throbber
Case 1:15-cv-06563-PAE-KNF Document 268 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`CCR INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`CCR Development Group, Inc., and
`José Fuertes, and Banco Cooperativo de Puerto Rico
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE ELIAS GROUP, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`No.: 15-6563(PAE-NFK)
`Civil Action
`No.: 16-6280(PAE-NFK)
`Civil Action
`No.: 17-6697 (PAE-NFK)
`Civil Action
`
`
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`
`
`MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT RULE 60(a)1
`
`TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
`
`
`
`Plaintiff CCR International, Inc. ("CCR International"), by and through its respective
`
`attorneys, very respectfully states and prays as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`This Court entered judgment in this case on April 14, 2021. Docket 266.
`
`In its December 21, 2020 Opinion and Order, this Court found that:
`
`First, Elias had to make an “initial payment” of $300,000, to be
`paid in three unequal installments upon the occurrence of three
`separate events. See id. § 1.03(a)(i) (requiring payment of $80,000
`upon CCR’s delivery to Elias of its certificate of incorporation and
`other corporate materials); id. § 1.03(a)(ii) (requiring another
`$70,000 payment if, after paying the above $80,000, CCR
`delivered additional documents to Elias, including a certificate of
`good standing); id. § 1.03(a)(iii) (requiring final $150,000 payment
`at the end of Elias’s due diligence). Elias appears only to have paid
`the first $70,000 and $80,000 payments, for a total of $150,000.
`See JSF ¶ 46; Fuertes Tr. at 53–54.
`
`
`Docket 251, Opinion and Order at 6.
`
`
`
`1See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12. Moreover, the undersigned has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.
`See attached copy of that motion.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-06563-PAE-KNF Document 268 Filed 08/02/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`The Opinion and Order also states, “In 2013, CCR assigned its right to receive that $9
`
`million in exchange for the payments set forth in the Assignment Agreement, including the
`
`$300,000 initial payment (of which Elias paid $150,000) and the “buyout amount” should
`
`Elias ever acquire the Coco Rico assets.” Id. at 12. Since $300,000 - $150,000 = $150,000,
`
`this Court should amend its order to find that Elias owes CCR International $150,000.
`
`F.R.C.P. 60(a) provides that judgment can be amended due to an oversight or omission in
`
`the judgment, so this Court can amend its judgment with the appellate court’s leave. This
`
`Court did not reject the payment of the $150,000, so CCR International understands that
`
`the failure to order Elias to pay the outstanding amount was an “oversight or omission.”
`
`4.
`
`The Court’s finding is based on the Assignment Agreement between CCR International
`
`and Elias Group, LLC (Elias), the latter agreed to pay CCR International $70,000 for
`
`certain corporate documents and $80,000 for other corporate certifications as well as
`
`$150,000 after the completion of the Due Diligence Review for the purchase of the CCR
`
`assets occurred, provided that CCR International had delivered the necessary certificates
`
`for the first two payments. Exhibit J to Elias’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Docket 242-
`
`15.
`
`5.
`
`Because CCR International provided the required certificates, Elias made the first two
`
`payments; the Due Diligence Review was completed, as evidenced by Elias purchasing
`
`CCR Development Group’s assets and as this Court has found; but Elias never paid the
`
`remaining $150,000 owed to CCR International. See Joint Stipulation of Material Facts at
`
`¶ 46. Docket 242-1. (“Prior to execution of the 2015 Asset Purchase Agreement, CCR
`
`received $150,000.00 from Elias Group under the Assignment Agreement.”)
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-06563-PAE-KNF Document 268 Filed 08/02/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`6.
`
`In its Motion for Summary Judgment, Elias recognizes that the 2015 Asset Purchase
`
`Agreement was executed. Elias’ Motion for Summary Judgment Docket 242-2 at 8, 14, 16,
`
`17, 28.
`
`7.
`
`Elias Group presented the Court with no evidence that the remaining $150,000 of the
`
`$300,000 was paid. See generally Elias’ Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment, Docket 242 and its attached exhibits.
`
`8.
`
`Based on the above, and consistent with this Court’s findings, CCR International, Inc. asks
`
`this Court to amend its judgment to reflect that Elias Group, LLC owes CCR International,
`
`Inc. $150,000.
`
`WHEREFORE, CCR International, Inc. respectfully requests this Honorable Court to amend its
`
`judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) to order Elias Group, LLC to pay CCR
`
`International, Inc. $150,000 and enter any other appropriate relief under law and equity.
`
`Dated: August 2, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Jane A. Becker
`jb-6155
`JANE A. BECKER
`P.O. Box 9023914
`San Juan, Puerto Rico 00902-3914
`Tel: (787) 585-3824
` janebeckerwhitaker@gmail.com
`
`
`
`Counsel for CCR International, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket