IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
`
`ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
` Appellant,
`
`v.
`
`GIDGET SWANSON,
`
` Respondent.
`
`ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
` Appellant,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No. 85090
`
`
`Electronically Filed
`Mar 07 2023 11:06 AM
`Elizabeth A. Brown
`Clerk of Supreme Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No. 85486
`
`
`v.
`
`GIDGET SWANSON,
`
` Respondent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPELLANT’S APPENDIX
`VOLUME 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ROBERT L. EISENBERG (SBN 950)
`LEMONS, GRUNDY & EISENBERG
`6005 Plumas Street, Third Floor
`Reno, NV 89519
`775-786-6868
`775-786-9716 fax
`rle@lge.net
`
`ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
`
`Docket 85090 Document 2023-06840
`
`
`
`ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
` Appellant,
`
`v.
`
`GIDGET SWANSON,
`
` Respondent.
`
`ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`
` Appellant,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No. 85090
`
`
`Electronically Filed
`Mar 07 2023 11:06 AM
`Elizabeth A. Brown
`Clerk of Supreme Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No. 85486
`
`
`v.
`
`GIDGET SWANSON,
`
` Respondent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPELLANT’S APPENDIX
`VOLUME 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ROBERT L. EISENBERG (SBN 950)
`LEMONS, GRUNDY & EISENBERG
`6005 Plumas Street, Third Floor
`Reno, NV 89519
`775-786-6868
`775-786-9716 fax
`rle@lge.net
`
`ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
`
`Docket 85090 Document 2023-06840
`
`
`
`CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX TO APPELLANT’S APPENDIX
`DOCUMENT
`DATE
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`Complaint
`10/24/19
`1
`1-7
`Defendant Acuity, A Mutual
`1/28/20
`1
`8-18
`Insurance Company’s Answer
`to Plaintiff’s Complaint
`Defendant Acuity, A Mutual
`Insurance Company’s Initial
`Designation of Expert Witnesses
`
`Exhibit 1: Troy Watson’s
`
`Expert Report dated
` April 10, 2021
`
`Exhibit 2: Troy Watson’s
`
`Expert Credentials
`
`Exhibit 3: Thomas Veitch’s
`
`Expert Report dated
` April 7, 2021
`
`Exhibit 4: Thomas Veitch’s
`
`Expert Credentials
`
`Exhibit 5: Brian Jones’ Expert
`
`Report dated April 16, 2021
`
`Exhibit 6: Brian Jones’ Expert
`
`Calculations
`
`Exhibit 7: Brain Jones’ Expert
`
`Credentials
`Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosure of
`Expert Witnesses
`
`Exhibit 1: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
`Expert Report
`
`Exhibit 2: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
`CV, Prior Testimony List
`
`and Fee Schedule
`
`Exhibit 3: Mary Ann Shannon,
` M.D.’s Expert Reports
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`2
`
`19-22
`
`23-32
`
`33-56
`
`57-69
`
`70-89
`
`90-110
`
`111-112
`
`113-165
`
`166-178
`
`179-243
`
`244-277
`
`278-291
`
`4/16/21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4/16/21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`NO.
`1.
`
`2.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`2
`292-301
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5/14/21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6/4/21
`
`
`
`
`
`7/16/21
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`2
`
`302-312
`
`313-329
`
`330-336
`
`337-352
`
`353-363
`
`364-372
`
`373-378
`
`379-382
`
`383-386
`
`387-389
`
`390-394
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 4)
`Exhibit 4: Mary Ann Shannon,
`
` M.D.’s CV, Prior Testimony
`
`
`List and Fee Schedule
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5: Sam Terry’s Expert
`
`
`Report
`
`
`
`Exhibit 6: Sam Terry’s CV,
`
`
`Prior Testimony List and
`
`
`Fee Schedule
`
`
`
`Exhibit 7: Qualifications of
`
` Non-Retained Treating Physicians
`
`5.
`Plaintiff’s Supplemental Disclosure
`
`of Initial and Rebuttal Expert
`
`Witnesses
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
`
`Rebuttal Expert Report
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Mary Ann Shannon
`
` M.D.’s Rebuttal Expert Report
`
`
`and Supplemental Expert Report
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Sam Terry’s Rebuttal
`
`
`Expert Report
`
`6.
`Defendant Acuity, A Mutual
`
`Insurance Company’s Supplemental
`
`Designation of Rebuttal Expert
`
`Witnesses
`
`
`
`Exhibit 11: Thomas Veitch’s
`
`
`Second Supplemental / Rebuttal
`
`
`Expert Report dated May 26, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 12: Troy Watson’s
`
`
`Second Supplemental / Rebuttal
`
`
`Expert Report dated May 30, 2021
`
`7.
`Defendant Acuity, A Mutual
`
`Insurance Company’s Second
`
`Supplemental Designation of
`
`Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`NO.
`
`8.
`
`
`9.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental
`Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion in
`Limine in Preclude Arguments
`and Evidence of Other Claims
`or Lawsuits Against Acuity
`(Motion in Limine No. 3)
`
`Exhibit A: Judgment from
` Donald Humes v. Acuity
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion in
`Limine to Exclude Select Opinions
`from Expert Stempel (Motion in
`Limine No. 6)
`
`Exhibit A: Deposition
`
`Transcript of Professor
`
`Jeffrey Stempel taken on
`
`July 15, 2021
`
`Exhibit B: Professor Jeffrey
`
`Stempel’s Initial Report
`
`Exhibit C: Professor Jeffrey
`
`Stempel’s Supplemental
`
`Report
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion in
`Limine to Exclude Plaintiff’s
`Claims for Extra Contractual
`Damages (Motion in Limine No. 8)
`
`Exhibit A: Gidget Swanson’s
` Deposition Transcript Volume II
`
`taken on January 14, 2021
`
`Exhibit B: Deposition
`
`Transcript of Professor
`
`Jeffrey Stempel taken on
`
`July 15, 2021
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion for
`Summary Judgment
`
`
`
`iii
`
`DATE
`7/16/21
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`2
`395-411
`
`8/13/21
`
`2
`
`412-420
`
`
`
`8/13/21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8/13/21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8/13/21
`
`2
`
`2
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`
`3
`
`421-422
`
`423-440
`
`441-505
`
`506-532
`
`533-543
`
`
`
`
`
`544-553
`
`554-566
`
`567-631
`
`632-653
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 12) Exhibit A: Acuity’s Insurance
`
`
`Policy
`
`
`
`Exhibit B: Plaintiff’s Motion
`
`
`for Protective Order, filed
`
`
`January 8, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit C: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
` December 23, 2015 Deposition
`
`
`Transcript in Schwartzer v.
`American Family
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit D: Acuity’s Opposition
`
`
`to Plaintiff’s Motion for a
`
`
`Protective Order, filed on
`
`
`January 22, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit E: Plaintiff’s Reply
`
`
`in Support of Motion for a
`
`
`Protective Order, filed on
`
`
`February 10, 2021
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Plaintiff’s
`
`
`
`Initial Disclosure of
`
`
` Witnesses and Production
`
`
`
`of Documents Pursuant to
`
`
` NRCP 16.1
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit F: Discovery
`
`
`Commissioner’s Report and
`
`
`Recommendations, filed on
`
` March 4, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit G: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
` Deposition Transcript taken
`
`
`July 15, 2021
`
`
`[Listed in Declaration but not
`
`
`included in filed pleading;
`
`
`please see Tab 10, Exhibit A]
`
`13.
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment Regarding
`
`Plaintiff’s Breach of Contract for
`
`Failure to Present for an IME
`
`
`
`Exhibit A: Acuity Insurance
`
`
`Policy
`
`
`
`
`iv
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`3
`654-681
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`682-705
`
`706-763
`
`764-776
`
`777-783
`
`784-812
`
`813-820
`
`8/13/21
`
`4
`
`821-845
`
`
`
`4
`
`846-873
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`4
`874-897
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8/16/21
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`5
`
`6
`
`898-901
`
`902-936
`
`937-949
`
`950-1014
`
`1015-1043
`
`1044-1063
`
`1064-1098
`
`1099-1163
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 13) Exhibit B: Emails sent between
`
`
`Counsel regarding setting
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Independent Medical
`
`
`Exam
`
`
`
`Exhibit C: Dr. Watson’s
`
`
`Supplemental Expert Report
`
`
`dated May 30, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit D: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit E: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume II
`
`
`taken on January 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit F: Sub Rosa Video of
`
`
`Plaintiff taken October 19 & 20,
`
`
`2020 (provided via Dropbox link)
`
`
`
`Exhibit G: Sub Rosa Video of
`
`
`Plaintiff taken January 26, 2021
`
`
`(provided via Dropbox link)
`
`
`
`Exhibit H: Professor Jeffrey
`
`
`Stempel’s Deposition Transcript
`
`
`taken on July 15, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit I: Mary Ann Shannon,
`
` M.D.’s Deposition Transcript
`
`
`taken on July 16, 2021
`
`14.
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion in
`
`Limine to Exclude Plaintiff’s
`
`Expert Jeffrey Stempel
`
`(Motion in Limine No. 5)
`
`
`
`Exhibit A: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit B: Professor Jeffrey
`
`
`Stempel’s Deposition Transcript
`
`
`taken on July 15, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 14) Exhibit C: Professor Jeffrey
`
`
`Stempel’s Deposition Transcript
`
`
`taken on December 23, 2015
`
`
`in Schwartzer, et al. adv.
`American Family Mutual
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit D: Plaintiff’s
`
`
`Supplemental Disclosure of
`
`
`Initial and Rebuttal Expert
`
` Witnesses dated May 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit E: Defendant Acuity’s
`
`
`Request for Production to
`
`
`Plaintiff Swanson dated
`
`
`July 13, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit F: Plaintiff’s Responses
`
`
`to Defendant Acuity’s Request
`
`
`for Production dated
`
` August 10, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit G: Plaintiff’s
`
`
`Supplemental Responses to
`
` Defendant Acuity’s Request
`
`
`for Productions dated
`
` October 26, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit H: Declaration of
`
`
`Professor Jeffrey Stempel
`
`
`dated April 13, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit I: List of Documents
`
`
`Reviewed by Professor
`
`
`Jeffrey Stempel marked as
`
`
`Exhibit C in his Declaration
`
`
`
`Exhibit J: Report of Professor
`
`
`Jeffrey Stempel filed in the
`
` United States District Court of
`
` Nevada in Schwartzer adv.
`American Family Mutual on
`
`
`
`
`February 22, 2016
`
`15.
`Defendant Acuity Motion for
`
`Partial Summary Judgment on
`
`Plaintiff’s Claims for Bad Faith
`
`
`
`
`
`vi
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`6
`1164-1221
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`1222-1238
`
`1239-1247
`
`1248-1263
`
`1264-1278
`
`1279-1305
`
`1306-1307
`
`1308-1339
`
`8/20/21
`
`7
`
`1340-1360
`
`
`
`
`
`NO.
`
`16.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`Appendix to Defendant Acuity’s
`Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claim
`for Bad Faith
`
`Exhibit A: Police Report
`
`Exhibit B: Gidget Swanson’s
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`Exhibit C: Claim Notes
`
`Exhibit D: Vehicle Damage
`
`Estimate for Plaintiff’s Vehicle
`
`from Sudden Impact Auto, dated
` March 20, 2018
`
`Exhibit E: Letter of Representation
`
`from Plaintiff’s First Counsel
`
`dated March 20, 2018
`
`Exhibit F: Edith Ellis Wilson’s
` Deposition Transcript, taken on
`
`September 21, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit G: Email sent from Edith
` Wilson of Acuity to Plaintiff, dated
`
`September 18, 2018, received
`
`from Acuity’s Claim File
`
`Exhibit H: Email sent from Edith
` Wilson of Acuity to Plaintiff’s
`
`First Counsel, dated February 18,
`
`2018
`
`Exhibit I: Plaintiff’s Demand
`
`Package sent to Acuity, dated
` March 11, 2019
`
`Exhibit J: Proof of Med Pay
`
`Payment
`
`Exhibit K: Correspondence
`
`sent by Edith Wilson of Acuity to
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel, dated
` April 12, 2019
`
`vii
`
`DATE
`8/20/21
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`7
`1361-1363
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`7
`
`7
`7
`
`7
`
`7
`
`7
`
`7
`
`7
`
`8
`
`8
`
`1364-1374
`1375-1409
`
`1410-1423
`1424-1439
`
`1440-1442
`
`1443-1492
`
`1493-1496
`
`1497-1499
`
`1500-1585
`
`1586-1587
`
`1588-1603
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 16) Exhibit L: Correspondence sent
`
`
`by Plaintiff’s First Counsel to
`
` Acuity, dated June 7, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit M: Correspondence sent
`
`
`by Edith Wilson of Acuity to
`
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel, dated
`
`
`June 11, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit N: Transcription of a
`
` Voicemail from Plaintiff’s First
`
`
`Counsel left for Scott Butzman
`
`
`of Acuity, dated August 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit O: Email sent from
`
`
`Edith Wilson of Acuity to
`
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel, dated
`
` August 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit P: Transcription of a
`
` Voicemail from Plaintiff’s
`
`
`First Counsel left for Scott
`
`
`Butzman of Acuity, dated
`
` August 20, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit Q: Cover Letter from
`
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel to
`
`
`Scott Butzman and Tom
`
`
`Behrend of Acuity, dated
`
` August 19, 2019, along with
`
`
`the Samuel Terry Report
`
`
`attached to said letter
`
`
`
`Exhibit R: Samuel Terry’s
`
` Deposition Transcript, taken on
`
`
`July 16, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit S: Plaintiff’s Complaint
`
`
`
`Exhibit T: Anna Kuneman’s
`
` Written Statement, dated March
`
`
`16, 2018
`
`17.
`Defendant Acuity’s Motion for
`
`Partial Summary Judgment on
`
`Plaintiff’s Punitive Damages
`
`
`
`
`
`viii
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`8
`1604-1606
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8/20/21
`
`8
`
`8
`
`8
`
`8
`
`8
`
`8
`
`8
`8
`
`8
`
`1607-1610
`
`1611-1613
`
`1614-1616
`
`1617-1619
`
`1620-1659
`
`1660-1688
`
`1689-1696
`1697-1698
`
`1699-1718
`
`
`
`DATE
`8/20/21
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`8
`1719-1721
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`8
`
`8
`8
`
`8
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`1722-1732
`1733-1767
`
`1768-1781
`1782-1797
`
`1798-1800
`
`1801-1850
`
`1851-1854
`
`1855-1857
`
`1858-1943
`
`1944-1945
`
`1946-1961
`
`
`
`NO.
`
`18.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`Appendix to Defendant Acuity’s
`Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment on Plaintiff’s Punitive
`Damages
`
`Exhibit A: Police Report
`
`Exhibit B: Gidget Swanson’s
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`Exhibit C: Claim Notes
`
`Exhibit D: Vehicle Damage
`
`Estimate for Plaintiff’s Vehicle
`
`from Sudden Impact Auto, dated
` March 20, 2018
`
`Exhibit E: Letter of Representation
`
`from Plaintiff’s First Counsel
`
`dated March 20, 2018
`
`Exhibit F: Edith Ellis Wilson’s
` Deposition Transcript, taken on
`
`September 21, 2020
`
`Exhibit G: Email sent from Edith
` Wilson of Acuity to Plaintiff, dated
`
`September 18, 2018
`
`Exhibit H: Email sent from Edith
` Wilson of Acuity to Plaintiff’s
`
`First Counsel, dated February 18,
`
`2018
`
`Exhibit I: Plaintiff’s Demand
`
`Package sent to Acuity, dated
` March 11, 2019
`
`Exhibit J: Proof of Med Pay
`
`Payment
`
`Exhibit K: Correspondence
`
`sent by Edith Wilson of Acuity to
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel, dated
` April 12, 2019
`
`ix
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 18) Exhibit L: Correspondence sent
`
`
`by Plaintiff’s First Counsel to
`
` Acuity, dated June 7, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit M: Correspondence sent
`
`
`by Edith Wilson of Acuity to
`
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel, dated
`
`
`June 11, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit N: Transcription of a
`
` Voicemail from Plaintiff’s First
`
`
`Counsel left for Scott Butzman
`
`
`of Acuity, dated August 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit O: Email sent from
`
`
`Edith Wilson of Acuity to
`
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel, dated
`
` August 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit P: Transcription of a
`
` Voicemail from Plaintiff’s
`
`
`First Counsel left for Scott
`
`
`Butzman of Acuity, dated
`
` August 20, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit Q: Cover Letter from
`
`
`Plaintiff’s First Counsel to
`
`
`Scott Butzman and Tom
`
`
`Behrend of Acuity, dated
`
` August 19, 2019, along with
`
`
`the Samuel Terry Report
`
`
`attached to said letter
`
`
`
`Exhibit R: Samuel Terry’s
`
` Deposition Transcript, taken on
`
`
`July 16, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit S: Plaintiff’s Complaint
`
`
`
`Exhibit T: Anna Kuneman’s
`
` Written Statement, dated March
`
`
`16, 2018
`
`19.
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 4
`
`to Preclude Post-Denial Conduct
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`x
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`9
`1962-1964
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8/20/21
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`1965-1968
`
`1969-1971
`
`1972-1974
`
`1975-1977
`
`1978-2017
`
`9
`
`2018-2046
`
`10
`10
`
`
`10
`
`2047-2054
`2055-2056
`
`2057-2066
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 19) Exhibit 1: Acuity’s Denial
`
`
`Letter of Gidget Swanson’s
`
`
`Claim dated June 11, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Gidget Swanson’s
`
`
`Letter Re: Accident
`
`
`Reconstruction Expert and
`
`
`Requested Reevaluation dated
`
` August 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Notice of Entry of
`
` Order {Order Re: Discovery
`
`
`Commissioner’s Report and
`
`
`Recommendations} filed
`
` March 29, 2021
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 4: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume II
`
`
`taken on January 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5: Stipulation and Order
`
`
`to Extend Discovery Deadlines
`
`
`
`Exhibit 6: Plaintiff’s Responses
`
`
`to Defendant Acuity’s Second
`
`
`Set of Request for Production of
`
` Documents dated March 5, 2021
`
`20.
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 7
`
`to Limit Experts to the Opinions
`
`Set Forth in Their Reports and
`
`Depositions
`
`21.
`Defendant Acuity’s Opposition to
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine
`
`Limited No. 4 to Preclude Post
`
`Denial Conduct
`
`
`
`Exhibit A: Joint Case Conference
`
`
`Report filed March 6, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit B: Report of Jeffrey
`
`
`Stempel dated April 13, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit C: Professor Jeffrey
`
`
`Stempel’s Deposition Transcript
`
`
`taken on July 15, 2021
`
`
`
`
`xi
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`10
`2067-2068
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`2069-2070
`
`10
`
`2071-2081
`
`10
`
`2082-2126
`
`10
`
`10
`
`2127-2133
`
`2134-2138
`
`8/20/21
`
`10
`
`2139-2144
`
`9/2/21
`
`10
`
`2145-2162
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`2163-2189
`
`2190-2216
`
`2217-2281
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`11
`2282-2294
`
`
`
`11
`
`2295-2329
`
`9/2/21
`
`11
`
`2330-2337
`
`9/15/21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`11
`
`2338-2350
`
`2351-2352
`
`11
`
`2353-2487
`
`11
`
`2488-2511
`
`11
`
`2512-2524
`
`12
`
`2525-2560
`
`12
`
`2561-2567
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 21) Exhibit D: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume II
`
`
`taken on January 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit E: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`22.
`Defendant Acuity’s Opposition to
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine
`
`Limit No. 7 to Limit Experts to
`
`the Opinions Set Forth in Their
`
`Reports and Depositions
`
`23.
`Opposition to Defendant Acuity’s
`
`Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Letter from Edith
`
` Wilson of Acuity dated June
`
`
`11, 2019 Denying Gidget
`
`
`Swanson’s Claim
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Deposition Transcript
`
`
`of Edith Wilson taken on
`
`
`September 21, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Plaintiff’s Motion for
`
`
`Protective Order, filed on
`
`
`January 8, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 4: Defendant Acuity’s
`
` Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion
`
`
`for Protective Order and Counter
`
` Motion or Liability Shield, filed
`
`
`on January 22, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5: Plaintiff’s Reply in
`
`
`Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for
`
`
`Protective Order, filed on
`
`
`February 10, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 6: Discovery
`
`
`Commissioner’s Report and
`
`
`Recommendations, filed on
`
`
`January 12, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xii
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`12
`2568-2596
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`2597-2631
`
`12
`
`2632-2644
`
`12
`
`2645-2646
`
`12
`
`2647-2667
`
`12
`
`2668-2673
`
`9/15/21
`
`12
`
`2674-2687
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`2688-2689
`
`13
`
`2690-2824
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 23) Exhibit 7: August 19, 2019
`
`
`Letter from William Brim to
`
`
`Scott Butzman and Tom Behrend
`
`
`of Acuity including Sam Terry’s
`
`
`Crash Reconstruction Summary
`
`
`Report
`
`
`
`Exhibit 8: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit 9: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume II
`
`
`taken on January 14, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 10: March 11, 2019
`
`
`Letter from William Brim to
`
`
`Edith Wilson of Acuity Re:
`
` Gidget Swanson’s UM Policy
`
`
`Limits
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 11: Plaintiff’s Eighth
`
`
`Supplemental Disclosure of
`
` Witnesses and Production of
`
` Documents, Pursuant to NRCP 16.1
`
`
`
`Exhibit 12: Declaration of
`
`
`Cara Xidis, Esq. with Email
`
`
`Exchange Between Ms. Xidis
`
`
`and Troy Clark, Esq.
`
`24.
`Opposition to Defendant Acuity’s
`
`Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`Regarding Plaintiff’s Breach of
`
`Contract for Failure to Present for
`
`an IME
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Letter from Edith
`
` Wilson of Acuity dated June 11,
`
`
`2019 Denying Gidget Swanson’s
`
`
`Claim
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Deposition Transcript
`
`
`of Edith Wilson taken September
`
`
`21, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xiii
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`13
`2825-2829
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`2830-2833
`
`13
`
`
`2834-2840
`
`13
`
`2841-2847
`
`13
`
`2848-2876
`
`13
`
`2877-2911
`
`13
`
`2912-2924
`
`9/15/21
`
`13
`
`2925-2940
`
`
`
`14
`
`2941-2942
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 24) Exhibit 3: Email Exchange
`
`
`Between Cara Xidis, Esq. and
`
`
`Resnick & Louis Regarding
`
` Gidget Swanson’s Failure to
`
`
`Submit to NRCP 35 Examination
`
`
`
`Exhibit 4: Scheduling Order and
`
` Order Setting Civil Jury Trial,
`
`
`filed on April 17, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5: Declaration of
`
`
`Cara Xidis, Esq. with Email
`
`
`Exchange Between Ms. Xidis
`
`
`and Troy Clark, Esq.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 6: Stipulation and Order
`
`
`to Extend Discovery Deadlines,
`
`
`filed on December 16, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit 7: August 19, 2019
`
`
`Letter from William Brim to
`
`
`Scott Butzman and Tom Behrend
`
`
`of Acuity including Sam Terry’s
`
`
`Crash Reconstruction Summary
`
`
`Report
`
`
`
`Exhibit 8: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume I
`
`
`taken on November 13, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit 9: Gidget Swanson’s
`
` Deposition Transcript Volume II
`
`
`taken on January 14, 2021
`
`25.
`Opposition to Defendant Acuity’s
`
`Motion for Partial Summary
`
`Judgment of Plaintiff’s Punitive
`
`Damages Claim
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: March 26, 2019
`
`
`Letter from Edith Wilson of
`
` Acuity to William Brim, Esq.
`
`
`Regarding Additional Time
`
`
`to Evaluate UIM Claim
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xiv
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 25) Exhibit 2: April 24, 2019
`
`
`Letter from William Brim, Esq.
`
`
`to Edith Wilson of Acuity
`
`
`Regarding Demand for UM
`
`
`Policy Limits
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Declaration of
`
`
`Cara Xidis, Esq. with Email
`
`
`Exchange Between Ms. Xidis
`
`
`and Troy Clark, Esq.
`
`26.
`Opposition to Defendant Acuity’s
`
`Motion for Partial Summary
`
`Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims
`
`for Bad Faith
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: March 26, 2019
`
`
`Letter from Edith Wilson of
`
` Acuity to William Brim, Esq.
`
`
`Regarding Additional Time
`
`
`to Evaluate UIM Claim
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: April 24, 2019
`
`
`Letter from William Brim, Esq.
`
`
`to Edith Wilson of Acuity
`
`
`Regarding Demand for UM
`
`
`Policy Limits
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Declaration of
`
`
`Cara Xidis, Esq. with Email
`
`
`Exchange Between Ms. Xidis
`
`
`and Troy Clark, Esq.
`
`27.
`Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
`
`in Limine No. 5 to Exclude
`
`Plaintiff’s Expert Jeffrey Stempel
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Plaintiff’s Initial
`
` Disclosure of Expert Witnesses,
`
`
`e-served on April 6, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Jeffrey Stempel’s CV
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
`
`Initial Expert Reports dated
`
` April 13, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`xv
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`14
`2943-2945
`
`
`
`14
`
`2946-2951
`
`9/15/21
`
`14
`
`2952-2967
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`2968-2969
`
`14
`
`2970-2972
`
`14
`
`2973-2978
`
`9/15/21
`
`14
`
`2979-2987
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`2988-3001
`
`14
`14
`
`3002-3027
`3028-3055
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 27) Exhibit 4: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
`
`Rebuttal Expert Report dated
`
` May 12, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5: Jeffrey Stempel’s
`
`
`Prior Expert Testimony List
`
`
`
`Exhibit 6: Stipulation and Order
`
`
`to Extend Discovery Deadlines,
`
`
`filed on December 16, 2020
`
`
`
`Exhibit 7: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Fifth Supplement to its Initial
`
`
`Early Case Conference
`
` Disclosure Statement of Witnesses
`
`
`and Documents
`
`
`
`Exhibit 8: Plaintiff’s Eighth
`
`
`Supplemental Disclosure of
`
` Witnesses and Production of
`
` Documents, Pursuant to
`
` NRCP 16.1
`
`28.
`Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
`
`in Limine No. 3 to Preclude
`
`Arguments and Evidence of Other
`
`Claims or Lawsuits Against Acuity
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Defendant Acuity’s
`
`
`Response to Plaintiff’s
`
`
`Interrogatories dated July 21, 2020
`
`29.
`Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
`
`in Limine No. 8 to Exclude Plaintiff’s
`
`Claims for Extracontractual
`
`Damages
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Plaintiff’s Eighth
`
`
`Supplemental Disclosure of
`
` Witnesses and Production of
`
` Documents Pursuant to NRCP 16.1
`
`
`dated July 16, 2021
`
`30.
`Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
`
`in Limine No. 6 to Exclude Select
`
`Opinions from Expert Stempel
`
`
`
`
`xvi
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`14
`3055-3064
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`14
`
`3065-3072
`
`3073-3079
`
`14
`
`3080-3098
`
`14
`
`3099-3119
`
`9/15/21
`
`14
`
`3120-3125
`
`
`
`14
`
`3126-3139
`
`9/15/21
`
`14
`
`3140-3145
`
`
`
`14
`
`3146-3166
`
`9/17/21
`
`14
`
`3167-3175
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`
`
`
`9/29/21
`
`9/29/21
`
`9/29/21
`
`10/5/21
`
`10/5/21
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 30) Exhibit 1: Plaintiff’s Initial
`
` Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
`
`
`dated April 16, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Jeffrey Stempel’s CV
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Defendant Acuity’s
`
` Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion
`
`
`for Protective Order and Counter
`
` Motion or Liability Shield filed on
`
`
`January 22, 2021
`
`31.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support
`
`of its Motion for Partial Summary
`
`Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claims for
`
`Bad Faith
`
`32.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support
`
`of its Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`33.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support
`
`of its Motion for Summary Judgment
`
`Regarding Plaintiff’s Breach of
`
`Contract for Failure to Present for
`
`an IME
`
`34.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support 9/29/21
`
`of its Motion for Partial Summary
`
`Judgment on Plaintiff’s Punitive
`
`Damages Claim
`
`35.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support
`
`of its Motion in Limine to Exclude
`
`Plaintiff’s Expert Jeffrey Stempel
`
`(Motion in Limine No. 5)
`
`36.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support
`
`of its Motion in Limine to Preclude
`
`Arguments and Evidence of Other
`
`Claims or Lawsuits Against Acuity
`
`(Motion No. 3)
`
`
`
`Exhibit A: Stipulation and Order
`
`
`to Extend Discovery Deadlines
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xvii
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`15
`3176-3189
`
`15
`15
`
`3190-3215
`3216-3228
`
`15
`
`3229-3240
`
`15
`
`15
`
`3241-3251
`
`3552-3264
`
`15
`
`3265-3275
`
`15
`
`3276-3286
`
`15
`
`3287-3296
`
`15
`
`3297-3303
`
`
`
`DATE
`10/5/21
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`15
`3304-3312
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`3313-3315
`
`15
`
`3316-3320
`
`15
`
`3321-3325
`
`15
`
`3326-3328
`
`15
`
`3329-3331
`
`15
`
`3332-3334
`
`15
`
`3335-3336
`
`15
`
`3337-3339
`
`
`
`NO.
`
`37.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support
`of Motion in Limine to Exclude
`Select Opinions from Expert
`Stempel (Motion in Limine No. 6)
`
`Exhibit A: July 20, 2020
` Defendant Email to Plaintiff
`
`Re: Binding Arbitration Proposal
`
`to Resolve Matter
`
`Exhibit B: July 22, 2022
` Defendant Email to Plaintiff
`
`Follow-Up on Binding Arbitration
`
`Proposal
`
`Exhibit C: July 23, 2020
`
`Plaintiff Email to Defendant
`
`Re: Binding Arbitration Proposal
`
`Exhibit D: July 28, 2020
`
`Plaintiff Letter to Defendant
`
`Proposed Terms for Binding
` Arbitration
`
`Exhibit E: August 11, 2020
` Defendant Letter to Plaintiff
`
`Response to Plaintiff’s Binding
` Arbitration Terms
`
`Exhibit F: August 31, 2020
`
`Plaintiff Letter to Defendant
`
`Response to Defendant’s
`
`Proposed Binding Arbitration
`
`Terms
`
`Exhibit G: November 2, 2022
`
`Plaintiff Letter to Defendant to
`
`Follow-Up on Binding Arbitration
`
`Exhibit H: January 21, 2021
` Defendant’s Response to Binding
` Arbitration Terms, Requesting
`
`Plaintiff’s Current Conditions
`
`[Only last page of letter included]
`
`
`
`xviii
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 37) Exhibit I: January 28, 2021
`
`
`Plaintiff Letter to Defendant
`
`
`Re: Plaintiff Willing to Arbitrate
`
`
`Breach of Contract Claim
`
` Against Acuity
`
`
`
`Exhibit J: June 22, 2021
`
`
`Plaintiff Letter to Defendant
`
`
`Re: Reaching Fair Resolution
`
`
`
`Exhibit K: June 13, 2021
`
` Defendant Email to Plaintiff
`
` Offering to Pay for Private
`
` Mediator
`
`
`
`Exhibit L: June 23, 2021
`
` Defendant Letter to Plaintiff
`
`
`Re: Defendant’s Effort to
`
` Mediate
`
`38.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support 10/5/21
`
`of its Motion in Limine to Exclude
`
`Plaintiff’s Claim for Extra
`
`Contractual Damages (Motion in
`
`Limine No. 8)
`
`39.
`Defendant Acuity’s Reply in Support 10/5/21
`
`of it Motion in Limine to Exclude
`
`Plaintiff’s Jeffrey Stempel
`
`(Motion in Limine No. 5)
`
`40.
`Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion
`
`in Limine No. 7 to Limit Experts to
`
`the Opinions Set Forth in Their
`
`Reports and Depositions
`
`41.
`Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion
`
`in Limine No. 4 to Preclude
`
`Post-Denial Conduct
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Order Re: Discovery
`
`
`Commissioner’s Report and
`
`
`Recommendations filed on
`
`
`January 27, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Insurance Policy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`xix
`
`DATE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10/6/21
`
`10/12/21
`
`
`
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`15
`3340-3341
`
`15
`
`3342-3343
`
`15
`
`3344-3345
`
`15
`
`3346-3348
`
`15
`
`3349-3354
`
`15
`
`3355-3365
`
`15
`
`3366-3368
`
`15
`
`3369-3379
`
`15
`
`3380-3386
`
`15
`
`3387-3414
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`
`
`10/21/21
`
`10/27/21
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 41) Exhibit 3: Email Exchange
`
`
`Regarding Gidget Swanson
`
` Not Undergoing IME Due to
`
`
`Pandemic
`
`
`
`Exhibit 4: Stipulation and Order
`
`
`to Extend Discovery Deadlines
`
`
`filed on December 16, 2020
`
`42.
`Order Regarding Defendant’s Motions 10/21/21
`
`for Summary Judgment
`
`43.
`Notice of Entry of Order
`
`{Re: Defendant’s Motions for
`
`Summary Judgment Entered on
`
`October 21, 2021}
`
`44.
`Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental
`
`Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Mary Ann Shannon,
`
` M.D.’s Supplemental Reports,
`
`
`dated August 4, 2021 and
`
` October 13, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Sam Terry’s Second
`
`
`Rebuttal Report, dated
`
` October 20, 2021
`
`45.
`Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Disclosure
`
`46.
`Defendant Acuity, a Mutual
`
`Insurance Company’s Pre-Trial
`
`Disclosures
`
`47.
`Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motions
`
`in Limine
`
`48.
`Order on Motion in Limine
`
`49.
`Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendant’s
`
`Pre-Trial Disclosures
`
`50.
`Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Memorandum
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial
`
` Disclosure, filed on October
`
`
`27, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`10/27/21
`10/27/21
`
`10/28/21
`
`10/28/21
`11/3/21
`
`11/3/21
`
`
`
`
`xx
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`15
`3415-3419
`
`16
`
`3420-3426
`
`16
`
`16
`
`16
`
`16
`
`3427-3431
`
`3432-3439
`
`3440-3454
`
`3455-3468
`
`16
`
`3469-3471
`
`16
`16
`
`16
`
`16
`16
`
`16
`16
`
`3472-3485
`3486-3498
`
`3499-3503
`
`3504-3510
`3511-3525
`
`3526-3531
`3532-3546
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`
`
`11/10/21
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`16
`3547-3560
`
`16
`
`3561-3576
`
`16
`
`3577-3591
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 50) Exhibit 2: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Pre-Trial Disclosure, filed on
`
` October 27, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Plaintiff’s Objections
`
`
`to Defendant’s Pre-Trial
`
` Disclosures, filed on November
`
`
`3, 2021
`
`51.
`Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff’s
`
`Pretrial Disclosures
`
`52.
`Defendant Acuity, a Mutual
`
`Insurance Company’s Supplemental
`
`Pre-Trial Disclosures
`
`53.
`Defendant Acuity, a Mutual
`
`Insurance Company’s Second
`
`Supplemental Pre-Trial Disclosures
`
`54.
`Plaintiff’s Objections to Defendant’s
`
`Supplemental Pre-Trial Disclosures
`
`and Second Supplemental Pre-Trial
`
`Disclosures
`
`55.
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order 12/2/21
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Email Exchange
`
`
`
`Between Troy Clark, Esq. and
`
`
`Cara Xidis, Esq. Regarding
`
`
`Trial Deposition of Officer
`
`
`Sean Watson
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Notice of Taking
`
`
`Recorded Trial Deposition
`
`
`of Officer Sean Watson dated
`
` November 30, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Fifteenth Supplement to its
`
`
`Initial Early Case Conference
`
` Disclosure Statement of
`
` Witnesses and Documents dated
`
` November 15, 2021
`
`
`
`11/15/21 16
`
`3592-3605
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/22/21
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`3606-3618
`
`16
`
`3619-3633
`
`16
`16
`
`3634-3639
`3640-3642
`
`16
`
`3643-3646
`
`16
`
`3647-3666
`
`
`
`xxi
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 55) Exhibit 4: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Pre-Trial Disclosures, filed on
`
` October 27, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 5: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Supplemental Pre-Trial
`
` Disclosures, filed on November
`
`
`15, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 6: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Second Supplemental Pre-Trial
`
` Disclosures, filed on November
`
`
`15, 2021
`
`56.
`Plaintiff’s Request for Clarification
`
`on the Orders Regarding Motions in
`
`Limine
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1: Order Regarding
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine,
`
`
`filed on October 28, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2: Order on Motions
`
`
`in Limine, filed on October 28,
`
`
`2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit 3: Order Regarding
`
` Defendant’s Motions in Limine
`
`57.
`Defendant Acuity’s Opposition to
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective
`
`Order on Order Shortening Time
`
`
`
`Exhibit A: Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial
`
` Disclosure field October 27, 2021
`
`
`
`Exhibit B: Defendant Acuity, A
`
` Mutual Insurance Company’s
`
`
`Pre-Trial Disclosures, filed on
`
` October 27, 2021
`
`58.
`Defendant Acuity, a Mutual
`
`Insurance Company’s Third
`
`Supplemental Pre-Trial Disclosures
`
`
`
`
`xxii
`
`DATE
`
`
`VOL. PAGE NO.
`17
`3667-3680
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`3681-3695
`
`17
`
`3696-3709
`
`12/6/21
`
`17
`
`3710-3712
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12/7/21
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`3713-3718
`
`17
`
`3719-3726
`
`17
`
`17
`
`17
`
`17
`
`3727-3730
`
`3731-3739
`
`3740-3754
`
`3755-3768
`
`12/7/21
`
`17
`
`3769-3781
`
`
`
`DATE
`
`
`12/8/21
`
`12/13/21
`
`12/20/21
`12/20/21
`12/20/21
`
`
`
`
`
`DOCUMENT
`NO.
`
`(Cont. 58) Deposition of Corporeal [sic]
`
`
`Sean Watson taken on
`
` December 6, 2021
`
`59.
`Plaintiff’s First Supplemental
`
`Pre-Trial Disclosure
`
`60.
`Discovery Commissioner’s Report
`
`and Recom
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
