`Washington, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN SILICON MICROPHONE
`PACKAGES AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-825
`
`JOINT MOTION TO CORRECT THE HEARING TRANSCRIPT
`
`Having met and conferred, Complainant Knowles Electronics, LLC and Respondents
`
`Analog Devices, Inc., Amkor Technology, Inc., and Avnet, Inc., submit this joint motion
`
`pursuant to Rule 210.38(c) to correct the hearing transcript.
`
`Rule 210.38(c) states as follows:
`
`(c) Corrections. Changes in the official transcript may be made only when they
`involve errors affecting substance. A motion to correct a transcript shall be
`addressed to the administrative law judge, who may order that the transcript be
`changed to reflect such corrections as are warranted, after consideration of any
`objections that may be made. Such corrections shall be made by the official
`reporter by furnishing substitute typed pages, under the usual certificate of the
`reporter, for insertion in the transcript. The original uncorrected pages shall be
`retained in the files of the Commission.
`
`The official transcript contains several errors affecting the substance of the testimony
`
`offered or the contents of the evidentiary record. The parties identify these errors below (with
`
`the corrected text underlined):
`
`Page:Line Transcribed text
`400:18
`A. And resistors and conductors, yes.
`559:15-16 Q. And Sony?
`A. As far as I know today, Sony is not
`Q. What patent(s), if any, of a
`
`1178:24
`
`Requested corrected text
`A. And resistors and inductors, yes.
`A. And Sonion?
`A. As far as I know today, Sonion is not
`Q. What part(s), if any, of a
`
`
`
`1832:5
`
`1912:20
`
`Requested corrected text
`Page:Line Transcribed text
`sealing ring could be metal?
`1387:24
`single ring could be metal?
`electret microphones
`1614:13
`electric microphones.
`A. And I see 122 metallization area,
`1647:21
`A. And I see 9122 metallization area,
`695 investigation was to determine if a
`1829:14
`9695 investigation was to determine if a
`large
`large
`when you were doing your analysis in
`when you were doing your analysis in
`695
`9695
`Q. And is that 97,812,616 patent and the Q. And is that the 7,812,626 patent and
`the
`RX-0895 were received into evidence.)
`RX-0233, RX-0240, RX-0256, RDX-
`0313, RDX-0314,
`RX-0895......................... 1939
`RDX-0313......................... 1939
`RDX-0314......................... 1939
`
`1939:9
`1939:21
`
`RX-0805 were received into evidence.)
`RX-0233, RX-0240, RX-0256, RX-0313,
`RX-0314,
`RX-0805......................... 1939
`1955:3
`1955:19-20 RX-0313......................... 1939
`RX-0314......................... 1939
`
`Joint and unopposed motions to correct substantive errors in hearing transcripts are
`
`readily granted. See, e.g., Certain Light-Emitting Diodes & Prods. Containing Same, Inv. No.
`
`337-TA-785, Order No. 36 (Aug. 8, 2012) (Pender, J.); Certain Microprocessors, Components
`
`Thereof, & Prods. Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-781, Order No. 60 (Sept. 14, 2012)
`
`(Shaw, J.); Certain Elec. Devices, Including Wireless Commc’n Devices, Portable Music & Data
`
`Processing Devices, & Tablet Computers, Inv. No. 337-TA-794, Order No. 90 (June 21, 2012)
`
`(Gildea, J.).
`
`Here, the identified corrections are necessary in order to correct transcription errors and
`
`to correct inadvertent errors in lists of exhibits to be moved into evidence, that were provided to
`
`the Court Reporter.
`
`For good cause shown and there being no opposition, the parties respectfully request that
`
`Your Honor order that the hearing transcript be corrected as set forth in the table above.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Dated: October 16, 2012
`
`By: /s/ Jordan Coyle
`
`Sten Jensen
`Jordan L. Coyle
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP
`1152 15th Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 339-8400
`Facsimile: (202) 339-8500
`
`Steven M. Bauer
`Sharada Devarasetty
`Proskauer Rose, LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`Telephone: (617) 526-9600
`Facsimile: (617) 526-9899
`
`Steven M. Kayman
`Matthew J. Morris
`Proskauer Rose LLP
`Eleven Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 969-3000
`Facsimile: (212) 969-2900
`
`Counsel for Respondents Analog Devices, Inc.,
`Amkor Technology, Inc., and Avnet, Inc.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ David Garr
`
`-
`
`Sturgis M. Sobin (ssobin@cov.com)
`Brian G. Bieluch (bbieluch@cov.com)
`Alexander D. Chinoy (achinoy@cov.com)
`David A. Garr (dgarr@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`2401
`Telephone: (202) 662
`6000
`Facsimile: (202) 662
`6291
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Robert T. Haslam (rhaslam@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP
`333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
`Telephone (650) 632-4700
`Facsimile: (650) 632-4800
`
`Emily R. Holness (eholness@cov.com)
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, N.Y. 10018-1405
`Telephone: (212) 841-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 841-1010
`
`Counsel for Complainant Knowles
`Electronics, LLC
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
