`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`Civil Action No.:
`
`l:15-cv-10154 (PAE)(SDA)
`
`FOCUS PRODUCTS GROUP
`INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ZAHNER DESIGN
`GROUP, LTD., AND HOO KLESS SYSTEMS
`OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., SF HOME
`DECOR, LLC, SURE FIT HOME DECOR
`HOLDINGS CORP., and SURE FIT HOME
`PRODUCTS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`KARTRI SALES COMPANY, INC. AND
`MARQUIS MILLS, INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`WHEREAS plaintiffs filed a Fourth Amended Complaint in this matter, including:
`
`Count I for patent infringement; Count II for trademark infringement under Section 43(a) of the
`
`Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a); and Count III under the New York Common Law of Unfair
`
`Competition (Dkt. 148);
`
`WHEREAS defendant Kartri Sales Company, Inc. ("Kartri") filed affirmative defenses
`
`and Counterclaims thereto (Dkt. 150);
`
`WHEREAS defendant Marquis Mills International, Inc. ("Marquis") filed affirmative
`
`defenses and Counterclaims thereto (Dkt. 151);
`
`WHEREAS, this Court issued an Order dated April 16, 2020 (Dkt. 297) on the parties'
`
`respective motions for summary judgment on their claims, counterclaims, and defenses; an Order
`
`dated May 3, 2020 (Dkt. 302) on defendants' Motion for Reconsideration, and an Order dated
`
`January 4, 2021 (Dkt. 312) on plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration;
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-10154-PAE Document 542 Filed 06/15/23 Page 2 of 4
`
`WHEREAS, the Court issued various pre-trial rulings thereafter addressing the claims,
`
`counterclaims, and defenses that the parties proposed to assert at trial;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court issued an Opinion and Order dated December 22, 2022 (Dkt.
`
`501) setting out the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`52 on the parties' remaining claims and defenses, following a six-day bench trial;
`
`WHEREAS, the Comt issued an Order dated June 5, 2023 (Dkt. 538) dismissing
`
`plaintiffs claim for infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. D746,078 patent, and dismissing
`
`Marquis' counterclaim for the invalidity of that patent, both without prejudice;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court issued an Opinion and Order dated June 5, 2023 (Dkt. 539)
`
`granting plaintiffs' motion for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees under the fee provisions of
`
`the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. §285, and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. l l l 7(a), and awarding pre-
`
`judgment interest based on the interest rate on the yield of a one-year U.S. Treasury bill, post-
`
`judgment interest, and costs; and,
`
`WHEREAS, no further claims, counterclaims, or defenses remain to be adjudicated;
`
`NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58, and upon all of the rulings
`
`and proceedings in this matter, this Court hereby enters Final Judgment in accordance with its
`
`prior Opinions, Orders, and rulings, and awards plaintiffs judgment against the defendants in the
`
`amount of $2,938,337 in damages (Dkt. 539 at 33), $929,126.95 in attorneys' fees (id.), and pre-
`
`judgment interest in the amount of$109,086.67, for a total of$3,976,550.62, plus costs.
`
`In accordance with the Comt's Order dated June 8, 2023 (Dkt. 540), plaintiffs shall file a
`
`bill of costs with the Clerk of Court as directed by Local Rule 54.1.
`
`Post-judgment interest is also awarded from the date of this final judgment at the
`
`statutory rate under 28 U.S.C. §1961, i.e. "a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-10154-PAE Document 542 Filed 06/15/23 Page 3 of 4
`
`maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
`
`System, for the calendar week preceding," which is 5 .18% for the preceding week.
`
`A permanent injunction under the Lanham Act and New York law is also awarded as set
`
`forth in the Court's Opinion and Order of December 22, 2022 (Dkt. 501 at 167-168).
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Hoof,~ ~,;{:)ff
`
`United States District Judge
`June 14, 2023
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-10154-PAE Document 542 Filed 06/15/23 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on June 14, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was
`
`served on counsel ofrecord via the Court's ECF system.
`
`Dated: June 14, 2023
`
`Isl Morris E. Cohen
`
`Morris E. Cohen
`
`4
`
`