throbber
23-015910-NI
`
`STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`CASE NO.
`
`STATE OF MICHIGAN
`THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
`WAYNE COUNTY
`
`GUBIN, JOSHUA v MD JABAL HUSSAIN,a/k/a JABAL HUSSAIN,etal.
`Case Status: Open Inactive
`Hon. Martha M. Snow
`Status Conference Date:
`03/08/2024
`Filed Date:
`12/08/2023
`
`PL JOSHUA GUBIN
`DF MD JABAL HUSSAIN,a/k/a JABAL HUSSAIN
`DF HALIMA KHANOM
`
`51335
`
`Joseph Dedvukaj
`
`1,
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`
`O Service has been obtained andtimefor filing of the answerhas not lapsed. IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`
`An adjourned Status Conferenceis to be held on:.
`
`PLAINTIFF IS ORDEREDto notify all parties of this conference, and file proof of service with
`Clerk of the Court (Room 201 Coleman A. Young Municipal Center).
`The Court has established the schedule of events noted below and PLAINTIFF IS ORDEREDto serve a
`
`
`
`
`
`copy of this Scheduling Orderon all parties and file proof of service with the Clerk of the Court.
`
`23-015910-NI
`FILED IN MY OFFICE
`WAYNE COUNTY CLERK
`3/22/2024 3:26:38PM
`CATHY M. GARRETT
`/s/ Moira Hartwell
`
`
`
`x] Service has been obtained, time for filing an answer has lapsed and no answerhas been filed by Defendant MD Jabal Hussain and Halima Khanom.
`Default shall befiled and served, and motion for entry of default judgmentshallbe filed and heard no later than 05/31/2024.
`
`
`
`
`i] The following schedule of events is ordered:
`
`Witness ExchangeFiling
`05/31/2024
`08/16/2024
`11/15/2024
`
`
`Please check (x ) Track Selection
`
`[] Track #1
`
`Discovery Cutoff
`
`07/19/2024
`
`[] Track #2
`
`[] Track #3
`
`[X] Other
`
`10/18/2024
`
`01/17/2025
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case Evaluation Month
`09/2024
`12/2024
`03/2025
`
`Settlement Conference
`
`(Case Evaluation date Plus 42 days)
`42 Days
`42 Days
`42 Days
`06/03/2024
`
`Other Conference
`
`Comments:
`
`
`(1) All summary disposition motions shall be filed no later than 30 days after Case Evaluation.
`
`(2) All responses to summary disposition motions shall be filed in accordance with the Summary Disposition
`
`Scheduling Order issued by the Court uponthefiling of a summary disposition motion.
`
`(3) Parties/attorneys shall reference Judge Snow's protocol on the Third Circuit Court website for further
`
`requirements with respect to filing various motions. www.3rdcc.org/divisions/civil
`
`Attorneys and/or parties are required to immediately notify the Court if there is a prior action arising out of the sametransaction
`or occurrence, includinga priorfirst party no-fault claim.
`Please check ( x ) if special case evaluation panelis applicable:
`BUSINESS COURT PANEL
`Oo
`oc COMMERICAL PANEL
`tc EMPLOYMENT/DISCRIMINATION PANEL
`NOTE:
`Thespecific trial attorneys, parties, lienholders and insurance representatives or other persons with authority to makea final
`decision as to settlement are required to appear at the Settlement Conference, unless excused by the assigned judge.
`This constitutes a duly entered Order of this Court, and failure to comply strictly with all its terms, may result in sanctions.
`
`NOTICE:
`
`
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`Bar No.
`
`Attorney for Defendant
`
`Bar No.
`
`
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`Bar No.
`
`Attorney for Defendant
`
`Bar No.
`
`
`
`/s/ Martha M. Snow 3/22/2024
`Circuit Court Judge
`(Date)
`
`

`

`Addendum to Scheduling Order in No-Fault Cases
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthatin all cases in which the Plaintiff is asserting a first-party claim for benefits under the
`Michigan No-Fault Act, MCL 500.3101, e¢ seq., the following shall apply:
`
`1. Within 21 days of entry of the first Scheduling Order, the Defendant insurance company shall provide to the Plaintiff a
`copy ofthe first-party claim file together with the privilege log for any redactions.
`
`2. Within 28 days of entry ofthe first Scheduling Order, the Plaintiff shall identify all known service providers (medical,
`household, and/or attendant care) and the Plaintiff's employer(s) by name, address, and phone number. ThePlaintiff shall
`immediately supplementas additional providers become known. Failure to timely identify a provider and/or employer may
`result in such claim being precluded from the pending lawsuit.
`
`3. Within 28 days of entry of the first Scheduling Order, the Plaintiff shall provide executed medical record authorizations for
`all providers on a form supplied by the Defendant.
`
`4. Within 28 days ofentry ofthe first Scheduling Order, the parties shall establish, in writing, a mutually agreed upon schedule
`for depositions and independent medical examinations.
`
`5.
`
`Ifmedical records are requested, MCR 2.314(D)(1) shall be enforced. If the custodian does not timely respond by the time
`limits set forth in MCR 2.314(D)(1), a subpoena may be issued under MCR 2.305(A)(2), directing the custodian to present
`the information for examination and copying at the time and place stated in the subpoena. MCR 2.314(D)(6). In the
`alternative, the party seeking medical records may also immediately file a Motion for an Order to Show Cause.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`/s/ Martha M. Snow
`
`Circuit Court Judge
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket