`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
`COMMISSION,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`CHARLES R. KOKESH,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No. 09-cv-1021 SMV/LAM
`
`Defendant.
`
`AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`A jury, having returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on all counts,
`
`
`
`and the Court, having granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Judgment [Doc. 205] in a Memorandum
`
`Opinion and Order entered concurrently herewith,
`
`
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the portion of the
`
`Court’s March 30, 2015 judgment [Doc. 185] ordering Defendant to disgorge $34,927,329, plus
`
`pre-judgment interest thereon, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant
`
`must disgorge $5,004,773, plus $2,646,466.25 of pre-judgment interest thereon, within 30 days
`
`of entry of this Order.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant must pay a civil penalty in the amount of
`
`$2,354,593 pursuant to Section 21(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”),
`
`Section 209(e) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”), and Section 42(e) of the
`
`Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d), 80b-9(e),
`
`and 80a-41(e), within 30 days of entry of this Order.
`
`
`
`Case 1:09-cv-01021-SMV-LAM Document 211 Filed 10/31/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is permanently enjoined from directly or
`
`indirectly violating Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Advisers Act; Section 13(a) of the Exchange
`
`Act and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13; Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and
`
`Exchange Act Rule 14a-9; Section 37 of the Investment Company Act; and Section 205(a) of the
`
`Advisers Act.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________
`STEPHAN M. VIDMAR
`United States Magistrate Judge
`Presiding by Consent
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
