`
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, New Jersey 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Celgene Corporation and
`Abraxis Bioscience, LLC
`
`Arnold B. Calmann
`Katherine A. Escanlar
`SAIBER LLC
`One Gateway Center
`10th Floor, Suite 1000
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`(973) 622-333
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Cipla Limited
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`
`ABRAXIS BIOSCIENCE, LLC and
`CELGENE CORPORATION,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`v.
`
`
`CIPLA LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 16-9074 (JMV)(MF)
`
`(Filed Electronically)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`Plaintiffs Abraxis Bioscience, LLC and Celgene Corporation (collectively, “Celgene”)
`
`and Defendant Cipla Ltd. (“Cipla”) hereby submit their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
`
`Statement in accordance with Local Patent Rule 4.3. At this time, there are no disputed claim
`
`terms requiring construction by the Court.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-09074-JMV-MF Document 78 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 778
`
`I.
`
`CONSTRUCTION OF PATENT TERMS
`
`A.
`
`Agreed Upon Claim Constructions
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4.3(a), the parties identify the following terms on which
`
`the parties agree for the purposes of this proceeding only. To the extent that the claim terms
`
`are used repeatedly throughout a patent or family of patents, any constructions of such terms
`
`carry the same meaning throughout a patent or family of patents.
`
`Term
`
`Patent(s)
`
`Definition
`
`The weight ratio of albumin
`to paclitaxel in the final
`product for injection into the
`patient
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,820,788,
`claims 1, 11, and 12
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,923,536,
`claims 1, 5, 6, 9, and 10
`U.S. Patent No. 8,138,229,
`claims 1, 4-5, 9-10, 15, 17-
`18, 25-26, 31-32, and 40-41
`
`“the weight ratio of albumin
`to paclitaxel in the
`composition”
`
`“the weight ratio of albumin
`to the paclitaxel in the
`composition”
`
`“the ratio (w/w) of albumin
`to the paclitaxel in the
`pharmaceutical composition”
`
`“the ratio (w/w) of the
`albumin to the paclitaxel in
`the pharmaceutical
`composition”
`
`B.
`
`Disputed Claim Terms
`
`The parties submit that there are no disputed claim terms requiring construction by the Court.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-09074-JMV-MF Document 78 Filed 11/21/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 779
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: s/ Arnold B. Calmann
`Arnold B. Calmann
`Katherine A. Escanlar
`SAIBER LLC
`One Gateway Center
`10th Floor, Suite 1000
`Newark, New Jersey 07102
`(973) 622-333
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Anil H. Patel
`Peter Giunta
`Ravi S. Deol
`Michael J. Freno
`Elizabeth Weiskopf
`K&L GATES LLP
`1000 Main St. Ste. 2550
`Houston, TX 77002
`(713)815-7300
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Cipla Limited
`
`Dated: November 21, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, NJ 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`F. Dominic Cerrito
`Eric C. Stops
`Andrew S. Chalson
`Daniel Wiesner
`Catherine T. Mattes
`Ross Misskelley
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`(212) 849-7000
`
`Anthony M. Insogna
`Cary Miller, Ph.D.
`Steven J. Corr
`JONES DAY
`12265 El Camino Real #200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 314-1200
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Celgene Corporation and
`Abraxis BioScience, LLC
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
