throbber
HELEN E. COONEY MUELLER
`Attorney at Law
`11 Susan Avenue
`Wayne, New Jersey 07470
`(973) 633-8021, FAX – (973) 633-8021
`helenelmueller@yahoo.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` July 13, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hon. Ernest M. Caposela, A.J.S.C.
`Superior Court of New Jersey Chancery Division, General Equity
`77 Hamilton Street, Paterson, New Jersey 07505
`
`Re: Wells Fargo Bank. N.A., as trustee for Park Place Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-
`Through Certificates Series 2004-WHQ2 v. Ralph Schiano and Eleanor Schiano v. Wells Fargo
`Bank, N.A. as trustee, et al. DN: C-79-19
`
`Dear Judge Caposela:
`
` Please accept this Supplemental letter in additional objection to Plaintiff/PHH (Plaintiff)
`
`proposed Order. Procedurally, the trial proceeded with Plaintiff first presenting its witnesses.
`
`Plaintiff, however, did not have a claim. The only claim Plaintiff had was to reinstate the
`
`discharged lien, which was already decided via Summary Judgment by Judge Chiocca in April
`
`2021. The claim to be tried was Schianos’ claim of Quiet Title. Thus, the Schianos were
`
`prepared to proceed first in presentation of evidence and witnesses. This did not occur, and
`
`Schianos were not permitted to present any evidence/witnesses. In a Quiet Title action – the
`
`party bringing the claim has the initial burden. That being said, the Schianos are mindful that the
`
`Court is attempting to assist the Schianos. Further, it was established via Plaintiff evidence that
`
`the Schianos have never been in default and that assignment to alleged trustee/trust is only done
`
`in foreclosure/default cases. Thus, the question for the Court in within Quiet Title action is
`
`whether an assignment that is invalid, as there is no default/foreclosure, remain in recorded chain
`
`of title? Quiet Title actions are brought to clear wrongful title possession. In this case, leaving
`
`wrongful assignment to trustee/trust subjects Schianos not only to immediate foreclosure action
`
`
`
`1
`
` PAS-C-000079-19 07/13/2022 08:11:00 AM Pg 1 of 2 Trans ID: CHC2022160830
`
`

`

`
`
`in event one loan payment is not recorded as paid, but also continues as derogatory on record to
`
`all potential lenders. A Court Order stating no default by Schianos may assist in getting past
`
`derogatory connotations to potential lender. However, is that Court Order sufficient to clear title
`
`that the Quiet Title action was intended? Thus, the question of first impression for the Court
`
`and/or certified question for appeal is as follows:
`
` Does an action for Quiet Title include restoring the claimants to status that does not
` include an assignment to alleged trustee/trust demonstrating wrongful
` default/foreclosure status, and subjecting claimants to immediate foreclosure upon loan
` servicer failure to accept loan payments? Are Quiet Title claimants entitled to
` presentation of evidence that establishes clear mortgage title without assignments
` reflecting foreclosure/default status?
`
`The above referenced matter was not a Plaintiff foreclosure case. It was a
`
`Counterclaimant/third party plaintiff claim for Quiet Title, and the above is a case of first
`
`impression for the Courts.
`
`Thank you for Your Honor’s continued attention to this matter.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Helen E. Cooney Mueller, Esq.
`Helen E. Cooney Mueller, Esq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cc: Brian Pantaleo, Esq., Paige Nestel, Esq.,
` Clark Cornwell, Esq.
`
`
`
`2
`
` PAS-C-000079-19 07/13/2022 08:11:00 AM Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: CHC2022160830
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket