`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`United States of America,
` Plaintiff(s),
`
`vs.
`
`
`Bill Sunga Modina, d/b/a 5M Financial and 6M
`Financial,
` Defendant(s).
`
`
`
`2:14-cv-00474-JAD-MDC
`
`
`Order granting motion to compel (ECF No. 38)
`
`
`
`The Court has reviewed plaintiff United States of America’s motion to compel discovery. ECF No.
`
`38. The Court grants the motion on the merits. The Court also grants the motion because plaintiff did not
`
`oppose the motion. Per LR 7-3(d), ‘[t]he failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in support
`
`of the motion constitutes a consent to the denial of the motion.” Id.
`
`IT IS ORDERED that:
`
`
`
`1. Plaintiff United States of America’s motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED.
`
`2. Defendant Bill Sunga Modina, d/b/a 5M Financial and 6M Financial has until Friday, March
`
`15, 2024 to answer the plaintiff’s discovery requests.
`
`
`
`NOTICE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and
`
`recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk
`
`of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal
`
`may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified
`
`time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections
`
`within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-00474-JAD-MDC Document 40 Filed 02/23/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court.
`
`Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452,
`
`454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, plaintiffs must immediately file written notification with the
`
`court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s
`
`attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this
`
`rule may result in dismissal of the action.
`
`Dated this 23rd day of February 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________
`Maximiliano D. Couvillier III
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`
`