`Steele County
`
`Conciliation Court
`Third District
`Court File Number: 74-CO-23-212
`Case Type: Conciliation
`
`Order on
`Claim and Counterclaim
` and Order for Judgment
` and Judgment
`
`XX
`
`Van Binsbergen & Associates, Inc. vs
`Superb Rental Holdings, LLC, f/k/a Superb
`in the Urbs LLC
`
`Appearances
`
`The following parties appeared at the hearing in this matter on March 12, 2024:
`
` Plaintiff:
`
`Van Binsbergen & Associates, Inc. by
`
`Sara Wohlers
`
` Defendant: Superb Rental Holdings, LLC, f/k/a
`
`Superb in the Urbs LLC by Nalee Vue
`
`and Johnny Lee
`
` Neither party appeared at the hearing
`
`This hearing was
`
` contested /
`
` by default.
`
`Based on the evidence received, IT IS ORDERED:
`
`
`X Plaintiff Van Binsbergen & Associates, Inc., is entitled to recovery against Defendant Superb Rental
`Holdings, LLC, fka Superb in the Urbs LLC, in the amount of $1,142.70, plus a filing fee of $65.00 for a
`
`,
`total recovery of $1,207.70.
`
`
`Judgment shall be entered in favor of
`
` (without damages).
`
`’s claim is dismissed without prejudice.
`
`’s claim is dismissed with prejudice.
`
`MNCIS-CCT-301
`
`STATE Order on Claim and Counterclaim and Order for Judgment and Judgment
`
`6/23
`
`
`
` shall immediately return to . The Sheriff of the county in which
`
`the property is located is authorized and directed to effect repossession of this
`
`property according to Minn. Stat. § 491A.01, subd. 5, and turn the property over to
`
`.
`
`Other/
`
` Memo:See attached memo
`
`Dated:
`
`Dated:
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`Judge of District Court
`
`Referee of District Court
`
`I certify the above order constitutes the Judgment of the Court.
`
`Court Administrator
`
`By ________________________
`
`Date ______________________
`
`MNCIS-CCT-301
`
`STATE Order on Claim and Counterclaim and Order for Judgment and Judgment
`
`6/23
`
`
`
`
`Van Binsbergen & Associates, Inc. v. Superb Rental Holdings, LLC, fka Superb in
`the Urbs LLC
`
`74-CO-23-212
`Plaintiff Van Binsbergen & Associates, Inc., sues Superb Rental Holdings, LLC,
`fka Superb in the Urbs LLC, on a breach of contract claim. The parties entered
`into a property management contract with Plaintiff providing property management
`services for Defendant landlord for the property at 442 Rowland St. Tracy MN.
`
`During the relatively short contract, a number of tenants left and repairs had to be
`made to the units. There were miscommunications regarding who should hire
`contractors. Plaintiff did not communicate with Defendant about what contractors
`were hired and what they would charge. Some of the contractors overcharged for
`their work and Plaintiff did not catch the overcharged contracts and let Defendant’s
`get overcharges because of alleged labor shortages in Tracy, MN.
`
`While Plaintiff managed the property, the apartment became significantly less
`profitable, and Defendant rightly terminated the contract between the parties.
`Defendant’s witness was more credible in their testimony than Plaintiff’s witness.
`Plaintiff did not properly maintain the property or caretake the property at 442
`Rowland St. Tracy MN.
`
`The following paint, material and fixture costs should be recovered by Plaintiff
`because they were used or left at the property:
`
`Materials/paint $42.73
`Menards bill $188.69
`Paint /Fixtures $865.27
`
`
`
`Supplies $46.01
`
`Recovery $1,142.70
`Filing fee $65.00
`
`
` $1,207.70
`
`Plaintiff Van Binsbergen & Associates, Inc., is entitled to recovery against
`Defendant Superb Rental Holdings, LLC, fka Superb in the Urbs LLC, in the
`amount of $1,142.70, plus a filing fee of $65.00 for a total recovery of $1,207.70.
`
`
`
`Bueltel, J
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
