`Case 3:12-cr-00115-ART-VPC Document 70 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`
`
`United States of America,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Thomas Baye,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:12-cr-00115- ART-VPC-1
`
`
`ORDER
`(ECF Nos. 59, 60)
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant Thomas Baye moves for early termination of supervised release.
`
`(ECF No. 59.) The Government opposes the motion, (ECF No. 62), and Defendant
`
`has replied to the Government’s opposition. (ECF No. 64.) Probation does not
`
`oppose Defendant’s motion. (See ECF No. 59.) The Court heard argument on the
`
`motion on September 30, 2024. Based on the briefing and argument, the Court
`
`grants the motion to terminate supervised release and the accompanying motion
`
`to seal. (ECF Nos. 59, 60.)
`
`In March 2013, this Court sentenced Defendant to 144 months followed by
`
`three years of supervised release. (See ECF No. 33.) While incarcerated,
`
`Defendant taught GED classes, took courses to get a commercial driver’s license,
`
`and worked as a caretaker for elderly inmates. (ECF No. 59.) Defendant served
`
`the last ten months of his custodial sentence at a halfway house in Las Vegas
`
`before release in February 2023. (Id.) During his time at the halfway house and
`
`his nearly twenty months on supervised release, Defendant has complied with all
`
`supervision conditions. He also has remained gainfully employed, developed
`
`positive relationships, and willfully participated in counseling and mental health
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cr-00115-ART-VPC Document 70 Filed 09/30/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`treatment.
`
`Defendant’s motion argues that he has met all conditions of his supervised
`
`release so far, that he has received positive feedback from his mental health
`
`treatment providers, that he has maintained gainful employment, that he has
`
`developed positive relationships during his time on supervised release, and that
`
`Probation, which is in the best position to evaluate Defendant’s likelihood of
`
`reoffending, does not oppose Defendant’s motion. (Id.; ECF No. 64.) The
`
`Government replies that Defendant’s progress is due to supervised release and
`
`that Defendant has reoffended during previous periods of supervised release.
`
`10
`
`(ECF No. 62.)
`
`11
`
`The Court may grant early termination of supervised release after a
`
`12
`
`defendant has completed one year of supervised release and upon finding that
`
`13
`
`relevant 18 USC §§ 3553(a) sentencing factors support early termination.
`
`14
`
`18 USC § 3583(e)(1). Defendant must satisfy the Court that Defendant’s conduct
`
`15
`
`and the interests of justice warrant early termination.
`
`16
`
`The Court finds that Defendant’s conduct, progression in mental health
`
`17
`
`treatment, and lack of opposition from probation together support early
`
`18
`
`termination of supervised release.
`
`19
`
`The Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion
`
`(ECF No. 59) and the
`
`20
`
`accompanying motion to seal (ECF No. 60).
`
`
`
`DATED THIS 30th day of September, 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ANNE R. TRAUM
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
