throbber
Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 1 of 7
`

`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`
`
`JUDGE:
`
`
`MAGISTRATE:
`
`
`*
`
`CARGILL, INCORPORATED
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`Plaintiff
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`VERSUS
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`M/V XING HE HAI,
`
`*
`
`COSCO SHIPPING (USA) INC.,
`*
`OCEAN KONG SHIPPING, LTD.,
`*
`FORTUNE OCEAN SHIPPING LTD.,
`*
`SHANGHAI OCEANFRATE SHIP
`*
`MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.,
`
`*
`ULTRABULK A/S,
`
`
`*
`MINSHENG ZHI XIN SHIPPING
`
`*
`LEASING CO LTD.,
`
`
`*
`STX PAN OCEAN CO., LTD., and
`*
`COMERGE SHIPPING
`
`
`*
`(HONG KONG) CO.
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`*
`
`
`
`
`
`
`* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT TO ENFORCE MARITIME LIEN
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Cargo Carriers, a business of Cargill, Incorporated (hereinafter “Cargill”), for
`
`its Complaint respectfully represents:
`
`Description of Action
`
`1.
`
`
`
`This is an action against M/V Xing He Hai, in rem, and COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc.,
`
`Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd., Fortune Ocean
`
`Shipping Ltd., Ultrabulk A/S, Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd., STX Pan Ocean Co.,
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 2 of 7
`

`
`Ltd., and Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co., in personam, in a cause of action for damage
`
`caused to Cargill refusing to load cargo.
`
`The Parties
`
`2.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated, is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware with its principal place of business in Minnesota.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`The vessel, “M/V Xing He Hai”, bearing IMO: 9746035, MMSI 477510800 is owned by
`
`Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd., Fortune Ocean
`
`Shipping Ltd., and/or COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc. and was doing business in Louisiana.
`
`4.
`
`
`
`Defendants, COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc., Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd.,
`
`Fortune Ocean Shipping Ltd., and/or Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., were, at all material times
`
`herein, the registered owner(s) of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`5.
`
`
`
`Defendant, Fortune Ocean Shipping Ltd. was the commercial manager in addition to
`
`being the beneficial owner of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`5.
`
`
`
` Defendant, Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd, is the technical manager of
`
`the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 

`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 3 of 7
`
`6.
`
`Defendant, Ultrabulk A/S, was the commercial operator of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant, STX Pan Ocean Co., Ltd., a foreign corporation, was at all material times a
`

`
`
`
`
`
`time charterer of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`8.
`
`
`
`Defendant, Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd, a foreign corporation was at all
`
`material times a charterer of the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`9.
`
`
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 46 U.S.C. Sec. 30101
`
`and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1333 in that this action is an admiralty and maritime claim within the
`
`meaning of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Supplemental Rules for
`
`Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims.
`
`10.
`
`
`
`Venue is proper in this district in that the vessel is located within this district, as required
`
`by Rule C of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims.
`
`Factual Allegations
`
`11.
`
`
`
`At all material times herein, Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated was set to load grain for
`
`Cargill Japan onto the M/V Xing He Hai.
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 

`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 4 of 7
`

`
`
`
`12.
`
`At all material times herein, Defendant, M/V Xing He Hai, was an ocean-going, vessel.
`
`The M/V Xing He Hai is currently within the district.
`
`13.
`
`
`
`On or about September 29, 2021, the M/V Xing He Hai was anchored in the Mississippi
`
`River within this court’s jurisdiction. The master of the M/V Xing He Hai, under operation of
`
`Fortune Ocean Shipping LTD., refused to open its hatches to load Cargill’s grain upon direction
`
`of vessel owners. At the time of the incident, Pan Ocean and/or Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong)
`
`Co., Ltd had a time charter. Also, at the time of the incident, Cargill had a voyage charter.
`
`Cargill failed to receive port funds in advance of calling vessel to buoys and as a result of the
`
`vessel’s failure to load there are significant port charges. The amount owed is in excess of
`
`$400,000.000.
`
`14.
`
`
`
`The aforementioned failure to load property not caused or contributed to by any fault or
`
`neglect on the part of Cargill, but rather was caused or contributed to solely by the fault or
`
`neglect of defendants in the following non-exclusive particulars:
`
`a. Breach of contract;
`
`b. Failure of defendants to load Cargill’s property on the M/V Xing He Hai;
`
`c. Failure to pay port funds; and
`
`d. Any and all negligence, fault, and/or intentional acts which are to be shown at the trial of
`
`this matter.
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 

`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 5 of 7
`

`
`
`
`15.
`
`The foregoing acts of fault or neglect were all done, occasioned, and incurred within the
`
`privity and knowledge of all defendants.
`
`16.
`
`
`
`Cargill has suffered damages
`
`in excess of FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND
`
`($400,000.00) dollars, as nearly as same can presently be estimated, together with pre-judgment
`
`interest and costs.
`
`17.
`
`
`
`By reason of the matters set forth, Cargill is entitled to a preferred maritime lien pursuant
`
`to 46 U.S.C. Sec. 31301, et al., against M/V Xing He Hai, her engines, tackle, apparel, furniture,
`
`etc., in excess of FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND ($400,000.00) dollars, as nearly as same can
`
`presently be estimated, together with pre-judgment interest and costs.
`
`
`
`The M/V Xing He Hai is at Wills Point Anchorage between 66.5 and 66.7 of the
`
`18.
`
`Mississippi River.
`
`19.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the United States Code, notice of these proceedings must be given to the
`
`owner or master of the M/V Xing He Hai, and all persons who have recorded liens with the U.S.
`
`Coast Guard, and Cargill requests the Court to order such notification to be made to such persons
`
`by certified mail, delivered to their last known address.
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 

`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 6 of 7
`

`
`
`
`20.
`
`All and singular, the premises are true and within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction
`
`of the United States and of this Honorable Court.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated, prays that:
`
`1. That process in due form of law, according to the course and practice of this Honorable
`
`Court, in causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction within the meaning of Rule 9(h)
`
`of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, issue against the M/V Xing He Hai bearing IMO:
`
`9746035, MMSI 477510800, its engines, tackle, apparel, furniture, etc., in rem, and all
`
`the necessaries thereunto belonging and appertaining, be condemned and sold to pay the
`
`demands and claims aforesaid with interest, costs and attorneys’ fees, and to pay any and
`
`all other relief as the law and justice may entitle Cargill to receive;
`
`2. Process in due form of law issue against M/V Xing He Hai, COSCO Shipping (USA),
`
`Inc., Ocean Kong Shipping, Ltd., Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd.,
`
`Fortune Ocean Shipping Ltd., Ultrabulk A/S, Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co
`
`Ltd., STX Pan Ocean Co., Ltd., and Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co. citing them to
`
`appear and answer the Complaint;
`
`3. After due proceedings are had, that there be a judgment entered herein, in favor of Cargill
`
`and against defendants, /V Xing He Hai, COSCO Shipping (USA), Inc., Ocean Kong
`
`Shipping, Ltd., Shanghai Oceanfrate Ship Management Co. Ltd., Fortune Ocean Shipping
`
`Ltd., Ultrabulk A/S, Minsheng Zhi Xin Shipping Leasing Co Ltd., STX Pan Ocean Co.,
`
`Ltd., and Comerge Shipping (Hong Kong) Co.; and
`
`4. Cargill may have such other and further relief as this Court and justice may deem just and
`
`reasonable in the premises.
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 

`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01798-ILRL-MBN Document 1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 7 of 7
`
`Respectfully submitted this 29 day of September, 2021.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`VALERIE THENG MATHERNE (#25898)
`JAMES M. MATHERNE (#26155)
`COLIN F. LOZES (#35893)
`STEVEN M. LOZES (#8922)
`COURINGTON, KIEFER, SOMMERS,
`MARULLO & MATHERNE, L.L.C.
`P. O. Box 2350
`New Orleans, LA 70176
`616 Girod Street
`New Orleans, LA 70130
`Telephone: (504) 524-5510
`Facsimile: (504) 524-7887
`Email: vmatherne@courington-law.com
`jmatherne@courington-law.com
`clozes@courington-law.com
`slozes@courington-law.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff, Cargill, Incorporated
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`{00741203.DOCX;1} 

`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket