`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
`
`
`MURPHY-JERMAINE WILSON,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GMFS MORTGAGE, SPECIALIZED LOAN
`SERVICING, LLC (SLS), TOM MILLON,
`BEN THOMPSON, WILL EGLIN, BILLY
`MAXWELL, JOHN TERRELL BROWN
`JUNIOR, JEFFREY WASTON, MOLLY
`WILLS, TOM D. ARMOND, TRANSUNION
`CREDIT UNION, CHRISTOPHER A.
`CARTWRIGHT, EQUIFAX CREDIT
`UNION, MARK BEGOR, EXPERIAN
`CREDIT UNION, BRIAN CASSIN,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 3:22-cv-00478-SDD-RLB
`
`DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC’S MOTION FOR
`EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
`
`Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC, incorrectly named as Equifax Credit
`
`Union, (“Equifax”), by counsel, files this motion for a 21-day extension of time to respond to
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Complaint”), pursuant to Local Rule 7(a) which states as follows:
`
`Upon certification by a moving party that there has been no
`previous extension of time to plead and that the opposing party has
`not filed in the record an objection to an extension of time, then on
`an ex parte motion and order, the Court will allow one extension
`for a period of twenty-one days from the time the pleading would
`otherwise be due. Further extensions will not be granted by
`stipulation, but only by motion to the Court and for good cause
`shown. This rule shall apply to pleadings listed in Fed. R. Civ. P.
`7(a).
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on September 21, 2022. [Dkt. No. 1].
`
`88908187v.1
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-00478-SDD-RLB Document 21 11/08/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`2.
`
`Equifax was served with Plaintiff’s Complaint on October 21, 2022, and pursuant
`
`to Rules 8 and 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Equifax must file its responsive pleading
`
`by November 14, 2022.
`
`3.
`
`Equifax seeks a 21-day extension until December 5, 2022 to respond to Plaintiff’s
`
`Complaint.
`
`4.
`
`The requested extension will not cause any prejudice or disrupt any scheduled
`
`deadlines in this case.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`This is Equifax’s first request for an extension of time.
`
`Equifax, through counsel, sent emails to the Plaintiff on November 3, 2022 and
`
`November 8, 2022 and no response has been received as of this submission.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant Equifax hereby respectfully requests that this Court grant this
`
`motion and extend its time to respond to the Complaint up to and including December 5, 2022.
`
`
`DATED: November 8, 2022
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`JONES WALKER LLP
`
`By: /s/ Madison M. Tucker
`Madison M. Tucker (#37722)
`Caroline V. McCaffrey (#39276)
`JONES WALKER LLP
`201 St. Charles Ave.
`New Orleans, LA 70170-5100
`Telephone: (504) 582-8261
`Facsimile: (504) 589-8261
`Email:
`mtucker@joneswalker.com
`cmccaffrey@joneswalker.com
`
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`Equifax Information Services LLC
`
`2
`
`
`
`88908187v.1
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-00478-SDD-RLB Document 21 11/08/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on November 8, 2022, I presented the foregoing DEFENDANT
`
`EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
`
`RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF
`
`system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record. A copy has also
`
`been sent via U.S. Mail to the following:
`
`Murphy-Jermaine: Wilson
`In care of 3282 Meadow Grove Avenue
`Zachary, Louisiana 70791
`
`
`
`/s/ Madison M. Tucker
`Madison M. Tucker
`Counsel for Defendant
`Equifax Information Services LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`88908187v.1
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
