`
`IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR BLACK HAWK COUNTY
`
`Case No.
`
`PETITION AND
`JURY TRIAL DEMAND
`
`Levita Simmons, Administrator of the
`Estate of Arthur Scott, and Jeffrey
`Orvis, Executor of the Estate of James
`Orvis
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`Tyson Foods, Inc., doing business as
`Tyson Pet Products, and Tyson Fresh
`Meats Group, a wholly owned subsidiary
`of Tyson Foods, Inc., John H. Tyson,
`Noel W. White, Dean Banks, Steven R.
`Stouffer, Tom Brower, Mary A.
`Oleksink, Elizabeth Croston, Scott
`Walston, David Scott, Tom Hart, Cody
`Brustkern, John Casey, Bret Tapken,
`Hamdija Beganovic, Ramiz Mujelic, and
`Unknown Plant Managers and
`Supervisors at Tyson Waterloo Plant
`and Unknown Plant Managers and
`Supervisors at Tyson Independence
`Plant.
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Levita Simmons, Administrator of the Estate of Arthur Scott, and
`
`Plaintiff Jeffrey Orvis, Successor in Interest to Estate of James Orvis, by and
`
`through their undersigned attorneys, bring this complaint seeking monetary
`
`damages against Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc., doing business as Tyson Pet
`
`Products, Tyson Fresh Meats Group, John H. Tyson, Noel W. White, Dean Banks,
`
`Steven R. Stouffer, Tom Brower, Mary A. Oleksink, Elizabeth Croston, Scott
`
`Walston, David Scott, Tom Hart, Hamdija Beganovic, Ramiz Mujelic, and Unknown
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 1 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 1
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`Plant Managers and Supervisors at Tyson Waterloo Plant and Unknown Plant
`
`Managers and Supervisors at Tyson Independence Plant:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`The global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus COVID-19 has
`
`engulfed the United States. The workers who keep America’s animal factories
`
`running have suffered as a result of the coronavirus pandemic in ways that few
`
`other people have—the calamitous consequences have included sickness and death
`
`for many hard-working people.
`
`2.
`
`Many of America’s factory farm workers are low-income, lack
`
`specialized skills, and enjoy few, if any, job prospects besides working at the local
`
`factory farm. They work very hard over long hours, receive low pay, and perform
`
`physically grueling and emotionally devastating work, all to keep the nation’s
`
`supply of meat steady and affordable.
`
`3.
`
`The factory farms that employ these farm workers have been deemed
`
`“essential” and have stayed open.
`
`4.
`
`Many plant workers have never received adequate sick leave, other
`
`paid time off, or protections from being summarily fired.
`
`5.
`
`These workers are thus forced to continue working, even if sick, in
`
`order to avoid being fired.
`
`6.
`
`This puts all of the workers at risk. That risk is exacerbated because
`
`the plants are unmitigated breeding grounds for coronavirus, where employees lack
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 2 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 2
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`personal protective equipment, work elbow to elbow, and in conditions that include
`
`inconsistent cleaning and sanitation.
`
`7.
`
`Tyson Foods, Inc. (Tyson) is a behemoth in the animal agriculture
`
`industry. Its annual revenue in 2019 was $43 billion. It produces meat for human
`
`consumption, as well as dog food and dog treats.
`
`8.
`
`Despite its vast wealth and resources, Tyson Foods, Inc., operating
`
`through two of its subsidiaries in Iowa, has chosen to let workers get sick and die,
`
`rather than take proper steps to ensure a safe workplace.
`
`9.
`
`Placing profits above people, Tyson enjoys the financial benefits of
`
`being deemed an “essential” business but has not followed the clear health and
`
`safety guidelines for protecting essential workers by the Centers for Disease Control
`
`and Prevention (“CDC”) and the Occupational Health and Safety Administration
`
`(“OSHA”).
`
`10.
`
`The consequences of Tyson’s failure to protect its workers has been
`
`dire: COVID-19 has spread at its Waterloo and Independence plants to employees,
`
`as well as to the people they live with and the communities at large, causing serious
`
`illness and multiple deaths. Had the business implemented appropriate
`
`preventative measures, those harms would have been greatly reduced.
`
`11.
`
`Tragically, the fates of Tyson’s employees, as well as numerous Iowans
`
`living in the vicinity of these two plants, was largely preventable. Defendants
`
`ignored clear evidence that their employees were at serious risk of catching a
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 3 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 3
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`serious disease, COVID-19, instead of putting basic health and safety measures in
`
`place to protect them.
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiffs bring this action for injunctive relief to require Tyson,
`
`through two of its subsidiaries, to follow CDC and OSHA guidelines and keep its
`
`workers safe. They also seek monetary relief to redress the harms that they have
`
`suffered and will continue to suffer in the future.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`13.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the Defendants because a substantial
`
`portion of the acts and omissions giving rise to the Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in
`
`Black Hawk County, Iowa.
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiffs certify, pursuant to IA Code § 619.18, that this action meets
`
`applicable jurisdictional requirements for amount in controversy.
`
`15.
`
`Venue is proper under IA Code § 616.18 because more than one
`
`Defendant resides in Black Hawk County.
`
`PARTIES
`
`A.
`
`The Named Plaintiffs
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff Levita Simmons is the Administrator of the Estate of Arthur
`
`Simmons. Mr. Simmons was a 51-year-old father and employee of Tyson. He worked
`
`at the Tyson Pet Products Plant in Independence, Iowa, which makes dog treats.
`
`Mr. Simmons died on April 23, 2020 of COVID-19.
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff Jeffrey Orvis is the Executor of the Estate of his brother,
`
`James Orvis. James worked in the laundry room at the Tyson Plant in
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 4 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 4
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`Independence, Iowa, which processes pork. Mr. Orvis died on April 19, 2020 of
`
`COVID-19.
`
`B.
`
`The Defendants
`
`
`
`18. Defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. (“Tyson”) is a Delaware corporation with
`
`its principal place of business in Arkansas.
`
`19. Defendant Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (“Tyson Fresh Meats”) is a wholly
`
`owned subsidiary of Tyson Foods, Inc., also incorporated in Delaware. It operates a
`
`pork processing facility in Waterloo, Iowa.
`
`20. Defendant Tyson Pet Products is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tyson
`
`Foods, Inc. It is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in
`
`Arkansas. Tyson Pet Products manufactures dog food treats at its Independence,
`
`Iowa plant under the brand name “True Chews.”
`
`21. Defendant John H. Tyson is the Chair of Tyson Foods, Inc.
`
`22. Defendant Noel W. White is the Chief Executive Officer of Tyson
`
`Foods, Inc.
`
`23. Defendant Dean Banks is the President of Tyson Foods, Inc.
`
`24. Defendant Steven R. Stouffer is the President of Tyson Fresh Meats,
`
`Inc.
`
`25. Defendant Tom Brower is the Senior Vice President of Health and
`
`Safety of Tyson Foods, Inc.
`
`26. Defendant Mary A. Oleksink is the Chief Human Resources Officer of
`
`Tyson Foods, Inc.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 5 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 5
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`27. Defendant Elizabeth Cranston is the Executive Communications
`
`Manager for Tyson Fresh Meats.
`
`28. On information and belief, Scott Walston was the Plant Manager of the
`
`Independence plant at all relevant times prior to and during the period when
`
`decedents Arthur Lee Scott and James Orvis contracted coronavirus and sustained
`
`their fatal injuries. On information and belief, David Scott was and/or is Plant
`
`Manager of the Independence plant and was the successor to Scott Walston.
`
`29. Defendant Tom Hart is the Plant Manager of the Tyson Waterloo
`
`Plant.
`
`30. Defendant Cody Brustkern and John Casey hold and/or held at all
`
`relevant times upper-level management positions at the Tyson Waterloo Plant.
`
`They are required to identify potential safety hazards and be familiar with all
`
`aspects of the Waterloo Plant.
`
`31. Defendant Bret Tapken is the Safety Lead of Tyson Waterloo Facility.
`
`He is required to identify potential safety hazards and be familiar with all aspects
`
`of the Waterloo Plant.
`
`32. Defendant Hamdija Beganovic is the Supervisor of the Tyson Waterloo
`
`Plant.
`
`33. Defendant Ramiz Muheljic is a general supervisor at the Tyson
`
`Waterloo Plant.
`
`34. Defendants Hart, Brustkern, Tapken, Beganovic, Muheljic were based
`
`out of the Waterloo Plant.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 6 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 6
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`35.
`
`Defendants Unknown Plant Managers and Supervisors of the Tyson
`
`Waterloo Plant are employees of Tyson and Tyson Fresh Meats who operate in a
`
`supervisory or managerial capacity at the Tyson Waterloo Plant.
`
`36.
`
`Defendants Unknown Plant Managers and Supervisors of the Tyson
`
`Independence Plant are employees of Tyson and Tyson Pet Products who operate in
`
`a supervisory or managerial capacity at the Tyson Independence Plant.
`
`A.
`
`A Health Pandemic Engulfs the Nation
`
`FACTS
`
`37.
`
`In January 2020, a deadly coronavirus causing the disease COVID-19
`
`began spreading throughout the world, killing more people than any other viral
`
`outbreak has for decades.
`
`38.
`
`The United States had its first confirmed case of COVID-19 on
`
`January 21. The rate of confirmed cases grew rapidly after that, as the virus spread
`
`through cities, towns, and rural areas throughout the country. According to data
`
`compiled by the CDC, the United States now has more than 27.6 million confirmed
`
`cases and has incurred more than 489,000 deaths, thus far.1
`
`39.
`
`The virus is highly contagious. A single person may be able to spread it
`
`to 5 or 6 other people.2 It is an airborne illness that spreads mainly from person-to-
`
`person contact, particularly between people who stand within 6 feet of each other.
`
`Coronavirus travels through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person
`
`coughs or sneezes, but it can also spread via smaller droplets emitted just by talking
`
`1 https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesinlast7days
`2 https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0282_article?deliveryName=USCDC_333-DM25287
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 7 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 7
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`or breathing. These droplets can land in the mouths or noses of people who are
`
`nearby. COVID-19 can be transmitted from people who are not showing symptoms.
`
`40. The coronavirus can remain in the air for up to three hours after a
`
`person emits it. Another person can breathe in the virus in the air particles and
`
`become infected.
`
`41. COVID-19 is associated with an array of symptoms. On one hand,
`
`some infected people have no symptoms at all. On the other hand, infected people
`
`can display symptoms associated with common illnesses such as fever, body ache,
`
`dry cough, fatigue, chills, headache, and sore throat. More severe symptoms include
`
`shortness of breath, high fever, and severe cough. People infected by coronavirus
`
`may also experience neurological symptoms (such as dizziness, confusion, and
`
`seizures) and gastrointestinal symptoms (such as vomiting and diarrhea).
`
`42.
`
`Individuals who have been infected by the coronavirus may have mild
`
`symptoms for several days or a week and then worsen rapidly. In other words, even
`
`asymptomatic individuals can pose a health risk.
`
`43. To stem the spread of the virus, public health experts cautioned the
`
`public to stay home whenever possible and to follow “social distancing” protocols by
`
`avoiding public spaces and groups and staying at least 6 feet away from others.
`
`When exposure to others must occur, health experts recommended wearing masks,
`
`frequently washing hands, not touching one’s own eyes, nose, or mouth prior to
`
`washing hands, maintaining physical distance, and other practices.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 8 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 8
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`44. These experts warned that failing to stay home on a large-scale basis
`
`would allow the virus to spread unchecked, such that the number of confirmed cases
`
`at any one time would overwhelm the hospital system and existing public health
`
`infrastructure.
`
`B.
`
`COVID-19 Spreads Through Iowa
`
`
`
`45.
`
` At the same time as the United States reported its first case of
`
`COVID-19 on January 21, 2020, the United States Department of Health and
`
`Human Services declared a national public health emergency.
`
`46. On March 8, 2020, three COVID-19 cases were reported in Iowa.
`
`47. On March 9, 2020, Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds issued a Proclamation
`
`of Disaster Emergency in response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
`
`48. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared
`
`the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic.
`
`49. Two days later, on March 13, 2020, President Donald Trump declared
`
`a National Emergency in response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
`
`50. Around the same time, on or about March 13, 2020, Tyson suspended
`
`all United States commercial business travel, forbid all non-essential visitors from
`
`entering Tyson’s offices and facilities, and mandated that all non-critical employees
`
`at its U.S. corporate office locations work remotely.
`
`51.
`
`Just a few days later, on March 17, 2020, Governor Reynolds declared
`
`a State of Public Health Disaster Emergency for the State of Iowa. President Trump
`
`approved a disaster declaration for Iowa on March 24, 2020.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 9 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 9
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`C.
`
`CDC Issues Guidelines To Reduce The Risk of Exposure to
`Coronavirus
`
`52. On February 4, 2020, the CDC issued guidelines for employers and
`
`employees regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, disseminating the public health
`
`protocols that should be followed to stop the spread of the virus.3 That guidance was
`
`updated on March 21, 2020.
`
`53. The purpose of the CDC guidance was to “help prevent workplace
`
`exposures to COVID-19 in nonhealthcare settings” and to “provide[] planning
`
`considerations for community spread of COVID 19.”
`
`54. Among other guidance, the CDC provided that:
`
`i. Employees who have symptoms should stay home and
`employers should develop flexible leave policies to allow
`employees to stay home, particularly by creating non-punitive
`sick leave policies;
`
`ii. Employers should not require a positive COVID-19 test or a
`healthcare provider’s note for employees to take a sick leave;
`
`iii. Sick employees should not return to work except in
`consultation with independent health care providers and state
`and local health departments;
`
`iv. Employers should reduce face-to-face contact between
`employees;
`
`v. Employers should take steps to reduce transmission at the
`workplace by reassigning work tasks to maintain a social
`distance of six feet, staggering shifts, or allowing telework;
`
`vi. Employers should establish policies to minimize spread
`through a workplace by using contact-tracing and testing to
`identify workers who have likely been exposed to the disease
`and quarantining infected workers;
`
`
`3 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6905e1.htm
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 10 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 10
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`vii. Employees should be encouraged to wash their hands and
`employers should facilitate this by providing hand washing
`stations;
`
`viii. Employers should increase ventilation rates; and
`
`ix. Employers should develop plans to clean high-touch areas with
`an EPA-approved cleaning agent.
`
`55.
`
`The CDC advised against gatherings of more than 10 people. It also
`
`warned of “community spread” where the virus spreads easily and sustainably within
`
`the community.
`
`56.
`
`On March 9, 2020, OSHA released guidance relating to safety in
`
`factories. That guidance said that employers should offer surgical masks or
`
`respirators to workers who could be exposed, especially workers who have to work
`
`within 6 feet of each other.
`
`D.
`
`Slaughterhouses and Meat Processing Facilities Are Breeding
`Grounds for COVID-19
`
`57.
`
`The working conditions inside factory farms accelerate the spread of
`
`airborne viruses like the novel coronavirus and leave workers particularly
`
`vulnerable to contracting COVID-19.
`
`58.
`
`As the CDC recognized, the work environment for meat and poultry
`
`processing workers, particularly in processing lines and other busy areas of the
`
`plant, “contribute substantially” to the workers’ potential exposures to COVID-19.
`
`This is for several reasons, including that:
`
`i. Meat and poultry processing workers usually stand “elbow-to-
`elbow” with no partition or other way to shield themselves from
`each other’s emissions of an airborne virus.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 11 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 11
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`ii. Workers are near each other in communal areas, such as when
`clocking in or out, during breaks, or in locker rooms.
`
`iii. Shifts are long (e.g., 10-12 hours per shift) and require prolonged
`closeness to coworkers.
`
`iv. Many plants are not well-ventilated, raising the likelihood of
`exposure to a coworker’s COVID-19.
`
`v. Plants focus on sanitizing the floors and other points of contact with
`the animal product but do not adequately sanitize the areas with
`which workers come into contact. Workers are exposed to
`coronavirus because they must interact with potentially
`contaminated surfaces or objects, such as machines, tools, other
`equipment, workstations, or breakroom tables.
`
`
`In addition, meat processing companies, including Defendants, have
`
`59.
`
`been speeding up production lines so that more meat can be processed at the plant
`
`in the same amount of time. But faster lines require more workers in the same
`
`amount of space, causing workers to have to stand closer together.
`
`60. Moreover, to accommodate the faster processing speed, workers have
`
`less time to practice necessary hygiene practices, such as washing their hands
`
`regularly. Defendants used faster line speeds to increase production and profits by
`
`knowingly sacrificing employees’ health and safety.
`
`61. The CDC also recognized additional factors that increase the risk of
`
`contracting the coronavirus among meat and poultry processing workers, including:
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`sharing transportation such as ride-share vans or shuttle vehicles
`to/from the plants; and
`
` frequent contact with fellow workers in community settings in
`areas where there is ongoing community transmission.
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 12 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 12
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`62. The heightened risks created by these unique work environments,
`
`coupled with certain plants’ failures to implement necessary or adequate safety
`
`protocols to minimize the virus’ spread, meant that these plants became hotbeds of
`
`COVID-19.
`
`63.
`
`Indeed, as of September 7, 2020, the United Food and Commercial
`
`Workers International Union estimated that 29,000 meatpacking and food
`
`processing workers have been impacted by the virus, meaning they have tested
`
`positive for COVID-19, missed work due to self-quarantine, are awaiting test
`
`results, or have been hospitalized, and/or are symptomatic. It has confirmed 238
`
`worker deaths in meatpacking and food processing.
`
`E.
`
`Tyson’s Employees Deemed Part of the “Essential Critical
`Infrastructure Workforce” that Required Serious Protections
`From COVID-19
`
`64. Given that food processing plants present a particularly dangerous
`
`work environment, the health and safety of Tyson’s workers depended on the
`
`company adhering to CDC and OSHA guidelines.
`
`65.
`
` On March 19, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
`
`Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency issued guidance identifying various
`
`businesses and industries that were considered “essential businesses.” Those who
`
`worked at essential businesses were part of the “essential critical infrastructure
`
`workforce.”
`
`66. Employees at animal slaughter and processing facilities were among
`
`the “critical infrastructure” workforce. The federal guidance referenced to them as:
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 13 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 13
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
` Food manufacturer employees and their supplier employees—to include those
`employed in food processing (packers, meat processing, cheese plants, milk
`plants, produce, etc.) facilities; livestock, poultry, and seafood slaughter
`facilities; pet and animal feed processing facilities; human food facilities
`producing by-products for animal food; beverage production facilities; and the
`production of food packaging
`
` Farm workers to include those employed in animal food, feed, and ingredient
`production, packaging, and distribution; manufacturing, packaging, and
`distribution of veterinary drugs; truck delivery and transport; farm and
`fishery labor needed to produce our food supply domestically
`
`67. Because these workers were considered “critical” to the nation’s health
`
`and safety during the COVID-19 crisis, the federal guidance made clear “as the
`
`nation relies on these workers…, they must be protected from exposure to and
`
`infection with the virus so that they can continue to carry out their responsibilities.”
`
`68. Accordingly, the federal guidance advised employers of the following
`
`“key principles”:
`
`i.Employers “must” comply with Occupational Safety and Health
`Administration (OSHA) requirements for protecting critical infrastructure
`workers who remain on or return to the job during the COVID-19 pandemic;
`
`ii.When continuous remote work is not possible, businesses should enlist
`strategies to reduce the likelihood of spreading the disease. This includes, but
`is not limited to, physically separating staff, staggering work shift hours or
`days, and other social distancing measures. While the CDC recommends that
`everyone wear a cloth face cover to contain respiratory droplets when around
`others, critical infrastructure employers must consider how best to
`implement this public health recommendation for source control in the
`workplace. For example, employers may provide disposable facemasks (e.g.,
`surgical masks) instead of cloth face coverings when workers would need to
`wear masks for extended periods of time (e.g., the duration of a work shift) or
`while performing tasks in which the face covering could become
`contaminated; and
`
`iii.Employers must consider the impact of workplace sick leave policies that may
`contribute to an employee decision to delay reporting medical symptoms. Sick
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 14 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 14
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`employees should not return to the workplace until they meet the criteria to
`stop home isolation.
`
`
`
`69. The CDC then promulgated guidelines specifically addressing meat
`
`and poultry workers.4 These guidelines memorialized the very same precautions it
`
`had provided one month earlier.
`
`70. For instance, it advised plants to, at a minimum, place their workers
`
`at least six feet apart:
`
`
`
`4 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/meat-poultry-processing-
`workers-employers.html
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 15 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 15
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`71. Plants should also implement “appropriate cleaning, sanitation, and
`
`disinfection practices to reduce exposure or shield workers.”
`
`72. The CDC also recommended:
`
`i. Consulting with a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
`engineer to ensure adequate ventilation in work areas to help
`minimize workers’ potential exposures;
`taking steps to minimize air from any fans blowing from one
`worker directly at another worker. Personal cooling fans should
`be removed from the workplace to reduce the potential spread of
`any airborne or aerosolized viruses. If fans are removed,
`employers should remain aware of, and take steps to
`prevent, heat hazards.
`ii. Placing handwashing stations or hand sanitizers with at least
`60% alcohol in multiple locations to encourage hand hygiene.
`iii. Adding additional clock in/out stations, if possible, that are
`spaced apart, to reduce crowding in these areas. Consider
`alternatives such as touch-free methods or staggering times for
`workers to clock in/out.
`iv. Removing or rearranging chairs and tables, or adding partitions
`to tables, in break rooms and other areas workers may frequent
`to increase worker separation
`v. Identifying alternative areas to accommodate overflow volume
`such as training and conference rooms, or using outside tents for
`break and lunch areas.
`
`73. At the Waterloo and Independence plants, Defendants followed none of
`
`these guidelines. At most, they implemented superficial measures that did not
`
`actually protect anyone from COVID-19.
`
`74. Moreover, the Independence plant manufactures specialty treats for
`
`dogs. Providing treats to dogs is not an essential service.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 16 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 16
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`F.
`
`COVID-19 Spreads Through Tyson Fresh Meats’ Waterloo Plant
`
`75. The Waterloo, Iowa facility is Tyson Fresh Meats’ largest pork plant. It
`
`can process 19,500 hogs per day, accounting for 3.9% of the U.S. pork processing
`
`capacity.
`
`76. More than 2,700 people work at the Tyson plant in Waterloo, Iowa.
`
`77. For its part, Tyson began focusing on COVID-19 on or about January
`
`2020. At that time, Tyson created a coronavirus task force.
`
`78. On information and belief, the task force allowed Tyson to closely
`
`understand COVID-19 and how the disease may impact its meat operations.
`
`79. On information and belief, by late-March, the Defendants knew or
`
`reasonably believed that COVID-19 was spreading within the Waterloo Plant.
`
`80. The Defendants knew that contracting COVID-19 could result in
`
`death.
`
`81. Notwithstanding its knowledge of COVID-19, including that the
`
`disease could spread easily in processing plants such as Waterloo, Tyson failed to
`
`protect its workers from the virus or properly communicate the impact of the virus
`
`on the Waterloo plant.
`
`82. For example, Tyson Foods did not provide its workers at the Waterloo
`
`plant with sufficient face coverings or other personal protective equipment (PPE).
`
`83. Nor did it implement or enforce sufficient social distancing measures
`
`at the plant.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 17 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 17
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`84. On or about April 6, 2020, Tyson temporarily shut down operations at
`
`its plant in Columbus Junction, Iowa, after two employees tested positive for
`
`COVID-19. As a result of the shutdown, a number of the hogs from Columbus
`
`Junction were transferred to Waterloo for processing there.
`
`85. Also on or about April 6, 2020, Tyson installed temperature checks to
`
`scan employees entering the Waterloo facility for a fever. Tyson knew or should
`
`have known that these temperature checks did not work as they were supposed to.
`
`For example, employees would routinely have the exact same temperature read
`
`each day even when their temperature varied.
`
`86. Moreover, none of the Defendants excused subcontractors and other
`
`visitors (such as truck drivers) from having their temperatures checked before
`
`entering the Plant.
`
`87. By late-March or early April, Defendants who were based out of the
`
`Waterloo Plant began avoiding the plant for the purpose of avoiding exposure to the
`
`coronavirus. Consequently, as the virus spread through the plant, these Defendants
`
`failed to ensure workers’ safety and instead relied on low-level employees with no
`
`management experience or training to perform their supervisory responsibilities.
`
`During this time, and on information and belief, these Defendants cancelled
`
`regularly scheduled safety meetings.
`
`88. On information and belief, after learning that COVID-19 was
`
`spreading throughout the Waterloo Plant, the Defendants based out of the Waterloo
`
`Plant: (i) directed others to deny knowledge of COVID-19 cases at the Plant; (ii)
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 18 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 18
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`falsely denied the existence of positive COVID-19 cases at the Plant; (iii) told
`
`workers they would be notified if they had been in close contact with a COVID-19-
`
`positive employee.
`
`89. Black Hawk County Sheriff Tony Thompson and other Black Hawk
`
`health officials toured the plant on April 10, 2020.
`
`90. Thompson and the health officials were initially satisfied with Tyson’s
`
`efforts after a meeting with management. But when they toured the facility,
`
`according to Sheriff Thompson, they saw workers using bandanas and sleep masks
`
`as masks, and some using no masks at all. There was no provision of PPE from
`
`corporate or plant management and no guidance on how to use PPE. They also saw
`
`little evidence of social distancing.
`
`91. By that point, Tyson acknowledged that they had at least three
`
`employees who had tested positive for COVID-19. As Sheriff Thompson asked: “Why
`
`on earth would they not be taking greater measures if what they’re telling is true,
`
`that their greatest focus is on their employee safety?”
`
`92.
`
`In fact, Sheriff Thompson said that what he saw when he toured the
`
`plant “shook [him] to the core.”
`
`93. Between April 9 and April 18, the number of positive COVID-19 cases
`
`in Black Hawk County surged by nearly 900%—from 20 cases to 192 cases. Local
`
`officials attributed 90% of the outbreak to the Tyson plant in Waterloo.
`
`94. Local officials urged Tyson to shut down the Waterloo plant, but Tyson
`
`denied that there was a COVID outbreak and refused to shut down.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 19 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 19
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`95. On April 12, 2020, on information and belief, nearly two-dozen Tyson
`
`employees were admitted to the emergency room at MercyOne Waterloo Medical
`
`Center.
`
`96. On April 14, Black Hawk County officials asked Tyson to temporarily
`
`shut down the Waterloo Plant because coronavirus was spreading there and
`
`creating a health hazard. The company refused.
`
`97.
`
`Instead of closing the plant, Tyson encouraged its workforce to
`
`continue coming in, offering a $500 bonus to anyone who showed up for every shift
`
`for three months.
`
`98. On April 16, 2020, Tyson company officials publicly denied a COVID-
`
`19 outbreak at the Waterloo Plant.
`
`99. On April 17, 2020, local officials warned Tyson that an “outbreak at a
`
`facility of your size puts great risk to the safety and well-being [of] all residents in
`
`our community, especially the elderly and vulnerable.” Writing to Tyson, the local
`
`officials asked Tyson to voluntarily cease operations on a temporary basis, and
`
`implored the company to protect its workers from the deadly virus. In short, the
`
`letter put Tyson on notice that its factory conditions were putting employees at
`
`significant risk of contracting the virus.
`
`100. On or about April 19, Iowa state lawmakers filed an OSHA complaint
`
`against Tyson Foods after Waterloo employees complained of unsafe working
`
`conditions amid the coronavirus pandemic.
`
`Case 6:21-cv-02036 Document 1-1 Filed 06/21/21 Page 20 of 82
`
`Exhibit A p. 20
`
`
`
`E-FILED 2021 APR 19 4:34 PM BLACK HAWK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
`
`101. Similarly, on April 21, Black Hawk County Board of Health issued a
`
`stat