`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, AMNEAL
`PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC, and
`AMNEAL EU, LIMITED,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`
`
`Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (“Fresenius” or “Plaintiff”) brings this action for patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infringement against Defendants Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Amneal Pharma”), Amneal
`
`Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC (“Amneal NY”), and Amneal EU, Limited (“Amneal EU”)
`
`(collectively, “Amneal” or “Defendants”).
`
`1.
`
`This is an action by Fresenius against Defendants for infringement of United States
`
`Patent No. 8,476,010 (“the ʼ010 patent”). This action arises out of Defendants’ filing of an
`
`Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) seeking approval by the United States Food and
`
`Drug Administration (“FDA”) to sell a generic version of Diprivan®, an innovative intravenously
`
`administered sedative and anesthetic, prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`2.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`Fresenius is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of
`
`business at Three Corporate Drive, Lake Zurich, Illinois 60047. Fresenius was formerly known
`
`as APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID: 2
`
`Defendants
`
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Amneal Pharma is a limited liability
`
`company organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, having a principal place of business
`
`at 400 Crossing Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Bridgewater, NJ 08807.
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Amneal NY is a limited liability company
`
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business
`
`at 400 Crossing Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Bridgewater, NJ 08807. Upon information and belief,
`
`Amneal NY is a wholly owned subsidiary of Amneal Pharma. Upon information and belief,
`
`Amneal NY is the U.S. agent for Amneal EU.
`
`5.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Amneal EU is a company organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Ireland, having a place of business at Cahir Road, Cashel, Co. Tipperary,
`
`Ireland E25 XD5l. Upon information and belief, Amneal EU is an indirect wholly owned
`
`subsidiary of Amneal Pharma.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`
`Subject Matter Jurisdiction
`
`6.
`This action for patent infringement arises under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`7.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), 2201, and 2202.
`
`Personal Jurisdiction
`
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants
`
`because, inter alia, they have maintained continuous and systematic contacts with the State of New
`
`Jersey.
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court also has personal jurisdiction over
`
`Defendants because, inter alia, they have committed, or aided, abetted, contributed to, or
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID: 3
`
`participated in the commission of, tortious conduct, which will lead to foreseeable harm and injury
`
`to Fresenius in the State of New Jersey, and by doing so, Defendants have purposefully directed
`
`their activities at the residents of this forum.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant
`
`Amneal Pharma because it has its principal place of business in New Jersey.
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant
`
`Amneal NY because it has its principal place of business in New Jersey.
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant
`
`Amneal EU because its U.S. agent, Amneal NY, has its principal place of business in New Jersey.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have previously availed themselves of
`
`this Judicial District by not contesting personal jurisdiction in at least the following actions: Cubist
`
`Pharms. LLC v. Amneal Pharms. LLC et al., Civil Action No. 3:19-cv-15439 (D.N.J. filed July
`
`16, 2019); and TherapeuticsMD, Inc. v. Amneal Pharms., Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-
`
`05256-FLW-TJB (D.N.J. filed Apr. 29, 2020).
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have engaged in continuous and
`
`systematic contacts with the State of New Jersey and/or purposefully have availed themselves of
`
`this forum by, inter alia, individually and/or in concert, making, marketing, shipping, using,
`
`offering to sell or selling Defendants’ pharmaceutical products in this Judicial District, and
`
`deriving substantial revenue from such activities.
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have engaged in and maintained
`
`systematic and continuous business contacts within the State of New Jersey, and have purposefully
`
`availed themselves of the benefits and protections of the laws of the State of New Jersey, rendering
`
`them at home in the State of New Jersey.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID: 4
`
`16.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants operate as a single vertically-integrated
`
`business with respect to the regulatory approval, manufacturing, marketing, sale and distribution
`
`of pharmaceutical products throughout the United States, including in this Judicial District.
`
`17.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants, individually and/or in concert, have
`
`committed, or aided, abetted, contributed to and/or participated in the commission of the tortious
`
`action of patent infringement that has led to foreseeable harm and injury to Fresenius, which sells
`
`Diprivan® for use throughout the United States, including the State of New Jersey.
`
`18.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have applied for FDA approval to market
`
`and sell a generic version of Diprivan® throughout the United States, including the State of New
`
`Jersey.
`
`19.
`
`Defendants’ submission of their ANDA to FDA evinces their intent to subject
`
`themselves to the jurisdiction of the courts where the drug that is the subject of the ANDA will be
`
`sold, including in the State of New Jersey.
`
`20.
`
`Defendants sent a letter, dated June 28, 2023 (the “Notice Letter”), to Fresenius
`
`stating that Defendants had filed ANDA No. 217525 seeking FDA approval to market generic
`
`Diprivan® products (“Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products”) prior to the expiration of the ʼ010
`
`patent. The Notice Letter was sent from the State of New Jersey by Bryan Sommese, Esq., Senior
`
`Patent Litigation Counsel IP, for Amneal Pharma in Bridgewater, New Jersey, on behalf of Amneal
`
`NY and Amneal EU.
`
`21.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants acted in concert to prepare and submit
`
`ANDA No. 217525.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID: 5
`
`22.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants, individually and/or in concert, will
`
`market, sell and offer for sale Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products in the State of New Jersey
`
`following FDA approval of those products.
`
`23.
`
`Upon information and belief, as a result of Defendants’ marketing, selling, or
`
`offering for sale of Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products in the State of New Jersey, Fresenius
`
`will lose sales of Diprivan® and be injured in the State of New Jersey.
`
`24.
`
`This Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over Defendants is fair and reasonable.
`
`Defendants are not burdened by litigating this suit in the State of New Jersey. The State of New
`
`Jersey has an interest in providing a forum to resolve Hatch-Waxman litigation, including in this
`
`case, because this case involves products that will be sold in the State of New Jersey by New
`
`Jersey-based companies and injury to Fresenius in the State of New Jersey. This Court’s exercise
`
`of jurisdiction serves the interests of the judicial system in efficient resolution of Hatch-Waxman
`
`litigation.
`
`25.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants
`
`for the reasons stated herein, including, inter alia, Defendants’ activities in the forum, activities
`
`directed at the forum, and significant contacts with the forum, all of which render Defendants at
`
`home in the forum. Personal jurisdiction is proper at least under Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan
`
`Pharms. Inc., 817 F.3d 755 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
`
`26.
`
`In the alternative, Defendant Amneal EU is subject to personal jurisdiction in this
`
`forum under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2).
`
`Venue
`
`
`27.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b). In
`
`re HTC Corp., 889 F.3d 1349, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
`
`28.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have a regular and established place of
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID: 6
`
`business in this Judicial District and have committed and/or will commit acts of infringement in
`
`this Judicial District.
`
`29.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants have not contested venue in this Judicial
`
`District in at least the following actions: Cubist Pharms. LLC v. Amneal Pharms. LLC et al., Civil
`
`Action No. 3:19-cv-15439 (D.N.J. filed July 16, 2019); and TherapeuticsMD, Inc. v. Amneal
`
`Pharms., Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-05256-FLW-TJB (D.N.J. filed Apr. 29, 2020).
`
`30.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Amneal Pharma has a regular and
`
`established place of business in this Judicial District at least because it: (1) has a principal place
`
`of business in the State of New Jersey; (2) has acted in concert with Amneal NY and Amneal EU
`
`to seek approval from FDA to market and sell Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products in this
`
`Judicial District; (3) has engaged in regular and established business contacts with the State of
`
`New Jersey by, inter alia, contracting and engaging in related commercial activities related to the
`
`marketing, making, shipping, using, offering to sell or selling Defendants’ products in this Judicial
`
`District, and deriving substantial revenue from such activities; and (4) has made agreements with
`
`retailers, wholesalers or distributors providing for the distribution of Defendants’ products in the
`
`State of New Jersey.
`
`31.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Amneal NY has a regular and established
`
`place of business in this Judicial District at least because it: (1) has a principal place of business
`
`in New Jersey; (2) has acted in concert with Amneal Pharma and Amneal EU to seek approval
`
`from FDA to market and sell Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products in this Judicial District; (3)
`
`has engaged in regular and established business contacts with the State of New Jersey by, inter
`
`alia, contracting and engaging in related commercial activities related to the marketing, making,
`
`shipping, using, offering to sell or selling Defendants’ products in this Judicial District, and
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID: 7
`
`deriving substantial revenue from such activities; and (4) has made agreements with retailers,
`
`wholesalers or distributors providing for the distribution of Defendants’ products in the State of
`
`New Jersey.
`
`32.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Amneal EU has a regular and established
`
`place of business in this Judicial District at least because it: (1) conducts business, individually
`
`and/or in concert with its U.S. agent, which is located in the State of New Jersey, in this Judicial
`
`District; and (2) has engaged in regular and established business contacts with the State of New
`
`Jersey by, inter alia, marketing, making, shipping, using, offering to sell or selling Defendants’
`
`products in this Judicial District, and deriving substantial revenue from such activities.
`
`33.
`
`Venue is also proper in this Judicial District for Amneal EU at least because, inter
`
`alia, Amneal EU is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ireland and may
`
`be sued in any judicial district in which it is subject to personal jurisdiction, including in the State
`
`of New Jersey.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`
`The Patent-in-Suit: United States Patent No. 8,476,010
`
`34.
`The ʼ010 patent, entitled “Propofol Formulations with Non-Reactive Container
`
`Closures,” was duly and lawfully issued on July 2, 2013, to inventors Neil P. Desai, Andrew Yang,
`
`and Sherry Xiaopei Ci. The named inventors assigned the ʼ010 patent to APP Pharmaceuticals,
`
`LLC, which later changed its name to Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC. Accordingly, Fresenius is the
`
`owner of all rights, title and interest in the ʼ010 patent. The ʼ010 patent will expire, with a period
`
`of pediatric exclusivity, on June 1, 2025. A true and accurate copy of the ʼ010 patent is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID: 8
`
`35.
`
`The ʼ010 patent is listed in FDA’s publication entitled, “Approved Drug Products
`
`with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,” commonly referred to as “The Orange Book,” with
`
`respect to Diprivan®.
`
`36.
`
`On or about January 16, 2020, after the conclusion of inter partes review (and the
`
`appeal therefrom), the United States Patent and Trademark Office cancelled claims 1, 13-15, 17,
`
`18, 20 and 24-28 of the ’010 patent. Fresenius is not asserting any of claims 1, 13-15, 17, 18, 20
`
`and 24-28 of the ’010 patent in this action. The remaining claims of the ’010 patent are, and
`
`remain, valid and enforceable.
`
`The Diprivan® Drug Product
`
`
`37.
`
`Fresenius currently sells, promotes, distributes and markets Diprivan® (propofol)
`
`injectable emulsion in the United States.
`
`38.
`
`Diprivan® is indicated, generally speaking, for the induction and maintenance of
`
`general anesthesia and sedation in certain patient populations.
`
`39.
`
`Fresenius holds an approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) No. 19627, under
`
`Section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 355(a), for and in
`
`connection with the Diprivan® (propofol) injectable emulsion product containing 10 mg propofol
`
`per 1 mL of emulsion.
`
`Defendants’ ANDA
`
`
`40.
`
`Defendants filed with the FDA an ANDA, under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j) (“Defendants’
`
`ANDA”), seeking approval to manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell in and import into the United
`
`States Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products (Propofol Injectable Emulsion USP, 10 mg/mL, in
`
`20 mL, 50 mL and 100 mL single-dose vials), prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`41.
`
`The FDA assigned Defendants’ ANDA the number 217525.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID: 9
`
`42.
`
`Defendants filed with FDA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), a
`
`certification alleging that the claims of the ʼ010 patent are invalid, unenforceable and/or would not
`
`be infringed by the manufacture, use, importation, sale or offer for sale of Defendants’ generic
`
`Diprivan® products (“Defendants’ Paragraph IV Certification”). Defendants notified Fresenius of
`
`Defendants’ Paragraph IV Certification in their Notice Letter, dated June 28, 2023, sent by United
`
`Parcel Service.
`
`43.
`
`This action is being commenced within forty-five (45) days of Fresenius’ receipt of
`
`Defendants’ Notice Letter.
`
`COUNT I FOR INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,476,010
`BY DEFENDANTS
`
`The allegations of paragraphs 1-43 are realleged and incorporated herein by
`
`44.
`
`reference.
`
`45.
`
`Defendants have infringed the ʼ010 patent by submitting and maintaining
`
`Defendants’ ANDA to and before FDA seeking approval to market Defendants’ generic Diprivan®
`
`products before the expiration of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`46.
`
`The use of Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products is covered by one or more
`
`claims of the ʼ010 patent literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`47.
`
`Upon information and belief, the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale,
`
`marketing, distribution and/or importation of Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products would
`
`infringe one or more claims of the ʼ010 patent, for example, at least claim 21 of the ’010 patent.
`
`48.
`
`Claim 21, which depends directly from claim 1, claims and is directed to: a sterile
`
`pharmaceutical composition of propofol in a container, comprising: a container which includes a
`
`closure and a composition in the container, and the composition in the container comprising from
`
`0.5% to 10% by weight propofol and from about 0 to about 10% by weight solvent for propofol,
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID: 10
`
`where when the composition in the container sealed with the closure is agitated at a frequency of
`
`300-400 cycles/minute for 16 hours at room temperature, the composition maintains a propofol
`
`concentration (w/v) measured by HPLC that is at least 93% of the starting concentration (w/v) of
`
`the propofol; where the closure is selected from the group consisting of siliconized bromobutyl
`
`rubber, metal, and siliconized chlorobutyl rubber; and wherein the closure also comprises metal.
`
`49.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products comprise: a
`
`sterile pharmaceutical composition of propofol in a container; a container which includes a closure
`
`and a composition in the container; a composition in the container comprising from 0.5% to 10%
`
`by weight propofol and from about 0 to about 10% by weight solvent for propofol, where when
`
`the composition in the container sealed with the closure is agitated at a frequency of 300-400
`
`cycles/minute for 16 hours at room temperature, the composition maintains a propofol
`
`concentration (w/v) measured by HPLC that is at least 93% of the starting concentration (w/v) of
`
`the propofol; a closure selected from the group consisting of siliconized bromobutyl rubber, metal,
`
`and siliconized chlorobutyl rubber; and wherein the closure also comprises metal.
`
`50.
`
`Defendants’ Notice Letter does not contest, or otherwise assert any grounds
`
`challenging, the validity or enforceability of claim 21 of the ’010 patent.
`
`51.
`
`Defendants were aware of the ʼ010 patent prior to the submission of Defendants’
`
`ANDA and were further aware that filing Defendants’ ANDA with Defendants’ Paragraph IV
`
`Certification constituted an act of infringement of the ’010 patent.
`
`52.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants intend to engage, or direct or induce
`
`others to engage, in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution and/or
`
`importation of Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products immediately and imminently upon
`
`approval of Defendants’ ANDA.
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID: 11
`
`53.
`
`The foregoing actions by Defendants constitute and/or would constitute direct,
`
`induced and/or contributory infringement of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`54.
`
`Fresenius will be substantially and irreparably harmed by Defendants’ infringing
`
`activities unless the Court enjoins those activities. Fresenius will have no adequate remedy at law
`
`if Defendants are not enjoined from the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale in and
`
`importation into the United States of Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products.
`
`COUNT II FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,476,010 BY DEFENDANTS
`
`55.
`
`The allegations of paragraphs 1-54 are realleged and incorporated herein by
`
`
`
`reference.
`
`56.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendants plan to begin manufacturing, marketing,
`
`selling, offering to sell and/or importing Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products soon after FDA
`
`approval of Defendants’ ANDA.
`
`57.
`
`Upon information and belief, such conduct will constitute direct or indirect
`
`infringement of one or more claims of the ’010 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`58.
`
`Defendants’ infringing activity complained of herein is imminent and will begin
`
`following FDA approval of Defendants’ ANDA.
`
`59.
`
`As a result of the foregoing facts, there is a real, substantial and continuing
`
`justiciable controversy between Fresenius and Defendants as to liability for infringement of the
`
`’010 patent. Defendants’ actions have created in Fresenius a reasonable apprehension of
`
`irreparable harm and loss resulting from Defendants’ threatened imminent actions.
`
`60.
`
`Fresenius will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are not enjoined from infringing
`
`the ’010 patent.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID: 12
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Fresenius respectfully requests the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`A judgment that Defendants’ submission of Defendants’ ANDA No. 217525
`
`infringes one or more claims of the ʼ010 patent and that the making, using, offering to sell or
`
`selling in the United States, or importing into the United States of Defendants’ generic
`
`Diprivan® products prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent will infringe one or more claims
`
`of the ʼ010 patent;
`
`b.
`
`An Order pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) providing that the effective date
`
`of any FDA approval of Defendants’ ANDA No. 217525 seeking approval to manufacture, use,
`
`offer for sale, sell in and import into the United States Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products
`
`or any product or compound the use of which infringes the ʼ010 patent, shall be a date that is
`
`not earlier than the expiration of the ’010 patent, including any period of pediatric exclusivity;
`
`c.
`
`An Order permanently enjoining Defendants and all persons acting in concert
`
`with Defendants from commercially manufacturing, using, offering for sale, selling, marketing,
`
`distributing or importing Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products, or any other product or
`
`compound the use of which infringes the ʼ010 patent, or inducing or contributing to the
`
`infringement of the ʼ010 patent, until after the expiration of the ’010 patent;
`
`d.
`
`An Order enjoining Defendants and all persons acting in concert with
`
`Defendants from seeking, obtaining or maintaining approval of Defendants’ ANDA No.
`
`217525 before the expiration of the ʼ010 patent;
`
`e.
`
`An award of Fresenius’ damages or other monetary relief to compensate
`
`Fresenius if Defendants engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale or
`
`marketing or distribution in, or importation into, the United States of Defendants’ generic
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:23-cv-04343-CCC-MAH Document 1 Filed 08/11/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID: 13
`
`Diprivan® products, or any product or compound the use of which infringes the ʼ010 patent,
`
`prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(C);
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`An award of Plaintiff’s reasonable costs and expenses in this action; and
`
`An award of any further and additional relief to Plaintiff as this Court deems just
`
`and proper, including attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 if supported by the totality of the
`
`circumstances.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 11, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Eric I. Abraham
`ERIC I. ABRAHAM
`
`
`HILL WALLACK LLP
`21 Roszel Road
`Princeton, New Jersey 08543
`(609) 924-0808
`(609) 452-1888 (Fax)
`Email: eia@hillwallack.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`William A. Rakoczy (wrakoczy@rmmslegal.com)
`Steven J. Birkos (sbirkos@rmmslegal.com)
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`6 West Hubbard Street, Suite 500
`Chicago, IL 60654
`(312) 527-2157
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`