`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
`COMMISSION,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`VUUZLE MEDIA CORP.,
`RONALD SHANE FLYNN, and
`RICHARD MARCHITTO,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. _______________
`
`JURY TRIAL
`DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`“Commission”) alleges as follows against the following Defendants, whose names and last
`
`known addresses are set forth below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`
`c.
`
`1.
`
`Vuuzle Media Corp. – 42 Broadway, Suite 12-117, New York NY, 10004;
`
`Ronald Shane Flynn – Angeles City, Philippines and/or Dubai, United Arab
`Emirates;
`
`Richard Marchitto – Rockaway, New Jersey.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`This action concerns an offering fraud perpetrated by Vuuzle Media Corp.
`
`(together with its predecessor entities, hereinafter referred to as “Vuuzle”) and its founder,
`
`Ronald Shane Flynn (“Flynn”), and aided and abetted by Richard Marchitto (“Marchitto”).
`
`2.
`
`From approximately September 2016 through at least May 2020, Vuuzle and
`
`Flynn offered and sold more than $14 million of Vuuzle common stock and warrants to investors
`
`throughout the United States. In violation of the securities laws, Flynn secretly diverted
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 2 of 36 PageID: 2
`
`approximately $5 million to support his aggressive fund-raising operations and pay commissions
`
`to stock promoters. Flynn misappropriated another nearly $5 million in direct transfers to his
`
`personal bank accounts overseas and by using corporate credit and debit cards for personal items,
`
`such as dating and gambling applications, gold bars, and luxury travel. An additional
`
`approximately $2 million appears to have been used for other expenses in furtherance of the
`
`fraud, including, but not limited to, Ponzi-like payments to a limited number of investors, Fed Ex
`
`charges, rent for a New York office, and attorney fees.
`
`3.
`
`To raise funds, Vuuzle and Flynn falsely represented to investors that Vuuzle was
`
`a legitimate, successful, and growing company in the business of providing online live streaming
`
`and entertainment services. In fact, Vuuzle was little more than a front for a boiler room Flynn
`
`controlled.
`
`4.
`
`Operating primarily out of the Philippines under a series of different corporate
`
`entities, Flynn, directly and through marketing teams acting at his direction, engaged in
`
`aggressive and high-pressure sales campaigns. Among other tactics, Flynn and his boiler room
`
`employees cold-called potential investors and, through relentless and deceptive phone and email
`
`communication, convinced them to buy Vuuzle securities. In return for bringing investor funds
`
`to Vuuzle, Flynn paid substantial commissions to himself and others.
`
`5.
`
`The securities offered were common stock. The price per share ranged from $1 to
`
`$5, with most investors paying $5 per share. Many investors were also granted warrants that
`
`provided the investor the purported right to purchase additional shares for a limited time at a
`
`discounted price. None of these securities were registered with the Commission.
`
`6.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn made numerous materially false and misleading statements in
`
`their communications with investors, filings with the Commission, and in offering documents,
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 3 of 36 PageID: 3
`
`including Vuuzle’s Private Placement Memoranda (“PPMs”). For instance, Vuuzle and Flynn
`
`told investors that their funds would be used to operate and build Vuuzle’s online streaming
`
`business, which would earn millions of dollars in revenue from service fees and advertising. In
`
`fact, of the $14 million raised in investor funds, Vuuzle and Flynn used only approximately $2
`
`million to build the streaming applications, which served as props to raise more investor funds.
`
`7.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn also falsely represented Vuuzle as a “pre-IPO” investment
`
`opportunity that would provide returns to investors in the form of dividends and skyrocketing
`
`post-IPO stock values. Yet, Vuuzle has never made a profit, never paid dividends to any
`
`investor, and never made a public offering on any stock exchange. From its inception in October
`
`2016 through May 2020, Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account reflects total business revenue of less than
`
`$1,670.
`
`8.
`
`Vuuzle’s public filings and offering documents falsely suggest Flynn had only a
`
`peripheral relationship with the company, if any. For example, in the PPMs, Vuuzle described
`
`Flynn as merely a “non-voting beneficial owner” of a Vuuzle corporate shareholder. And
`
`Vuuzle’s Forms D, filed with the Commission in 2017 and 2019, do not name Flynn as a related
`
`party at all. In fact, however, Flynn exercised ultimate control over every part of Vuuzle’s
`
`business for the primary purpose of enriching himself.
`
`9.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn concealed Flynn’s control over Vuuzle by falsely representing
`
`to investors and the public that Vuuzle was operated by a legitimate team of independent
`
`executive officers. In early 2018, Flynn hired two former executives of a publicly-traded
`
`company to ostensibly serve as Vuuzle’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Operating
`
`Officer (“COO”). Their hiring was all for show. During their time at Vuuzle, both individuals
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 4 of 36 PageID: 4
`
`raised serious questions about Flynn’s operation of Vuuzle, and both were gone by November of
`
`that year.
`
`10.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn were aided and abetted in their fraud by Marchitto, a former
`
`dentist who had lost money investing in one of Flynn’s previous business ventures. He provided
`
`substantial assistance to Vuuzle and Flynn by acting as their U.S. corporate and financial
`
`presence, thereby enhancing Vuuzle’s aura of legitimacy as a U.S.-based company. Because
`
`Flynn avoided U.S. jurisdiction, Marchitto was instrumental to the fraud.
`
`11.
`
`Specifically, Marchitto (a) organized Vuuzle’s predecessor legal entity and served
`
`as its initial member; (b) opened and maintained a U.S. bank account for Vuuzle, which was
`
`used to receive and disburse the overwhelming majority of investor funds; (c) maintained a New
`
`York office space, which was represented to investors as Vuuzle’s primary place of business;
`
`and (d) facilitated Flynn’s misappropriation of investor funds by transferring funds to Flynn’s
`
`accounts overseas and opening and maintaining corporate credit cards, which Flynn used for
`
`personal expenses.
`
`12. Marchitto was the sole signatory to Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account and had direct
`
`access to that account. Marchitto also collected mail from the New York office space and
`
`deposited investor checks to Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account. Because he had all the account
`
`information, Marchitto knew or was reckless in not knowing that investor funds were deposited
`
`to that U.S. bank account, and that his actions directly aided Flynn in misappropriating these
`
`funds. By his conduct, he substantially assisted Flynn’s and Vuuzle’s violations of the securities
`
`laws.
`
`13.
`
`By perpetrating this offering fraud, Vuuzle and Flynn have violated Section 17(a)
`
`of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] and Section 10(b) of the
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 5 of 36 PageID: 5
`
`Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 [17
`
`C.F.R. § 240.10b-5] thereunder, and Marchitto aided and abetted those violations. By failing to
`
`register the offering of Vuuzle securities, Vuuzle and Flynn also have violated Section 5 of the
`
`Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e]. And, by acting as a broker in selling Vuuzle securities without
`
`being registered as, or associated with, a registered broker-dealer, Flynn has violated Section
`
`15(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78o(a)].
`
`14.
`
`Because of the Defendants’ unlawful conduct, the Commission respectfully
`
`requests that the Court: (i) permanently enjoin each Defendant from further violations of the
`
`foregoing securities laws, (ii) order each Defendant to disgorge the unlawful profits from their
`
`violations with prejudgment interest, (iii) impose civil money penalties on each Defendant, and
`
`(iv) impose such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and appropriate.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`15.
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Section 20 of the Securities
`
`Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(b)] and Sections 21A and 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-1,
`
`78aa]. Defendants, directly or indirectly, singly or in concert with others, made use of the means
`
`or instruments of transportation and communication in interstate commerce, or of the mails, in
`
`connection with the acts, transactions, and practices alleged in this Complaint.
`
`16.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under Section 22(a) of the Securities Act [15
`
`U.S.C. § 77v(a)] and Section 27(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78aa] because, among
`
`other things, Defendant Marchitto resides in this district, and Defendants Vuuzle and Flynn have
`
`targeted, communicated with, and raised money from investors that reside in this district.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`17.
`
`Vuuzle Media Corp. is a Delaware corporation formed on August 22, 2017 as a
`
`successor entity to Boink Live Streaming LLC, which was incorporated in Delaware on
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 6 of 36 PageID: 6
`
`September 16, 2016. (A separate corporation called Boink Live Streaming Corp. was also
`
`incorporated in Delaware on August 22, 2017 and, until October 26, 2018, when the name was
`
`officially changed to Vuuzle Media Corp., company documents referred to the entity
`
`interchangeably as Boink Live Streaming, Boink Live Streaming Corp., and Boink Live
`
`Streaming LLC.) Vuuzle markets itself as a provider of online live streaming and entertainment
`
`services. Vuuzle has claimed at various times to have offices around the world, including in
`
`New York City, Las Vegas, and Scottsdale, as well as the Philippines, United Arab Emirates, and
`
`United Kingdom. Vuuzle was founded by Flynn, who controlled Vuuzle’s operations at all times
`
`during the relevant period.
`
`18.
`
`Vuuzle has never registered any of its securities with the Commission. Vuuzle
`
`filed a Form D Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities on September 26, 2017 (in the name of
`
`Boink Live Streaming Corp.), and an amendment on February 15, 2019 (in the name of Vuuzle
`
`Media Corp.), claiming an exemption from registration under Securities Act Rule 506(b).
`
`19.
`
`Ronald Shane Flynn (a/k/a Ronnie Shane), age 56, is a United States citizen,
`
`resident of the Philippines and/or the United Arab Emirates, and the founder of Vuuzle. While
`
`Flynn currently holds no official title at Vuuzle, he is Vuuzle’s majority shareholder and
`
`exercises ultimate control over all aspects of Vuuzle’s business, including its operations, online
`
`presence, communications with investors, and company finances.
`
`20.
`
`Flynn has been subject to at least two state cease-and-desist orders in connection
`
`with his prior solicitations of investors: one dated October 4, 2000 by the Ohio Division of
`
`Securities; and a second dated September 22, 2016 by the State of California Department of
`
`Business Oversight. Flynn was a registered representative of a registered broker-dealer from
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 7 of 36 PageID: 7
`
`November 1988 to March 1989, but he is not currently registered with the Commission in any
`
`capacity.
`
`21.
`
`Richard Marchitto, age 72, is a retired dentist residing in Rockaway, New
`
`Jersey. Marchitto has held various titles at Vuuzle, including “VP Marketing” and “board
`
`director.” He acts on behalf of Vuuzle at Flynn’s direction. For example, at Flynn’s direction,
`
`Marchitto established the original Vuuzle entity (Boink Live Streaming LLC) on September 28,
`
`2016 and was its initial member. Also at Flynn’s direction, Marchitto opened Vuuzle’s primary
`
`U.S. bank account (initially using his home address) – which Defendants used to receive and
`
`transfer investor assets – and provided Flynn with electronic access to that account while
`
`Marchitto remained the sole signatory. In addition, Marchitto opened credit card accounts in the
`
`names of his former dental practice and various Vuuzle entities and granted Flynn the use of
`
`those cards. Marchitto has never been registered with the Commission in any capacity.
`
`I.
`
`Vuuzle’s Purported Business
`
`FACTS
`
`
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn convinced investors to buy Vuuzle securities by presenting
`
`22.
`
`Vuuzle as a legitimate, successful, and growing provider of online live streaming and
`
`entertainment services. Investors were inundated with communications drafted and sent by
`
`Flynn, directly or through his marketing teams, that used hyperbole to describe Vuuzle, its
`
`products, and the online entertainment industry as whole.
`
`23.
`
`Vuuzle, Flynn, and his subordinates told investors that Vuuzle would use their
`
`funds to grow and operate Vuuzle’s business. But instead, Flynn misappropriated the vast
`
`majority of what Vuuzle received. Of the $14 million investors gave Defendants, only
`
`approximately $2 million was used to operate Vuuzle – just enough to build and maintain
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 8 of 36 PageID: 8
`
`superficial versions of the online streaming applications from which Vuuzle was purportedly
`
`going to earn revenue. These purported products were mere props Flynn used to raise additional
`
`investor funds.
`
`24.
`
`Beginning in September 2016, Vuuzle and Flynn told investors that Vuuzle was
`
`in the process of building a mobile phone application called “Bonk.live” (later called
`
`“Bonk.be.live”) through which the company would provide a platform for performers who
`
`wanted to livestream their talent to an audience. Flynn, Vuuzle, and Flynn’s marketing teams
`
`provided investors with revenue projections showing millions and, in some instances, even
`
`billions of dollars in expected company earnings. For example, in a September 11, 2016 email to
`
`investors, Flynn claimed that “BONK LIVE HAS 6 UNIQUE INCOME STREAMS” and
`
`depicted math equations purportedly reflecting revenues from each income stream ranging from
`
`$50,457,600 per year to more than $21 billion per year.
`
`25.
`
`On October 30, 2016, Flynn sent an another email to investors attaching a “press
`
`announcement” in which he described Bonk.live as “the newest streaming super app in the
`
`world” which was “nothing less than genius as it allows digital publishers, advertisers, and the
`
`live social streamers to make enormous money.” In this press announcement, Flynn claimed that
`
`the “advertising carousel” on Bonk.live “will earn the company more th[a]n 50 million United
`
`States Dollars per year” and that advertising during an influencer’s live stream could result in
`
`another “$350,000,000 Million” to “1 billion USD to 3 billion USD Dollars per year.”
`
`26.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn told investors that Bonk.live users would be able to purchase
`
`virtual gift packages that they could send to live streamers they liked. In that same October 30,
`
`2016 announcement, Flynn told investors that “Bonk potential earnings with only 100 million
`
`users buying one package of $128.95 per year is more than 12 billion [dollars] per year.”
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 9 of 36 PageID: 9
`
`Performers that received enough virtual gifts were supposed to be able to cash out the value of
`
`those gifts through debit cards. Indeed, Flynn sent investors photos of what appeared to be
`
`Bonk-branded debit cards. Yet, Vuuzle never actually created or distributed any such cards.
`
`27.
`
`Despite these promises to investors, Bonk.live never made millions of dollars, or
`
`really any money at all. Using outside vendors to build the platform, Flynn directed just enough
`
`money to create an application with the minimum functionality necessary for downloading on a
`
`mobile device. Flynn then used the existence of the app as proof of Vuuzle’s legitimacy, by, for
`
`example, sending investors images of the Bonk.live application downloaded to his own phone.
`
`28.
`
`Vuuzle’s revenue projections assumed that there would be millions of Bonk.live
`
`users. In fact, however, there were not. From May 25 through November 15, 2018, the average
`
`daily number of devices using the Bonk.live app was 371. Flynn knew the actual number of
`
`users because he received weekly emails containing updated charts of Bonk.live user data.
`
`29. Moreover, Flynn knew that there never could be millions of users. In an email
`
`dated September 27, 2018, a Vuuzle adviser told Flynn that his first discussion about the
`
`Bonk.live application was “terrifying” because he “just found out how weak and undeveloped
`
`this whole initiative is right now.” In particular, the adviser emphasized that he had just learned
`
`that the software could only handle 40,000 users with “a full system crash imminent at 50,000+.”
`
`Flynn responded that he already knew the app’s limitations, stating: “[t]he question about users
`
`is not a new question as it was addressed months ago.”
`
`30.
`
`In approximately November 2018, Vuuzle began to shift its focus away from the
`
`Bonk.live app. Flynn, directly and through his marketing teams, told investors that Vuuzle was
`
`moving its business toward online streaming of television shows, through a mobile application it
`
`later called “Vuuzle TV.” Flynn drafted and sent to investors, directly and through his marketing
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 10 of 36 PageID: 10
`
`teams, multiple emails raving about Vuuzle TV, its capabilities, and its potential. According to
`
`this marketing material, Vuuzle TV was going to offer free as well as paid versions of its app and
`
`would earn money through subscription fees and advertising. Investors were told that online
`
`streaming was going to be the next revolution in entertainment and that Vuuzle investors would
`
`earn “gargantuan return[s].”
`
`31.
`
`For example, on April 13, 2019, Flynn sent an email to investors with an attached
`
`document titled, “Vuuzle TV’s Ten Million Dollar Investment Is Set To Win OTT subscribers
`
`while eliminating the competition.” Flynn encouraged investors to “cash out of those mediocre
`
`investments and finally make a sizeable investment in Vuuzle Media and get paid for being in
`
`the right place at the right time with an investment that will win you BIG money!!!!!!!”
`
`32.
`
`Flynn’s statement that “ten million dollar[s]” was invested into building Vuuzle
`
`TV was false. As described above, Flynn directed just enough money toward the business to
`
`build a mobile application that users could download and view some television shows. Once the
`
`app was available, Flynn sent investors, directly and through his marketing teams, links to the
`
`Vuuzle.TV site along with images of Vuuzle.TV on his phone.
`
`33.
`
`And, contrary to the promises of “BIG money,” Vuuzle TV has not resulted in the
`
`promised revenues. From its inception in October 2016 through May 2020, Vuuzle’s U.S. bank
`
`account reflects total business revenue of less than $1,670. In its entire four years of operation,
`
`through all the various mobile products Vuuzle and Flynn have hyped, Vuuzle has never made a
`
`profit.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 11 of 36 PageID: 11
`
`II.
`
`Vuuzle was a Front for Flynn’s Boiler Room
`
`34.
`
`Rather than the legitimate, successful business touted to investors, Vuuzle was
`
`simply a front for a boiler room, the sole purpose of which was to bring investor funds to Vuuzle
`
`to be spent by Flynn and at Flynn’s direction.
`
`35.
`
`Operating primarily out of the Philippines, Flynn directed marketing teams
`
`headed by four to six “Investment Representatives” (“IRs”) who were mostly close associates of
`
`Flynn or members of his family. The marketing teams operated, at varying times, through four
`
`companies under Flynn’s control: WorldCom Online Marketing, Inc.; Bonk Marketing Trade
`
`and Promotion, Inc.; iMagically LLC; and Vuuzle Media Corp Fze LLC.
`
`36.
`
`Together, Flynn and the marketing teams engaged in coordinated and aggressive
`
`sales campaigns to convince investors to buy Vuuzle securities. These sales campaigns involved
`
`repeated, high-pressure sales calls. Flynn and his marketing teams also inundated current and
`
`potential investors with emailed marketing materials – sometimes several in a single day –
`
`relating to the business of Vuuzle, its products, and the industry as a whole.
`
`37.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn identified potential investors by purchasing “lead lists” of
`
`purportedly accredited investors from several independent sellers, for anywhere from $1,000 to
`
`$5,000 per list. In addition to names and contact information, certain lists also included
`
`information such as the types of investments the investor was interested in and, sometimes,
`
`descriptions of the investors themselves. For instance, one lead list received by Flynn on June 5,
`
`2019, included additional, often profane, descriptors next to certain names such as “dumbass,”
`
`“old,” or “stroke.”
`
`38.
`
`After receiving the lists, Flynn had his marketing teams “wash” them for
`
`duplicate names from prior lead lists and then directed them to cold-call the remaining entries.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 12 of 36 PageID: 12
`
`Flynn provided his marketing teams with initial “sales pitch” scripts for them to use in their calls
`
`with potential investors.
`
`39.
`
`In most cases, Flynn’s scripts directed comparisons of Vuuzle to Facebook,
`
`Twitter, and Google, highlighting the billions of dollars made by Facebook shareholders from
`
`the Facebook IPO. In at least one instance, aware of the misrepresentations typically made to
`
`investors, Flynn instead recommended that a particular investor be pitched “super clean.” In a
`
`July 19, 2018 email, Flynn directed an IR to call an acquaintance of the then-CEO of Vuuzle.
`
`Specifically, Flynn instructed the IR to “just pitch clean because he will tell [the CEO]
`
`everything and I don’t want him to scare [the CEO] into thinking we are selling dirty.”
`
`Notwithstanding Flynn’s efforts, Vuuzle’s CEO resigned a few months after Flynn’s July 2018
`
`email.
`
`40.
`
`Flynn controlled nearly every aspect of the sales campaigns. He directed the sales
`
`pitches, created marketing material sent to investors via email, oversaw Vuuzle’s online
`
`presence, controlled the content posted to Vuuzle’s websites, followed up directly with each
`
`investor by phone to address any concerns, if necessary, and often “closed” the investment deal.
`
`41.
`
`In addition to the IRs and marketing representatives, Flynn retained a staff of
`
`secretaries, IT support specialists, content writers, and finance employees who reported solely to
`
`him and who helped him solicit investor funds. Flynn required each group of employees to
`
`provide him with periodic reports of their “accomplishments.” These reports make clear that
`
`selling Vuuzle securities – not building a legitimate business – consumed the overwhelming
`
`majority of Flynn’s and his employees’ time and energy.
`
`42.
`
`For example, at any given time, Flynn retained anywhere from four to thirteen
`
`secretaries to contact existing and potential investors (who they referred to as “clients”) and to
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 13 of 36 PageID: 13
`
`maintain meticulous records of their efforts to procure additional investor funds. To control the
`
`messaging to investors, Flynn required his secretaries to send him written investor
`
`communications for his approval before they were sent to investors. In addition, Flynn arranged
`
`for his secretaries to receive trainings in dealing with investors. As part of these trainings, Flynn
`
`was provided reports on each secretary’s skills in “pitch[ing] a customer,” including evaluations
`
`of their English pronunciation and their ability to recite “rebuttals” to standard investor concerns.
`
`43.
`
`On a daily basis, each secretary provided Flynn with a report of her
`
`“accomplishments.” These reports included detailed information about which investors the
`
`secretary had contacted, when the communications occurred, what was said, how much the
`
`investor planned to invest, and what next steps were necessary to close the investment deal.
`
`Periodically, secretaries also sent group reports to Flynn, titled “Incoming Done Deals,” which
`
`were consolidated lists of investors who had committed funds that Flynn could expect to receive
`
`shortly.
`
`44.
`
`Similarly, Flynn received daily reports from his “IT Department.” These reports
`
`reflected virtually no activity relating to the production or maintenance of the Bonk.live or
`
`Vuuzle TV applications, the ostensible focus of Vuuzle’s business. Instead, his IT employees
`
`primarily reported providing computer and tech support to Flynn and his marketing teams,
`
`“washing” lead lists, creating Skype and email accounts for new marketing representatives, and
`
`double-checking investor calls reported by Flynn’s secretaries.
`
`45.
`
`In addition, Flynn received “Treasury Department” reports, which had nothing to
`
`do with business revenue or Vuuzle’s books and records. Instead, these reports detail finance
`
`employees’ efforts to track investments made into Vuuzle, issuing share certificates and warrant
`
`agreements, and maintaining the Vuuzle shareholder records.
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 14 of 36 PageID: 14
`
`46. Marketing team meeting notes similarly reflected the pressure to make investor
`
`sales within the boiler room. For instance, in a meeting that took place on May 25, 2019, one IR
`
`told his marketing representatives that he needed potential investors to be “fully pitched and not
`
`half-pitched,” and that marketing representatives should “do whatever it takes every day to
`
`produce” investor sales. As the IR reminded his marketing team, their focus should always be on
`
`the money: “[y]ou have good opportunities to make good cash right here and right now if you
`
`stay focus[ed] and do what needs to be done every day.”
`
`47.
`
`As compensation for recruiting investors, Vuuzle and Flynn paid commissions to
`
`Flynn, his IRs, and other boiler room staff based upon their respective roles. To receive
`
`payment, the IR was required to submit a request or invoice to Flynn for his approval. No one
`
`got paid unless Flynn approved it.
`
`48.
`
`Accordingly, detailed spreadsheets were emailed to Flynn by his IRs, which
`
`calculated each investor’s “done deal” investment amount, the initials of the boiler room staff
`
`person credited with “opening” and/or “closing” the deal, and the percentage commission earned.
`
`According to these charts, Flynn and his IRs received commissions from 8% to 15% of investor
`
`funds, while lower level marketing reps were paid commissions of up to 2.5% of investor funds.
`
`III. Vuuzle and Flynn Misused $10 Million in Investor Funds
`
`49.
`
`Vuuzle and Flynn falsely represented to investors, directly and through the
`
`marketing teams, that Vuuzle was a legitimate business and that it would use investor funds to
`
`grow and operate the company.
`
`50.
`
`For example, a 2017 PPM that was provided to investors describes the use of
`
`investor proceeds as follows:
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 15 of 36 PageID: 15
`
`
`
`51.
`
`In this chart and other similar statements, Flynn, Vuuzle, and their marketing
`
`team represented that Vuuzle would use more than 99% of investor funds for building,
`
`marketing, and selling Vuuzle’s online products. They also claimed that only 0.5% of investor
`
`funds would be used in connection with offering securities. Similarly, in an email dated April
`
`20, 2020, Flynn told an investor that “the corporation is using its funds to grow the platform.”
`
`52.
`
`Vuuzle made similarly false statements in two Forms D filed with the
`
`Commission in 2017 and 2019.
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 16 of 36 PageID: 16
`
`
`
`53.
`
`Both Forms D contained identical responses that specifically represented that
`
`Vuuzle had paid $0 in sales commissions and $0 in finders’ fees in connection with the offering
`
`of Vuuzle securities.
`
`54.
`
`As Flynn knew, these statements were false. Of the $14 million invested in
`
`Vuuzle, only approximately $2 million was ultimately used for the costs of building and
`
`maintaining Vuuzle’s online products. Flynn diverted more than $10 million for his personal
`
`use and benefit and to support his boiler room operations, including paying commissions to
`
`himself and others.
`
`A.
`
`55.
`
`Flynn Personally Misappropriated $5 million of Investor Funds
`
`Flynn diverted a total of nearly $5 million of investor proceeds from Vuuzle’s
`
`primary U.S. bank account for his own benefit. Specifically, from November 21, 2016 to August
`
`22, 2019, Flynn transferred (or directed Marchitto to transfer) more than $2.6 million in investor
`
`funds from Vuuzle’s U.S. bank account to Flynn’s personal bank accounts in Singapore and the
`
`United Arab Emirates. In addition, Flynn used investor funds to pay more than $2.3 million in
`
`expenses that he incurred using corporate credit and debit cards.
`
`56.
`
`The overwhelming majority of the $2.3 million in expenses were personal. They
`
`included, for instance, nearly $1 million in purchases at jewelry stores in Singapore, Dubai, and
`
`the Philippines. Receipts from the Dubai jewelry store reflect that some of Flynn’s purchases
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 17 of 36 PageID: 17
`
`were for 24 Karat gold bars. Flynn also racked up more than $500,000 in credit card charges for
`
`his travel and entertainment, including international business class flights, luxury hotels, strip
`
`clubs, and restaurants. Flynn also used the Vuuzle debit card connected to the primary U.S. bank
`
`account that received investor funds to spend another more than $25,000 on clearly personal
`
`items, such as online dating and gambling applications. Investors unwittingly paid for it all.
`
`B.
`
`57.
`
`Vuuzle Paid Undisclosed Commissions to Flynn and Others
`
`In addition to $5 million misappropriated for Flynn’s personal use, Vuuzle and
`
`Flynn diverted another approximately $5.5 million in investor funds to sustain Flynn’s boiler
`
`room operations, including paying undisclosed commissions to himself and his marketing staff.
`
`58.
`
`Flynn engaged in efforts to conceal the nature of these payments. From
`
`November 22, 2016 through May 28, 2020, Flynn transferred (or directed Marchitto to transfer)
`
`a total of $5.1 million from Vuuzle’s primary U.S. bank account to overseas accounts in the
`
`names of entities under Flynn’s control, including more than $2.2 million to his company,
`
`iMagically.
`
`59.
`
`Flynn attempted to legitimize some of these payments by directing iMagically to
`
`send Vuuzle invoices for “consulting fees.” However, these invoices clearly reflect
`
`commissions, as they contain investor names, along with the amounts invested, and a description
`
`of the charges that said “40% Fees, Consulting, meetings, phone, time, FedEx, Credit charges &
`
`secretarial.” The bottom of each invoice had a note stating “[i]f you have any questions about
`
`this invoice please contact Ronnie Shane Flynn” and providing Flynn’s phone and email address.
`
`60.
`
`Once the funds arrived in the overseas accounts, Flynn directed them to be
`
`disbursed to himself and his marketing staff, mostly in the form of commissions. For example,
`
`on April 9, 2019, Flynn sent his treasury staff an email with the subject line, “10k sent to
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 2:21-cv-01226-KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 18 of 36 PageID: 18
`
`magically” and a message saying, “SENT YOU TEN THOUSAND, GET JOSHUA PAID…”
`
`Similarly, on August 24, 2019, Flynn sent his staff an email that stated “I have sent off an
`
`additional 5 k that can be used for the commis