`
`TODD KIM
`Assistant Attorney General
`Environment & Natural Resources Division
`United States Department of Justice
`DAVIS H. FORSYTHE
`Colorado Bar No. 51737
`DEBORAH A. GITIN
`California Bar No. 284947
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`United States Department of Justice
`999 18th Street, South Terrace – Suite 370
`Denver, CO 80202
`Phone: (303) 844-1391
`E-mail: davis.forsythe@usdoj.gov
`
`RACHAEL A. HONIG
`Acting United States Attorney
`ALEX D. SILAGI
`Assistant United States Attorney
`District of New Jersey
`970 Broad Street, Suite 700
`Newark, NJ 07102
`Phone: (973) 353-6001
`E-mail: alex.silagi@usdoj.gov
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`_________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`XTREME DIESEL PERFORMANCE, LLC,
`)
`)
`)
`
`Defendant.
`_________________________________________)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 2 of 24 PageID: 2
`
`The United States of America (“United States”), by authority of the Attorney
`
`General of the United States and at the request of the Administrator of the United
`
`States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), files this Complaint and alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`
`
`I.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil action brought under Sections 203 and 205 of the Clean
`
`Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7522 & 7524, seeking assessment of civil penalties
`
`against Xtreme Diesel Performance, LLC (“Defendant”), with its principal place of
`
`business at 1758 State Route 34, Wall Township, New Jersey 07727, for violations
`
`of the CAA related to Defendant’s manufacture and sale of aftermarket products
`
`that bypass, defeat, or render inoperative emission controls installed on motor
`
`vehicles or motor vehicle engines, in violation of the CAA.
`
`
`
`II.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`2.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to
`
`this action pursuant to Section 205 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7524, and 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1331 (Federal Question), 1345 (United States as Plaintiff), and 1355 (Fine,
`
`Penalty, or Forfeiture).
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in the District of New Jersey pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1391(b)(2), 1391(c)(2), and 1395(a), as well as Section 205 of the CAA,
`
`42 U.S.C. § 7524, because it is a judicial district in which Defendant is located, is
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 3 of 24 PageID: 3
`
`doing business, or in which a substantial part of the alleged violations in the
`
`Complaint occurred.
`
`
`
`III.
`
`DEFENDANT
`
`4.
`
`Defendant is a limited liability corporation with its registered office at
`
`1758 State Route 34, Wall Township, New Jersey 07727.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant manufactures, sells, and offers for sale aftermarket
`
`products that are designed to enhance the power, performance, or fuel economy of
`
`diesel-powered motor vehicles.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant has a sales and distribution center at 5550 Cameron Street,
`
`Suite J-K, Las Vegas, Nevada 89118.
`
`
`
`IV.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`7.
`
`This action arises under Title II of the CAA, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 7521-7590, and the regulations promulgated thereunder relating to the control
`
`of emissions of air pollution from motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines.
`
`A.
`8.
`
`Statutory and Regulatory Objectives
`In creating the CAA, Congress found that “the increasing use of motor
`
`vehicles . . . has resulted in mounting dangers to the public health and
`
`welfare . . . .” 42 U.S.C. § 7401(a)(2). Congress’s purposes in creating the CAA
`
`were “to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air resources so as to
`
`promote the public health and welfare and the productive capacity of its
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 4 of 24 PageID: 4
`
`population,” and “to initiate and accelerate a national research and development
`
`program to achieve the prevention and control of air pollution.” 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7401(b)(1)–(2).
`
`9.
`
`“Motor vehicle” is defined in the CAA as “any self-propelled vehicle
`
`designed for transporting persons or property on a street or highway.” 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7550(2); 40 C.F.R. § 85.1703.
`
`10. Title II of the CAA and the regulations promulgated thereunder
`
`establish standards for the emissions of air pollutants from motor vehicles and
`
`motor vehicle engines that “cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may
`
`reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7521(a)(1). These pollutants include nitrogen oxides (“NOx”), particulate matter
`
`(“PM”), non-methane hydrocarbons (“NMHCs”), and carbon monoxide (“CO”).
`
`42 U.S.C. § 7521(a)(3)(A).
`
`11. EPA has also established National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
`
`certain pollutants, including ozone, NOx, PM, and CO. See 40 C.F.R. §§ 50.1–
`
`50.19.
`
`12. Ozone is a highly reactive gas that is formed in the atmosphere from
`
`other pollutants, including pollutants emitted from motor vehicles.
`
`13. PM is a form of air pollution composed of microscopic solids and
`
`liquids suspended in air. PM is emitted directly from motor vehicles and is also
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 5 of 24 PageID: 5
`
`formed in the atmosphere from other pollutants, including pollutants emitted from
`
`motor vehicles.
`
`14. NOx and NMHCs are reactive gases that contribute to the formation of
`
`PM and ozone.
`
`15. Exposure to ozone and PM is linked to respiratory and cardiovascular
`
`health problems as well as premature death. Children, older adults, people who are
`
`active outdoors (including outdoor workers), and people with heart or lung disease
`
`are particularly at risk for health effects related to ozone or PM exposure.
`
`16. CO is a highly toxic gas that forms when the carbon in fuel does not
`
`burn completely. CO is harmful to human health because it reduces oxygen
`
`delivery to the body’s organs and tissues. CO can cause headaches, dizziness,
`
`vomiting, nausea, loss of consciousness, and death. Long-term exposure to CO has
`
`been associated with an increased risk of heart disease.
`
`B. Acts Prohibited by Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act
`17. Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B),
`
`prohibits
`
`any person to manufacture or sell, or offer to sell, or install, any part or
`component intended for use with, or as a part of, any motor vehicle or motor
`vehicle engine, where a principal effect of the part or component is to
`bypass, defeat, or render inoperative any device or element of design
`installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance
`with regulations under this subchapter, and where the person knows or
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 6 of 24 PageID: 6
`
`should know that such part or component is being offered for sale or
`installed for such use or put to such use.
`
`
`42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B). This is generally known as the “defeat device
`
`prohibition.”
`
`18. Any person violating Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7522(a)(3)(B), is subject to civil penalties of up to $3,750 for each violation
`
`occurring on or after January 13, 2009, through November 2, 2015, and up to
`
`$4,876 for each violation occurring after November 2, 2015, and assessed on or
`
`after December 23, 2020, in accordance with Section 205(a) of the CAA. 42
`
`U.S.C. § 7524(a) as modified by 40 C.F.R. § 19.4 (2020); 85 Fed. Reg. 83818,
`
`83820 (Dec. 23, 2020).
`
`19. Each part or component manufactured, sold, offered for sale, or
`
`installed in violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7522(a)(3)(B), is a separate violation. 42 U.S.C. § 7524(a).
`
`C. EPA’s Certificate of Conformity Program for New Motor
`Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Engines
`20. Manufacturers of new motor vehicles or motor vehicle engines must
`
`apply for and obtain a certificate of conformity from EPA to sell, offer to sell, or
`
`introduce or deliver for introduction into commerce any new motor vehicle or
`
`motor vehicle engine in the United States. 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(1).
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 7 of 24 PageID: 7
`
`21. To obtain a certificate of conformity, the original equipment
`
`manufacturer (“OEM”) must demonstrate that the motor vehicle or motor vehicle
`
`engine will conform to established emissions standards for NOx, PM, NMHCs,
`
`CO, and other pollutants during the motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine’s useful
`
`life. 42 U.S.C. § 7525(a)(2); see 40 C.F.R. §§ 86.007-30(a)(1)(i),
`
`86.1848-01(a)(1).
`
`22. The certificate of conformity application must include a description of
`
`the vehicle’s “emission control system, and fuel system components.” 40 C.F.R.
`
`§ 86.094-21(b)(1); see also 40 C.F.R. § 86.1844-01(d)–(e).
`
`23. Once issued by EPA, a certificate of conformity covers only those
`
`new motor vehicles or motor vehicle engines that conform in all material respects
`
`to the specifications provided to EPA in the certificate of conformity application
`
`for such vehicles or engines. 40 C.F.R. § 86.1848-01(c)(6).
`
`D. Emissions-Related Elements of Design
`24. An “element of design” is “any control system (i.e., computer
`
`software, electronic control system, emission control system, computer logic),
`
`and/or control system calibrations, and/or the results of systems interaction, and/or
`
`hardware items on a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine.” 40 C.F.R. § 86.1803-
`
`01 (General Compliance Provisions for Control of Air Pollution from New and In-
`
`Use Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks, and Heavy-Duty Vehicles).
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 8 of 24 PageID: 8
`
`25. An “emission control system” is a “unique group of emission control
`
`devices, auxiliary emission control devices, engine modifications and strategies,
`
`and other elements of design designated by the Administrator [of EPA] used to
`
`control exhaust emissions of a vehicle.” Id.
`
`26. OEMs install a variety of software and hardware elements of design in
`
`motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines to monitor and control emissions of
`
`pollutants in order to comply with the CAA and regulations promulgated
`
`thereunder. These elements of design, which collectively make up the emission
`
`control system, are referred to in this Complaint as “Emissions-Related Elements
`
`of Design.”
`
`27. Modern motor vehicles are equipped with Electronic Control Units
`
`(“ECUs”), which are on-board computer systems that run the software that
`
`monitors and controls vehicle operations, including the operation of Emissions-
`
`Related Elements of Design. Emissions-Related Elements of Design generally
`
`include both the specific hardware described below, and the ECU or ECUs and
`
`software that control operation of that hardware.
`
`i.
`
`Systems that Re-Route Gases and Vapors
`
`28. OEMs install hardware and associated operational software to re-route
`
`gases and vapors containing pollutants back to the engine in order to reduce
`
`emissions. These include:
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 9 of 24 PageID: 9
`
`29. Exhaust Gas Recirculation System (“EGR System”). Diesel engines
`
`produce high combustion temperatures that result in the production of NOx. An
`
`Exhaust Gas Recirculation System (“EGR System”) reduces NOx emissions by
`
`recirculating a portion of engine exhaust gas back through the engine’s cylinders,
`
`thereby lowering the combustion temperature and reducing NOx production. The
`
`EGR System is an Emissions-Related Element of Design, and is a “device or
`
`element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in
`
`compliance with [CAA] regulations” within the meaning of Section 203(a)(3)(B)
`
`of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522 (a)(3)(B).
`
`ii.
`
`Aftertreatment Systems
`
`30.
`
`“Aftertreatment” means any “system, component, or technology
`
`mounted downstream of the exhaust valve . . . whose design function is to reduce
`
`emissions in the engine exhaust before it is exhausted to the environment.” 40
`
`C.F.R. § 1068.30.
`
`31. Aftertreatment systems consist of hardware installed in the stock
`
`exhaust system, as well as software that runs on one or more ECUs and directs
`
`operation of the hardware components. Diesel Particulate Filters (“DPFs”), Diesel
`
`Oxidation Catalysts (“DOCs”), Selective Catalytic Reduction (“SCR”) Systems,
`
`and NOx Adsorber Catalysts (“NACs”) are Aftertreatment systems that can be used
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 10 of 24 PageID: 10
`
`alone, or in combination with each other or with other Emissions-Related Elements
`
`of Design, to control the emission of pollutants.
`
`32. Diesel Particulate Filter (“DPF”). A Diesel Particulate Filter (“DPF”)
`
`is a filter that captures soot from engine exhaust, thereby decreasing PM emissions.
`
`By design, soot that collects in the DPF is periodically burned off by elevated
`
`exhaust temperatures in a process referred to as active or passive regeneration.
`
`The DPF is a “device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or
`
`motor vehicle engine in compliance with [CAA] regulations” within the meaning
`
`of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), and also an
`
`Emissions-Related Element of Design.
`
`33. Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (“DOC”). A Diesel Oxidation Catalyst
`
`(“DOC”) is a precious-metal coated, flow-through honeycomb structure. As
`
`exhaust gas passes through the DOC, the coating of precious metal causes a
`
`catalytic reaction that breaks down CO and NMHCs in the exhaust into their less
`
`harmful components. The DOC is a “device or element of design installed on or in
`
`a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with [CAA] regulations”
`
`within the meaning of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7522(a)(3)(B), and also an Emissions-Related Element of Design.
`
`34. Selective Catalytic Reduction (“SCR”). A Selective Catalytic
`
`Reduction (“SCR”) system (a/k/a “catalytic converter or “catalyst”) reduces NOx
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 11 of 24 PageID: 11
`
`emissions by chemically converting exhaust gas that contains NOx into nitrogen
`
`and water through the injection of diesel exhaust fluid, typically composed of urea.
`
`The SCR is a “device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or
`
`motor vehicle engine in compliance with [CAA] regulations” within the meaning
`
`of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), and also an
`
`Emissions-Related Element of Design.
`
`35. NOx Adsorber Catalyst (“NAC”). A NOx Adsorber Catalyst (“NAC”)
`
`(a/k/a “NOx trap”) reduces NOx emissions by chemically adsorbing NOx from
`
`exhaust gas. The NAC is a “device or element of design installed on or in a motor
`
`vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with [CAA] regulations” within the
`
`meaning of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), and also
`
`an Emissions-Related Element of Design.
`
`iii. Onboard Diagnostics System (“OBD”)
`
`36. The CAA requires OEMs to install an On-Board Diagnostics system
`
`(“OBD”) on motor vehicles. 42 U.S.C. § 7521(m). The OBD monitors, detects,
`
`reports, and records malfunctions of monitored Emissions-Related Elements of
`
`Design and other components through a network of sensors installed throughout
`
`the motor vehicle and motor vehicle engine. 40 C.F.R. §§ 86.007-17, 86.010-18,
`
`86.1806-05. The OBD monitors sensor inputs for malfunction or deterioration that
`
`could cause a vehicle to fail to comply with CAA emission standards.
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 12 of 24 PageID: 12
`
`37. CAA regulations require that when the OBD detects a malfunction of
`
`an emissions-related system or component, it must illuminate the vehicle’s
`
`malfunction indicator light (a/k/a “check engine light”) on the dashboard. See 40
`
`C.F.R. § 86.1806-05(b)-(d).
`
`38. CAA regulations require that once the malfunction indicator light has
`
`been illuminated, the OBD must record a diagnostic trouble code. 40 C.F.R.
`
`§ 86.1806-05(e). The OBD stores diagnostic trouble codes that service personnel
`
`can read in order to diagnose and repair a vehicle, and that government inspectors
`
`can download to verify a vehicle’s compliance with emissions standards.
`
`39. The OBD may also prompt a driver to correct a problem by altering
`
`vehicle performance, such as by putting the vehicle into “limp-home mode.” In
`
`limp-home mode, the ECU significantly downgrades engine performance to alert
`
`the driver that there is a problem with the emission control system, permitting the
`
`vehicle to be driven (albeit slowly) to a service station for repair.
`
`40. The OBD is a “device or element of design installed on or in a motor
`
`vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with [CAA] regulations” within the
`
`meaning of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), and also
`
`an Emissions-Related Element of Design.
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 13 of 24 PageID: 13
`
`iv. Certified Stock Calibrations
`
`41. OEMs install a suite of pre-set software calibrations for operational
`
`parameters (“Certified Stock Calibrations”); these calibrations control all aspects
`
`of vehicle and engine operation including combustion, performance, and operation
`
`of EGR and Aftertreatment systems. The Certified Stock Calibrations for a
`
`particular engine or vehicle operate together to control the formation and emission
`
`of pollutants. OEMs program the ECUs with Certified Stock Calibrations and
`
`disclose them to EPA on their application for a certificate of conformity for each
`
`vehicle model, because the Certified Stock Calibrations are an important part of a
`
`motor vehicle’s overall emissions control strategy.
`
`42. The types of Certified Stock Calibrations relevant to this Complaint
`
`include but are not limited to:
`
`
`
`
`
`calibrations that affect the operation of the EGR System;
`
`calibrations that affect the operation of Aftertreatment systems
`
`(the DPF, DOC, SCR, or NAC);
`
`
`
`calibrations that affect engine combustion, performance, and
`
`operation (e.g., air-fuel ratio, fuel injection timing, fuel quantity, fuel injection
`
`pressure, and fuel injection pulse width), which are critical elements of the OEM’s
`
`strategy to control the formation of pollutants in the engine; and
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 14 of 24 PageID: 14
`
`
`
`calibrations that affect OBD detection, warning and recording
`
`of malfunctions.
`
`43. Each of the above-listed types of Certified Stock Calibration is an
`
`“element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in
`
`compliance with [CAA] regulations” within the meaning of Section 203(a)(3)(B)
`
`of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), and also an Emissions-Related Element of
`
`Design.
`
`E. Aftermarket Products that Bypass, Defeat, or Render Inoperative
`Emissions-Related Elements of Design
`44. Third parties, including Defendant, manufacture, sell, and offer for
`
`sale products for use with existing motor vehicles that are designed to enhance the
`
`vehicle’s power, performance, or fuel economy. In some cases, these products
`
`achieve their purpose through a design that bypasses, defeats, or renders
`
`inoperative OEM-installed Emissions-Related Elements of Design. These products
`
`fall into two broad categories: hardware and software.
`
`i.
`
`Aftermarket Hardware Products
`
`45. Some aftermarket products are designed to physically interfere with,
`
`or remove, Emissions-Related Elements of Design through the addition of new or
`
`replacement hardware to a motor vehicle. The following types of aftermarket
`
`hardware products are relevant to this Complaint:
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 15 of 24 PageID: 15
`
`
`
`EGR Delete Hardware Products. Some aftermarket hardware
`
`products interfere with or remove (“delete”) the EGR System. Examples of such
`
`products include “blocker plates,” “EGR valve deletes,” and “EGR cooler deletes.”
`
`These products are collectively referred to in this Complaint as “EGR Delete
`
`Hardware Products.”
`
`
`
`Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Products. Some aftermarket
`
`hardware products physically alter or remove some or all of a vehicle’s
`
`Aftertreatment systems by changing, removing, or replacing essential physical
`
`elements of the DPF, DOC, SCR, or NAC. This often involves removing the
`
`vehicle’s entire exhaust system, in which the Aftertreatment systems are installed,
`
`and installing a replacement with no Aftertreatment. Examples include “straight
`
`pipes” and “race pipes.” These products are collectively referred to in this
`
`Complaint as “Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Products.”
`
`ii.
`
`Aftermarket Software Products (a/k/a “Tunes”)
`
`46. Other aftermarket products consist of software that is uploaded into a
`
`motor vehicle’s ECUs and alters or overwrites the vehicle’s Certified Stock
`
`Calibrations. An individual piece of such software is commonly referred to as a
`
`“Tune,” derived from its intended purpose of “tuning” the vehicle’s performance.
`
`47. The following general categories of Tunes modify or replace Certified
`
`Stock Calibrations in ways relevant to this Complaint:
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 16 of 24 PageID: 16
`
`
`
`Tunes that modify or replace Certified Stock Calibrations
`
`relating to the EGR System, as well as signals or records related to the EGR
`
`System.
`
`
`
`Tunes that modify or replace Certified Stock Calibrations
`
`relating to Aftertreatment systems: the DPF, DOC, SCR, or NAC, as well as
`
`signals or records related to these systems.
`
`
`
`Tunes that modify or replace Certified Stock Calibrations
`
`related to engine combustion, performance, and operation (e.g., air-fuel ratio, fuel
`
`injection timing, fuel quantity, fuel injection pressure, and fuel injection pulse
`
`width).
`
`
`
`Tunes that modify or replace Certified Stock Calibrations
`
`related to OBD functions in order to prevent the generation of diagnostic trouble
`
`codes, prevent the malfunction indicator light from illuminating, and prevent the
`
`OBD from putting the vehicle into “limp-home mode” due to changes in Certified
`
`Stock Calibrations or removal of the EGR System or Aftertreatment systems.
`
`48. A single Tune can change or overwrite multiple types of Certified
`
`Stock Calibrations. For example, a Tune that deletes EGR System functions will
`
`also typically modify OBD functions so that the EGR System deletion will not be
`
`detected.
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 17 of 24 PageID: 17
`
`49. Multiple Tunes are often bundled together and sold as a single
`
`product.
`
`50. Products that include Tunes that bypass, defeat, or render inoperative
`
`Emissions-Related Elements of Design are collectively referred to in this
`
`Complaint as “Defeat Tune Products.”
`
`
`
`V. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`51. Defendant is a “person” within the meaning of the CAA. 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7602(e).
`
`52. Defendant manufactures, sells, and offers to sell products intended for
`
`use in “motor vehicles” as that term is defined by the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7550(2),
`
`and regulations promulgated thereunder at 40 C.F.R. § 85.1703.
`
`53. Defendant sells and offers to sell these products over the internet
`
`through its website and through sales to other retailers that then market the
`
`products to consumers.
`
`54. As described below, Defendant has manufactured, sold, and offered
`
`for sale products with a principal effect of bypassing, defeating, or rendering
`
`inoperative an element of design, including but not limited to the Emissions-
`
`Related Elements of Design described in Paragraphs 24-43 above, installed in or
`
`on a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with Subchapter II of the
`
`Clean Air Act.
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 18 of 24 PageID: 18
`
`VI. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Manufacture, Sale, or Offer for Sale of EGR Delete Hardware Products
`in Violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act
`
`55. The United States re-alleges Paragraphs 1-54 above as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`56. Between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2017, and upon information
`
`and belief continuing until at least 2019, Defendant manufactured, sold, or offered
`
`for sale numerous EGR Delete Hardware Products.
`
`57. The EGR Delete Hardware Products manufactured, sold, or offered
`
`for sale by Defendant include blocker plates, EGR valve deletes, EGR cooler
`
`deletes, and other hardware that interferes with the recirculation of exhaust gas
`
`back into the engine combustion chamber.
`
`58. Each EGR Delete Hardware Product that Defendant manufactured,
`
`sold, or offered for sale is, and at all relevant times was, intended for use with
`
`certified motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines, including Powerstroke engines
`
`in Ford vehicles, Duramax engines in GM vehicles, and Cummins engines in
`
`Dodge vehicles.
`
`59. A principal effect of each EGR Delete Hardware Product that
`
`Defendant manufactured, sold, or offered for sale is, and at all relevant times was,
`
`to bypass, defeat, or render inoperative a motor vehicle’s EGR System.
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 19 of 24 PageID: 19
`
`60. Defendant knew or should have known that each EGR Delete
`
`Hardware Product it manufactured, sold, or offered for sale was being offered for
`
`sale or installed for such use or put to such use.
`
`61. Each unit of each EGR Delete Hardware Product that Defendant
`
`manufactured, sold, or offered for sale, is a separate violation of Section
`
`203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B). 42 U.S.C. § 7524(a).
`
`62. Defendant is liable to the United States for civil penalties of up to
`
`$3,750 for each violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) described in Paragraphs 56-61
`
`occurring on or after January 13, 2009, through November 2, 2015, and civil
`
`penalties of up to $4,876 for each violation occurring after November 2, 2015, and
`
`assessed on or after December 23, 2020, in accordance with Section 205(a) of the
`
`CAA. 42 U.S.C. § 7524(a) as modified by 40 C.F.R. § 19.4 (2020); 85 Fed. Reg.
`
`83818, 83820 (Dec. 23, 2020).
`
`VII. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Sale or Offer for Sale of Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Products
`in Violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act
`
`63. The United States re-alleges Paragraphs 1-54 above as if fully set
`
`
`
`forth herein.
`
`64. Between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2017, and upon information
`
`and belief continuing until at least 2019, Defendant sold or offered for sale
`
`numerous Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Products.
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 20 of 24 PageID: 20
`
`65. The Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Products that Defendant sold or
`
`offered for sale are, and at all relevant times were, intended for use with certified
`
`motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines, including Powerstroke engines in Ford
`
`vehicles, Duramax engines in GM vehicles, and Cummins engines in Dodge
`
`vehicles.
`
`66. A principal effect of each Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Product
`
`that Defendant sold or offered for sale is, and at all relevant times was, to bypass,
`
`defeat, or render inoperative a motor vehicle’s DPF, DOC, SCR, or NAC (i.e.,
`
`some or all of the vehicle’s Aftertreatment systems).
`
`67. Defendant knew or should have known that each Aftertreatment
`
`Delete Hardware Product it sold or offered for sale was being offered for sale or
`
`installed for such use or put to such use.
`
`68. Each unit of each Aftertreatment Delete Hardware Product that
`
`Defendant sold or offered for sale is a separate violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of
`
`the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B). 42 U.S.C. § 7524(a).
`
`69. Defendant is liable to the United States for civil penalties of up to
`
`$3,750 for each violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) described in Paragraphs 64-68
`
`above occurring on or after January 13, 2009, through November 2, 2015, and up
`
`to $4,876 for each violation occurring after November 2, 2015, and assessed on or
`
`after December 23, 2020, in accordance with Section 205(a) of the CAA. 42
`
`19
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 21 of 24 PageID: 21
`
`U.S.C. § 7524(a) as modified by 40 C.F.R. § 19.4 (2020); 85 Fed. Reg. 83818,
`
`83820 (Dec. 23, 2020).
`
`VIII. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`Sale or Offer for Sale of Tunes that Bypass, Defeat, or Render
`Inoperative Emissions-Related Elements of Design in Violation of
`Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act
`
`70. The United States re-alleges Paragraphs 1-54 above as if fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`71. Between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2017, and upon information
`
`and belief continuing until at least 2019, Defendant sold or offered for sale
`
`numerous Defeat Tune Products.
`
`72. The Defeat Tune Products that Defendant sold or offered for sale
`
`change or overwrite one or more of the following types of Certified Stock
`
`Calibrations:
`
`
`
`Certified Stock Calibrations relating to the EGR System, as
`
`well as signals or records related to the EGR System.
`
`
`
`Certified Stock Calibrations relating to Aftertreatment systems:
`
`the DPF, DOC, SCR, or NAC, as well as signals or records related to these
`
`systems.
`
`
`
`Certified Stock Calibrations related to engine combustion,
`
`performance and operation such as air-fuel ratio, fuel injection timing, fuel
`
`quantity, fuel injection pressure, and fuel injection pulse width.
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 22 of 24 PageID: 22
`
`
`
`Certified Stock Calibrations related to OBD functions in order
`
`to prevent the generation of diagnostic trouble codes, prevent the malfunction
`
`indicator light from illuminating, and prevent the OBD from putting the vehicle
`
`into “limp-home mode” due to changes in Certified Stock Calibrations or removal
`
`of the EGR System or Aftertreatment systems.
`
`73. The Defeat Tune Products that Defendant sold or offered for sale are
`
`intended for use with certified motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines, including
`
`Powerstroke engines in Ford vehicles, Duramax engines in GM vehicles, and
`
`Cummins engines in Dodge vehicles.
`
`74. A principal effect of each Defeat Tune Product that Defendant sold or
`
`offered for sale is, and at all relevant times was, to bypass, defeat, or render
`
`inoperable one or more Emissions-Related Elements of Design by modifying or
`
`overwriting a motor vehicle’s Certified Stock Calibrations relating to one or more
`
`of the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the EGR System;
`
`the Aftertreatment systems (the DPF, DOC, SCR, or NAC);
`
`engine combustion, performance, and operation (e.g., air-fuel
`
`ratio, fuel injection timing, fuel quantity, fuel injection pressure, and fuel injection
`
`pulse width); and
`
`
`
`OBD system functions.
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-16968-ZNQ-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/15/21 Page 23 of 24 PageID: 23
`
`75. Defendant knew or should have known that each Defeat Tune Product
`
`it sold or offered for sale was being offered for sale or installed for such use or put
`
`to such use.
`
`76. Each unit of each Defeat Tune Product that Defendant sold or offered
`
`for sale is a separate violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
`
`§ 7522(a)(3)(B). 42 U.S.C. § 7524(a).
`
`77. Defendant is liable to the United States for civil penalties of up to
`
`$3,750 for each violation of Section 203(a)(3)(B) described in Paragraphs 71-76
`
`above occurring on or after January 13, 2009, through November 2, 2015, and civil
`
`penalties of and up to $4,876 for each violation occurring after November 2, 2015,
`
`and assessed on or after December 23, 2020, in accordance with Section 205(a) of
`
`the CAA. 42 U.S.C. § 7524(a) as modified by 40 C.F.R. § 19.4 (2020); 85 Fed.
`
`Reg. 83818, 83820 (Dec. 23, 2020).
`
`
`
`IX. RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that this Court:
`
`1.
`
`Assess civil penalties against Defendant for each violation of Section
`
`203(a)(3)(B) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3)(B), in the amount of up to
`
`$3,750 for each violation occurrin