`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`IN RE: PRE-FILLED PROPANE TANK
`ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`THIS ORDER RELATES TO:
`ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS
`
`
`
`MDL Docket No. 2567
`
`Master Case No. 14-2567-MD-W-GAF
`
`
`
` FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DISMISSED PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AGAINST
`AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
`
`Having considered AmeriGas Partners, L.P.’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment as to
`
`
`
`Dismissed Plaintiffs’ Claims Against AmeriGas Partners, L.P. Under Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 54(b), and finding no just reason to delay, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND
`
`ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Whereas the Court, by its Order of August 21, 2019 (ECF No. 355), dismissed with
`
`prejudice the complaints asserted by Plaintiffs David McNally, Ken Cramer, Robert Orr, Steven
`
`Luttrell, James L. Ristow, Allan Disbrow, MaryLou Breed, Nicholas Pulli, Gary Sage, Kevin
`
`Dougherty, Paul Toomey, Daniel Kelleher, Richard Pedrick, Troy Winters, Thomas Gane, Mark
`
`I. Stevens, Richard Paradowski, and John Gilbert (collectively, the “Dismissed Plaintiffs”), and
`
`good cause existing therefor, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of AmeriGas
`
`Partners, L.P. against the Dismissed Plaintiffs, who shall take nothing by their complaints against
`
`AmeriGas. Each party shall bear its/his/her own attorneys’ fees and costs.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Gary A. Fenner
`GARY A. FENNER, JUDGE
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED: February 2, 2021
`
`
`
`
`1
`Case 4:16-cv-00809-GAF Document 150 Filed 02/02/21 Page 1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
