throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:11-cr-00304-RCJ-PAL Document 158 Filed 11/28/23 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`DARRELL CONNERS,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 2:11-cr-00304-RCJ-PAL
`
` ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Pending before the Court is Counsel’s Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record
`
`for Darrell Conners, (Dkt. 156).1 For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion and
`
`recommends that CJA attorney Jamie Resch be appointed as counsel of record in this case.
`
`Lisa A. Rasmussen was appointed to represent Conners in this case on April 9, 2018. (Dkt.
`
`156 at 1); (see also Dkt. 115). This case is currently on appeal at the Ninth Circuit. (Dkt. 156 at
`
`
`Counsel filed the pending motion amending only to correct the mailing address provided for Conners.
`1
`(Dkt. 156 at 1). Thus, the Court will consider moot counsel’s original motion to withdraw, (Dkt. 155).
`
`1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cr-00304-RCJ-PAL Document 158 Filed 11/28/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2); (see also Dkt. 150). At times, Rasmussen and Conners have had a “difference of opinion . . .
`
`as to what the priorities are in his case.” (Dkt. 156 at 2). The motion states that “[t]here are times
`
`in cases when a defendant and his lawyer do not see eye to eye on the preferred course of action
`
`and this is one of those instances.” (Id. at 2–3). Therefore, the motion argues that due to Conners’
`
`frustration, it “appears that he would be better served by having a different attorney represent him
`
`in this matter.” (Id. at 3).
`
`Currently pending in state court is another case involving Conners, where he is represented
`
`by CJA attorney Jamie Resch. (Dkt. 156 at 2, 4). At Conners’ request, Rasmussen believes that
`
`it would be best if she withdraws as Conners’ counsel in this case. (Id. at 2–3). She recommends
`
`that the Court consider appointing Mr. Resch as her replacement as he is handling “the state court
`
`post-conviction matter and its resolution could impact the Judgment in this case.” (Id. at 3, 4–5).
`
`Further, Rasmussen notes that “there is no upcoming trial or hearing” in this case where a chance
`
`of counsel could materially affect Conners’ case. (Id. at 3).
`
`Rule 1.16 of the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct allows a lawyer to seek to withdraw
`
`from a case where good cause exists and if withdraw can be accomplished without any adverse
`
`impact on the interests of the client. Rule 1.16(b)(1) (“[A] lawyer may withdraw from representing
`
`a client if . . . [w]ithdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of
`
`the client[.]”). Rasmussen has established that good cause exists in this case to permit withdrawal
`
`and that withdrawal would not harm her client. The Court agrees with Rasmussen and
`
`recommends that Jamie Resch be appointed as counsel in this case.
`
`
`
`2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:11-cr-00304-RCJ-PAL Document 158 Filed 11/28/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counsel’s Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of
`
`Record for Darrell Conners, (Dkt. 156), is GRANTED.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to NOTIFY CJA
`
`appointing authority for the District of Nevada regarding the appointment of Jamie Resch as
`
`counsel for Conners in this case.
`
`IT IS FURHTER ORDERED that Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record
`
`for Darrell Conners, (Dkt. 155), is TERMINATED as MOOT.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated November 28, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
`
` ROBERT C. JONES
`
` United States District Judge
`
`3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket