`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`
`
`JUDGE:
`
`
`MAGISTRATE:
`
`
`*
`
`CARGILL, INCORPORATED
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`Plaintiff
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`VERSUS
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`M/V XING HE HAI,
`
`*
`
`COSCO SHIPPING (USA) INC.,
`*
`OCEAN KONG SHIPPING, LTD.,
`*
`FORTUNE OCEAN SHIPPING LTD.,
`*
`SHANGHAI OCEANFRATE SHIP
`*
`MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.,
`
`*
`ULTRABULK A/S,
`
`
`*
`MINSHENG ZHI XIN SHIPPING
`
`*
`LEASING CO LTD.,
`
`
`*
`STX PAN OCEAN CO., LTD., and
`*
`COMERGE SHIPPING
`
`
`*
`(HONG KONG) CO.
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE MARITIME LIEN
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Cargo Carriers, a business of Cargill, Incorporated (hereinafter “Cargill”), for
`
`its Complaint respectfully represents:
`
`Description of Action
`
`1.
`
`
`
`This is an action against M/V Xing He Hai, in rem, and COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc.,
`
`Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd., Fortune Ocean
`
`Shipping Ltd., Ultrabulk A/S, Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd., STX Pan Ocean Co.,
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`Ltd., and Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co., in personam, in a cause of action for damage
`
`caused to Cargill refusing to load cargo.
`
`The Parties
`
`2.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated, is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware with its principal place of business in Minnesota.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`The vessel, “M/V Xing He Hai”, bearing IMO: 9746035, MMSI 477510800 is owned by
`
`Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd., Fortune Ocean
`
`Shipping Ltd., and/or COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc. and was doing business in Louisiana.
`
`4.
`
`
`
`Defendants, COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc., Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd.,
`
`Fortune Ocean Shipping Ltd., and/or Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., were, at all material times
`
`herein, the registered owner(s) of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`5.
`
`
`
`Defendant, Fortune Ocean Shipping Ltd. was the commercial manager in addition to
`
`being the beneficial owner of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`5.
`
`
`
` Defendant, Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd, is the technical manager of
`
`the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 3 of 7
`
`6.
`
`Defendant, Ultrabulk A/S, was the commercial operator of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant, STX Pan Ocean Co., Ltd., a foreign corporation, was at all material times a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`time charterer of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`8.
`
`
`
`Defendant, Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd, a foreign corporation was at all
`
`material times a charterer of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`9.
`
`
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 46 U.S.C. Sec. 30101
`
`and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1333 in that this action is an admiralty and maritime claim within the
`
`meaning of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Supplemental Rules for
`
`Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims.
`
`10.
`
`
`
`Venue is proper in this district in that the vessel is located within this district, as required
`
`by Rule C of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims.
`
`Factual Allegations
`
`11.
`
`
`
`At all material times herein, Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated was set to load grain for
`
`Cargill Japan onto the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`12.
`
`At all material times herein, Defendant, M/V Xing He Hai, was an ocean-going, vessel.
`
`The M/V Xing He Hai is currently within the district.
`
`13.
`
`
`
`On or about September 29, 2021, the M/V Xing He Hai was anchored in the Mississippi
`
`River within this court’s jurisdiction. The master of the M/V Xing He Hai, under operation of
`
`Fortune Ocean Shipping LTD., refused to open its hatches to load Cargill’s grain upon direction
`
`of vessel owners. At the time of the incident, Pan Ocean and/or Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong)
`
`Co., Ltd had a time charter. Also, at the time of the incident, Cargill had a voyage charter.
`
`Cargill failed to receive port funds in advance of calling vessel to buoys and as a result of the
`
`vessel’s failure to load there are significant port charges. The amount owed is in excess of
`
`$400,000.000.
`
`14.
`
`
`
`The aforementioned failure to load property not caused or contributed to by any fault or
`
`neglect on the part of Cargill, but rather was caused or contributed to solely by the fault or
`
`neglect of defendants in the following non-exclusive particulars:
`
`a. Breach of contract;
`
`b. Failure of defendants to load Cargill’s property on the M/V Xing He Hai;
`
`c. Failure to pay port funds; and
`
`d. Any and all negligence, fault, and/or intentional acts which are to be shown at the trial of
`
`this matter.
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`15.
`
`The foregoing acts of fault or neglect were all done, occasioned, and incurred within the
`
`privity and knowledge of all defendants.
`
`16.
`
`
`
`Cargill has suffered damages
`
`in excess of FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND
`
`($400,000.00) dollars, as nearly as same can presently be estimated, together with pre-judgment
`
`interest and costs.
`
`17.
`
`
`
`By reason of the matters set forth, Cargill is entitled to a preferred maritime lien pursuant
`
`to 46 U.S.C. Sec. 31301, et al., against M/V Xing He Hai, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture,
`
`etc., in excess of FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND ($400,000.00) dollars, as nearly as same can
`
`presently be estimated, together with pre-judgment interest and costs.
`
`
`
`The M/V Xing He Hai is at Wills Point Anchorage between 66.5 and 66.7 of the
`
`18.
`
`Mississippi River.
`
`19.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the United States Code, notice of these proceedings must be given to the
`
`owner or master of the M/V Xing He Hai, and all persons who have recorded liens with the U.S.
`
`Coast Guard, and Cargill requests the Court to order such notification to be made to such persons
`
`by certified mail, delivered to their last known address.
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`All and singular, the premises are true and within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction
`
`of the United States and of this Honorable Court.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated, prays that:
`
`1. That process in due form of law, according to the course and practice of this Honorable
`
`Court, in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction within the meaning of Rule 9(h)
`
`of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, issue against the M/V Xing He Hai bearing IMO:
`
`9746035, MMSI 477510800, its engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, etc., in rem, and all
`
`the necessaries thereunto belonging and appertaining, be condemned and sold to pay the
`
`demands and claims aforesaid with interest, costs and attorneys’ fees, and to pay any and
`
`all other relief as the law and justice may entitle Cargill to receive;
`
`2. Process in due form of law issue against M/V Xing He Hai, COSCO Shipping (USA),
`
`Inc., Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd.,
`
`Fortune Ocean Shipping Ltd., Ultrabulk A/S, Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co
`
`Ltd., STX Pan Ocean Co., Ltd., and Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co. citing them to
`
`appear and answer the Complaint;
`
`3. After due proceedings are had, that there be a judgment entered herein, in favor of Cargill
`
`and against defendants, /V Xing He Hai, COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc., Ocean Kong
`
`Shipping, Ltd., Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd., Fortune Ocean Shipping
`
`Ltd., Ultrabulk A/S, Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd., STX Pan Ocean Co.,
`
`Ltd., and Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co.; and
`
`4. Cargill may have such other and further relief as this Court and justice may deem just and
`
`reasonable in the premises.
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 7 of 7
`
`Respectfully submitted this 29 day of September, 2021.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`VALERIE THENG MATHERNE (#25898)
`JAMES M. MATHERNE (#26155)
`COLIN F. LOZES (#35893)
`STEVEN M. LOZES (#8922)
`COURINGTON, KIEFER, SOMMERS,
`MARULLO & MATHERNE, L.L.C.
`P. O. Box 2350
`New Orleans, LA 70176
`616 Girod Street
`New Orleans, LA 70130
`Telephone: (504) 524-5510
`Facsimile: (504) 524-7887
`Email: vmatherne@courington-law.com
`jmatherne@courington-law.com
`clozes@courington-law.com
`slozes@courington-law.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1}
`
`
`7
`
`