throbber
Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 7
`
`
`ANGELA H. DOWS, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 10339
`adows@crdslaw.com
`CORY READE DOWS & SHAFER
`1333 North Buffalo Drive, Suite 210
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
`Telephone: (702) 794-4411
`Facsimile: (702) 794-4421
`Attorney for Defendant DONNIE BRYANT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`DONNIE BRYANT,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`***
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`Case No. 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF
`
`
`DONNIE BRYANT’S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
`TIME TO FILE RENEWED MOTION
`FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
`
`Defendant DONNIE BRYANT, by and through counsel, Angela H. Dows, Esq.,
`
`respectfully requests that this Court grant Defendant an extension of time of twenty-nine (29)
`
`days or until on or before March 29, 2024 to file a renewed motion for sentence reduction
`
`pursuant to this Court’s Order entered on January 31, 2024 (ECF No. 867). This Motion is based
`
`upon the attached points and authorities and all pleadings and papers on file herein.
`
`
`
`DATED this 1st day of March, 2024.
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Angela H. Dows
`CORY READE DOWS & SHAFER
`Attorney for Defendant DONNIE BRYANT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
`
`I.
`
`FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
`
`A.
`
`Convictions for Murder and Weapons Offenses Committed While Donnie
`Bryant was a Juvenile, with Sentence of Life Imprisonment Plus Fifty Years.
`
`In February of 2006, over seventeen years ago, Donnie Bryant was convicted on several
`
`counts of Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity (“VICAR”), including murder and
`
`weapons offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (“other offenses”). (ECF No. 826, at page 1 of 15.)
`
`All of Donnie Bryant’s offenses were for acts committed while Donnie Bryant was a juvenile.
`
`(ECF No. 18.) Donnie Bryant was sentenced to life imprisonment for the VICAR murder count,
`
`plus an additional fifty years for the other offenses. (ECF No. 566.)
`
`B.
`
`Amended Judgments Following the United States Supreme Court Decisions
`in Miller v. Alabama and Johnson v. United States.
`
`In March of 2010, this Court entered an amended judgment that sentenced Donnie Bryant
`
`to life imprisonment on the VICAR murder count, plus an additional forty years for the other
`
`offenses. (ECF No. 617.) Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.
`
`Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), this Court resentenced Donnie Bryant to forty years of
`
`imprisonment for the VICAR murder count, plus forty years of imprisonment for the other
`
`offenses, for a total of eighty years of imprisonment. (ECF No. 694.)
`
`Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 135
`
`S.Ct. 2551 (2015), this Court entered a Judgment in September of 2019 that granted in part and
`
`denied in part Donnie Bryant’s motions to vacate. (ECF No. 826.) The Court in part vacated
`
`Donnie Bryant’s conviction as to Count 6 and his sentence of imprisonment of ten years as to the
`
`same. (ECF No. 827, at page 1 of 1.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`C. Motion for a Reduced Sentence Under the First Step Act.
`
`On July 5, 2023, Donnie Bryant filed a pro se motion to reduce his sentence under the
`
`First Step Act. (ECF No. 849.) Donnie Bryant argued that: (1) there is an unfair disparity
`
`between his sentence and the sentence of his co-defendant Jonathon Toliver, (2) there is an unfair
`
`disparity in sentences considering the fact that he was a juvenile at the time of the offenses, and
`
`(3) he has participated in educational programs and has become a better person through self-
`
`improvement, and sincerely believes that a reduction in his sentence would allow him to
`
`“contribute to society.” (ECF No. 849, at page 1 of 1.)
`
`On July 13, 2023, following the appointment of counsel, this Court ordered that
`
`appointed counsel be allowed to file a supplement Donnie Bryant’s pro se motion. (ECF No.
`
`854), which was later filed (ECF No. 857). The Government filed a response (ECF No. 859),
`
`and appointed counsel filed a reply (ECF No. 864).
`
`D.
`
` Order Denying Motion for Sentence Reduction.
`
`On November 14, 2023, this Court issued an order that denied without prejudice
`
`Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction. (ECF No. 865). The order additionally provided
`
`Defendant until February 1, 2024 to file another motion for sentence reduction, with the renewed
`
`motion to “remedy the deficiencies identified in this Order.” (ECF No. 865). The current
`
`renewed motion is due on or before March 1, 2024. (ECF No. 867).
`
`E.
`
` Motion for Copies of Sealed or Stricken Documents/Items.
`
`On February 13, 2024, Donnie Bryant filed a pro se motion that was stricken by this
`
`Court on the same day. (ECF Nos, 869, 871). On February 16, 2024, without revealing the
`
`substance of the communications, instant counsel had a telephone conference with Donnie
`
`Bryant in which the need to obtain certain documents or information was understood by instant
`
`counsel.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`On February 26, 2024, instant counsel left a voicemail with the U.S. District Court’s
`
`clerk’s office to request copies of certain documents. On February 28, 2024, instant counsel had
`
`a telephone conference and sent separate electronic correspondences to the U.S. District Court’s
`
`clerk’s office for a copy of:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Donnie Bryant’s pro se motion for sentence reduction filed on February 12, 2024.
`
`A docket in a juvenile delinquency case from 2004 in which Donnie Bryant was a
`
`named defendant.
`
`On March 1, 2024, instant counsel received responses to the requests as follows:
`
`a. Since ECF 869 was stricken from the record, it is now a restricted document viewable
`to court personnel only. You may file a motion requesting to obtain this document.
`The judge can review the motion and enter a ruling on your request. (See Exhibit 1
`(emphasis in original)).
`
`b. Per my supervisor’s review, there is a sealed docket sheet for this defendant in case
`2:04-cr-00495 . If you wish to obtain a copy of this sealed docket sheet, you will need
`to file a motion. (See Exhibit 1 (emphasis in original)).
`
`
`On March 1, 2024, following said conferrals, instant counsel filed a motion for copies of sealed
`
`and/or stricken documents or information. (ECF No. 872).
`
`Instant counsel now files a motion for extension of time to file a renewed motion for
`
`sentence reduction.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Instant counsel respectfully requests an extension of time of twenty-nine (29) days, or to
`
`on or before March 29, 2024 to file a renewed motion for sentence reduction. Said request is
`
`made under the following reasoning:
`
`a. Instant counsel has diligently worked on
`
`the matter,
`
`including conferring
`
`telephonically and via U.S. Mail correspondences.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 5 of 7
`
`b. Instant counsel set up and completed a call via the counselor for Donnie Bryant in
`
`February of 2024, which took additional conferring due to Donnie Bryant’s in-
`
`custody status.
`
`c. After said telephone call, instant counsel was left with the impression that Donnie
`
`Bryant would like counsel to review one or more pro se filings by Donnie Bryant in
`
`preparation for his renewed motion for sentence reduction, including a filing in the
`
`year 2006, and in February of 2024, as well as a docket from a 2004 case.
`
`d. That, additionally, counsel with the Federal Public Defender’s Office also inquired
`
`with instant counsel as to Donnie Bryant’s February 2024 pro se motion insofar as the
`
`motion requested relief under Amendment 821.
`
`e. Instant counsel advised the Federal Public Defender’s Office that counsel would try
`
`and obtain a copy of the pro se motion for review by the Federal Public Defender’s
`
`Office to see if there is an argument under Amendment 821.
`
`f. In order to properly represent Donnie Bryant and review all potential information in
`
`preparation for the renewed motion, instant counsel respectfully requests an extension
`
`of time for the Court to rule on the March 1, 2024 motion for copies of sealed or
`
`stricken documents and information, as well as review the information obtained
`
`therein.
`
`g. The instant Motion is not being prepared or filed under any bad faith, or lack of due
`
`diligence.
`
`h. On March 1, 2024, instant counsel conferred with counsel for the Government,
`
`Assistant United States Attorney Jim W. Fang, regarding the proposed extension.
`
`Said counsel advised that there was not an opposition to said request.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 6 of 7
`
`i. That Defendant Donnie Bryant does not have an objection to said extension due to
`
`said request encapsulates Donnie Bryant’s requests as to the anticipated timeline.
`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`That, accordingly, instant counsel respectfully requests an additional twenty-nine (29)
`
`days, or on or before Friday, March 29, 2024 by which to file a renewed motion for reduction
`
`of sentence.
`
`Respectfully submitted this 1st day of March, 2024.
`
`By: /s/ Angela H. Dows
`CORY READE DOWS & SHAFER
`Attorney for Defendant DONNIE BRYANT
`
` ORDER
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for Defendant to file a Renewed Motion
`for Sentence Reduction is extended until Friday, March 29, 2024.
`
`Dated this ____ day of March, 2024.
`
`___________________________
`Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`6
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:06-cr-00234-GMN-GWF Document 875 Filed 03/04/24 Page 7 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby affirms that a copy of the foregoing:
`
`DONNIE BRYANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
`RENEWED MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
`
`
`has been served on all counsel of record as listed below, via electronic transmission, pursuant to
`
`local Order, as follows:
`
`JIM W. FANG
`Assistant United States Attorney
`501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
`jim.fang@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED this 1st day of March, 2024.
`
` ___/s/_____________________
` ANGELA H. DOWS, ESQ.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket