throbber
Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 11
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`
`
`
`
`
`
` CIVIL ACTION NO.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
`STATE OF LOUISIANA,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE
`LINE LLC
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`The United States of America, by authority of the Attorney General of the United States,
`
`acting at the request of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), the
`
`United States Department of the Interior (“DOI”) through the United States Fish and Wildlife
`
`Service (“FWS”), and the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), and the State
`
`of Louisiana (“State”), appearing through the Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office,
`
`Department of Public Safety & Corrections (“LOSCO”), Louisiana Department of Natural
`
`Resources (“LDNR”), Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (“LDEQ”), Louisiana
`
`Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (“LDWF”), and the Louisiana Coastal Protection and
`
`Restoration Authority (“CPRA”) (collectively, the “Trustees”), through the undersigned
`
`attorneys, file this Complaint and allege as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1. This is a civil action, brought against Defendant American Commercial Barge
`
`Line LLC (“ACBL”), for recovery of damages for injury to, loss of, or destruction of natural
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 11
`
`resources under Sections 1002(a) and (b) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), 33 U.S.C.
`
`§ 2702(a) and (b)(2), and Section 2480 of the Louisiana Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act
`
`(“OSPRA”), La. R.S. 30:2480. Plaintiffs seek damages in order to compensate for injury to,
`
`destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of certain natural resources resulting from an oil spill
`
`caused by the collision of the ocean-going tanker M/V TINTOMARA with ACBL’s tanker
`
`barge DM-932 under tow by the M/V MEL OLIVER on the Mississippi River near New
`
`Orleans, Louisiana in July 2008. Plaintiffs also seek to recover unreimbursed costs of assessing
`
`such damages and planning related restoration.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to
`
`28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345 and Section 1017(b) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2717(b). The Court also
`
`has supplemental jurisdiction over the State law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`
`3. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), and Section
`
`1017(b) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2717(b), because Defendant resides and does business in this
`
`district and the oil discharge occurred in this district.
`
`STATUTORY BACKGROUND
`
`The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
`
`4.
`
`Section 1002(a) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(a), provides that “each responsible
`
`party for a vessel or a facility from which oil is discharged . . . into or upon the navigable waters
`
`or adjoining shorelines or the exclusive economic zone is liable for the removal costs and
`
`damages specified in [33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)] that result from such incident.”
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 3 of 11
`
`5.
`
`Section 1001(32)(A) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(32)(A), defines “responsible
`
`party” to include, in the case of a vessel, “any person owning, operating, or demise chartering
`
`the vessel.”
`
`6.
`
`Section 1001(27) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(27), defines “person” to include a
`
`corporation, partnership, or association.
`
`7.
`
`Section 1001(37) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(37), defines “vessel” to mean “every
`
`description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a
`
`means of transportation on water, other than a public vessel.”
`
`8.
`
`Section 1001(26) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(26), defines “owner or operator” to
`
`mean “in the case of a vessel, any person owning, operating, or chartering by demise, the
`
`vessel.”
`
`9.
`
`Section 1001(23) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(23), defines “oil” to mean “oil of
`
`any kind or in any form, including petroleum, [and] fuel oil.”
`
`10. Section 1001(7) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(7), defines “discharge” to mean “any
`
`emission (other than natural seepage), intentional or unintentional,” and to include “spilling,
`
`leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, or dumping.”
`
`11. Section 1001(21) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(21), defines “navigable waters” to
`
`mean “the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas.”
`
`12. Section 1002(b)(2) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)(2), provides that the “damages”
`
`referred to in Section 1002(a) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(a), include “[d]amages for injury to,
`
`destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of, natural resources, including the reasonable costs of
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 4 of 11
`
`assessing the damage, which shall be recoverable by a United States trustee, a State trustee, an
`
`Indian tribe trustee, or a foreign trustee.”
`
`13. Section 1001(20) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(20), defines “natural resources” to
`
`include “land, fish, wildlife, biota, air, water, ground water, drinking water supplies, and other
`
`such resources belonging to, managed by, held in trust by, appertaining to, or otherwise
`
`controlled by the United States (including the resources of the exclusive economic zone), any
`
`State or local government or Indian tribe, or any foreign government.”
`
`14. Section 1001(14) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(14), defines “incident” to mean “any
`
`occurrence or series of occurrences having the same origin, involving one or more vessels . . . ,
`
`resulting in the discharge . . . of oil.”
`
`The Louisiana Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act
`
`15. The purpose of OSPRA is to assist the State of Louisiana “in fulfilling its duties
`
`to protect, conserve, and replenish the natural resources of th[e] state in accordance with Article
`
`XI, Section 1 of the Constitution of Louisiana.” La. R.S. 30:2453(A).
`
`16.
`
`It is the intent of OSPRA “to support and complement the Oil Pollution Act of
`
`1990 (P.L. 101-380) and other federal law, specifically those provisions . . . relating to the
`
`responsibilities of state agencies designated as natural resource trustees. The legislature intends
`
`[OSPRA] to be interpreted and implemented in a manner consistent with federal law.”
`
`La. R.S. 30:2453(B).
`
`17. OSPRA provides that a responsible party shall make full payment or initiate
`
`restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, or mitigation of damages to natural resources after
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 5 of 11
`
`completion of an assessment of natural resource damages and the amount of the damages by the
`
`state agencies designated as natural resource trustees. La. R.S. 30:2480(G).
`
`18. “Responsible party” means “[t]he owner or operator of a vessel . . . from which
`
`an unauthorized discharge of oil emanates or threatens to emanate.” La. R.S. 30:2454(22)(a).
`
`“Responsible party” also includes any person “who causes, allows, or permits an unauthorized
`
`discharge of oil or threatened unauthorized discharge of oil.” La. R.S. 30:2454(22)(c).
`
`19. “Owner” or “operator” means “[a]ny person owning, operating, or chartering by
`
`demise a vessel[.]” La. R.S. 30:2454(20)(a).
`
`20. “‘Vessel’ includes every description of watercraft or other contrivance used or
`
`capable of being used as a means of transportation on water, whether self-propelled or
`
`otherwise, including barges.” La. R.S. 30:2454(30).
`
`21.
`
` “‘Unauthorized discharge of oil’ means any actual or threatened discharge of oil
`
`not authorized by a federal or state permit.” La. R.S. 30:2454(29).
`
`22. “‘Discharge of oil’ means an intentional or unintentional act or omission by
`
`which harmful quantities of oil are spilled, leaked, pumped, poured, emitted, or dumped into or
`
`on coastal waters of the state or at any other place where, unless controlled or removed, they
`
`may drain, seep, run, or otherwise enter coastal waters of the state.” La. R.S. 30:2454(7).
`
`23. “‘Oil’ means oil of any kind or in any form, including but not limited to crude
`
`oil, petroleum, [and] fuel oil . . . .” La. R.S. 30:2454(18).
`
`24. “Damages” means and includes “damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of
`
`natural resources as defined in [OSPRA], includ[ing] the reasonable and any direct, documented
`
`cost to assess, restore, rehabilitate, or replace injured natural resources, or to mitigate further
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 6 of 11
`
`injury, and their diminution in value after such restoration, rehabilitation, replacement or
`
`mitigation, which shall be recoverable by the state of Louisiana.” La. R.S. 30:2454(5)(a).
`
`25. “‘Natural resources’ means all land, fish, shellfish, fowl, wildlife, biota,
`
`vegetation, air, water, groundwater supplies, and other similar resources owned, managed, held
`
`in trust, regulated, or otherwise controlled by the state.” La. R.S. 30:2454(17).
`
`26. NOAA and FWS are the designated United States trustees of natural resources
`
`injured by ACBL’s oil discharge pursuant to Section 1006(b)(2) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. §
`
`2706(b)(2), Subpart G of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency
`
`Plan (“NCP”) (40 C.F.R. §§ 300.600 et seq.), and Executive Order 12580 (3 C.F.R., 1987
`
`Comp. p. 193, 52 Fed. Reg. 2923 (January 23, 1987)), as amended by Executive Order 12777,
`
`56 Fed. Reg. 54757 (October 19, 1991).
`
`27. The Louisiana trustees, LOSCO, LDNR, LDEQ, LDWF, and CPRA
`
`(collectively, the “State Trustees”) are designated by the Governor of Louisiana as State trustees
`
`of natural resources injured by ACBL’s oil discharge pursuant to Section 1006(b)(3) of OPA, 33
`
`U.S.C. § 2706(b)(3), and 40 C.F.R. § 300.605.
`
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`Natural Resource Damages under Section 1002 of OPA
`
`28. Paragraphs 1 through 14 and 26 through 27 are realleged and incorporated herein.
`
`29. ACBL is a corporation and a “person” within the meaning of Section 1001(27) of
`
`OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(27)
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 7 of 11
`
`30. At the time of the oil discharge, ACBL was the “responsible party” as owner of
`
`the tanker barge DM-932 and tug M/V MEL OLIVER within the meaning of Section
`
`1001(32)(A) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(32)(A).
`
`31. ACBL’s tanker barge DM-932 is a “vessel” within the meaning of Section
`
`1001(37) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(37).
`
`32. On or about July 23, 2008, the tug M/V MEL OLIVER was pushing tanker barge
`
`DM-932 upriver on the Mississippi River. DM-932 was carrying 9,983 barrels (419,286
`
`gallons) of #6 fuel oil. At the same time, the M/V TINTOMARA was sailing downriver on the
`
`Mississippi River. As the M/V MEL OLIVER and M/V TINTOMARA closed, the M/V MEL
`
`OLIVER began an arcing turn to port and crossed in front of the M/V TINTOMARA. The M/V
`
`TINTOMARA struck barge DM-932, causing the release of an estimated 6,734 barrels (282,828
`
`gallons) of #6 fuel oil into the waters of the Mississippi River over a two-week period.
`
`33. The spilling of oil from tanker barge DM-932 was a “discharge” within the
`
`meaning of Section 1001(7) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(7).
`
`34. All of the oil released during the incident was “oil” within the meaning of
`
`Section 1001(23) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(23).
`
`35. The Mississippi River is a “navigable water” of the United States within the
`
`meaning of Section 1001(21) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(21).
`
`36. The incident occurred during a high water event along the Mississippi River and
`
`oil was transported downstream rapidly. As the waters receded, oil became stranded in the
`
`batture between the river and the adjacent levees, on rip-rap, in crevices in rip-rap, and along the
`
`shoreline.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 8 of 11
`
`37. The discharged oil spread more than 100 miles downriver and covered over 5,000
`
`acres of shoreline habitat, although large amounts of the #6 fuel oil remained present near the
`
`incident site.
`
`38. As a result of the discharge, the United States Coast Guard closed the River from
`
`RMM 98 (just upriver from New Orleans) to the Southwest Pass Sea Buoy. The closure was in
`
`place from July 23, 2008 until July 29, 2008, affecting commerce and human use activities such
`
`as recreational fishing and shoreline use.
`
`39. The incident also generated several days of public complaints related to the oil
`
`odors from the spill.
`
`40. ACBL, the United States, and the State responded to the spill and conducted and
`
`monitored cleanup efforts. The discharge lasted until August 10, 2008, when final salvage
`
`efforts were completed.
`
`41. The oil discharge polluted portions of the Mississippi River and the batture
`
`between the river and the adjacent levees, rip-rap, crevices in rip-rap, and along the river’s
`
`shoreline.
`
`42. The oil discharge caused injury to, destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of
`
`“natural resources” belonging to, managed by, held in trust by, appertaining to, or otherwise
`
`controlled by the United States or the State within the meaning of Section 1001(20) of OPA,
`
`33 U.S.C. § 2701(20), including riverine batture habitat, aquatic/water column organisms, birds,
`
`and marsh, and resulted in lost recreation and lost use of marsh restoration material.
`
`43. NOAA and FWS have incurred costs in assessing injuries to natural resources
`
`resulting from the oil spill, including costs related to restoration planning.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 9 of 11
`
`44. Pursuant to Section 1002(a) and (b)(2) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(a) and (b)(2),
`
`ACBL is liable to the United States and to the State for damages for injury to, destruction of,
`
`loss of, or loss of use of natural resources, including the reasonable costs of assessing such
`
`injury, destruction, loss, or loss of use resulting from the discharge of oil from ACBL’s vessel as
`
`alleged in this Complaint.
`
`SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`Natural Resource Damages under Section 2480 of OSPRA
`
`
`
`45. The preceding paragraphs are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`46. The Louisiana trustees, LOSCO, LDNR, LDEQ, LDWF, and CPRA serve as
`
`State Trustees under OSPRA according to La. R.S. 30:2451, et seq. and La. Admin. Code tit. 43,
`
`part XXIX, et seq.
`
`47. ACBL was the owner and operator of tanker barge DM-932 and, as such, is the
`
`“responsible party” under OSPRA. La. R.S. 30:2454(22).
`
`48. The oil discharge from tanker barge DM-932 on or about July 23 through August
`
`10, 2008 was not authorized by a federal or state permit and therefore constitutes an
`
`“unauthorized discharge of oil” under OSPRA. La. R.S. 30:2454(29).
`
`49. The unauthorized discharge of oil caused injury to, destruction of, or loss of
`
`natural resources managed, held in trust, and/or regulated by the State Trustees.
`
`50. The State Trustees have incurred costs in assessing damages to natural resources
`
`resulting from the unauthorized discharge of oil, including costs related to restoration planning.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 10 of 11
`
`51. Pursuant Section 2480 of OSPRA, La. R.S. 30:2480, ACBL is liable to the State
`
`Trustees for natural resource damages, including the reasonable cost of assessing such damages,
`
`resulting from the unauthorized discharge of oil from ACBL’s vessel as alleged herein.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully pray that this Court:
`
`Award Plaintiffs a judgment against the Defendant for all damages for injury to,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of natural resources, including reimbursement of Plaintiffs’
`
`assessment and restoration planning costs; and
`
`2.
`
`Grant Plaintiffs such other relief as this Court may deem appropriate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
`
`
`
`TODD KIM
`Assistant Attorney General
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`United States Department of Justice
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Scott M. Cernich
`SCOTT M. CERNICH (DC# 479851), T.A.
`Senior Counsel
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources
`Division
`United States Department of Justice
`P.0. Box 7611, Benjamin Frank1in Station
`Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
`Telephone: (202) 514-0056
`Facsimile: (202) 514-2583
`scott.cernich@usdoj.gov
`
`DUANE A. EVANS
`UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
`
`/s/ Peter M. Mansfield
`Peter M. Mansfield
`Assistant United States Attorney
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01818-CJB-DMD Document 1 Filed 10/04/21 Page 11 of 11
`
`Chief of Civil Division
`Office of the United States Attorney
`650 Poydras Street, Suite 1600
`New Orleans, LA 70130
`
`FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF LOUISIANA:
`
`
`
`/s/ Stephanie C. Morris*
`STEPHANIE C. MORRIS
`Attorney, LA Bar Roll No. 30279
`La. Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office
`P. O. Box 66614
`Baton Rouge, LA 70896
`(225) 925-6606 (Telephone)
`(225) 925-7068 (Facsimile)
`stephanie.morris@la.gov
`
`
`*Counsel for the State of Louisiana provided consent for the placement of her electronic
`signature on this pleading.
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket