throbber
TIROG
`000
`TUMOR INSTITUTE RADBATION ONCOLOGY GROUP, LLP
`
`*‘
`
`MEDICAL DIRECTOR
`TODD A. BARNETT M.D.
`
`ROBERT M. DOUGLAS, M.D.
`
`SFEPHEN M. EULAU, M.D.
`
`_
`
`DANIEL M. LANDIS, M.D., PHD
`
`BRIAN LEE, M.D., PHD
`
`SKYLER LINDSLEY, M.D.
`
`CHRIFFOPHER LOISELLE, M.D.
`
`TIMOTHY P. MATE, M.D.
`
`VIVEK K. MEHTA, M.D.
`
`ROBERT M. MEIER, M.D.
`
`Asmio 0. MORRIS,M.D.
`
`JAMES F. SPIEGEL, M.D.
`
`ROBERT M. TAKAMIYA, M.D.
`
`JOHN J. TRAVAGLINI, M.D.
`
`SANDRA S. VERMEULEN, M.D.
`
`JAMES R. DINGELS, MBA, MPH, CPA
`ADMINISTRATOR
`
`swenrsn CANCER1|-isrrrin-E ATFIRSF HILL
`1221 Madison Street First Floor
`Seatfle, WA 98104
`P: 206-386-2323
`F: 206-2156150
`
`swsnrsu RADIQSURGERYcan-rm
`James Tower, Life Sciences Building
`550 17"‘ Ave., Suite A-10
`.
`Seattle, WA98122
`P: 206-320-7130
`F: 206-320-7137
`
`SWEDISHmnczn msrrrurs ATEDMONDS
`21605 75"‘ Avenue W
`Edmonds, WA98166
`P: 425-640-4300
`F: 425-640-4440
`
`SWEDISH CANCER INSTITUTE AT HIGHLINE
`16251 Sylvester Road SW
`Burlen, WA 98166
`P: 206-386-2626
`F: 206-246-7344
`
`SWEDISHcnncsn msrrnrrz ATISSAQUAH
`751 NE Blakely Drive, Suite 1090
`Issaquah, WA 98029
`~
`P: 206-386-2626
`F: 206-246-7344
`
`UW VALLEYMEDIFALcement
`400 S 43"’ Street
`Renton, WA 98055
`P: 425-251-5121
`F: 425-6564072
`
`December 14, 2016
`
`The Honorable Irving Williamson, Chairman
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street SW
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Re:
`
`Certain Radiotherapy Systemsand Treatment Planning Software,
`and Components Thereofi Inv. No. 337-TA-968
`
`Dear Chairman Williamson:
`
`_
`
`I write in response to the Commission’s Request for Submissions on Public
`Interest, issued October 30, 2016, in the above-captioned investigation. I
`understand that Complainants have asked the Commission to stop the
`importation and sale in the United States of Elekta’s linear accelerator products
`(“linacs”) and Monaco treatment planning software. I am writing to advise you
`of the very real detrimental impacts such action would have on my hospital and
`other similarly situated entities.
`'
`
`'
`
`Elekta is the only substantial competitor to Varian in the market for
`radiotherapy equipment such as linacs. Although there are a few other much
`smaller market participants, such as Accuray, Elekta provides the only real
`alternative to purchasing a Varian linac. If Elekta’s products are eiccluded,
`Varian would have unchecked dominance over the U.S. market and could price
`its products accordinglywithout any competitive pressure. -This is very likely
`to drive prices for new and upgraded linac equipment very high, straining the
`budgets of American’s already burdened public health system. Moreover, the
`market barriers for any new competitors, including smaller players like
`Accuray, is extremely high and would not provide any real check to Varian’s
`market power.
`_
`
`Another important consideration is the long order cycle for new linacs.
`Hospitals and clinics frequently put many months, and sometimes years, of
`planning into purchasing a linac and the related software and equipment. The
`decision often involves a detailed look at the specific hospital and patient
`needs, the capabilities and relative strengths of the various linac products, and
`the experience and training of the staff on the different brands of linac
`~
`products. Many orders.alsoirequire specialconstruction of vaults before linacs
`can be delivered.
`~
`. A
`1
`;
`'
`
`1221 Madison Street Q Seattle, WA Q 98104 O Phone: 206-386_-2323 O Fax: 206-215-6150
`I
`-
`6%i'Zz%
`

`

`
`Forcinga hospital with an existing linac order, awaiting final delivery or installation, to abandon
`those efforts order a Varian.linac would be harmful to the patients who must wait longer for treatment
`and for increased
`’ -
`~
`
`cost of healthcare. For this reason, even if the Commission decides to exclude Elekta linacs,
`customers should be permitted to receive linacs that are the subject of existing orders.
`
`Finally, the Commission should be aware that a linac is not a one-off purchase. Linac customers,
`including my hospital the Swedish Cancer Institute/Providence Health System, purchase multiple
`Elekta linacs knowing and relying on the ability to upgrade those linacsas needed over a periodof
`several years, if not a decade or more. An upgrade to, for example, a more sophisticated multi-leaf
`collimator allows a hospital or clinic to expand the types of treatments it provides to patients along
`with increased speed and efficiency. Upgrades of Elekta equipment cost only a fraction of the
`amount of a new linac and are perfonned much’more quickly, allowing better treatment options for
`patients. Varian hardware is not compatible with Elekta equipment, so Varian cannot provide
`upgrades to Elekta equipment. If Elekta upgrades are not available, most facilities will have to go ‘
`without such improvements, because purchasing 'a new linae is a largeinvestment. For these reasons,
`even if the Commission decides to exclude Elekta‘linacs, Elekta should be allowed to not only repair
`and service existing products, but to offer upgrades to newer versions.
`'
`
`I recognize the importance of enforcing intellectual propertyirights. I believe, however, that
`excluding Elekta linacs and treatment planning software from the U.S. market would do a grave
`disservice to America’s public health system and the hospitals, clinics, physicians, and patients in that
`system. If the Commission ultimately decides to issue an exclusion order, however, that exclusion
`order should account for and attempt to mitigate the concems addressed above.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`.
`=
`Vivek Mehta, MD
`Director, Center for Advanced Targeted Radiotherapies
`Swedish Cancer Institute
`.
`1221 Madison St, First Floor
`Seattle, WA 98104
`_
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`I
`
`c_c: Counsel of Record
`Per Certificate of Service
`
`V

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket