`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DIVISION FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
`
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 5:16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM
`(consolidated)
`Hon. Judith E. Levy
`Mag. Mona K. Majzoub
`
`No. 5:16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM
`(consolidated)
`Hon. Judith E. Levy
`Mag. Mona K. Majzoub
`
`
`In re Flint Water Cases.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________
`
`Elnora Carthan, et. al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Governor Rick Snyder, et. al.
`
`Defendants
`
`
`_________________________
`
`DEFENDANT MICHAEL GLASGOW’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE
`DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH CONSOLIDATED AMENDED
`CLASS COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF,
`MONEY DAMAGES AND JURY DEMAND
`
`NOW COMES the Defendant, MICHAEL GLASGOW (“Defendant
`
`
`
`Glasgow”), by and through his attorneys, CHRISTOPHER J. MARKER and
`
`GREGORY W. MAIR, for his Answer to Plaintiffs’ Fifth Consolidated Amended
`
`Class Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, Money Damages, and Jury
`
`Demand (“Complaint”), answering solely for himself and solely as to allegations
`
`directed against him, (1) incorporates by reference his Answer and Affirmative
`
`
`
`Case 5:16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM ECF No. 1259 filed 09/08/20 PageID.39452 Page 2 of 3
`
`Defenses to the Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint (DN 1183) and (2)
`
`submits the following additional answers, solely as to those allegations added in the
`
`Fifth Consolidated Amended Complaint pursuant to the Court’s August 28, 2020
`
`Order Regarding Matters Discussed at the August 26, 2020 Status Conference (DN
`
`1247). In recognition of the conditions and limitations set forth above, Defendant
`
`Glasgow states in Answer to Plaintiffs’ Fifth Consolidated Amended Class
`
`Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, Money Damages, and Jury
`
`Demand (DN 1175-3) (“Complaint”) as follows:
`
`
`
`26. That Defendant Glasgow neither admits nor denies the allegations
`
`contained in the Instant Paragraph of Plaintiffs’ Complaint for lack of sufficient
`
`information upon which to form a belief, leaving Plaintiffs to their strict proofs.
`
`
`
`27. That Defendant Glasgow neither admits nor denies the allegations
`
`contained in the Instant Paragraph of Plaintiffs’ Complaint for lack of sufficient
`
`information upon which to form a belief, leaving Plaintiffs to their strict proofs.
`
`
`
`29. That Defendant Glasgow neither admits nor denies the allegations
`
`contained in the Instant Paragraph of Plaintiffs’ Complaint for lack of sufficient
`
`information upon which to form a belief, leaving Plaintiffs to their strict proofs.
`
`
`
`31. That Defendant Glasgow neither admits nor denies the allegations
`
`contained in the Instant Paragraph of Plaintiffs’ Complaint for lack of sufficient
`
`information upon which to form a belief, leaving Plaintiffs to their strict proofs.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 5:16-cv-10444-JEL-MKM ECF No. 1259 filed 09/08/20 PageID.39453 Page 3 of 3
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`s/CHRISTOPHER J. MARKER (P81564)
`Date: September 8, 2020
` CHRISTOPHER J. MARKER (P81564)
` GREGORY W. MAIR (P67465)
` Attorneys for Defendant Michael Glasgow
` 300 St. Andrews Road, Suite 302
` Saginaw, Michigan 48638
` cmarker@owdpc.com
` gregmair@owdpc.com
` mclark@owdpc.com
` dana@owdpc.com
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 8, 2020, I electronically filed the above
`
`document with the Clerk of the Court using the Court’s ECF system, which will
`
`send notification of such filing to all counsel of record.
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`s/CHRISTOPHER J. MARKER (P81564)
`Date: September 8, 2020
` CHRISTOPHER J. MARKER (P81564)
` GREGORY W. MAIR (P67465)
` Attorneys for Defendant Michael Glasgow
` 300 St. Andrews Road, Suite 302
` Saginaw, Michigan 48638
` cmarker@owdpc.com
` gregmair@owdpc.com
` mclark@owdpc.com
` dana@owdpc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
