throbber
4:22-cv-03026-JMG-SMB Doc # 1 Filed: 02/24/22 Page 1 of 4 - Page ID # 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
`DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
`
`STEPHANIE A. CUMMINGS,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`SMITHFIELD FRESH MEATS
`CORP.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`DEFENDANT SMITHFIELD FRESH MEATS CORP.’S
`NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`Please take notice that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441(a), and 1446, Defendant
`
`Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. (“Smithfield”) hereby removes this action from the District Court
`
`of Saline County, Nebraska, to the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. In
`
`support of this Notice of Removal, Smithfield avers as follows:
`
`PROCEDURAL HISTORY
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Stephanie Cummings filed a Complaint in the District Court of Saline
`
`County, Nebraska against Smithfield (the “State Court Action”). A true and accurate copy of the
`
`Complaint served in the State Court Action is attached as Exhibit 1.1
`
`2.
`
`On January 25, 2022, Plaintiff served Smithfield by certified mail through its
`
`registered agent with a Summons and a copy of the Complaint. A true and accurate copy of the
`
`Summons served in the State Court Action is attached as Exhibit 2.
`
`3.
`
`Exhibits 1 and 2 constitute all process, pleadings, and orders that were served on
`
`Smithfield in the State Court Action. A true and accurate copy of the Register of Actions in the
`
`State Court Action as of February 23, 2022 is attached as Exhibit 3.
`
`1 Plaintiff’s Complaint is undated.
`
`4:22-cv-3026
`
`

`

`4:22-cv-03026-JMG-SMB Doc # 1 Filed: 02/24/22 Page 2 of 4 - Page ID # 2
`
`JURISDICTION AND BASIS FOR REMOVAL
`
`4.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1441(a) because the matter in controversy arises under federal law.
`
`5.
`
`A case is properly removed if it could have been originally filed in federal district
`
`court. Mensah v. Owners Ins. Co., 951 F.3d 941, 943 (8th Cir. 2020); In re Otter Tail Power
`
`Company, 116 F.3d 1207, 1213 (8th Cir. 1997).
`
`6.
`
`In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Smithfield discriminated against her on the
`
`basis of her sex and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
`
`(42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.) by failing to adequately address Plaintiff’s allegations of sexual
`
`harassment, and removing Plaintiff from her job assignment after she reported being sexually
`
`harassed. Plaintiff’s Complaint does not allege any violations of Nebraska state law. See Complaint
`
`⁋⁋ 9, 12-16, 18, 22.
`
`7.
`
`Because the causes of action set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint arise under federal
`
`law, removal is appropriate. See, Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 (1987) (“The
`
`presence or absence of federal-question jurisdiction is governed by the ‘well-pleaded complaint
`
`rule,’ which provides that federal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is presented on
`
`the face of the plaintiff's properly pleaded complaint”) (internal citation omitted); Crews v.
`
`General American Life Ins. Co., 274 F.3d 502, 504 (8th Cir. 2001) (“A defendant has a right to
`
`remove a case from state to federal court if the plaintiff's cause of action arose under federal law”).
`
`8.
`
`Removal to this district is proper because the United States District Court for the
`
`District of Nebraska embraces Saline County, Nebraska. 28 U.S.C. §§ 107, 1441(a).
`
`9.
`
`Removal is proper because this Notice of Removal is timely filed within 30 days
`
`of service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
`
`2
`
`

`

`4:22-cv-03026-JMG-SMB Doc # 1 Filed: 02/24/22 Page 3 of 4 - Page ID # 3
`
`10.
`
`In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), after filing this Notice of Removal
`
`Smithfield will promptly serve written notice of this Notice of Removal on counsel for Plaintiff
`
`and file the same with the Clerk of the District Court of Saline County, Nebraska.
`
`NON-WAIVER OF DEFENSES
`
`11.
`
`By removing this action from the District Court of Saline County, Nebraska,
`
`Smithfield does not waive any defenses available to it.
`
`12.
`
`By removing this action from the District Court of Saline County, Nebraska,
`
`Smithfield does not admit any of the allegations in Plaintiff’s Complaint.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. removes the above-captioned
`
`action from the District Court of Saline County, Nebraska to the United States District Court for
`
`the District of Nebraska.
`
`Dated: February 24, 2022
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted on behalf of
`Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp.
`
`POLSINELLI PC
`
`/s/ Jason N.W. Plowman
`Jason N.W. Plowman (NE #26652)
`900 W. 48th Place, Suite 900
`Kansas City, MO 64112
`Telephone: (816) 753-1000
`Facsimile: (816) 753-1536
`jplowman@polsinelli.com
`
`Amber M. Rogers (motion for pro hac vice
`admission forthcoming)
`arogers@huntonAK.com
`HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
`1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700
`Dallas, TX 75202
`Phone: 214.979.3000
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Smithfield Fresh
`Meats Corp.
`
`3
`
`

`

`4:22-cv-03026-JMG-SMB Doc # 1 Filed: 02/24/22 Page 4 of 4 - Page ID # 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 24th day of February 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing
`with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system. A notification of such filing (NEF) will be sent
`to the following counsel of record for the Plaintiff via first-class mail:
`
`Abby Osborn
`Shiffermiller Law Office, P.C., L.L.O.
`1002 G Street
`Lincoln, NE 68508
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`/s/ Jason N.W. Plowman
`Attorney for Defendant
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket