throbber
Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 13
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
`BOSTON DIVISION
`
`
`Case No.:
`
`In Admiralty
`
`|
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`PATRIOT MARINE, LLC,
`|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`________________________________________________|
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`Plaintiff United States of America alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This action is brought by the United States in accordance with the Oil
`
`Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2761, to recover removal costs
`
`arising from the clean-up and removal of oil discharged by the M/V OCEAN KING into
`
`the waters of Great Harbor, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, on or about January 20-21,
`
`2018.
`
`2.
`
`Federal oil spill removal actions may be financed through the Oil Spill
`
`Liability Trust Fund (the Fund). See 26 U.S.C. §§ 4611 and 9509. Under OPA Section
`
`1012(a), 33 U.S.C. § 2712(a), the Fund can be used, inter alia, for the payment of federal
`
`and state removal costs; certain claims against the Fund related to uncompensated
`
`removal costs; and certain federal administrative, operational and personnel costs and
`
`expenses under OPA. As will be shown, the Fund was used to pay for the removal of oil
`
`from the navigable waters of Great Harbor following the oil spill.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 13
`
`3.
`
`The United States also seeks a declaratory judgment on liability for
`
`removal costs and damages against the Defendant, pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment
`
`Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a), and OPA Sections 1002(a), 1005, 1015, and 1017(f)(2), 33
`
`U.S.C. §§ 2702(a), 2705, 2715, and 2717(f)(2), that is binding in this action and will be
`
`binding on any subsequent action or actions against the Defendant, for all removal costs,
`
`natural resource damages, and interest resulting from the oil spill.
`
`4. With respect to natural resource damages, the United States seeks a
`
`declaratory judgment under Section 1017(f)(2) that addresses only the elements of
`
`liability under Section 1002(a) of OPA that apply in common with liability for removal
`
`costs and liability for natural resource damages. The United States is not seeking an
`
`award of natural resource damages in this action, nor is it seeking declaratory judgment
`
`on what injury, destruction, or loss of natural resources has occurred as a result of the
`
`unlawful discharge of oil by the Defendant. Any such injury to, destruction of, or loss of
`
`natural resources and the damages that should be awarded are reserved for determination
`
`in a subsequent action or actions under Sections 1015(c) and 1017(f) of OPA, 33 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 2715(c), 2717(f).
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and over the parties
`
`pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 2717(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1333 and 1345.
`
`6.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 33
`
`U.S.C. § 2717(b).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 3 of 13
`
`7.
`
`Authority to bring this action is vested in the United States Department of
`
`Justice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 516 and 519.
`
`8.
`
`This action includes an admiralty and maritime claim against the
`
`Defendant, within the meaning of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`PARTIES
`
`9.
`
`Defendant Patriot Marine, LLC (“Patriot Marine”) is a limited liability
`
`company that was organized in Massachusetts in 2005. The company is engaged in
`
`marine construction and dredging. At the time of the matters at issue in this complaint,
`
`Patriot Marine had a place of business at 550 Pleasant Street, Suite 104, Winthrop,
`
`Massachusetts, 02152, and was doing business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
`
`and within the jurisdiction of this Court through, inter alia, the ownership and operation
`
`of the towboat M/V OCEAN KING.
`
`10.
`
`In February of 2019, Patriot Marine reorganized and changed the location
`
`of its principal office from Winthrop, Massachusetts to New Haven, Connecticut. Patriot
`
`Marine’s current principal office is located at 2 Poplar Street, New Haven, Connecticut,
`
`06513. Patriot Marine also maintains corporate records at 256 Marginal Street, East
`
`Boston, MA, 02128.
`
`11.
`
`The M/V OCEAN KING, Official Number 259410, is a 199 gross register
`
`ton, 95 foot long, commercial towing vessel, built in 1950. Patriot Marine purchased this
`
`towing vessel in 2011.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 4 of 13
`
`12. At all material times, the M/V OCEAN KING was owned and operated by
`
`Patriot Marine, and was, at all material times, within the jurisdiction of this Court with
`
`respect to the matters alleged in this Complaint.
`
`STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND
`
`13. OPA Section 1002(a), 33 U.S.C. § 2702(a), provides that:
`
`“Notwithstanding any other provision or rule of law, and subject to the provisions of this
`
`Act, each responsible party for a vessel or a facility from which oil is discharged, or
`
`which poses the substantial threat of a discharge of oil, into or upon the navigable waters
`
`or adjoining shorelines or the exclusive economic zone is liable for the removal costs and
`
`damages specified in subsection (b) that result from such incident.”
`
`14. At all material times, the M/V OCEAN KING was a “vessel” within the
`
`meaning of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701(37).
`
`15. Under OPA Section 1017(f)(2), 33 U.S.C. § 2717(f)(2), in any action for
`
`recovery of removal costs referred to in OPA Section 2702(b)(1), 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)(1),
`
`the court shall enter a declaratory judgment on liability for removal costs or damages that
`
`shall be binding on any subsequent action or actions to recover further removal costs or
`
`damages.
`
`16. OPA Section 1002(b)(2), 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b), provides that the “damages”
`
`referred to in Section 1002(a) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(a), include damages for injury
`
`to, destruction of, or loss of, or loss of use of, natural resources.
`
`17. OPA Section 1001(20), 33 U.S.C. § 2701(20), provides that “‘natural
`
`resources’ includes land, fish, wildlife, biota, air, water, ground water, drinking water
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 5 of 13
`
`supplies, and other such resources belonging to, managed by, held in trust by,
`
`appertaining to, or otherwise controlled by the United States (including the resources of
`
`the exclusive economic zone), any State or local government or Indian tribe, or any
`
`foreign government.”
`
`18. Under OPA Section 1006, 33 U.S.C. § 2706, liability for natural resource
`
`damages shall be to the United States and/or a State for natural resources belonging to,
`
`managed by, controlled by, or appertaining to the United States and/or a State.
`
`19.
`
`The United States is involved in the ongoing work of, and incurring costs
`
`related to, assessing injury, destruction, loss, or loss of use of natural resources belonging
`
`to, managed by, controlled by, or appertaining to the United States resulting from the
`
`unlawful discharge of oil from the M/V OCEAN KING.
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`20. On January 20, 2018, the M/V OCEAN KING sustained hull damage when
`
`it ran aground in Sequetucket Harbor in Harwich, Massachusetts. After the grounding,
`
`the M/V OCEAN KING transited from Harwich to Woods Hole, Massachusetts, where it
`
`moored at the Woods Hole town dock.
`
`21.
`
`In the morning of January 21, 2018, the M/V OCEAN KING departed
`
`Woods Hole. Several hours later, the Coast Guard’s National Response Center received
`
`a report from a private citizen of a 100 yard by 100 yard sheen, which smelled of motor
`
`oil, in the water and on the rocks in Great Harbor, Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Later
`
`that day, personnel from the Coast Guard’s Marine Safety Detachment Cape Cod arrived
`
`on scene to conduct a preliminary assessment and collect oil samples from the spill.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 6 of 13
`
`22. Because no responsible party was found on-scene, Cape Waterman Inc.,
`
`d/b/a Sea Tow Cape and Islands (“Sea Tow”), was authorized to commence clean-up
`
`operations, which began on January 21. Sea Tow continued as the primary responder for
`
`clean-up operations in Woods Hole from January 21 until February 15, 2018.
`
`23.
`
`The oil spill, which spread out from the M/V OCEAN KING on the surface
`
`of the water, impacted approximately two miles of shoreline within Great Harbor, up to
`
`the high tide line.
`
`24. While the clean-up was ongoing, the Coast Guard investigated the spill and
`
`collected oil samples from the M/V OCEAN KING’S bilge water. The oil samples from
`
`the M/V OCEAN KING matched the oil samples from the January 2018 Woods Hole
`
`spill.
`
`25. On January 31, 2018, the Coast Guard issued a Notice of Designation to
`
`Patriot Marine, formally designating the M/V OCEAN KING as the source of the
`
`discharge.
`
`26. On February 9, 2018, the Coast Guard issued an Administrative Order
`
`directing Patriot Marine to dispose of waste materials associated with the clean-up, and
`
`opened Federal Project Number (FPN) B18003 to track associated disposal costs.
`
`27. On February 12, 2018, a Notice of Federal Assumption was issued to
`
`Patriot Marine. The Notice of Federal Assumption provided notice that the actions taken
`
`by Patriot Marine to abate or remove the oil were unsatisfactory to the Federal On-Scene
`
`Coordinator (FOSC), and that the government would assume partial response activities,
`
`including proper disposal of the materials used during the clean-up.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 7 of 13
`
`28. On February 14, 2018, George Chalos, an attorney for Patriot Marine, sent
`
`a letter to Sea Tow, stating “In accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 USC
`
`2714(c)), Patriot Marine LLC, as owner and operator of the Tug OCEAN KING, has
`
`voluntarily accepted responsibility for an accidental discharge of bilge water and oil into
`
`the Great Harbor on or about January 21, 2018. Claims for certain uncompensated
`
`damages and removal costs may be submitted to Patriot Marine LLC.”
`
`29. On February 15, 2018, pursuant to a contract with Clean Harbors
`
`Environmental Services (“Clean Harbors”), the Coast Guard had the oil contaminated
`
`materials properly disposed of.
`
`30. Over the course of the 26 day clean-up period, the Coast Guard incurred
`
`$17,545.74 in costs. These costs include use of the Coast Guard’s resources for
`
`monitoring clean-up activities, oil sampling and analysis, and contract fees associated
`
`with hiring Clean Harbors to dispose of oily waste materials. The Fund paid the total
`
`removal costs incurred by the Coast Guard.
`
`31.
`
`Sea Tow presented a request for compensation for removal costs related to
`
`the incident to Patriot Marine as the Responsible Party. However, Patriot Marine never
`
`paid the costs or otherwise settled Sea Tow’s claim.
`
`32. On July 20, 2018, Sea Tow sent a claim to the National Pollution Funds
`
`Center (“NPFC”) in the amount of $1,088,560.25 for uncompensated removal costs. This
`
`claim was received by the NPFC on July 30, 2018.
`
`33. On February 1, 2019, the Fund paid Sea Tow $1,004,001.35 as full
`
`compensation for its claim, denying $84,558.90 as non-compensable costs.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 8 of 13
`
`34.
`
`The Fund’s oil spill removal costs are as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Coast Guard contract with Clean Harbors $15,263.00
`Coast Guard equipment
`
`
`
` $2.24
`Coast Guard personnel
`
`
` $1,254.50
`Marine Safety lab
`
`
`
` $1,026.00
`Sea Tow claim
`
`
`
`$1,004,001.35
`
`Total:
`
`
`
`$1,021,547.09
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`35. On May 15, 2019, the NPFC sent a Notice of Potential Liability (NOPL)
`
`letter to Patriot Marine, stating that Patriot Marine was responsible for the M/V OCEAN
`
`KING pollution incident.
`
`36. On July 11, 2019, the NPFC sent Patriot Marine an invoice with a due date
`
`of August 10, 2019.
`
`37. As of this date, Patriot Marine has not reimbursed the NPFC for the oil spill
`
`removal costs incurred as a result of the M/V OCEAN KING’s release of oil into the
`
`navigable waters of Great Harbor.
`
`38.
`
`The United States has also incurred and continues to incur natural resource
`
`damages, and the cost of assessment of such damages.
`
`39.
`
`The United States’ assessment of natural resource damages to natural
`
`resources resulting from Defendant’s oil discharge is ongoing. Thus, the amount of
`
`damages sustained by the United States resulting from the unlawful discharge of oil from
`
`M/V OCEAN KING is not yet fully known.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 9 of 13
`
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990
`
`The United States incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 39 of this
`
`
`40.
`
`Complaint.
`
`41.
`
`Pursuant to OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., each responsible party for a
`
`vessel from which oil is discharged, or which poses the substantial threat of discharge,
`
`into or upon the navigable waters or adjoining shorelines or the exclusive economic zone
`
`of the United States, is strictly liable for all costs, damages, and/or disbursements
`
`specified in the Act.
`
`42. As owner and operator of the M/V OCEAN KING, Patriot Marine is
`
`strictly liable for the oil spill removal costs incurred by the United States through the
`
`NPFC.
`
`43.
`
`The NPFC incurred costs in the amount of $1,021,547.09 as a result of
`
`paying Sea Tow’s claim and reimbursing the Coast Guard for its clean-up expenses.
`
`44.
`
`The actions taken by the Coast Guard and Sea Tow were necessary to
`
`prevent, minimize or mitigate the effects of the M/V OCEAN KING oil spill. The clean-
`
`up actions were directed by the FOSC or determined to be consistent with the National
`
`Contingency Plan.
`
`45.
`
`Pursuant to OPA, and under the circumstances herein, the Defendant is
`
`liable to the United States, without limitation, for all the aforesaid costs, damages, and/or
`
`disbursements sustained by the United States as a result of the matters alleged in this
`
`Complaint. The United States’ unreimbursed removal costs to date are $1,021,547.09.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 10 of 13
`
`SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990
`
`46.
`
`The United States incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 45 of this
`
`
`
`Complaint.
`
`47.
`
`Pursuant to OPA, the Fund shall be subrogated to all rights, claims, and
`
`causes of action of claimants to whom it has paid compensation.
`
`48. As a result of the matters alleged in this Complaint, the Fund may incur
`
`costs, damages, and/or disbursements by reason of claims for removal costs and damages
`
`brought against it under OPA.
`
`49.
`
`Pursuant to OPA, and under the circumstances herein, the Defendant is
`
`liable to the United States, without limitation, for all such costs, damages, and/or
`
`disbursements which may be sustained by the Fund as a result of the matters alleged in
`
`this Complaint.
`
`THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990
`
`50.
`
`The United States incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 49 of this
`
`
`
`Complaint.
`
`51. At all times material herein, Defendant was the owner or operator of the
`
`M/V OCEAN KING and has been and remains a “responsible party” for a “vessel”
`
`within the meaning of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. The United States may sustain
`
`“damages,” as that term is defined in 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)(2), for, inter alia, injuries to,
`
`destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of natural resources.
`
`52. An actual controversy exists between the United States and the Defendant.
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 11 of 13
`
`53.
`
`Pursuant to OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2717(f)(2), the United States is entitled to,
`
`and hereby seek, a declaratory judgment that will be binding in any subsequent action or
`
`actions that the Defendant is liable for removal costs and for natural resource damages
`
`resulting from the discharge of oil from the M/V OCEAN KING.
`
`54. With respect to natural resource damages, the declaratory judgment to
`
`which the United States is entitled under Section 1017(f) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2717(f), as
`
`described in the immediately prior Paragraph, is a declaratory judgment on the elements
`
`of liability for removal costs that also apply to liability for natural resource damages.
`
`This partial declaratory judgement would not address what injury, destruction, loss of, or
`
`loss of use of, natural resources has occurred resulting from the M/V OCEAN KING oil
`
`spill. Any such injury to, destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of, natural resources and
`
`the damages that should be awarded are reserved for determination in a subsequent action
`
`or actions.
`
`
`REQUEST FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff United States of America respectfully requests that this
`
`
`
`Court:
`
`(1) Enter a judgment against the Defendant and in favor of the United States, in
`
`the amount of $1,021,547.09, plus all costs incurred by the United States by reason of
`
`this claim, including interest (including prejudgment interest), administrative costs, and
`
`attorney’s fees;
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 12 of 13
`
`(2) Enter a declaratory judgment, pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28
`
`U.S.C. § 2201(a), and the OPA Sections 1002(a), 1005, 1015, and 1017(f)(2), 33 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 2702(a), 2705, 2715, and 2717(f)(2), that Defendant is liable, without limitation, for
`
`all removal costs and damages, including any injury, destruction, loss of, or loss of use
`
`of, natural resources, including all reasonable assessment costs, shown in a subsequent
`
`action or actions to recover natural resource damages, resulting from the oil discharge
`
`from the M/V OCEAN KING, which will be binding on this action and on any
`
`subsequent action or actions to recover removal costs or damages; and
`
`(3) Grant such other relief as may be appropriate.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 12, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`BRIAN M. BOYNTON
`Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil
`Division
`
`/s/ Michelle T. Delemarre
`MICHELLE T. DELEMARRE
`Senior Admiralty Counsel
`United States Department of Justice
`Civil Division, Torts Branch
`Post Office Box 14271
`Washington, DC 20044-4271
`Telephone: (202) 616-4037
`Facsimile: (202) 616-4002
`Email: Michelle.delemarre@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-10243-NMG Document 1 Filed 02/12/21 Page 13 of 13
`
`ORLA M. BRADY
`Trial Attorney
`United States Department of Justice
`Civil Division, Torts Branch
`Post Office Box 14271
`Washington, DC 20044-4271
`Telephone: (202) 514-0372
`Facsimile: (202) 616-4002
`Email: Orla.M.Brady@usdoj.gov
`
`JEAN E. WILLIAMS
`Acting Assistant Attorney General,
`Environment & Natural Resources Division
`
`/s/ Anna Grace
`Anna Grace
`Trial Attorney
`United States Department of Justice
`Environment & Natural Resources Division
`Post Office Box 7611
`Ben Franklin Station
`Washington, D.C. 20010
`Phone: (202) 514-4091
`
`
`
`Attorneys for the United States
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`LCDR SHANNON PRICE
`National Pollution Funds Center, U.S. Coast Guard
`2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE
`Washington, DC 20593
`
`BRIAN JUDGE, Chief
`Office of Claims and Litigation (CG-LCL)
`U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters
`2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave, SE, Stop 7213
`Washington, DC 20593-7213
`
`BRIANNA C. KENNY
`Office of the Solicitor, Northeast Region
`U.S. Department of the Interior
`15 State Street, 8th Floor
`Boston, MA 02109-3502
`
`
`
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket