`
`UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
`on
`MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
`
`IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI−LEVEL PAP,
`AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS
`LIABILITY LITIGATION
`
`MDL No. 3014
`
`(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
`
`CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −12)
`
`On October 8, 2021, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
`Western District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, 122 additional action(s) have been transferred to the
`Western District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the
`Honorable Joy Flowers Conti.
`It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the
`actions previously transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Conti.
`Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,
`the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Western District of
`Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of October 8, 2021, and, with the consent of that court,
`assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti.
`This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District
`Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7
`days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this
`7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
`
`FOR THE PANEL:
`
`John W. Nichols
`Clerk of the Panel
`
`
`
`Case FLN/3:21-cv-04244 Document 3 Filed 01/12/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI−LEVEL PAP,
`AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS
`LIABILITY LITIGATION
`
`MDL No. 3014
`
`SCHEDULE CTO−12 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
`
`DIST
`
`DIV.
`
`C.A.NO.
`
`CASE CAPTION
`
`CALIFORNIA EASTERN
`
`CAE
`CAE
`
`2
`2
`
`21−02305
`21−02306
`
`Morris v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al
`Rose v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al
`
`FLORIDA NORTHERN
`
`FLN
`
`3
`
`21−04244
`
`MITCHELL v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV et al
`
`ILLINOIS CENTRAL
`
`ILC
`
`3
`
`21−03268
`
`Engelbrecht v. Philips North America LLC et al
`
`MASSACHUSETTS
`
`MA
`MA
`MA
`MA
`
`1
`1
`1
`1
`
`21−12111
`21−12112
`21−12114
`21−12115
`
`Marsh v. Philips North America LLC et al
`Olive v. Philips North America, LLC et al
`Speller v. Philips North America, LLC et al
`Wood v. Philips North America, LLC et al
`
`NEW YORK SOUTHERN
`
`NYS
`
`7
`
`21−10780
`
`Corrigan et al v. Philips RS North America LLC et al
`
`PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN
`
`PAE
`
`2
`
`21−05674
`
`TRAVERA v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
`Opposed 1/11/2022
`
`TEXAS NORTHERN
`
`TXN
`
`3
`
`21−03157
`
`Gentry v. Philips North America LLC et al
`
`TEXAS SOUTHERN
`
`TXS
`TXS
`
`4
`4
`
`21−03754
`21−04079
`
`Obidi v. Philips North America LLC et al
`Gebhardt v. Philips North America LLC et al
`
`VIRGINIA WESTERN
`
`VAW
`
`1
`
`21−00052
`
`Marshall v. Philips North America LLC et al
`
`
`
`Case FLN/3:21-cv-04244 Document 3 Filed 01/12/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`WASHINGTON EASTERN
`
`WAE
`
`1
`
`21−03165
`
`Lofland v. Phillips North America, LLC
`
`