throbber
!
`
`COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
`OF THE TRIAL COURT
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. a» _ | 5 (7
`
`
`
`re
`————
`wrapsFICantATS
`
`“ostaoeOURSac
`
`MAY 9 4 2023
`Fi;/LEGem |
`
`
`en
`
`) ) ) ) ) ))
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`5
`
`MIDDLESEX,SS.
`
`FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
`GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN,
`Plaintiff,
`
`JOSEPH ZAGARELLA, DAVID STANIZZI,
`NATALIAE STANIZZI, THOMAS OGDEN,
`TRACEY DAVIS OGDEN, TJ OGDEN
`COMPANY,INC. and PAUL COSTELLO,
`PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
`ESTATE OF ETHAN COSTELLO,
`Defendants
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF —
`
`Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan (hereinafter “Foremost
`Insurance”), pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P., Rule 57 and G.L. c. 231A,et. seq. hereby alleges as
`
`follows:
`
`I. PARTIES
`
`1,
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4,
`
`5.
`
`The Plaintiff, Foremost Insurance, is an insurance company authorized to do business in
`Massachusetts with a principal office at 5600 Beech Tree Lane, Caledonia, Michigan.
`
`The Defendant, Joseph Zagarella, is an adult individual currently incarcerated at the
`Middlesex County House of Corrections, 269 Treble Cove Road,Billerica,
`Massachusetts.
`
`The Defendant, David Stanizzi, is an adult individual residing at 35 Rolling Meadow
`Road, Tewksbury, Middlesex County, Massachusetts.
`The Defendant, Nataliae Stanizzi, is an adult individual residing at 35 Rolling Meadow
`Road, Tewksbury, Middlesex County, Massachusetts.
`
`The Defendant, Thomas Ogden,is an adult individual residing at 346 Boylston Street,
`Lowell, Middlesex County, Massachusetts. Thomas Ogdenis an interested party.
`
`1
`
`

`

`The Defendant, Tracey Davis Ogden,is an adult individual residing at 346 Boylston
`Street, Lowell, Middlesex County, Massachusetts. Tracey Davis Ogdenis an interested
`party.
`
`The Defendant, TJ Ogden Company,Inc. (“TJ Ogden”), is a Massachusetts Corporation
`with a principal office at 17 Catherwood Road, Tewksbury, Middlesex County,
`—
`Massachusetts. TJ Ogden ownsand/or controls the premises at 358 Boylston Street,
`Lowell, Massachusetts and is an interested party.
`
`The Defendant, Paul Costello, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethan Costello’s
`Estate, with an address of Five Sullivan Parkway, Tewksbury, Middlesex County,
`Massachusetts.
`
`Il.
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Foremostrealleges and repleads paragraphs 1 through 8 above,as if set forth fully herein.
`As of October 28, 2016, David and Nataliae Stanizzi, husband and wife, owned the
`premises located at 35 Rolling Meadow Road, Tewksbury, Middlesex County,
`Massachusetts.
`
`As of October 28, 2016, Joseph Zagarella, the nephew of Davidand Nataliae Stanizzi,
`resided at 35 Rolling Meadow Road, Tewksbury, Middlesex County, Massachusetts with
`theStanizzi’s.
`.
`
`Asof October 28, 2016, 35 Rolling Meadow Road, Tewksbury, Middlesex County,
`Massachusetts was insured by a Foremost Classic CL HomeownersInsurance Policy,
`(hereinafter “the Homeowners Policy”) issued by Foremost Insurance with David and
`Nataliae Stanizzi listed as the named insureds.
`
`Foremost Insurance is authorized to sell Homeowners insurance in Massachusetts.
`
`The HomeownersPolicy issued to David and Nataliae Stanizzi by Foremost Insurance
`provided, among other coverages, Comprehensive Personal Liability Coverage of
`$500,000.00 per accident and Medical Payments Coverage of $5,000.00 each person.
`
`On October 28, 2016, Joseph Zagarella attended a birthday party at the home of Thomas
`and Tracey Davis Ogden, 346 Boylston Street, Lowell, Middlesex County,
`Massachusetts, arranged by the Ogdensfor their daughter, Samantha Ogden (16 years old
`at the time).
`
`On October 28, 2016, Mr. Zagarella, while at the Ogdens’ homeat 346 Boylston
`Street, Lowell, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, assaulted and battered Ethan
`Costello, causing serious injuries, eventually resulting in Ethan’s death, two days
`later, on October 30, 2016.
`
`

`

`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`Mr. Zagarella was arrested and subsequently indicted on two charges:(1)
`Manslaughter (M.G.L. c. 265, §13); and (2) Assault & Battery with a Dangerous
`Weapon causing Serious Bodily Injury (M.G.L. c. 265, §15.A(c)(i)).
`The criminal proceeding against Mr. Zagarella wasinitially commenced in the
`Lowell District Court but after he was indicted, it was transferred to the
`Middlesex Superior Court (Docket No. 1781CR00481) in 2017.
`
`The criminal case against Mr. Zagarella was delayed many years due to a number
`of issues, including Covid-19.
`
`The criminal matter wastried, beginning on June 14, 2022, before a jury and after
`a seven-daytrial, Mr. Zagarella was found not guilty of Manslaughter, but guilty
`of a lesser included offense, Assault & Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury
`(M.G.L. c. 265, §13A(b)()).
`
`21.
`
`M.G.L. c. 265, §13A(b)(i), Assault & Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury,
`providesin pertinentpart:
`
`(b) Whoever commits an assault or an assault and battery:
`
`(i) upon another and by such assault and battery causes serious
`bodily injury;
`
`To be convicted of assault and battery in Massachusetts, theprosecution must prove
`beyond a reasonable doubtthat the defendant intentionally committed, “a harmful or
`offensive touching of the victim, without justification or excuse.” Commonwealthv.
`Oberle, 476 Mass. 539 (2017).
`
`Moreover,“[c]onviction of assault and battery requires finding of intentional
`striking of victim.”” Commonwealth v. Chasson, 383 Mass. 183.(1981).
`
`Mr. Zagarella was sentenced to two years and six months in the Middlesex
`County House of Corrections and he did not appeal the conviction.
`
`On April 9, 2018, Paul Costello (as the personal representative of Ethan’s Estate),
`filed a wrongful death action (seeking personal injury, conscious pain and
`suffering and death damagesas well as punitive damages) against Mr. Zagarella,
`the Ogdens and TJ Ogdenin the Middlesex Superior Court (Docket No.
`1881CV01002).
`With respect to Mr. Zagarella, the Wrongful Death Complaint alleges that he was
`negligent and/or grossly negligent in causing Ethan’s death by causing him “to
`strike his head.”
`
`The docket for the Wrongful Death Complaintindicates that Mr. Zagarella was
`served a Summons, Complaint, Civil Action Cover Sheet, Tracking Order, First
`3
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`

`

`Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents athis last
`and usual place of abode, 35 Rolling Meadow Road, Tewksbury, Massachusetts,
`on June 11, 2018.
`
`Mr. Zagarella did not answer the Complaint or otherwise respond.
`Accordingly, on September 12, 2018, the Middlesex Superior Court defaulted Mr.
`Zagarella and orderedthe Plaintiff to either file a Motion for an Assessment of
`Default Judgment or a Request for a Default Judgment by October 12, 2018.
`
`On September 28, 2018, Counsel for the Plaintiff in the Wrongful Death lawsuit,
`filed correspondence requesting a stay in any Assessment of Damagesuntil a later
`date or at the timeoftrial.
`
`The docket for the Wrongful Death action does not reflect a formal order
`regarding the Plaintiff’s request for a stay of the Assessment of Damages hearing
`and/or an entry of Default Judgment against Mr. Zagarella.
`
`Foremost Insurance did not become aware of the Wrongful Death Complaint until
`April 13, 2022.
`
`Uponreceiving notice of the Wrongful Death Complaint, Foremost Insuranceretained
`counsel, Jeffrey A. Novins, Esq. of Howd & Ludorf, LLC, to defend Mr. Zagarella and
`Counsel is continuing his efforts to vacate the default, which wasinitially denied without
`prejudice on December7, 2022.
`
`Underthe Definition Section of the Homeowners Policy issued by Foremost Insurance to
`David and Nataliae Stanizzi, “you, your and yours meansthe person namedonthe
`Declarations Page and that person’s family member.”
`
`Underthe Definition Section of the HomeownersPolicy, “Family member” means a
`person whoresides in your household andis related to you by blood, marriage or
`adoption [and includes] a wardora foster child.”
`
`Mr. Zagarella resided in David and Nataliae Stanizzi’s household as of October 28, 2016
`and wasrelated by blood.
`
`The Homeowners Policy issued by Foremost Insurance to David and Nataliae Stanizzi, in
`effect as of October 28, 2016, provides Comprehensive Personal Liability Coverage for
`bodily injury caused by an “accident.”
`
`The Homeowners Policy issued by Foremost Insurance to David and Nataliae Stanizzi, in
`effect as of October 28, 2016, provides Medical Payments to Others Coverage for a
`person off the insured premisesif the Bodily Injury arising out of an “accident”is
`“caused by youractivities.”
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`

`

`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`Theword “accident” is not defined in the HomeownersPolicy but SectionII of the
`Policy, entitled, “Exclusions,” does allow Foremost Insurance to disclaim Bodily Injury
`and Medical Payment to Others claims,“[r]esulting from any act or omissionthatis
`intended by any of you to cause any harm or that any of you could reasonably expect to
`cause harm ... whether or not any of you:
`
`a.
`
`Intended or expected the result of his or her act or omission so
`long as the resulting injury or damage was natural consequence
`of the intended act or omission.”
`
`The Homeowners Policy further excludes bodily injury “[r]esulting from an act
`committed by any of you in the course ofor in furtherance of any crimeor offense
`of a violent nature.”
`
`The Homeowners Policy provides that Foremost Insurance be “promptly ... [sent] any
`demand, notice; summonsor other legal papers you receive.”
`
`42.
`
`The HomeownersPolicy further provides:
`
`You will be required to cooperate with us in our effort to
`investigate the accidentorloss, settle any claims against you and
`defend you. If you fail to cooperate, we havethe right to deny you
`coveragein this policy.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`44,
`
`45.
`
`COUNT I
`. REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF v. ALL DEFENDANTS
`
`Foremost Insurancerealleges, repleads and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1
`through 42 above,asif set forth fully herein.
`
`Foremost Insurance brings this Count for declaratory relief pursuant to Mass. R. Civ.P.,
`Rule 57 and G.L. c. 231A et. seq.
`
`There exists an actual case in controversy between Foremost Insurance and PaulCostello,
`Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethan Costello, as to whether the Estate is
`entitled to recover Personal Liability Coverage benefits from a HomeownersPolicy
`issued to David and Nataliae Stanizzi, arising out of the assault and battery of Ethan
`Costello on October 28, 2016.
`
`There exists an actual case in controversy between Foremost Insurance and Paul Costello,
`Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethan Costello, as to whether the Estate is
`entitled to recover Medical Payments to Others Coverage benefits from a Homeowners
`Policy issued to David and Nataliae Stanizzi, arising out of the assault and battery of
`Ethan Costello on October 28, 2016.
`
`

`

`46.
`
`There exists an actual case in controversy between Foremost Insurance and Joseph
`Zagarella, David Stanizzi and Nataliae Stanizzi, as to whether Foremost Insurance has a
`duty to defendJoseph Zagarella in the Wrongful Death litigation, arising out of the
`assault and battery of Ethan Costello on October 28, 2016.
`
`WHEREFORE,Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan, respectfully
`requests that this Honorable Court issue a judicial declaration that:
`
`a) Foremost Insuranceis not required to provide Personal Liability Coverage benefits to
`Paul Costello, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethan Costello, pursuantto the
`HomeownersPolicy issued to David and Nataliae Stanizzi based on the following facts:
`
`i.
`
`il.
`
`Mr. Zagarella was a member of David and Nataliae Stanizzi’s household
`as of October 28, 2016 and therefore was covered for bodily injury to
`others caused by him in an “accident” under the HomeownersPolicy,
`subject to policy exclusions;
`
`The HomeownersPolicy issued by Foremost Insurance to David and
`Nataliae Stanizzi entitles Foremost to disclaim Personal Liability claims,
`resulting from any act or omission that was intended by Mr. Zagarella to
`cause any harm orthat he could reasonably expect to cause harm, whether
`he intended or expectedthe result of his act, as the resulting injury or
`damage was a natural consequenceofthe intendedact.
`
`ui.
`
`Mr. Zagarella was convicted,after a jury trial on the merits, of Assault and
`Battery causing Serious Bodily Injury;
`
`The jury in the criminal action determined, beyond a reasonable doubt,
`that Mr. Zagarella intentionally committed a harmful or offensive touching
`of Ethan Costello, withoutjustification or excuse; and
`
`Mr. Zagarella failed to cooperate with Foremost Insurancein its
`investigation of the October 28, 2016, incident, by failing to notify
`Foremost of the subject incident and that a Wrongful Death lawsuit had
`been served on him in 2018.
`
`b) Foremost Insurance is not required to provide Medical Payments to Others Coverage
`benefits to Paul Costello, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethan Costello,
`pursuant to the Homeowners Policy issued to David and Nataliae Stanizzi based on the
`following facts:
`
`i.
`
`Mr. Zagarella’s activities off the insured premises on October 28, 2016
`were covered by the HomeownersPolicy issued by ForemostInsurance to
`David and Nataliae Stanizzi, subject to policy exclusions;
`
`

`

`The HomeownersPolicy issued by Foremost Insurance to David and
`Nataliae Stanizzi entitles Foremost to disclaim Medical Paymentsto
`Others Coverage claims, resulting from any act or omission that was
`intended by Mr. Zagarella to cause any harm orthat he could reasonably
`expect to cause harm, whether he intended or expected the result of his
`act, as the resulting injury or damage wasa natural consequenceofthe
`intendedact.
`
`ili.
`
`‘iv.
`
`Mr. Zagarella was convicted, after a jury trial on the merits, of Assault and
`Battery causing Serious Bodily Injury;
`
`Thejury in the criminal action determined, beyond a reasonable doubt,
`that Mr. Zagarella intentionally committed a harmful or offensive touching
`of Ethan Costello, without justification or excuse; and
`
`Mr. Zagarella failed to cooperate with Foremost Insuranceinits
`investigation of the October 28, 2016, incident, by failing to timely notify
`Foremost of the subject incident and that a Wrongful Death lawsuit had
`been served on him in 2018.
`
`c) Foremost Insuranceis not required to defend Mr. Zagarella in the Wrongful Death
`lawsuit (Docket No. 1881CV01002) based on the following facts:
`
`i.
`
`Mr. Zagarella failed to cooperate with Foremost Insurancein its
`investigation of the October 28, 2016, incident, by failing to timely notify
`Foremost Insurance of the subject incident and that a Wrongful Death
`lawsuit had been served on him in 2018.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`The Plaintiff demandsa trial by jury asto all issues triable to a jury.
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted,
`For the Defendant,
`Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids,
`Michigan,
`
`Byits attorneys,
`
`BBO No. 551558
`Glenda H. Ganem,Esq.
`gganem@mhg-pe.com
`BBO No. 564374
`McGovern & Ganem,P.C.
`21 Merchants Row, 4th Floor
`Boston, MA 02109
`(617) 723-1444
`
`Date: May 18, 2023
`
`

`

`COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`MIDDLESEX,SS.
`.
`
`SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT
`OF THE TRIAL COURT
`CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`
`2H AS fe 2 he fe fee oe oe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe of 24s 2 fs oe 2k 2s 2 ok 2 2 2 ok ok ok
`
`FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
`GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN,
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`JOSEPH ZAGARELLA, DAVID STANIZZI,
`NATALIAE STANIZZI, THOMAS OGDEN,
`TRACEY DAVIS OGDEN, TJ OGDEN
`COMPANY,INC. and PAUL COSTELLO,
`PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
`ESTATE OF ETHAN COSTELLO,
`Defendants.
`
`SHR fe fs fe es fe os os 2s 2s fe oe oe Ae fe os ois os fs fs ois 2 oe ois oie 2s ok fe oie fe ofc oh ie ok
`
`NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
`
`Please note the appearanceof Patrick M. Conran, Esq., as counsel for the Plaintiff,
`
`Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan, in connection with the above-captioned
`
`matter.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Forthe Plaintiff,
`Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids,
`Michigan,
`Byits attorney,
`
`/s/ Patrick Conran
`Patrick M. Conran, Esq.
`pceonran@mhg-pce.com
`BBO No.: 551558
`McGovern & Ganem,P.C.
`21 Merchants Row, 4th Floor
`Boston, MA 02109
`(617) 723-1444
`
`Date: May 18, 2023
`
`

`

`The Superior Court
`COUNSEL CERTIFICATION FORM|2°CKETNUMBER Trial Court of Massachusetts ae
`
`
`Pursuant to SJC RULE 1:18 CASE NAME:
`
`,
`Foremost Insurance Company “* Joseph Zagarella et.al.
`
`Woburn, MA 01801
`
`Michael A. Sullivan
`Middlesex
`COURT NAME & ADDRESS
`Middlesex Superior Court
`200 Trade Center, 2nd Floor
`
`[=]cterk of Courts
`[=] County
`
`| am attorney of record for Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
`
`plaintiff
`
`[~] defendant in the above-entitled matter.
`
`| hereby certify that in accordance with Rule 5 of the Supreme Judicial Court Uniform Rules on Dispute Resolution (SJC Rule
`
`1:18), | have complied with the requirements of the rule requiring that | provide myclients with information about court-
`
`connected dispute resolution services and discuss with them the advantages and disadvantagesof the various methodsof
`
`dispute resolution.
`
`Dated: May 17, 2023
`
`
`
`Signature:
`Print name:Patrick M. Conran, Esa.
`Address: McGovern & Ganem, P.C.
`21 Merchants Row, 4th FL
`
`Boston, MA 02109
`
`BBO#:
`
`551558
`
`
`FILED
`INTHEOFCFOF THE
`,
`CLE!COL£ OES1 OF MIDDLESE
`
`#
`FOR T
`MAY 24 2023
`FHC"
`
`
`
`
`rev: 01/10/2023
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket