throbber
Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 1 of 36 PageID: 1
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
`COMMISSION,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`VUUZLE MEDIA CORP.,
`RONALD SHANE FLYNN, and
`RICHARD MARCHITTO,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Civil Action No. _______________
`
`JURY TRIAL
`DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`“Commission”) alleges as follows against the following Defendants, whose names and last
`
`known addresses are set forth below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`1.
`
`Vuuzle Media Corp. – 42 Broadway, Suite 12-117, New York NY, 10004;
`
`Ronald Shane Flynn – Angeles City, Philippines and/or Dubai, United Arab
`Emirates;
`
`Richard Marchitto – Rockaway, New Jersey.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`This action concerns an offering fraud perpetrated by Vuuzle Media Corp.
`
`(together with its predecessor entities, hereinafter referred to as “Vuuzle”) and its founder,
`
`Ronald Shane Flynn (“Flynn”), and aided and abetted by Richard Marchitto (“Marchitto”).
`
`2.
`
`From approximately September 2016 through at least May 2020, Vuuzle and
`
`Flynn offered and sold more than $14 million of Vuuzle common stock and warrants to investors
`
`throughout the United States. In violation of the securities laws, Flynn secretly diverted
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 2 of 36 PageID: 2
`
`approximately $5 million to support his aggressive fund-raising operations and pay commissions
`
`to stock promoters. Flynn misappropriated another nearly $5 million in direct transfers to his
`
`personal bank accounts overseas and by using corporate credit and debit cards for personal items,
`
`such as dating and gambling applications, gold bars, and luxury travel. An additional
`
`approximately $2 million appears to have been used for other expenses in furtherance of the
`
`fraud, including, but not limited to, Ponzi-like payments to a limited number of investors, Fed Ex
`
`charges, rent for a New York office, and attorney fees.
`
`3.
`
`To raise funds, Vuuzle and Flynn falsely represented to investors that Vuuzle was
`
`a legitimate, successful, and growing company in the business of providing online live streaming
`
`and entertainment services. In fact, Vuuzle was little more than a front for a boiler room Flynn
`
`controlled.
`
`4.
`
`Operating primarily out of the Philippines under a series of different corporate
`
`entities, Flynn, directly and through marketing teams acting at his direction, engaged in
`
`aggressive and high-pressure sales campaigns. Among other tactics, Flynn and his boiler room
`
`employees cold-called potential investors and, through relentless and deceptive phone and email
`
`communication, convinced them to buy Vuuzle securities. In return for bringing investor funds
`
`to Vuuzle, Flynn paid substantial commissions to himself and others.
`
`5.
`
`The securities offered were common stock. The price per share ranged from $1 to
`
`$5, with most investors paying $5 per share. Many investors were also granted warrants that
`
`provided the investor the purported right to purchase additional shares for a limited time at a
`
`discounted price. None of these securities were registered with the Commission.
`
`6.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn made numerous materially false and misleading statements in
`
`their communications with investors, filings with the Commission, and in offering documents,
`

`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 3 of 36 PageID: 3
`
`including Vuuzle’s Private Placement Memoranda (“PPMs”). For instance, Vuuzle and Flynn
`
`told investors that their funds would be used to operate and build Vuuzle’s online streaming
`
`business, which would earn millions of dollars in revenue from service fees and advertising. In
`
`fact, of the $14 million raised in investor funds, Vuuzle and Flynn used only approximately $2
`
`million to build the streaming applications, which served as props to raise more investor funds.
`
`7.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn also falsely represented Vuuzle as a “pre-IPO” investment
`
`opportunity that would provide returns to investors in the form of dividends and skyrocketing
`
`post-IPO stock values. Yet, Vuuzle has never made a profit, never paid dividends to any
`
`investor, and never made a public offering on any stock exchange. From its inception in October
`
`2016 through May 2020, Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account reflects total business revenue of less than
`
`$1,670.
`
`8.
`
`Vuuzle’s public filings and offering documents falsely suggest Flynn had only a
`
`peripheral relationship with the company, if any. For example, in the PPMs, Vuuzle described
`
`Flynn as merely a “non-voting beneficial owner” of a Vuuzle corporate shareholder. And
`
`Vuuzle’s Forms D, filed with the Commission in 2017 and 2019, do not name Flynn as a related
`
`party at all. In fact, however, Flynn exercised ultimate control over every part of Vuuzle’s
`
`business for the primary purpose of enriching himself.
`
`9.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn concealed Flynn’s control over Vuuzle by falsely representing
`
`to investors and the public that Vuuzle was operated by a legitimate team of independent
`
`executive officers. In early 2018, Flynn hired two former executives of a publicly-traded
`
`company to ostensibly serve as Vuuzle’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Operating
`
`Officer (“COO”). Their hiring was all for show. During their time at Vuuzle, both individuals
`

`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 4 of 36 PageID: 4
`
`raised serious questions about Flynn’s operation of Vuuzle, and both were gone by November of
`
`that year.
`
`10.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn were aided and abetted in their fraud by Marchitto, a former
`
`dentist who had lost money investing in one of Flynn’s previous business ventures. He provided
`
`substantial assistance to Vuuzle and Flynn by acting as their U.S. corporate and financial
`
`presence, thereby enhancing Vuuzle’s aura of legitimacy as a U.S.-based company. Because
`
`Flynn avoided U.S. jurisdiction, Marchitto was instrumental to the fraud.
`
`11.
`
`Specifically, Marchitto (a) organized Vuuzle’s predecessor legal entity and served
`
`as its initial member; (b) opened and maintained a U.S. bank account for Vuuzle, which was
`
`used to receive and disburse the overwhelming majority of investor funds; (c) maintained a New
`
`York office space, which was represented to investors as Vuuzle’s primary place of business;
`
`and (d) facilitated Flynn’s misappropriation of investor funds by transferring funds to Flynn’s
`
`accounts overseas and opening and maintaining corporate credit cards, which Flynn used for
`
`personal expenses.
`
`12. Marchitto was the sole signatory to Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account and had direct
`
`access to that account. Marchitto also collected mail from the New York office space and
`
`deposited investor checks to Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account. Because he had all the account
`
`information, Marchitto knew or was reckless in not knowing that investor funds were deposited
`
`to that U.S. bank account, and that his actions directly aided Flynn in misappropriating these
`
`funds. By his conduct, he substantially assisted Flynn’s and Vuuzle’s violations of the securities
`
`laws.
`
`13.
`
`By perpetrating this offering fraud, Vuuzle and Flynn have violated Section 17(a)
`
`of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] and Section 10(b) of the
`

`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 5 of 36 PageID: 5
`
`Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 [17
`
`C.F.R. § 240.10b-5] thereunder, and Marchitto aided and abetted those violations. By failing to
`
`register the offering of Vuuzle securities, Vuuzle and Flynn also have violated Section 5 of the
`
`Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e]. And, by acting as a broker in selling Vuuzle securities without
`
`being registered as, or associated with, a registered broker-dealer, Flynn has violated Section
`
`15(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)].
`
`14.
`
`Because of the Defendants’ unlawful conduct, the Commission respectfully
`
`requests that the Court: (i) permanently enjoin each Defendant from further violations of the
`
`foregoing securities laws, (ii) order each Defendant to disgorge the unlawful profits from their
`
`violations with prejudgment interest, (iii) impose civil money penalties on each Defendant, and
`
`(iv) impose such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and appropriate.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`15.
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 20 of the Securities
`
`Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b)] and Sections 21A and 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-1,
`
`78aa]. Defendants, directly or indirectly, singly or in concert with others, made use of the means
`
`or instruments of transportation and communication in interstate commerce, or of the mails, in
`
`connection with the acts, transactions, and practices alleged in this Complaint.
`
`16.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under Section 22(a) of the Securities Act [15
`
`U.S.C. § 77v(a)] and Section 27(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78aa] because, among
`
`other things, Defendant Marchitto resides in this district, and Defendants Vuuzle and Flynn have
`
`targeted, communicated with, and raised money from investors that reside in this district.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`17.
`
`Vuuzle Media Corp. is a Delaware corporation formed on August 22, 2017 as a
`
`successor entity to Boink Live Streaming LLC, which was incorporated in Delaware on
`

`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 6 of 36 PageID: 6
`
`September 16, 2016. (A separate corporation called Boink Live Streaming Corp. was also
`
`incorporated in Delaware on August 22, 2017 and, until October 26, 2018, when the name was
`
`officially changed to Vuuzle Media Corp., company documents referred to the entity
`
`interchangeably as Boink Live Streaming, Boink Live Streaming Corp., and Boink Live
`
`Streaming LLC.)  Vuuzle markets itself as a provider of online live streaming and entertainment
`
`services. Vuuzle has claimed at various times to have offices around the world, including in
`
`New York City, Las Vegas, and Scottsdale, as well as the Philippines, United Arab Emirates, and
`
`United Kingdom. Vuuzle was founded by Flynn, who controlled Vuuzle’s operations at all times
`
`during the relevant period.
`
`18.
`
`Vuuzle has never registered any of its securities with the Commission. Vuuzle
`
`filed a Form D Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities on September 26, 2017 (in the name of
`
`Boink Live Streaming Corp.), and an amendment on February 15, 2019 (in the name of Vuuzle
`
`Media Corp.), claiming an exemption from registration under Securities Act Rule 506(b).
`
`19.
`
`Ronald Shane Flynn (a/k/a Ronnie Shane), age 56, is a United States citizen,
`
`resident of the Philippines and/or the United Arab Emirates, and the founder of Vuuzle. While
`
`Flynn currently holds no official title at Vuuzle, he is Vuuzle’s majority shareholder and
`
`exercises ultimate control over all aspects of Vuuzle’s business, including its operations, online
`
`presence, communications with investors, and company finances.
`
`20.
`
`Flynn has been subject to at least two state cease-and-desist orders in connection
`
`with his prior solicitations of investors: one dated October 4, 2000 by the Ohio Division of
`
`Securities; and a second dated September 22, 2016 by the State of California Department of
`
`Business Oversight. Flynn was a registered representative of a registered broker-dealer from
`

`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 7 of 36 PageID: 7
`
`November 1988 to March 1989, but he is not currently registered with the Commission in any
`
`capacity.
`
`21.
`
`Richard Marchitto, age 72, is a retired dentist residing in Rockaway, New
`
`Jersey. Marchitto has held various titles at Vuuzle, including “VP Marketing” and “board
`
`director.” He acts on behalf of Vuuzle at Flynn’s direction. For example, at Flynn’s direction,
`
`Marchitto established the original Vuuzle entity (Boink Live Streaming LLC) on September 28,
`
`2016 and was its initial member. Also at Flynn’s direction, Marchitto opened Vuuzle’s primary
`
`U.S. bank account (initially using his home address) – which Defendants used to receive and
`
`transfer investor assets – and provided Flynn with electronic access to that account while
`
`Marchitto remained the sole signatory. In addition, Marchitto opened credit card accounts in the
`
`names of his former dental practice and various Vuuzle entities and granted Flynn the use of
`
`those cards. Marchitto has never been registered with the Commission in any capacity.
`
`I.
`
`Vuuzle’s Purported Business
`
`FACTS
`
`
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn convinced investors to buy Vuuzle securities by presenting
`
`22.
`
`Vuuzle as a legitimate, successful, and growing provider of online live streaming and
`
`entertainment services. Investors were inundated with communications drafted and sent by
`
`Flynn, directly or through his marketing teams, that used hyperbole to describe Vuuzle, its
`
`products, and the online entertainment industry as whole.
`
`23.
`
`Vuuzle, Flynn, and his subordinates told investors that Vuuzle would use their
`
`funds to grow and operate Vuuzle’s business. But instead, Flynn misappropriated the vast
`
`majority of what Vuuzle received. Of the $14 million investors gave Defendants, only
`
`approximately $2 million was used to operate Vuuzle – just enough to build and maintain
`

`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 8 of 36 PageID: 8
`
`superficial versions of the online streaming applications from which Vuuzle was purportedly
`
`going to earn revenue. These purported products were mere props Flynn used to raise additional
`
`investor funds.
`
`24.
`
`Beginning in September 2016, Vuuzle and Flynn told investors that Vuuzle was
`
`in the process of building a mobile phone application called “Bonk.live” (later called
`
`“Bonk.be.live”) through which the company would provide a platform for performers who
`
`wanted to livestream their talent to an audience. Flynn, Vuuzle, and Flynn’s marketing teams
`
`provided investors with revenue projections showing millions and, in some instances, even
`
`billions of dollars in expected company earnings. For example, in a September 11, 2016 email to
`
`investors, Flynn claimed that “BONK LIVE HAS 6 UNIQUE INCOME STREAMS” and
`
`depicted math equations purportedly reflecting revenues from each income stream ranging from
`
`$50,457,600 per year to more than $21 billion per year.
`
`25.
`
`On October 30, 2016, Flynn sent an another email to investors attaching a “press
`
`announcement” in which he described Bonk.live as “the newest streaming super app in the
`
`world” which was “nothing less than genius as it allows digital publishers, advertisers, and the
`
`live social streamers to make enormous money.” In this press announcement, Flynn claimed that
`
`the “advertising carousel” on Bonk.live “will earn the company more th[a]n 50 million United
`
`States Dollars per year” and that advertising during an influencer’s live stream could result in
`
`another “$350,000,000 Million” to “1 billion USD to 3 billion USD Dollars per year.”
`
`26.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn told investors that Bonk.live users would be able to purchase
`
`virtual gift packages that they could send to live streamers they liked. In that same October 30,
`
`2016 announcement, Flynn told investors that “Bonk potential earnings with only 100 million
`
`users buying one package of $128.95 per year is more than 12 billion [dollars] per year.”
`

`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 9 of 36 PageID: 9
`
`Performers that received enough virtual gifts were supposed to be able to cash out the value of
`
`those gifts through debit cards. Indeed, Flynn sent investors photos of what appeared to be
`
`Bonk-branded debit cards. Yet, Vuuzle never actually created or distributed any such cards.
`
`27.
`
`Despite these promises to investors, Bonk.live never made millions of dollars, or
`
`really any money at all. Using outside vendors to build the platform, Flynn directed just enough
`
`money to create an application with the minimum functionality necessary for downloading on a
`
`mobile device. Flynn then used the existence of the app as proof of Vuuzle’s legitimacy, by, for
`
`example, sending investors images of the Bonk.live application downloaded to his own phone.
`
`28.
`
`Vuuzle’s revenue projections assumed that there would be millions of Bonk.live
`
`users. In fact, however, there were not. From May 25 through November 15, 2018, the average
`
`daily number of devices using the Bonk.live app was 371. Flynn knew the actual number of
`
`users because he received weekly emails containing updated charts of Bonk.live user data.
`
`29. Moreover, Flynn knew that there never could be millions of users. In an email
`
`dated September 27, 2018, a Vuuzle adviser told Flynn that his first discussion about the
`
`Bonk.live application was “terrifying” because he “just found out how weak and undeveloped
`
`this whole initiative is right now.” In particular, the adviser emphasized that he had just learned
`
`that the software could only handle 40,000 users with “a full system crash imminent at 50,000+.”
`
`Flynn responded that he already knew the app’s limitations, stating: “[t]he question about users
`
`is not a new question as it was addressed months ago.”
`
`30.
`
`In approximately November 2018, Vuuzle began to shift its focus away from the
`
`Bonk.live app. Flynn, directly and through his marketing teams, told investors that Vuuzle was
`
`moving its business toward online streaming of television shows, through a mobile application it
`
`later called “Vuuzle TV.” Flynn drafted and sent to investors, directly and through his marketing
`

`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 10 of 36 PageID: 10
`
`teams, multiple emails raving about Vuuzle TV, its capabilities, and its potential. According to
`
`this marketing material, Vuuzle TV was going to offer free as well as paid versions of its app and
`
`would earn money through subscription fees and advertising. Investors were told that online
`
`streaming was going to be the next revolution in entertainment and that Vuuzle investors would
`
`earn “gargantuan return[s].”
`
`31.
`
`For example, on April 13, 2019, Flynn sent an email to investors with an attached
`
`document titled, “Vuuzle TV’s Ten Million Dollar Investment Is Set To Win OTT subscribers
`
`while eliminating the competition.” Flynn encouraged investors to “cash out of those mediocre
`
`investments and finally make a sizeable investment in Vuuzle Media and get paid for being in
`
`the right place at the right time with an investment that will win you BIG money!!!!!!!”
`
`32.
`
`Flynn’s statement that “ten million dollar[s]” was invested into building Vuuzle
`
`TV was false. As described above, Flynn directed just enough money toward the business to
`
`build a mobile application that users could download and view some television shows. Once the
`
`app was available, Flynn sent investors, directly and through his marketing teams, links to the
`
`Vuuzle.TV site along with images of Vuuzle.TV on his phone.
`
`33.
`
`And, contrary to the promises of “BIG money,” Vuuzle TV has not resulted in the
`
`promised revenues. From its inception in October 2016 through May 2020, Vuuzle’s U.S. bank
`
`account reflects total business revenue of less than $1,670. In its entire four years of operation,
`
`through all the various mobile products Vuuzle and Flynn have hyped, Vuuzle has never made a
`
`profit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 11 of 36 PageID: 11
`
`II.
`
`Vuuzle was a Front for Flynn’s Boiler Room
`
`34.
`
`Rather than the legitimate, successful business touted to investors, Vuuzle was
`
`simply a front for a boiler room, the sole purpose of which was to bring investor funds to Vuuzle
`
`to be spent by Flynn and at Flynn’s direction.
`
`35.
`
`Operating primarily out of the Philippines, Flynn directed marketing teams
`
`headed by four to six “Investment Representatives” (“IRs”) who were mostly close associates of
`
`Flynn or members of his family. The marketing teams operated, at varying times, through four
`
`companies under Flynn’s control: WorldCom Online Marketing, Inc.; Bonk Marketing Trade
`
`and Promotion, Inc.; iMagically LLC; and Vuuzle Media Corp Fze LLC.
`
`36.
`
`Together, Flynn and the marketing teams engaged in coordinated and aggressive
`
`sales campaigns to convince investors to buy Vuuzle securities. These sales campaigns involved
`
`repeated, high-pressure sales calls. Flynn and his marketing teams also inundated current and
`
`potential investors with emailed marketing materials – sometimes several in a single day –
`
`relating to the business of Vuuzle, its products, and the industry as a whole.
`
`37.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn identified potential investors by purchasing “lead lists” of
`
`purportedly accredited investors from several independent sellers, for anywhere from $1,000 to
`
`$5,000 per list. In addition to names and contact information, certain lists also included
`
`information such as the types of investments the investor was interested in and, sometimes,
`
`descriptions of the investors themselves. For instance, one lead list received by Flynn on June 5,
`
`2019, included additional, often profane, descriptors next to certain names such as “dumbass,”
`
`“old,” or “stroke.”
`
`38.
`
`After receiving the lists, Flynn had his marketing teams “wash” them for
`
`duplicate names from prior lead lists and then directed them to cold-call the remaining entries.
`

`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 12 of 36 PageID: 12
`
`Flynn provided his marketing teams with initial “sales pitch” scripts for them to use in their calls
`
`with potential investors.
`
`39.
`
`In most cases, Flynn’s scripts directed comparisons of Vuuzle to Facebook,
`
`Twitter, and Google, highlighting the billions of dollars made by Facebook shareholders from
`
`the Facebook IPO. In at least one instance, aware of the misrepresentations typically made to
`
`investors, Flynn instead recommended that a particular investor be pitched “super clean.” In a
`
`July 19, 2018 email, Flynn directed an IR to call an acquaintance of the then-CEO of Vuuzle.
`
`Specifically, Flynn instructed the IR to “just pitch clean because he will tell [the CEO]
`
`everything and I don’t want him to scare [the CEO] into thinking we are selling dirty.”
`
`Notwithstanding Flynn’s efforts, Vuuzle’s CEO resigned a few months after Flynn’s July 2018
`
`email.
`
`40.
`
`Flynn controlled nearly every aspect of the sales campaigns. He directed the sales
`
`pitches, created marketing material sent to investors via email, oversaw Vuuzle’s online
`
`presence, controlled the content posted to Vuuzle’s websites, followed up directly with each
`
`investor by phone to address any concerns, if necessary, and often “closed” the investment deal.
`
`41.
`
`In addition to the IRs and marketing representatives, Flynn retained a staff of
`
`secretaries, IT support specialists, content writers, and finance employees who reported solely to
`
`him and who helped him solicit investor funds. Flynn required each group of employees to
`
`provide him with periodic reports of their “accomplishments.” These reports make clear that
`
`selling Vuuzle securities – not building a legitimate business – consumed the overwhelming
`
`majority of Flynn’s and his employees’ time and energy.
`
`42.
`
`For example, at any given time, Flynn retained anywhere from four to thirteen
`
`secretaries to contact existing and potential investors (who they referred to as “clients”) and to
`

`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 13 of 36 PageID: 13
`
`maintain meticulous records of their efforts to procure additional investor funds. To control the
`
`messaging to investors, Flynn required his secretaries to send him written investor
`
`communications for his approval before they were sent to investors. In addition, Flynn arranged
`
`for his secretaries to receive trainings in dealing with investors. As part of these trainings, Flynn
`
`was provided reports on each secretary’s skills in “pitch[ing] a customer,” including evaluations
`
`of their English pronunciation and their ability to recite “rebuttals” to standard investor concerns.
`
`43.
`
`On a daily basis, each secretary provided Flynn with a report of her
`
`“accomplishments.” These reports included detailed information about which investors the
`
`secretary had contacted, when the communications occurred, what was said, how much the
`
`investor planned to invest, and what next steps were necessary to close the investment deal.
`
`Periodically, secretaries also sent group reports to Flynn, titled “Incoming Done Deals,” which
`
`were consolidated lists of investors who had committed funds that Flynn could expect to receive
`
`shortly.
`
`44.
`
`Similarly, Flynn received daily reports from his “IT Department.” These reports
`
`reflected virtually no activity relating to the production or maintenance of the Bonk.live or
`
`Vuuzle TV applications, the ostensible focus of Vuuzle’s business. Instead, his IT employees
`
`primarily reported providing computer and tech support to Flynn and his marketing teams,
`
`“washing” lead lists, creating Skype and email accounts for new marketing representatives, and
`
`double-checking investor calls reported by Flynn’s secretaries.
`
`45.
`
`In addition, Flynn received “Treasury Department” reports, which had nothing to
`
`do with business revenue or Vuuzle’s books and records. Instead, these reports detail finance
`
`employees’ efforts to track investments made into Vuuzle, issuing share certificates and warrant
`
`agreements, and maintaining the Vuuzle shareholder records.
`

`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 14 of 36 PageID: 14
`
`46. Marketing team meeting notes similarly reflected the pressure to make investor
`
`sales within the boiler room. For instance, in a meeting that took place on May 25, 2019, one IR
`
`told his marketing representatives that he needed potential investors to be “fully pitched and not
`
`half-pitched,” and that marketing representatives should “do whatever it takes every day to
`
`produce” investor sales. As the IR reminded his marketing team, their focus should always be on
`
`the money: “[y]ou have good opportunities to make good cash right here and right now if you
`
`stay focus[ed] and do what needs to be done every day.”
`
`47.
`
`As compensation for recruiting investors, Vuuzle and Flynn paid commissions to
`
`Flynn, his IRs, and other boiler room staff based upon their respective roles. To receive
`
`payment, the IR was required to submit a request or invoice to Flynn for his approval. No one
`
`got paid unless Flynn approved it.
`
`48.
`
`Accordingly, detailed spreadsheets were emailed to Flynn by his IRs, which
`
`calculated each investor’s “done deal” investment amount, the initials of the boiler room staff
`
`person credited with “opening” and/or “closing” the deal, and the percentage commission earned.
`
`According to these charts, Flynn and his IRs received commissions from 8% to 15% of investor
`
`funds, while lower level marketing reps were paid commissions of up to 2.5% of investor funds.
`
`III. Vuuzle and Flynn Misused $10 Million in Investor Funds
`
`49.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn falsely represented to investors, directly and through the
`
`marketing teams, that Vuuzle was a legitimate business and that it would use investor funds to
`
`grow and operate the company.
`
`50.
`
`For example, a 2017 PPM that was provided to investors describes the use of
`
`investor proceeds as follows:
`

`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 15 of 36 PageID: 15
`
`
`
`51.
`
`In this chart and other similar statements, Flynn, Vuuzle, and their marketing
`
`team represented that Vuuzle would use more than 99% of investor funds for building,
`
`marketing, and selling Vuuzle’s online products. They also claimed that only 0.5% of investor
`
`funds would be used in connection with offering securities. Similarly, in an email dated April
`
`20, 2020, Flynn told an investor that “the corporation is using its funds to grow the platform.”
`
`52.
`
`Vuuzle made similarly false statements in two Forms D filed with the
`
`Commission in 2017 and 2019.
`

`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 16 of 36 PageID: 16
`
`
`
`53.
`
`Both Forms D contained identical responses that specifically represented that
`
`Vuuzle had paid $0 in sales commissions and $0 in finders’ fees in connection with the offering
`
`of Vuuzle securities.
`
`54.
`
`As Flynn knew, these statements were false. Of the $14 million invested in
`
`Vuuzle, only approximately $2 million was ultimately used for the costs of building and
`
`maintaining Vuuzle’s online products. Flynn diverted more than $10 million for his personal
`
`use and benefit and to support his boiler room operations, including paying commissions to
`
`himself and others.
`
`A.
`
`55.
`
`Flynn Personally Misappropriated $5 million of Investor Funds
`
`Flynn diverted a total of nearly $5 million of investor proceeds from Vuuzle’s
`
`primary U.S. bank account for his own benefit. Specifically, from November 21, 2016 to August
`
`22, 2019, Flynn transferred (or directed Marchitto to transfer) more than $2.6 million in investor
`
`funds from Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account to Flynn’s personal bank accounts in Singapore and the
`
`United Arab Emirates. In addition, Flynn used investor funds to pay more than $2.3 million in
`
`expenses that he incurred using corporate credit and debit cards.
`
`56.
`
`The overwhelming majority of the $2.3 million in expenses were personal. They
`
`included, for instance, nearly $1 million in purchases at jewelry stores in Singapore, Dubai, and
`
`the Philippines. Receipts from the Dubai jewelry store reflect that some of Flynn’s purchases
`

`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 17 of 36 PageID: 17
`
`were for 24 Karat gold bars. Flynn also racked up more than $500,000 in credit card charges for
`
`his travel and entertainment, including international business class flights, luxury hotels, strip
`
`clubs, and restaurants. Flynn also used the Vuuzle debit card connected to the primary U.S. bank
`
`account that received investor funds to spend another more than $25,000 on clearly personal
`
`items, such as online dating and gambling applications. Investors unwittingly paid for it all.
`
`B.
`
`57.
`
`Vuuzle Paid Undisclosed Commissions to Flynn and Others
`
`In addition to $5 million misappropriated for Flynn’s personal use, Vuuzle and
`
`Flynn diverted another approximately $5.5 million in investor funds to sustain Flynn’s boiler
`
`room operations, including paying undisclosed commissions to himself and his marketing staff.
`
`58.
`
`Flynn engaged in efforts to conceal the nature of these payments. From
`
`November 22, 2016 through May 28, 2020, Flynn transferred (or directed Marchitto to transfer)
`
`a total of $5.1 million from Vuuzle’s primary U.S. bank account to overseas accounts in the
`
`names of entities under Flynn’s control, including more than $2.2 million to his company,
`
`iMagically.
`
`59.
`
`Flynn attempted to legitimize some of these payments by directing iMagically to
`
`send Vuuzle invoices for “consulting fees.” However, these invoices clearly reflect
`
`commissions, as they contain investor names, along with the amounts invested, and a description
`
`of the charges that said “40% Fees, Consulting, meetings, phone, time, FedEx, Credit charges &
`
`secretarial.” The bottom of each invoice had a note stating “[i]f you have any questions about
`
`this invoice please contact Ronnie Shane Flynn” and providing Flynn’s phone and email address.
`
`60.
`
`Once the funds arrived in the overseas accounts, Flynn directed them to be
`
`disbursed to himself and his marketing staff, mostly in the form of commissions. For example,
`
`on April 9, 2019, Flynn sent his treasury staff an email with the subject line, “10k sent to
`

`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 18 of 36 PageID: 18
`
`magically” and a message saying, “SENT YOU TEN THOUSAND, GET JOSHUA PAID…”
`
`Similarly, on August 24, 2019, Flynn sent his staff an email that stated “I have sent off an
`
`additional 5 k that can be used for the commis

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket