throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, DC
`
`Before the Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`In The Matter Of
`CERTAIN SILICON MICROPHONE
`PACKAGES AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-825
`
`COMPLAINANT KNOWLES ELECTRONICS, LLC’S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION TO TERMINATE INVESTIGATION
`WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN CLAIMS
`
`For the purpose of narrowing this Investigation, Complainant Knowles Electronics, LLC
`
`
`
`(“Knowles”) moves pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a) to terminate this investigation, in
`
`part, by withdrawing the allegations in its complaint as to claims 2, 5, and 6 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,018,049 (the “’049 Patent”).
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), Knowles states that there are no agreements,
`
`written or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning the subject matter of this
`
`motion. Pursuant to Rule 5.1.2 of the Ground Rules, counsel for Knowles made reasonable,
`
`good-faith efforts to contact and resolve this matter with counsel for Respondents Analog
`
`Devices, Inc., Avnet Inc., and Amkor Technology, Inc. (collectively, “Respondents”), at least
`
`two days prior to filing this motion. Counsel for Respondents has indicated that Respondents
`
`will not oppose this motion to terminate the claims at issue.
`
`In view of the foregoing, Knowles respectfully requests that the above-captioned
`
`Investigation be terminated as claims 2, 5, and 6 of the ’049 Patent. Should this motion be
`
`granted, Knowles expects to continue this Investigation as to claims 1, 11, 12, 15, 16, 19, 21-23,
`
`and 26 of the ’049 Patent, and as to claims 1, 2, and 8-18 of U.S. Patent No. 7,439,616.
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Dated: May 8, 2012,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Alexander D. Chinoy
`Sturgis M. Sobin (ssobin@cov.com)
`Alexander D. Chinoy (achinoy@cov.com)
`Paul J. Wilson (pwilson@cov.com)
`David A. Garr (dgarr@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`
`Washington, D.C. 20004‐2401
`Telephone: (202) 662‐6000
`Facsimile: (202) 662‐6291
`
`
`Eric Hellerman (ehellerman@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, N.Y. 10018-1405
`Telephone: (212) 841-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 841-1010
`
`Counsel for Complainant Knowles Electronics,
`LLC
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, DC
`
`Before the Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`In The Matter Of
`CERTAIN SILICON MICROPHONE
`PACKAGES AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-825
`
`MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINANT KNOWLES ELECTRONICS,
`LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TERMINATE INVESTIGATION
`WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN CLAIMS
`
`Complainant Knowles Electronics, LLC (“Knowles”) has moved pursuant to
`
`
`
`Commission Rule 210.21(a) to terminate this investigation, in part, by withdrawing the
`
`allegations in its complaint as to claims 2, 5, and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 8,018,049 (the “’049
`
`Patent”).
`
`There are no procedural impediments to granting the instant motion. Commission Rule
`
`210.21(a)(1) provides in relevant part that “[a]ny party may move at any time prior to the
`
`issuance of an initial determination on violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to
`
`terminate an investigation in whole or in part as to any or all respondents, on the basis of
`
`withdrawal of the complaint or certain allegations contained therein.” Here, no initial
`
`determination on violation has been issued. Knowles also states, pursuant to Rule 210.21(a)(1),
`
`that “there are no agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning
`
`the subject matter of this motion.”
`
`This motion is in the best interest of the parties, the court, and the public. Withdrawal of
`
`the identified claims will help focus the parties’ efforts at the hearing and will narrow the issues
`
`for the Administrative Law Judge and Commission, thereby preserving private and public
`
`1
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`resources. This is particularly true given the early state of the litigation: this motion is filed
`
`more than four months in advance of the hearing, which is scheduled for September 24, 2012,
`
`and well in advance of the initial determination, which is scheduled to issue on January 11, 2013.
`
`Under these circumstances, motions for partial termination are routinely granted. See, e.g.,
`
`Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-796,
`
`Order. No. 17 (April 17, 2012) (hereinafter “Certain Electronic Media”) (granting motion for
`
`partial termination as to certain claims because “public and private resources will be
`
`conserved”); Certain Tool Handles, Tool Holders, Tool Sets, and Components Thereof, Inv. No.
`
`337-TA-483, Order No. 7 (Apr. 22, 2003) (granting motion for partial termination as to certain
`
`claims because “a reduction in the number of patent claims at issue will allow the parties to focus
`
`their attention on the ‘primary’ patent claims in a more expeditious manner and will also reduce
`
`the time and resources required from all of the parties and the administrative law judge”).
`
`The respondents in this case do not oppose this motion, and no extraordinary
`
`circumstances exist that justify denying it. See Certain Transport Vehicle Tires, Inv. No. 337-
`
`TA-390, Order No. 17 at 4-5 (Jan. 30, 1997) (“In the absence of extraordinary circumstances,
`
`termination of the investigation will be readily granted to a complainant during the prehearing
`
`stage of an investigation.” (quoting Certain Ultrafiltration Membrane Systems, and Components
`
`Thereof, Including Ultrafiltration Membranes, Inv. No. 337-TA-107, Commission Action and
`
`Order at 2 (Mar. 11, 1982))); see also Certain Electronic Media (“In the absence of
`
`extraordinary circumstances . . . partial termination will be granted.” (emphasis added)).
`
`Based on the foregoing, Knowles respectfully requests that its motion be granted, and
`
`that the above-captioned Investigation be terminated as claims 2, 5, and 6 of the ’049 Patent.
`
`Should this motion be granted, Knowles expects to continue this Investigation as to claims 1, 11,
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12, 15, 16, 19, 21-23, and 26 of the ’049 Patent, and as to claims 1, 2, and 8-18 of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,439,616.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 8, 2012,
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Alexander D. Chinoy
`Sturgis M. Sobin (ssobin@cov.com)
`Alexander D. Chinoy (achinoy@cov.com)
`Paul J. Wilson (pwilson@cov.com)
`David A. Garr (dgarr@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`
`Washington, D.C. 20004‐2401
`Telephone: (202) 662‐6000
`Facsimile: (202) 662‐6291
`
`
`Eric Hellerman (ehellerman@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, N.Y. 10018-1405
`Telephone: (212) 841-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 841-1010
`
`Counsel for Complainant Knowles Electronics,
`LLC
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`In the Matter of Certain Silicon Microphone
`Packages and Products Containing Same
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Inv. No.: 337-TA-825
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Melissa Sackin, certify that on May 8, 2012, copies of the foregoing
`COMPLAINANT KNOWLES ELECTRONICS, LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
`TERMINATE INVESTIGATION WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
`MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF were delivered, pursuant to U. S. International
`Trade Commission regulations, to the following interested parties as indicated:
`
`Via EDIS
`
`Two copies via hand delivery and via email:
`gregory.moldafsky@usitc.gov
`
`Counsel for Respondents Analog Devices,
`Inc., Amkor Technology Inc. and Avnet Inc.
`
`Via email:
`Analog-825@orrick.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa Sackin
`Melissa Sackin
`Senior IP Litigation Specialist
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2401
`msackin@cov.com
`202.662.6677
`
`The Honorable James Holbein
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, DC 20436
`The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, DC 20436
`Steven M. Bauer
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Sten Jensen
`Jordan L. Coyle
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`1152 15th Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service Page 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket