throbber
Case 4:19-cv-00028-BMM Document 173 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
`GREAT FALLS DIVISION
`
`
`INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL
`NETWORK and NORTH COAST RIVERS
`ALLIANCE,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`vs.
`
`PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, et al.,
`
`
`and
`
`TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE
`PIPELINE, LP, a Delaware limited
`partnership, and TC ENERGY
`CORPORATION, a Canadian Public
`Company,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4:19-cv-00028-BMM
`
`SECOND ORDER
`ON MOOTNESS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants,
`
`Defendant-Intervenors.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Indigenous Environmental Network (“IEN”) and North Coast Rivers
`
`Alliance (“NCRA”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against President
`
`Donald J. Trump and various government agencies and agents in their official
`
`capacities (“Federal Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that President Trump violated
`
`the Property Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the Commerce Clause of the U.S.
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-00028-BMM Document 173 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`Constitution, and Executive Order 13,337 when he issued a Presidential Permit in
`
`2019 (“2019 Permit”) to Defendant-Intervenors TransCanada Keystone Pipeline,
`
`LP and TC Energy Corporation (collectively, “TC Energy”) to construct a cross-
`
`border segment of the Keystone XL oil pipeline (“Keystone”).
`
`President Joseph R. Biden signed an Executive Order on January 20, 2021 to
`
`revoke the 2019 Permit. See Protecting Public Health and the Environment and
`
`Restoring Science To Tackle the Climate Crisis, Exec. Order 13,990, 86 Fed. Reg.
`
`7,037, 7,041 (Jan. 25, 2021). President Biden’s revocation noted that the 2019
`
`Permit included an express condition that the President could revoke that permit at
`
`“the President’s sole discretion.” Id.
`
`The Court sought briefing on whether President Biden’s revocation rendered
`
`the above-captioned case moot. (Doc. 162). The Court subsequently issued an
`
`Order on Mootness on May 28, 2021. (Doc. 166). The Court determined in part
`
`that:
`
`The case presents a live controversy because the Court can provide
`relief to Plaintiffs by ordering the removal of the constructed border
`segment. . . . This case does not involve mere text in the Federal
`Register. Rather, it involves a physical pipeline that today sits under the
`ground at the U.S.-Canada border. The Court can provide Plaintiffs
`with requested injunctive relief by ordering TC Energy to remove that
`pipeline from the ground.
`
`
`(Doc. 166 at 9–10). The Court further determined that even if the Court could not
`
`provide such injunctive relief, that the case met an exception to mootness.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-00028-BMM Document 173 Filed 07/30/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`“Specifically, President Biden’s revocation represents the voluntary cessation of
`
`unlawful activity. It remains unclear whether President Biden or a future president
`
`simply could issue unilaterally another permit to TC Energy.” (Doc. 166).
`
`TC Energy announced that it “definitively terminated” Keystone on June 9,
`
`2021. (Doc. 167 at 3). TC Energy has since filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 169).
`
`TC Energy again argues that the case proves moot in light of this new
`
`announcement. (Doc. 170). Plaintiffs argue that the case remains live. (Doc. 172).
`
`Nothing in TC Energy’s announcement alters the status of this case as the
`
`Court assessed in its Order on Mootness. (Doc. 166). The case presents a live
`
`controversy for substantially the same reason it did before. (Doc. 166 at 7–10, 14).
`
`Even if the case failed to present a live controversy, it meets a mootness exception.
`
`(Doc. 166 at 10–13). The 2019 Permit presents a live controversy to the Court.
`
`The Court will issue an order on the parties’ pending motions for summary
`
`judgment in due course. Federal Defendants and TC Energy shall continue to
`
`apprise the Court on any changes, expansions, or alterations to the existing pipeline
`
`infrastructure from the 1.2-mile border crossing segment during the pendency of
`
`this matter.
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that TC Energy’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
`
`169) is DENIED.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-00028-BMM Document 173 Filed 07/30/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated the 30th day of July, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket