`
`Case 3:17-cv-12706—MAS-DEA Document 46 Filed 05/31/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 1402
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`CENTRAL JERSEY, CML,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KAUSHIK PATEL, et (11.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 17-12706 (MAS) (DEA)
`
`ORDER
`
`This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Kaushik Patel, Ashwin Chaudhary,
`
`Dipen Patel, Yogesh Patel, Vipul Patel, 6qu Puri, Nilesh Patel, Danny Saparia. the Estate of
`
`Suresh Patel, and Atul Patel's (collectively. iDefendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
`
`No. 28), and Plaintiff Central Jersey. CML’s ("Plaintiff’ or "Central CML”) Amended Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40). [n opposition to Defendants’ Motion, Plaintiff submitted a
`
`Statement of Material Facts in Opposition (ECF No. 32) and an Opposition Brief (ECF No. 33),
`
`to which Defendants replied (ECF No. 35.) Defendants opposed Plaintiff‘s Motion. (ECF No. 44.)
`
`Plaintiff did not reply to Defendants’ opposition.l
`
`For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, and for good cause
`
`shown,
`
`IT IS on this 3_l_s_t day of May 2020, ORDERED that:
`
`1. Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40) is DENIED.
`
`2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED.
`
`' Plaintiff submitted an informal Letter Brief in reply to Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiffs
`original motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff, however, did not file a reply to
`Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff‘s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court also
`notes that Plaintiffs Letter Brief, apart from briefly referencing a case cited by Defendants,
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-12706-MAS-DEA Document 46 Filed 05/31/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1403
`
`Case 3:17-cv-12706—MAS-DEA Document 46 Filed 05/31/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 1403
`
`3. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.
`
`4. The clerk shall close this case.
`
`sf Michael A. Shi
`
`MICHAEL A. SHIPP
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
