throbber
Case 4:22-cv-12669-SDK-APP ECF No. 10, PageID.26 Filed 04/21/23 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 22-12669
`Honorable Shalina D. Kumar
`Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
`
`STEPHANIE MUSIC,
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`KANYE WEST,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 7)
`AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1)
`
`
`Plaintiff Stephanie Music filed this pro se complaint against
`
`defendant. ECF No. 1. This case was referred to the assigned magistrate
`
`judge for all pretrial purposes and specifically for screening to determine if
`
`the complaint should be summarily dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1915(e)(2)(B). ECF No. 6.
`
`On March 16, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued a report
`
`and recommendation (R&R). ECF No. 7. The R&R recommends that the
`
`Court summarily dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to comply with
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and thus for failure to state a claim
`
`upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-12669-SDK-APP ECF No. 10, PageID.27 Filed 04/21/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`Parties must file objections within fourteen days of when the R&R is
`
`filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The magistrate
`
`judge's R&R contained the notice that objections must be filed within
`
`fourteen days as required by statute. ECF No. 7, PageID.21-22; 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 636(b)(1)(C). Plaintiff did not file objections.1
`
`Because no objections were filed, de novo review of the R&R’s
`
`conclusions is not required. The Court has reviewed the record and the
`
`R&R is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of
`
`the Court.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 21, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Shalina D. Kumar
`SHALINA D. KUMAR
`United States District Judge
`
`
`1 The docket reflects that the copies of the order granting plaintiff’s IFP
`application and the R&R mailed to plaintiff were returned as undeliverable.
`ECF Nos. 8, 9. That plaintiff apparently failed to notify the Court of a
`change in address, as she was required to do, provides an additional basis
`for dismissal. See ECF No. 4.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket