throbber

`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 1 of 7
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
`:
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff-Intervenor,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11 Civ. 0071 (PGG)
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER
`OF SETTLEMENT AND
`DISMISSAL BETWEEN THE
`UNITED STATES AND
` RELATOR
`
`
`:::::
`
`
`
`
`
`::x
`
`WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Release (the “Relator
`
`Stipulation”) is entered into between the United States of America (the“ United States”), by its
`
`attorney, Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New
`
`York, and relator Oswald Bilotta (“Relator” and, together with the United States, the “Parties”),
`
`through his undersigned counsel;
`
`WHEREAS, in January 2011, Relator filed a complaint in the above-captioned action in
`
`the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) under the qui
`
`tam provisions of the False Claims Act, as amended, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (the “FCA”), which
`
`complaint was subsequently amended on October 19, 2012 as of right, on April 3, 2013 (pursuant
`
`to an unopposed motion dated March 21, 2013), and on July 10, 2013 (pursuant to a stipulation
`
`dated July 8, 2013), alleging, inter alia, that defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
`
`(“Defendant” or “Novartis”) violated the FCA and the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-
`
`7b(b) (the “AKS”), by, inter alia, paying doctors remuneration to prescribe the drugs Lotrel,
`
`Valturna, Starlix, Tekturna, Tekturna HCT, Diovan, Diovan HCT, Exforge and Exforge HCT
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 2 of 7
`
`through the mechanism of speaker program honoraria and related misconduct (the “Relator
`
`Action”);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on April 26, 2013, the United States intervened in the above-referenced qui
`
`tam action by filing a Notice of Election to Intervene and Complaint in Intervention, in which it
`
`is asserting claims against Novartis under the FCA and common law;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on August 26, 2013, the United States filed an Amended Complaint in
`
`Intervention (the “Government Complaint”), alleging that (i) from January 1, 2002, through
`
`November 21, 2011, Novartis offered and paid remuneration in the form of cash, meals, alcohol,
`
`hotels, travel, entertainment, and honoraria payments to health care practitioners (“HCPs”) who
`
`spoke at or attended Novartis speaker events, roundtables, speaker training meetings or lunch-n-
`
`learns to induce them to prescribe Lotrel, Valturna, Starlix, Tekamlo, Diovan HCT, Tekturna
`
`HCT, and Exforge HCT, in violation of the AKS, and thereby caused false claims for
`
`prescriptions for those drugs to be submitted to and paid by Medicare, Medicaid, the Department
`
`of Veterans Affairs and TRICARE, in violation of the FCA; and (ii) from January 1, 2010,
`
`through November 21, 2011, Novartis paid remuneration in the form of cash, meals, alcohol,
`
`hotels, travel, entertainment, and honoraria payments to HCPs who spoke at or attended Novartis
`
`speaker events, roundtables, speaker training meetings or lunch-n-learns to induce them to
`
`prescribe Diovan, Tekturna, and Exforge, in violation of the AKS, and thereby caused false
`
`claims for prescriptions for Diovan, Tekturna, and Exforge to be submitted to and paid by
`
`Medicare, Medicaid, the Department of Veterans Affairs and TRICARE, in violation of the FCA
`
`(the “Covered Conduct”);
`
`WHEREAS, on or about June 29, 2020, the United States, Novartis, and Relator entered
`
`into a Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal (the “Settlement Agreement”);
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 3 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the Settlement Agreement, Defendant agreed to
`
`pay the United States (i) $591,442,008.92 plus interest (the “Settlement Amount”), and
`
`$38,406,717.42 million (the “Forfeiture Amount”) as money subject to forfeiture to the United
`
`States under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), to resolve the claims of the United States for the Covered
`
`Conduct;
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Relator has asserted that, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(l), he is entitled to
`
`receive a portion of the Settlement Amount (the “Relator Share Claim”);
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Relator agrees that he is not entitled to receive any portion of the Forfeiture
`
`Amount; and
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties mutually desire to reach a full and final compromise of the Relator
`
`Share Claim pursuant to the terms set forth below.
`
`
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, in reliance on the representations contained herein and in
`
`consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and obligations in this Relator Stipulation, and
`
`for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree
`
`as follows:
`
`1. Contingent upon receipt by the United States of the full Settlement Amount, the
`
`United States will pay Relator, c/o Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah, LLP, as attorneys for
`
`Relator (“Relator’s Counsel”), eighteen and one-half percent (18.5%) of the payment of the
`
`Settlement Amount received from Defendant ($109,416,771.65 plus 18.5% of the interest paid on
`
`the Settlement Amount) in accordance with written instructions provided by Relator’s Counsel
`
`within a reasonable time after the United States’ receipt of the payment of the Settlement Amount.
`
`The obligation to make the payment to the Relator under this Paragraph is expressly conditioned
`
`on, and only arises with, the receipt by the United States of the payment of the Settlement Amount
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 4 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 4 of 7
`
`from Defendant required by the Settlement Agreement. In the event that Defendant fails to make
`
`full payment of the Settlement Amount, the United States shall have no obligation to make any
`
`payment to the Relator.
`
`2. Relator, for himself and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and assigns, agrees
`
`that this settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable under all circumstances, and will not challenge
`
`the Settlement Agreement, including but not limited to the Settlement Amount, pursuant to 31
`
`U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(B) or other applicable law, and expressly waives the opportunity for a hearing
`
`on any such objection, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(B) or other applicable law. Relator, for
`
`himself and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and assigns, further agrees that he will not seek
`
`and is not entitled to receive any portion of the Forfeiture Amount.
`
`3.
`
`In agreeing to accept payment of the Relator’s share set forth in Paragraph 1 above,
`
`and upon payment thereof, Relator, for himself and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and
`
`assigns, releases and is deemed to have released and forever discharged the United States and its
`
`agencies, officers, employees, servants, and agents from any claim for a share of any proceeds of
`
`the Settlement Agreement pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730 or other applicable law, and from any and
`
`all claims against the United States and its agencies, officers, employees, servants, and agents
`
`arising from or relating to the Settlement Agreement or any claim in the Relator Action or the
`
`Government Complaint.
`
`4.
`
`This Relator Stipulation does not resolve or in any manner affect any claims the
`
`United States has or may have against Relator arising under Title 26, U.S. Code (Internal Revenue
`
`Code), or any claims that the Parties may have arising under this Relator Stipulation.
`
`5.
`
`The United States and Relator agree that if the Settlement Agreement is held by a
`
`court not to be “fair, adequate, and reasonable,” as required under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(B), this
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 5 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 5 of 7
`
`Relator Stipulation is null and void.
`
`6.
`
`This Relator Stipulation shall inure to the benefit of and be binding only on the
`
`Parties, their successors, assigns, and heirs.
`
`7.
`
`This Relator Stipulation shall become final, binding, and effective only upon entry
`
`by the Court.
`
`8.
`
`This Relator Stipulation constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with respect
`
`to the subject matter of this Relator Stipulation and may not be changed, altered, or modified,
`
`except by a written agreement signed by the Parties specifically referring to this Relator
`
`Stipulation.
`
`9.
`
`This Relator Stipulation is governed by the laws of the United States. The exclusive
`
`jurisdiction and venue for any dispute relating to this Relator Stipulation is the United States
`
`District Court for the Southern District of New York. For purposes of construing this Relator
`
`Stipulation, this Relator Stipulation shall be deemed to have been drafted by all Parties to it and
`
`shall not, therefore, be construed against any Party for that reason in any subsequent dispute.
`
`10. This Relator Stipulation may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall
`
`constitute an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 6 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For the United States of America:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 2, 2020
`
`
`
`AUDREY STRAUSS
`Acting United States Attorney
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:/s/ Jacob M. Bergman
`JEANNETTE A. VARGAS
`MÓNICA FOLCH
`JACOB T. LILLYWHITE
`PIERRE G. ARMAND
`JENNIFER A. JUDE
`JACOB M. BERGMAN
`Assistant United States Attorneys
`86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
`New York, NY 10007
`
`
`For Relator Oswald Bilotta:
`
`Dated: _________, 2020
`
`SHEPHERD FINKELMAN MILLER & SHAH, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
` JAMES E. MILLER
` Attorney for Relator
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` OSWALD BILOTTA
` Relator
`
`
`SO ORDERED ON THIS ____ DAY OF _______, 2020:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HON. PAUL G. GARDEPHE
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 343 Filed 07/02/20 Page 7 of 7Case 1:11-cv-00071-PGG Document 346 Filed 07/21/20 Page 7 of 7
`
`For the United States of America:
`
`Dated: _________, 2020
`
`AUDREY STRAUSS
`Acting United States Attorney
`
`By:
`JEANNETTE A. VARGAS
`MÓNICA FOLCH
`JACOB T. LILLYWHITE
`PIERRE G. ARMAND
`JENNIFER A. JUDE
`JACOB M. BERGMAN
`Assistant United States Attorneys
`86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
`New York, NY 10007
`
`For Relator Oswald Bilotta:
`
`Dated: July 2, 2020
`
`SHEPHERD FINKELMAN MILLER & SHAH, LLP
`
`By:
` JAMES E. MILLER
` Attorney for Relator
`
` OSWALD BILOTTA
` Relator
`
`
`
`July
`SO ORDERED ON THIS ____ DAY OF _______, 2020:
`21
`
`HON. PAUL G. GARDEPHE
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`6
`
`DocuSign Envelope ID: 7DE85044-F43B-4648-905B-2161BD310A0C
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket