Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 1 of 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`Case No.: 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK
`
`
`Order Resolving Objections to
`Designated Deposition Testimony
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Billy Cepero
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Douglas Gillespie et al.,
`
`
`
`Defendants
`
`In the notices of deposition designations, the parties provided their objections to
`
`designated deposition testimony.1 Attached are the court’s rulings on those objections, denoted
`
`next to the objection in the appropriate line of the charts. IT IS ORDERED that the objections
`
`are sustained or overruled as stated on these attachments.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`
`
`Whether addressed by these rulings or not, when presenting deposition testimony at trial,
`
`13
`
`counsel must:
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`
`
`• Exclude the internal objections and any discussion about or response thereto; and
`
`• Exclude attorney-to-attorney colloquy.
`
`
`____________ __________________
`U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
`January 22, 2024
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`
`1 ECF No. 271; ECF No. 273.
`
`

`

`A&—WwNO
`OoOoNNDBD
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`702.784.5200
`
`
`
`
`
`LasVegas,Nevada89169
`
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 2 of 13
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 2 of 13
`
`Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 10569
`Dawn L.Davis, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 13329
`SNELL & WILMERLL.
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`Las Vegas, NV 89169
`Telephone:
`(702) 784-5200
`Facsimile:
`(702) 784-5252
`kdove@swlaw.com
`ddavis@swlaw.com
`
`Attorneysfor PlaintiffBilly Cepero
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`BILLY CEPERO,
`
`Case No. 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`DOUGLASGILLESPIE etal.,
`
`Court's Ruling on Plaintiff's
`Deposition Designations, Objections to
`Defendant’s Deposition Designations
`and Counter-Designations
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Plaintiff Billy Cepero submits the following deposition designations, objections and
`
`counter-designations. Plaintiff's designations and counter-designations are highlighted in the
`
`deposition transcripts attached as Exhibits 1-3.
`
`A.
`
`Plaintiff's Designations
`
`Mark J. Rosen, M.D.
`
`DESIGNATIONS OBJECTIONS
`
`Plaintiff's
`eeections
`4:17-1919
`
`517-25 >
`61-18 a
`7:13-25 esee
`
`DEF. COUNTER| Court's Ruling on
`
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`8:1-14 eeee
`
`Snell&Wilmer
`
`
`
`
`L.LP.
`
`
`
`
`
`LAWOFFICES3883HowardHughesParkway,Suite1100
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 3 of 13
`
`Court's Ruling on
`Plaintiff's
`Objections
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`PLT.
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`DEF.
`OBJECTIONS
`
`DEF. COUNTER
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`10:4-7
`10:14-25
`11:1-25
`12:1-25
`13:1-25
`14:10-25
`15:1-25
`16:1-25
`17:1-25
`18:1-25
`19:1-22
`20:9-25
`21:1-16
`21:21-23
`22:12-25
`23:1-25
`24:1-14
`25:8-20
`26:5-18
`26:23-5
`27:1-9
`27:14-22
`28:2-19
`29:1-25
`30:18-24
`31:2-25
`32:1-25
`33:1-11
`33:16-24
`40:9-25
`41:1
`42:21-23
`42:25
`43:1-4
`47:6-12
`
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`- 2 -
`
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`
`702.784.5200
`
`LAW OFFICES
`
`Snell & Wilmer
`
`L.L.P.
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 4 of 13
`
`B.
`
`Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s Designations and Counter-Designations
`1.
`Michelle Lee Lowther
`
`Court's Ruling on
`Plaintiff's
`Objections
`
`DEF.
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`PLT.
`OBJECTIONS
`
`PLT. COUNTER
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`5:6
`5:8-9
`10:21-25
`11:1
`11:5-25
`12:1-25
`13:1-23
`14:3-7
`
`14:11-25
`15:1-25
`16:1-25
`17:1-8
`17:16-25
`18:1-16
`18:20-25
`19:1-18
`23:9-14
`24:9-11
`25:1-25
`26:1-25
`27:1-25
`28:1-25
`29:1-15
`34:9-25
`35:1-25
`36:1-8
`38:20-25
`
`39:1-10
`
`39:13-20
`40:4-10
`41:1-25
`42:1-11
`42:19-21
`
`Hearsay
`
`13:24-25
`14:1-2
`44:17-20
`
`Relevance
`
`Relevance
`Relevance
`Relevance
`Relevance,
`duplicative
`Relevance,
`duplicative,
`foundation
`
`19:19-22
`
`24:12-21
`
`39:21-25
`40:1-3
`
`42:12-18
`43:2-13
`
`- 3 -
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`
`702.784.5200
`
`LAW OFFICES
`
`Snell & Wilmer
`
`L.L.P.
`
`Sustained
`
`Overruled
`
`Sustained
`
`Sustained
`
`Sustained
`
`Sustained
`
`Sustained
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 5 of 13
`
`Court's Ruling on
`Plaintiff's
`Objections
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`DEF.
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`PLT.
`OBJECTIONS
`
`PLT. COUNTER
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`45:4-7
`
`Relevance
`
`44:17-20
`
`2.
`
`Stacie Pace
`
`DEF.
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`PLT.
`OBJECTIONS
`
`PLT. COUNTER
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`4:9-13
`5:25
`6:1-24
`
`9:7-20
`10:5-15
`11:6-10
`11:15-29 [sic]
`12:1-25
`
`13:1-25
`14:1-25
`15 1-25
`
`16 1-25
`17:1
`17:13-25
`
`18:1-16
`
`Hearsay
`
`Foundation
`
`Hearsay
`
`4:18-25
`
`6:25
`7:1-16
`8:10-22
`
`29:5-25
`30:1-10
`31:3-25
`32:1-19
`
`31:3-25
`32:1-19
`
`17:2
`33:14-25
`34:1-25
`35:1-25
`36:1-25
`37:1-14
`
`18:21-25
`19:1-12
`19:21-25
`20:1-9
`29:5-25
`30:1-10
`31:3-25
`- 4 -
`
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`
`702.784.5200
`
`LAW OFFICES
`
`Snell & Wilmer
`
`L.L.P.
`
`Overruled
`
`Overruled
`
`Overruled
`
`Sustained
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 6 of 13
`
`Court's Ruling on
`Plaintiff's
`Objections
`
`DEF.
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`PLT.
`OBJECTIONS
`
`PLT. COUNTER
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`19:13-20
`
`No testimony
`
`20:13-23
`
`32:1-19
`37:1-14
`38:25
`39:1-21
`
`18:21-25
`19:1-12
`19:21-25
`20:1-9
`29:5-25
`30:1-10
`31:3-25
`32:1-19
`37:1-14
`38:25
`39:1-21
`
`19:21-25
`20:1-9
`22:7-22
`25:17-25
`26:1-21
`33:14-25
`34:1-25
`35:1-25
`36:1-25
`37:1-14
`38:25
`39:1-21
`41:9-20
`
`Dated: January 17, 2024.
`
`SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
`
`By: /s/ Dawn L. Davis
`Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 10569
`Dawn L. Davis, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 13329
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Billy Cepero
`
`- 5 -
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
`
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
`
`702.784.5200
`
`LAW OFFICES
`
`Snell & Wilmer
`
`L.L.P.
`
`Overruled
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 7 of 13
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 7 of 13
`
`Marquis Aurbach
`Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 6882
`Tye S. Hanseen, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 10365
`10001 Park Run Drive
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
`Telephone: (702) 382-0711
`Facsimile: (702) 382-5816
`canderson@maclaw.com
`thanseen@maclaw.com
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case Number:
`2:11-ev-01421-JAD-NJK
`
`BILLY CEPERO,
`
`vs.
`
`GILLESPIE,ET AL.,
`
`COURT'S RULING ON
`DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS
`AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS
`TO PLAINTIFF’S PAGE/LINE
`DESIGNATIONS AND COUNTER-
`DESIGNATIONS
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Defendant
`
`James Bonkavich (“Defendant”), hereby submits objections and
`
`counter-designations to Plaintiff's deposition designations as follows:
`
`A.
`
`ROSEN.
`
`Pitf.
`
`Designationsnations
`ae19
`
`8:1-14
`
`8:21-25
`
`Def.Objections
`
`Court's Ruling on
`Objection
`
`Hearsay. (7:20-21)
`
`Hearsay. (8:10-14)
`
`aa
`
`9:9-12
`
`Foundation. No testimony. (9:9-12)
`
`Overruled
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`MAC-:05166-573 5353222_1
`
`OA&_WwWNO
`OowoNYDW
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`MARQUISAURBACH
`
`
`
`
`
`10001ParkRunDriveLasVegas,Nevada89145
`
`
`
`
`
`(702)382-0711FAX:(702)382-5816
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 8 of 13
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 8 of 13
`
`
`
`10:4-7
`
`12:1-25
`
`13:1-25
`
`14:10-25
`
`15:1-25
`
`Hearsay. (13:22-25)
`
`
`
`Treating physician maynottestify beyond
`scope of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co.,
`218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL 2440953, at *2
`(D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Goodmanv.
`Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d
`817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`Overruled
`(22:19-23:6)
`
`
`23:1-25
`
`OA&_WwWNO
`OowoNYDW
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`22
`
`28
`
`25:8-20
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Treating physician may nottestify beyond scope
`of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co.,
`218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL 2440953, at *2
`(D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Goodmanv.
`Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d
`817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`(26:5-9)
`
`Overruled
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`MAC-05166-573 5353222_1
`
`
`
`MARQUISAURBACH
`
`
`
`
`
`10001ParkRunDriveLasVegas,Nevada89145
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(702)382-0711FAX:(702)382-5816
`
`Hearsay. Treating physician may nottestify
`beyond scope of treatment (23:13-24:5) See
`Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNJK,
`2022 WL 2440953,at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)|sustained
`21
`(citing Goodmanv. Staples The Office
`Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir.
`2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)). (23:7-11)
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 9 of 13
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 9 of 13
`
`
`
`26:5-18
`
`26:23-5
`
`27:1-9
`
`27:14-22
`
`28:2-19
`
`29:1-25
`
`treating physician file. (29:1-25)
`
`Overruled
`
`Foundation. Treating physician may nottestify
`beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico
`Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL
`2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)(citing
`Goodmanv. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC,
`644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule
`26(a)(2)(B)). Hearsay. Document outside of
`treating physician file. (26:16-25)
`
`Foundation. Treating physician may nottestify
`beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico
`Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL
`2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing
`Goodmanv. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC,
`644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule
`26(a)(2)(B)). Hearsay. Document outside of
`treating physician file. (26:16-25)
`
`Foundation. Treating physician may nottestify
`beyond scopeof treatment. See Rosas v. Geico
`Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL
`2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing
`Goodmanv. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC,
`644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule
`26(a)(2)(B)). Hearsay. Document outside of
`treating physician file. (27:1-9)
`
`Foundation. Treating physician may nottestify
`beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico
`Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL
`2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing
`Goodmanv. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC,
`644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule
`26(a)(2)(B)). Hearsay. Document outside of
`treating physician file. (27:14-22)
`
`Foundation. Treating physician may nottestify
`beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico
`Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL
`2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing
`Goodmanv. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC,
`644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule
`26(a)(2)(B)). Hearsay. Document outside of
`treating physician file. (28:2-9)
`
`Foundation. Treating physician maynottestify
`beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico
`Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL
`2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing
`Goodmanv. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC,
`644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule
`26(a)(2)(B)). Hearsay. Document outside of
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`MAC-:05166-573 5353222_1
`
`OA&_WwWNO
`OowoNYDW
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`MARQUISAURBACH
`
`
`
`
`
`10001ParkRunDriveLasVegas,Nevada89145
`
`
`
`
`
`(702)382-0711FAX:(702)382-5816
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 10 of 13
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 10 of 13
`
`
`
`30:18-24
`
`31:2-25
`
`32:1-25
`
`33:1-11
`
`33:16-24
`
`(33:1-11, 16-24.)
`
`Overruled
`
`Foundation. Speculation. An attempt at causation
`that fails to satisfy legal requirements. See
`Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`43 F.3d 1311, 1314 (9th Cir. 1995) (must be
`“sufficiently compelling proof that agent must
`have caused the damage somehow). Also,treating
`physician maynottestify beyond scope of
`treatment. See Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co.,
`218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL 2440953, at *2
`(D. Nev.Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Goodmanv.
`Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d
`817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`(30:18-24)
`
`Foundation. Speculation. An attempt at causation
`that fails to satisfy legal requirements. See
`Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`43 F.3d 1311, 1314 (9th Cir. 1995) (must be
`“sufficiently compelling proof that agent must
`have caused the damage somehow). Also,treating
`physician maynottestify beyond scope of
`treatment. See Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co.,
`218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL 2440953, at *2
`(D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Goodmanv.
`Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d
`817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`(31:2-25)
`
`Treating physician maynottestify beyond scope
`of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co.,
`218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL 2440953, at *2
`(D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Goodmanv.
`Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d
`817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`Also, speculation. (32:1-25)
`
`Documentoutside offile. Treating physician may
`not testify beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas
`v. Geico Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNJIK, 2022
`WL 2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)
`(citing Goodmanv. Staples The Office
`Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir.
`2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`(33:1-11, 16-24.)
`
`Documentoutside offile. Treating physician may
`not testify beyond scope of treatment. See Rosas
`v. Geico Cas. Co., 218CV01200APGNIK, 2022
`WL 2440953, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022)
`(citing Goodmanv. Staples The Office
`Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d 817, 826 (9th Cir.
`2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`MAC-:05166-573 5353222_1
`
`OA&_WwWNO
`OowoNYDW
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`MARQUISAURBACH
`
`
`
`
`
`10001ParkRunDriveLasVegas,Nevada89145
`
`
`
`
`
`(702)382-0711FAX:(702)382-5816
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 11 of 13
`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 11 of 13
`
`
`
`40:9-25
`
`41:1
`
`42:25
`
`47:6-12
`
`Treating physician maynottestify beyond scope
`of treatment. See Rosas v. Geico Cas. Co.,
`218CV01200APGNIK, 2022 WL 2440953, at *2
`(D. Nev. Jan. 26, 2022) (citing Goodmanv.
`Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, 644 F.3d
`817, 826 (9th Cir. 2011) and Rule 26(a)(2)(B)).
`
`Sustained
`
`B.
`
`LOWTHER.
`
`Pitf.-Counter
`Designations
`
`Def. Objections
`
`14:17-20
`
`
`19:19-22
`
`24:12-21
`
`Also, speculation. (47:6-12)
`
`
`pe
`eS
`ee
`aa
`
`a C
`
`c.
`
`PACE.
`
`Pitf. Counter-
`Designations
`4:18-25
`
`
`
`Def. Objection
`
`Felony not admissible under FRE 609(b).
`
`Sustained
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`MAC-:05166-573 5353222_1
`
`OA&_WwWNO
`oOOoNINDW
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`MARQUISAURBACH
`
`
`
`
`
`10001ParkRunDriveLasVegas,Nevada89145
`
`
`
`
`
`(702)382-0711FAX:(702)382-5816
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 12 of 13
`
`7:1-16
`
`8:10-22
`
`17:2
`
`18:21-25
`
`19:1-12
`
`19:21-25
`
`20:1-9
`
`22:7-22
`
`25:17-25
`
`26:1-21
`
`29:5-25
`
`30:1-10
`
`31:3-25
`
`32:1-19
`
`33:14-25
`
`34:1-25
`
`35:1-25
`
`36:1-25
`
`37:1-14
`
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`MAC:05166-573 5353222_1
`
`MARQUIS AURBACH
`
`10001 Park Run Drive
`
`(702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816
`
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
`
`

`

`Case 2:11-cv-01421-JAD-NJK Document 281 Filed 01/22/24 Page 13 of 13
`
`38:25
`
`39:1-21
`
`41:9-20
`
`Dated this 19th day of January, 2024.
`
`MARQUIS AURBACH
`
`By /s/ Tye S. Hanseen
`Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 6882
`Tye S. Hanseen, Esq.
`Nevada Bar No. 10365
`10001 Park Run Drive
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
`Attorney for Defendant
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`MAC:05166-573 5353222_1
`
`MARQUIS AURBACH
`
`10001 Park Run Drive
`
`(702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816
`
`Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
`
`