throbber

`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 48
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
`(Southern Division)
`
`
`AMY SNYDER, Derivatively on Behalf of
`NOVAVAX, INC.,
`2632 Tunlaw Road NW #107
`Washington, D.C. 20007
`
`
`
`
`Case No.:
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`STANLEY C. ERCK
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`JOHN J. TRIZZINO
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`GREGORY M. GLENN
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`JOHN A. HERRMANN III
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`GREGG H. ALTON
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`RICHARD H. DOUGLAS
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`MARGARET G. MCGLYNN
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`DAVID M. MOTT
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 2 of 48
`
`
`
`
`RACHEL K. KING
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`MICHAEL A. MCMANUS, JR.
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`JAMES F. YOUNG
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`GARY C. EVANS
`5128 Horseshoe Trail
`Dallas, TX 75209
`
`
`
`Defendants,
`
`
`and
`
`NOVAVAX, INC.
`21 Firstfield Road
`Gaithersburg, MD 20878
`
`
`
`Nominal Defendant
`
`
`VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Amy Snyder (“Plaintiff”), by and through her undersigned attorneys, brings this
`
`stockholder derivative complaint for the benefit of Nominal Defendant, Novavax Inc. (“Novavax”
`
`or the “Company”), against its current and a former member of its Board of Directors (the
`
`“Board”) to remedy their breaches of fiduciary duties for insider trading (Brophy claim), failing
`
`to adequately oversee the Company’s mission-critical compliance with manufacturing safety
`
`regulations (Caremark claim), and unjust enrichment. Plaintiff’s allegations are based upon her
`
`personal knowledge as to herself and her own acts, and upon information and belief, developed
`
`from the investigation and analysis by Plaintiff’s counsel, including a review of publicly available
`
`information such as filings by Novavax with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 3 of 48
`
`
`
`(“SEC”), press releases, news reports, analyst reports, investor conference transcripts, publicly
`
`available filings in lawsuits, and matters of public record, and books and records produced in
`
`response to Plaintiff’s books and records demand pursuant to 8 Del. C. § 220 (the “220 Demand”).
`
`All such books and records are expressly incorporated into this Complaint. For the avoidance of
`
`doubt, this incorporation by reference does not change the pleading standard applicable to any
`
`motion to dismiss that may be filed in this case.
`
`I.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff brings this stockholder derivative action on behalf of Novavax against the
`
`Company’s directors and certain of its current and former executive officers for wrongfully selling
`
`the Company’s stock based on adverse material non-public information (“MNPI”). The Board
`
`also failed to adequately oversee the Company’s mission-critical compliance with manufacturing
`
`safety regulations and protocols. This misconduct has damaged the Company and gives rise to
`
`claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.
`
`2.
`
`Novavax purports to be a late-stage biotechnology company that promotes global
`
`health through the discovery, development, and commercialization of innovative vaccines to
`
`prevent serious infectious diseases. The Company’s product candidates include, among others,
`
`NVX-CoV2373, which is in development as a vaccine for COVID-19. Novavax planned to
`
`complete Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) submissions for NVX-CoV2373 with the U.S.
`
`Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in the second quarter of 2021.
`
`3.
`
`During 2021, directors and certain executive officers of the Company made
`
`materially false and misleading statements regarding NVX-CoV2373’s development while selling
`
`Novavax stock at artificially inflated prices. Defendants kept the Company’s stock price inflated
`
`by materially misleading the public about when the Company actually planned to complete EUA
`
`submission and the true reasons for the delays in completing EUA submission.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 4 of 48
`
`
`
`4.
`
`Specifically, Defendants misled investors about the vaccine’s purported successful
`
`development, production, and imminent FDA approval. In reality, Novavax’s vaccine was
`
`nowhere close to being approved for use: (a) because the vaccine’s purity and potency numbers
`
`fell well below FDA safety requirements as a result of severe manufacturing problems; (b) because
`
`of the failure to manufacture the vaccine at scale; and (c) because of supply chain disruptions—all
`
`of which caused significant delays that jeopardized any chance Novavax had to capitalize on the
`
`market for COVID-19 vaccines.
`
`5.
`
`Contract development manufacturing organizations (“CDMOs”) are companies
`
`that provide drug development and drug manufacturing services in the pharmaceutical industry on
`
`a contract basis. The Company uses CDMOs to assist in manufacturing NVX-CoV2373. The
`
`Company is responsible for the conditions of the CDMOs’ facilities. The Board failed to
`
`adequately oversee the Company’s mission-critical compliance with manufacturing safety
`
`regulations at its CDMOs’ facilities.
`
`6.
`
`The Board’s failures were not fully revealed until October 19, 2021, when Politico
`
`published an article entitled ‘They rushed the process’: Vaccine maker’s woes hamper global
`
`inoculation campaign.1 The Politico article cited sources stating that Novavax’s “issues are more
`
`concerning than previously understood” and that the Company could take until the end of 2022 to
`
`resolve its manufacturing issues and win regulatory authorizations and approvals.
`
`
`1 Sarah Owermohle, Erin Banco and Adam Cancryn, ‘They rushed the process’: Vaccine
`maker’s woes hamper global inoculation campaign, Politico (Oct. 19, 2021),
`https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/19/novavax-vaccine-rush-process-global-campaign-
`516298.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 5 of 48
`
`
`
`7.
`
`These revelations precipitated the filing of a securities class action in this District
`
`against Novavax and certain of the defendants named herein, captioned Sinnathurai v. Novavax,
`
`Inc., et al., Case No. 8:21-cv-02910 (the “Securities Fraud Class Action”).
`
`8.
`
`On March 4, 2022, Plaintiff served her 220 Demand on the Company seeking to
`
`inspect the Company’s books and records related to Board and management knowledge and/or
`
`oversight of the Company’s compliance with manufacturing protocols and their knowledge of
`
`MNPI concerning the same, including their relation to regulatory approval of Novavax’s COVID-
`
`19 vaccine candidate, NVX-CoV2373. Following negotiations and entry into a confidentiality
`
`agreement, the Company produced over 2,300 pages of internal documents.
`
`9.
`
`Premised on the information produced in response to the 220 Demand, Plaintiff
`
`did not make a litigation demand prior to filing suit because making a demand would be a futile
`
`and useless act.
`
`10.
`
`At least half of the Company’s current Board could not give disinterested and
`
`independent consideration to a litigation demand because four of the eight current directors
`
`engaged in insider trading on the basis of MNPI in breach of their duty of loyalty and were thus
`
`unjustly enriched; because at least four of the eight current directors knew or should have known
`
`of the grossly deficient manufacturing controls and procedures, yet allowed misleading statements
`
`to be disseminated; and because the entire Board failed to oversee manufacturing controls and
`
`compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”). As a result, at least half of
`
`the Board is unable to impartially consider whether to bring the claims asserted in this action.
`
`II.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`11.
`
`The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the
`
`matter in controversy exceeds the sum of $75,000 and there is complete diversity of citizenship
`
`between Plaintiff and all of the Defendants.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 6 of 48
`
`
`
`12.
`
`This derivative action is not a collusive action to confer jurisdiction on a court of
`
`the United States that would not otherwise have such jurisdiction.
`
`13.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1401 because a
`
`substantial portion of the transactions and wrongs complained of herein occurred in this District,
`
`the Company’s principal place of business is in this District, and the Defendants have received
`
`substantial compensation in this District by engaging in numerous activities that had an effect in
`
`this District.
`
`III.
`
`PARTIES
`
`Plaintiff
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff Amy Snyder purchased shares of Novavax stock on July 20, 2020 and has
`
`continuously owned her Novavax stock since that date. She is a citizen of Washington, D.C.
`
`Nominal Defendant
`
`15.
`
`Nominal Defendant Novavax is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive
`
`offices in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq under the
`
`symbol “NVAX.” The Company is a citizen of Delaware and Maryland
`
`Defendants
`
`16.
`
`Defendant Stanley C. Erck (“Erck”) has served as Chief Executive Officer
`
`(“CEO”) and President since 2011 and as a director of the Company since 2009. He is named as
`
`a defendant in the Securities Fraud Class Action. Erck received $2,771,685 in total compensation
`
`from the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017; $4,158,398 in total compensation
`
`from the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018; $2,438,562 in total compensation
`
`from the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019; and $48,086,018 in total
`
`compensation from the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Between 2017 and
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 7 of 48
`
`
`
`2020, Erck’s publicly reported income from sources other than the Company was approximately
`
`$350,000. Erck is a citizen of South Carolina.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant John J. Trizzino (“Trizzino”) has served as the Company’s Chief
`
`Business Officer since March 2018, Chief Commercial Officer since November 2020, and an
`
`Executive Vice President of the Company since June 2020. He served as Interim CFO from April
`
`12, 2021 to August 16, 2021. He is named as a defendant in the Securities Fraud Class Action.
`
`Trizzino is a citizen of Massachusetts.
`
`18.
`
`Defendant Gregory M. Glenn (“Glenn”) has served as the Company’s President,
`
`Research and Development since March 2016. He is named as a defendant in the Securities Fraud
`
`Class Action. Glenn is a citizen of Maryland.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant John A. Herrmann III (“Hermann”) has served as Executive Vice
`
`President and Chief Legal Officer since June 2020 and Corporate Secretary since April 2010. He
`
`served as Senior Vice President from June 2014 until June 2020, as General Counsel from March
`
`2012 until June 2020, and as Executive Director, Legal Affairs from April 2010 until March 2012.
`
`Hermann is a citizen of Maryland.
`
`20.
`
`Defendant Gregg H. Alton (“Alton”) has served as a director of Novavax since
`
`November 2020. Alton is a citizen of California.
`
`21.
`
`Defendant Richard H. Douglas (“Douglas”) has served as a director of Novavax
`
`since 2010. He is a member of the Board’s Research and Development Committee (the “R&D
`
`Committee”). Douglas is a citizen of Florida.
`
`22.
`
`Defendant Margaret G. McGlynn (“McGlynn”) has served as a director of
`
`Novavax since December 2020. McGlynn is a citizen of Pennsylvania.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 8 of 48
`
`
`
`23.
`
`Defendant David M. Mott (“Mott”) has served as a director of Novavax since June
`
`2020. He is a member of the R&D Committee. Mott received $727,332 in total compensation from
`
`the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Mott is a citizen of Maryland.
`
`24.
`
`Defendant Rachel K. King (“King”) has served as a director of Novavax since
`
`2018. King is a citizen of Maryland.
`
`25.
`
`Defendant Michael A. McManus, Jr. (“McManus”) has served as a director of
`
`Novavax since 1998. McManus received $246,512 in total compensation from the Company for
`
`the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017; $241,678 in total compensation from the Company for
`
`the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018; $134,296 in total compensation from the Company for
`
`the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019; and $876,252 in total compensation from the Company
`
`for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. McManus’s compensation from the Company
`
`comprised substantially all of his publicly reported income for 2020. McManus is a citizen of New
`
`York.
`
`26.
`
`Defendant James F. Young (“Young”) has served as a director of Novavax since
`
`2010 and as Chairman of the Board since 2011. He is the Chair of the R&D Committee. Young
`
`received $533,780 in total compensation from the Company for the fiscal year ended December
`
`31, 2017; $471,715 in total compensation from the Company for the fiscal year ended December
`
`31, 2018; $223,741 in total compensation from the Company for the fiscal year ended December
`
`31, 2019; and $4,387,708 in total compensation from the Company for the fiscal year ended
`
`December 31, 2020. His compensation from the Company accounts for substantially all of his
`
`publicly reported income. Young is a citizen of Maryland.
`
`27.
`
`Defendant Gary C. Evans (“Evans”) served as a director of Novavax from 1998 to
`
`June 2021. Evans is a citizen of Texas.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 9 of 48
`
`
`
`28.
`
`Defendants Erck, Trizzino, Glenn, Herrmann, Alton, Douglas, McGlynn, Mott,
`
`King, McManus, Young, and Evans are sometimes referred to hereinafter as the “Defendants.”
`
`IV.
`
`THE DUTIES OF THE DEFENDANTS
`A.
`
`Fiduciary Duties
`
`29.
`
`By reason of their positions as directors, officers and/or fiduciaries of Novavax and
`
`because of their ability to control the business and corporate affairs of Novavax, at all relevant
`
`times, Defendants owed Novavax and its stockholders fiduciary obligations of good faith, loyalty,
`
`and candor, and were required to use their utmost ability to control and manage Novavax in a fair,
`
`just, honest, and equitable manner. Defendants were required to act in furtherance of the best
`
`interests of Novavax and its stockholders so as to benefit all stockholders equally and not in
`
`furtherance of their own personal interest or benefit. Each director and officer of the Company
`
`owes to Novavax and its stockholders fiduciary duties to exercise loyalty, good faith and diligence
`
`in the administration of the affairs of the Company and in the use and preservation of its property
`
`and assets, and the highest obligations of fair dealing.
`
`30.
`
`Because of their positions of control and authority as directors and/or officers of
`
`Novavax, Defendants were able to and did, directly and/or indirectly, exercise control over the
`
`wrongful acts complained of herein. Because of their advisory, executive, managerial, and
`
`directorial positions with Novavax, each of the Defendants had knowledge of MNPI regarding the
`
`Company.
`
`31.
`
`To discharge their duties, Defendants were required to exercise reasonable and
`
`prudent supervision over the management, policies, practices and controls of the Company. By
`
`virtue of such duties, Defendants were required to, among other things:
`
`(a)
`
`Exercise good faith to ensure that the affairs of the Company were
`conducted in an efficient, business-like manner so as to make it possible to
`provide the highest quality performance of their business;
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 10 of 48
`
`
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`Exercise good faith to ensure that the Company was operated in a diligent,
`honest, and prudent manner and complied with all applicable federal and
`state laws, rules, regulations and requirements, and all contractual
`obligations, including acting only within the scope of its legal authority;
`
`Exercise good faith to ensure that the Company’s communications with the
`public and with stockholders are made with due candor in a timely and
`complete fashion; and
`
`(d) When put on notice of problems with the Company’s business practices and
`operations, exercise good faith in taking appropriate action to correct the
`misconduct and prevent its recurrence.
`
`The Board Committee Charters
`
`At all relevant times, the Board had four standing committees: (i) the Audit
`
`B.
`
`32.
`
`Committee; (ii) the Compensation Committee; (iii) the Nominating & Corporate Governance
`
`Committee, and (iv) the R&D Committee.
`
`33.
`
`The Audit Committee is tasked to assist the Board with overseeing: (i) “the
`
`Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes;” (ii) “the preparation, presentation and
`
`integrity of the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to any
`
`government or regulatory body, the public or other users thereof;” (iii) “the adequacy and efficacy
`
`of the Company’s systems of internal accounting, auditing and financial controls, the Company’s
`
`compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;” (iv) “the conduct, independence and
`
`qualifications of the Company’s independent auditor;” (v) “the performance of the annual
`
`independent audit of the Company’s financial statements;” (vi) “the Company’s compliance with
`
`applicable federal and state laws and regulations;” and (vii) “the implementation and operation of
`
`the Company’s corporate compliance program.”2 The words “manufacturing,” “safety,” “CDMO”
`
`or “cGMPs” do not appear in the Audit Committee Charter. The word “quality” appears in the
`
`
`2 See Novavax Fifth Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter (the “Audit Committee
`Charter”), https://novavax.widen.net/s/l55pc2vqpx/audit_committee_charter_20210916.
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 11 of 48
`
`
`
`Audit Committee Charter only in the context of evaluating the Company’s principal auditors and
`
`not in the context of the Company’s products.
`
`34.
`
`The Compensation Committee is tasked with assisting the Board “with its
`
`responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s officers and directors and the
`
`development, administration, and oversight of the Company’s compensation and benefits plans.”3
`
`The words “manufacturing,” “quality,” “safety,” “CDMO,” or “cGMPs” do not appear in the
`
`Compensation Committee Charter.
`
`35.
`
`The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is tasked with assisting the
`
`Board with its oversight responsibilities by: (i) “reviewing and making recommendations to the
`
`Board regarding the Board’s size, structure and composition; establishing criteria for Board
`
`membership;” (ii) “identifying and evaluating candidates qualified to become members of the
`
`Board, including candidates proposed by stockholders;” (iii) “recommending to the Board for
`
`selection of director nominees to be presented for approval at the annual meeting of stockholders
`
`and to fill vacancies on the Board;” (iv) “considering the qualifications, tenure, and performance
`
`of incumbent members of the Board in determining whether to recommend that they be nominated
`
`for reelection;” (v) “evaluating Company policies relating to the recruitment of Board members;
`
`(vi) “developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance policies and practices
`
`applicable to the Company; (vii) “overseeing policies and practices with respect to corporate social
`
`responsibility and environmental sustainability applicable to the Company;” and (viii) “overseeing
`
`management’s plans for succession to senior management positions in the Company.”4 The words
`
`
`3 See Novavax Seventh Amended and Restated Compensation Committee Charter (the
`“Compensation Committee Charter”),
`https://novavax.widen.net/s/t6mhrp96wq/compensation_committee_charter_20211209
`4 See Novavax Fifth Amended and Restated Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
`“Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter”),
`Charter
`(the
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 12 of 48
`
`
`
`“manufacturing,” “quality,” “safety,” “CDMO,” or “cGMPs” do not appear in the Compensation
`
`Committee Charter.
`
`36.
`
`The R&D Committee’s “primary purpose” is to assist the Board “in reviewing and
`
`assessing the Company’s research and development (‘R&D’) programs, and overseeing the
`
`Company’s strategy and investment in R&D programs, and to perform such other functions as may
`
`be deemed necessary or appropriate in carrying out the foregoing.”5 The R&D Committee Charter
`
`charges the R&D Committee with the following specific responsibilities:6
`
`1.
`Review and assess the Company’s R&D programs, with the
`Committee Chair playing a day-to-day role providing input on key
`aspects of such R&D programs;
`
`Evaluate the Company’s progress in achieving R&D goals and
`2.
`objectives, and make recommendations to the Board on modifications to
`the Company’s R&D goals and objectives;
`
`3.
`Advise the Board on the scientific and R&D aspects of licensing,
`strategic partnerships, and acquisition or divestiture transactions;
`
`Review and assess the Company’s intellectual property portfolio
`4.
`and strategy;
`
`5.
`
`Review the Company’s regulatory efforts and strategy;
`
`6.
`Oversight of management’s exercise of its responsibility to assess
`and manage risks associated with the Company’s R&D programs and
`regulatory matters;
`
`Identify and report to the Board on significant emerging science
`7.
`and technology issues and trends that may impact the Company;
`
`
`https://novavax.widen.net/s/kzkjssfttq/nominating_and_corporate_governance_committee_charte
`r_20211209.
`5 See Novavax Research and Development Committee Charter (the “R&D Committee Charter”),
`https://novavax.widen.net/s/xhr5zwxgqm/research_and_development_committee_charter_20201
`214.
`6 Id. Unless otherwise stated, all emphasis in bold and italics hereinafter is added.
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 13 of 48
`
`
`
`Serve as a resource for management to consult on any such topics
`8.
`regarding scientific and regulatory matters as reasonably requested; and
`
`Select, retain, and supervise any advisors as the Committee deems
`9.
`necessary, in its discretion, to fulfill its mandates under this Charter, and
`compensate, at the expense of the Company, such advisors.
`
`The R&D Committee Charter does not contain the words “manufacturing,” “quality,” “safety,”
`
`“CDMO,” or “cGMPs.”
`
`37.
`
`Accordingly, not one of the Company’s four Board committees is directly charged
`
`with assisting the Board in overseeing the Company’s manufacturing organization and operations;
`
`its compliance with cGMPs (i.e., Current Good Manufacturing Practices); quality or safety
`
`assurance; or the use of CDMOs.
`
`38.
`
`Exacerbating the lack of oversight, Novavax has been a public company for decades
`
`and has long described itself as a “biopharmaceutical company engaged in the research,
`
`development and commercialization” of pharmaceutical products, yet the Board did not establish
`
`the R&D Committee until December 2020.7 According to the Company’s proxy statement filed
`
`May 2, 2022, the R&D Committee had met only one time during 2021.
`
`V.
`
`SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
`A.
`
`Background
`
`39.
`
`Novavax is a late-stage biotechnology company that purports to promote
`
`“improved global health through the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative
`
`vaccines to prevent serious infectious diseases and address urgent, global health needs.”8
`
`
`7 Novavax, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Mar. 29, 2001) at 2.
`8 Novavax, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Mar. 1, 2021) at 5.
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 14 of 48
`
`
`
`40.
`
`In the past, the Company has attempted to develop vaccines for HIV, SARS, swine
`
`flu, and the Ebola virus. Each candidate either failed in testing or became obsolete as the epidemics
`
`ebbed.
`
`41.
`
`Amid substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
`
`Novavax sold its manufacturing facilities for approximately $18 million in mid-2019 to stem its
`
`financial losses. As a result of the transactions and related attrition, the Company reduced its
`
`headcount by more than 200 employees.
`
`42.
`
`As of March 2020, Novavax had only 127 employees engaged primarily in
`
`research, development and manufacturing activities. The Company was at risk of being delisted
`
`from the Nasdaq stock exchange as its stock traded under $4 per share and had barely enough cash
`
`to survive another six months.
`
`1.
`
`COVID-19 Gives the Company a Lifeline
`
`43.
`
`In late 2019 and early 2020, a novel respiratory coronavirus – COVID-19 – sparked
`
`a once-a-century global pandemic.
`
`44.
`
`Although the Company had never successfully brought a vaccine to market in its
`
`35 year history, the Company announced its intention to develop a COVID-19 vaccine on February
`
`26, 2020.
`
`45.
`
`On March 10, 2020, Novavax received $4 million in funding from the Coalition for
`
`Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, a global partnership among organizations to accelerate the
`
`development of vaccines for emerging infectious diseases.
`
`46.
`
`On April 8, 2020, Novavax announced that it would initiate a first-in-human trial
`
`in mid-May for its coronavirus vaccine candidate, NVX-CoV2373, a stable, prefusion protein
`
`created using the Company’s proprietary technology.
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 15 of 48
`
`
`
`47.
`
`The development and success of NVX-CoV2373 was critical for the Company. As
`
`one analyst, CFRA, noted, “the future financial success of [Novavax] and its ability to record a
`
`positive bottom-line result
`
`is highly dependent on successful approvals and rapid
`
`commercialization of its COVID-19 vaccine.”
`
`2.
`
`The U.S. Government Gives the Company Over $1.6 Billion to Develop
`its Vaccine Candidate
`
`48.
`
`On June 4, 2020, Novavax announced that it was awarded up to $60 million by the
`
`U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) for the production of “several components” of its COVID-
`
`19 vaccine candidate, including “a 2020 delivery of 10 million doses of NVX-CoV2373 for DoD
`
`that could be used in Phase 2/3 clinical trials or under” emergency regulatory approval.9 To that
`
`end, Novavax would work with one or more CDMOs “to manufacture the antigen component of
`
`NVX-CoV2373 for at least 10 million doses of vaccine” and scale up production.
`
`49.
`
`On July 7, 2020, Novavax announced that it was selected to participate in Operation
`
`Warp Speed (“OWS”), the U.S. government’s $10 billion effort to develop and deliver a COVID-
`
`19 vaccine. Specifically, the Company was “awarded $1.6 billion by the federal government to
`
`complete late-stage clinical development, including a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial; establish large-
`
`scale manufacturing; and deliver 100 million doses of NVX-CoV2373… as early as late 2020.”10
`
`As a condition of the award, Novavax was required to demonstrate it could scale up manufacturing
`
`the vaccine candidate.
`
`
`9 See https://ir.novavax.com/2020-06-04-Novavax-Awarded-Department-of-Defense-Contract-
`for-COVID-19-Vaccine.
`10 See https://ir.novavax.com/2020-07-07-Novavax-Announces-1-6-Billion-Funding-from-
`Operation-Warp-Speed.
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 16 of 48
`
`
`
`B.
`
`Novavax Expands its Manufacturing Capabilities and Anticipates Seeking
`Regulatory Approval of its COVID-19 Vaccine by Second Quarter 2021
`
`50.
`
`Having sold its own manufacturing facilities in 2019 to alleviate its cash crunch, on
`
`July 23, 2020, Novavax announced that it had entered into an agreement with a CDMO, Fujifilm
`
`Diosynth Biotechnologies (“FDB”), to manufacture bulk drug substance for NVX-CoV2373. In
`
`fact, FDB’s North Carolina site had already begun production of the first batch, which would be
`
`“utilized in a future pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of up to 30,000 subjects which is expected to
`
`begin in the fall of 2020 and which will determine the safety and efficacy of NVX-CoV2373.”11
`
`As Defendant Trizzino later acknowledged, the “antigen produced at the Fuji sites in North
`
`Carolina and Texas are a critical component of our US supply chain.”12
`
`51.
`
`On November 9, 2020, Novavax announced that the FDA had granted “Fast Track
`
`Designation for NVX-CoV2373.”13 Such designation is the FDA’s procedure to “facilitate the
`
`development and expedite the review of drugs to treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical
`
`need.”14
`
`52.
`
`On February 4, 2021, Novavax announced that it had begun the rolling review for
`
`authorization of NVX-CoV2373 by multiple regulatory agencies, which was contingent on the
`
`pivotal Phase 3 trials. Later that month, the Company completed enrollment of PREVENT-19, its
`
`Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373.
`
`
`11 See https://ir.novavax.com/2020-07-23-Novavax-and-FUJIFILM-Diosynth-Biotechnologies-
`Initiate-Large-Scale-Manufacturing-of-COVID-19-Vaccine-Candidate.
`12 Testimony of John Trizzino at the Hearing on “Pathway to Protection: Expanding Availability
`of COVID-19 Vaccines” on February 23, 2021 before the House Subcommittee on Oversight and
`Investigations, available at https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF02/20210223/111226/HHRG-
`117-IF02-Wstate-TrizzinoJ-20210223.pdf
`13 See https://ir.novavax.com/2020-11-09-Novavax-COVID-19-Vaccine-Granted-Fast-Track-
`Designation-by-U-S-FDA.
`14 Id.
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 17 of 48
`
`
`
`53.
`
` On March 1, 2021, Novavax filed with the SEC its annual report on Form 10-K
`
`for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the “2020 10-K”), which disclosed that the Company
`
`planned “to file submissions for Emergency Use Authorization (‘EUA’) with the FDA and
`
`expect[ed] to complete [its] EUA filing in the second quarter of 2021.”15 With respect to the
`
`manufacturing of NVX-CoV2373, the Company stated in the 2020 10-K that it had “secured
`
`fill/finish activities for NVX-CoV2373 at several sites globally.”16 The Company cited to “various
`
`manufacturing partnerships,” announcing a “projected global manufacturing production rate of
`
`NVXCoV2373” of more than 2 billion doses annually once manufacturing was at full capacity,
`
`which Novavax expected “to occur in mid-2021.”17
`
`54.
`
`The same day, the Company issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter
`
`and full year 2020 results, which confirmed the statements made in the 2020 10-K. In addition to
`
`reiterating projected global manufacturing capacity of more than 2 billion annualized doses by
`
`mid-2021, the press release noted that the Company had “[e]ngaged in ongoing dialogue with [the
`
`FDA]…with potential for EUA filing in the second quarter of 2021.”18 The press release also
`
`quoted Erck, who stated that “Novavax continues to make significant strides towards bringing
`
`NVX-CoV2373, our Covid-19 vaccine candidate, to market.”19 Erck also touted various attributes
`
`of the vaccine that would purportedly “support emergency use authorization.”20
`
`
`15 Novavax 2020 10-K at 9.
`16 Id. at 55.
`17 Id. at 10.
`18 Press Release, Novavax Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Financial Results and
`Operational Highlights (Mar. 1, 2021), https://ir.novavax.com/2021-03-01-Novavax-Reports-
`Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2020-Financial-Results-and-Operational-Highlights.
`19 Id.
`20 Id.
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 8:22-cv-01415-PX Document 1 Filed 06/10/22 Page 18 of 48
`
`
`
`C.
`
`The Company’s Quality Controls Were Gravely Deficient
`1.
`
`Novavax Was Required to Adhere to the FDA’s Strict Manufacturing
`Regulations
`
`55.
`
` Vaccine

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket