraged. Your
`comments should address one or more
`of the following four points:
`—Evaluate whether the proposed
`collection of information is necessary
`for the proper performance of the
`functions of the agency, including
`whether the information will have
`practical utility;
`—Evaluate the accuracy of the
`agencies estimate of the burden of the
`proposed collection of information,
`including the validity of the
`methodology and assumptions used;
`—Enhance the quality, utility, and
`clarity of the information to be
`collected; and
`
`VerDate Aug<31>2005 21:00 May 06, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1
`
`sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES