`
`
`G.K.
`
`
`
`VERSUS
`
`D.M.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL NO. 21-2242
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER AND REASONS
`
`SECTION: T (2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court has before it Plaintiff G.K’s Motion to Quash Service upon him by Intervenors
`
`Fishman Haygood, LLP, Michael Dodson, Danielle Teutonico and Monica Bergeron. R. Doc. 258.
`
`Intervenors have responded in opposition. R. Doc. 264.
`
`
`
`In the Fifth Circuit, “the party on whose behalf [service] is made must bear the burden of
`
`establishing its validity.” Aetna Business Credit, Inc. v. Universal Decor & Interior Design, Inc.,
`
`635 F.2d 434, 435 (5th Cir. 1981). Having considered the parties’ briefing, the Court cannot
`
`determine whether Plaintiff was properly served with the Intervenors’ Complaint. Thus,
`
`Intervenors have failed to carry their burden, and the challenged service upon Plaintiff must be
`
`quashed. Accordingly,
`
`
`
`IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion, R. Doc. 258, is GRANTED and proof of service
`
`upon Plaintiff, R. Doc. 256, is hereby QUASHED.
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file with this Court no later than
`
`November 15, 2023, his current and active telephone number, e-mail address, and postal address
`
`at which he may be served. Plaintiff is WARNED that failure to comply with this order may result
`
`in the entry of default judgment against him. See Sindhi v. Raina, 905 F.3d 327, 332 (5th Cir. 2018)
`
`(noting the “well-settled principle” that Rule 55 allows district courts to enter judgment default
`
`against a party for failure to comply with court orders).
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Intervenors shall re-serve Plaintiff with their
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-02242-GGG-DPC Document 267 Filed 11/01/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`Complaint in Intervention no later than thirty (30) days after the docketing of any filing Plaintiff
`
`may make in conformity with the above order of this Court. If Intervenors are unable to serve
`
`Plaintiff at the provided address, Intervenors are DIRECTED to notify the Court immediately.
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is again NOTIFIED of his obligations,
`
`pursuant to this district’s Local Rule 11.1, to promptly notify the Court of any change to any
`
`address or telephone number previously submitted to the Court, and to include his e-mail address,
`
`postal address, and telephone number on any and all pro se filings made to this Court. Plaintiff is
`
`hereby WARNED that any future filing he may submit to this Court in violation of Local Rule
`
`11.1 will be rejected as deficient. Plaintiff is further NOTIFIED that failure to notify the Court of
`
`a current e-mail or postal address may be cause for dismissal of this action pursuant to Local Rule
`
`41.3.1.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`New Orleans, Louisiana, this 1st day of November, 2023.
`
`
` GREG GERARD GUIDRY
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2
`
`