`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 22-12669
`Honorable Shalina D. Kumar
`Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
`
`STEPHANIE MUSIC,
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KANYE WEST,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 7)
`AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1)
`
`
`Plaintiff Stephanie Music filed this pro se complaint against
`
`defendant. ECF No. 1. This case was referred to the assigned magistrate
`
`judge for all pretrial purposes and specifically for screening to determine if
`
`the complaint should be summarily dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1915(e)(2)(B). ECF No. 6.
`
`On March 16, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued a report
`
`and recommendation (R&R). ECF No. 7. The R&R recommends that the
`
`Court summarily dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to comply with
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and thus for failure to state a claim
`
`upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case 4:22-cv-12669-SDK-APP ECF No. 10, PageID.27 Filed 04/21/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`Parties must file objections within fourteen days of when the R&R is
`
`filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The magistrate
`
`judge's R&R contained the notice that objections must be filed within
`
`fourteen days as required by statute. ECF No. 7, PageID.21-22; 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 636(b)(1)(C). Plaintiff did not file objections.1
`
`Because no objections were filed, de novo review of the R&R’s
`
`conclusions is not required. The Court has reviewed the record and the
`
`R&R is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of
`
`the Court.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 21, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Shalina D. Kumar
`SHALINA D. KUMAR
`United States District Judge
`
`
`1 The docket reflects that the copies of the order granting plaintiff’s IFP
`application and the R&R mailed to plaintiff were returned as undeliverable.
`ECF Nos. 8, 9. That plaintiff apparently failed to notify the Court of a
`change in address, as she was required to do, provides an additional basis
`for dismissal. See ECF No. 4.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`