throbber
Case 2:20-cv-02351 Document 2-1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Kyler A. Scheid (NY#4984258)
`Sara S. Demirok (AZ#031970)
`Carmen León (CA#249981)
`National Labor Relations Board, Region 28
`2600 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1400
`Phoenix, Arizona 85004
`Tel: (602) 416-4769
`Fax: (602) 640-2178
`Email: sara.demirok@nlrb.gov
`Email: kyler.scheid@nlrb.gov
`Email: carmen.leon@nlrb.gov
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`
`
`CORNELE A. OVERSTREET,
`Regional Director of the Twenty-Eighth
`Region of the National Labor Relations
`Board, for and on behalf of the
`National Labor Relations Board,
`
`
`
`
`
`NP RED ROCK LLC D/B/A RED ROCK
`CASINO RESORT & SPA,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-2351
`
`
`
`DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION TO FILE MEMORANDUM OF
`POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
`SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR
`INJUNCTION UNDER SECTION 10(j)
`OF THE NATIONAL LABOR
`RELATIONS ACT [29 U.S.C. § 160(j)]
`THAT EXCEEDS PAGE LIMIT
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Petitioner,
`
`Respondent.
`
`I, Kyler Scheid, have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called to
`
`testify, would do so as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a field attorney for the National Labor Relations Board (the Board),
`
`Region 28, in Phoenix, Arizona. I am the designated Counsel for the General Counsel of the Board
`
`
`
`1
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-02351 Document 2-1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`for the hearing in the underlying administrative proceeding in Board Cases 28-CA-24484, 28-CA-
`
`250950, 28-CA-250229, 28-CA-250282, 28-CA-250873, 28-CA-252591, 28-CA-253276, 28-CA-
`
`254470, 28-CA-254510, 28-CA-254510, 28-CA-254514, 28-CA-260640, 28-CA-260641, 28-CA-
`
`262187, 28-CA-262803, and 28-CA-264605 (Board Cases).
`
`2.
`
`The Board Cases in this matter involve significant unfair labor practice
`
`allegations stemming from a union organizing drive and numerous violations of Section 8(a)(1),
`
`(3), and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act [29 U.S.C. §158(a)(1), (3), (5)], including
`
`numerous unlawful promises of benefits, threats, and other unlawful statements; grant of the
`
`promised benefits; discrimination against four employees for supporting a union; a request for a
`
`remedial bargaining order under NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575 (1969); and
`
`changes made to employees’ terms and conditions of employment without bargaining with the
`
`employees’ union.
`
`3.
`
`The extent and severity of the unfair labor practices involved, and the need
`
`to provide the Court with a factual and legal basis for the relief sought, requires a Memorandum
`
`of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Injunction under Section 10(j) of the National
`
`Labor Relations Act [29 U.S.C. § 160(j)], herein Memorandum of Points and Authorities, that
`
`exceed 24 pages.
`
`4.
`
`This case will be presented to the Court without a formal trial based upon
`
`the Court’s granting Petitioner’s Motion to Try Petition for Temporary Injunction on the Basis of
`
`the Administrative Record, Affidavits, and Documentary Evidence. As a result, the factual
`
`summary set forth in the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, with citations to the supporting
`
`exhibits and affidavits, and the statement and application of relevant law, must fully set forth the
`
`
`
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-02351 Document 2-1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`factual backdrop, the legal issues in the underlying administrative proceedings, and the
`
`appropriateness of injunctive relief for multiple categories of unfair labor practice allegations.
`
`5.
`
`Petitioner was unable to shorten the Petition and Memorandum while
`
`adequately briefing the Court on the legal and factual questions involved in considering whether
`
`to grant the Petition, particularly given the extraordinary number of unfair labor practices
`
`Respondent is alleged to have committed and the nature of the relief sought which includes an
`
`interim bargaining order.
`
`6. For the reasons set forth above, Petitioner is requesting permission to file a
`
`Memorandum of Points and Authorities totaling 32 pages, excluding tables of contents and
`
`authorities, and exhibits.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the Laws of the United States of America
`
`that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 29th day of December, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kyler Scheid
`Kyler Scheid, Attorney
`
`On behalf of:
`Cornele A. Overstreet, Regional Director
`National Labor Relations Board, Region 28
`2600 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1400
`Phoenix, Arizona 85004
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket