throbber
Case 2:21-cv-02242-GGG-DPC Document 267 Filed 11/01/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`G.K.
`
`
`
`VERSUS
`
`D.M.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL NO. 21-2242
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER AND REASONS
`
`SECTION: T (2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court has before it Plaintiff G.K’s Motion to Quash Service upon him by Intervenors
`
`Fishman Haygood, LLP, Michael Dodson, Danielle Teutonico and Monica Bergeron. R. Doc. 258.
`
`Intervenors have responded in opposition. R. Doc. 264.
`
`
`
`In the Fifth Circuit, “the party on whose behalf [service] is made must bear the burden of
`
`establishing its validity.” Aetna Business Credit, Inc. v. Universal Decor & Interior Design, Inc.,
`
`635 F.2d 434, 435 (5th Cir. 1981). Having considered the parties’ briefing, the Court cannot
`
`determine whether Plaintiff was properly served with the Intervenors’ Complaint. Thus,
`
`Intervenors have failed to carry their burden, and the challenged service upon Plaintiff must be
`
`quashed. Accordingly,
`
`
`
`IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion, R. Doc. 258, is GRANTED and proof of service
`
`upon Plaintiff, R. Doc. 256, is hereby QUASHED.
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file with this Court no later than
`
`November 15, 2023, his current and active telephone number, e-mail address, and postal address
`
`at which he may be served. Plaintiff is WARNED that failure to comply with this order may result
`
`in the entry of default judgment against him. See Sindhi v. Raina, 905 F.3d 327, 332 (5th Cir. 2018)
`
`(noting the “well-settled principle” that Rule 55 allows district courts to enter judgment default
`
`against a party for failure to comply with court orders).
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Intervenors shall re-serve Plaintiff with their
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-02242-GGG-DPC Document 267 Filed 11/01/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`Complaint in Intervention no later than thirty (30) days after the docketing of any filing Plaintiff
`
`may make in conformity with the above order of this Court. If Intervenors are unable to serve
`
`Plaintiff at the provided address, Intervenors are DIRECTED to notify the Court immediately.
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is again NOTIFIED of his obligations,
`
`pursuant to this district’s Local Rule 11.1, to promptly notify the Court of any change to any
`
`address or telephone number previously submitted to the Court, and to include his e-mail address,
`
`postal address, and telephone number on any and all pro se filings made to this Court. Plaintiff is
`
`hereby WARNED that any future filing he may submit to this Court in violation of Local Rule
`
`11.1 will be rejected as deficient. Plaintiff is further NOTIFIED that failure to notify the Court of
`
`a current e-mail or postal address may be cause for dismissal of this action pursuant to Local Rule
`
`41.3.1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`New Orleans, Louisiana, this 1st day of November, 2023.
`
`
` GREG GERARD GUIDRY
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket