throbber
USDCSDNY
`Case 1:16-cv-03852-JPO Document 18 Filed 05/27/16 Page 1 of 2
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICAU. Y FILED
`~------~~~·,~~
`3 · 3 t:? • :Z. ot 2-
`DATE FILED:
`
`AMENDED
`STANDING ORDER
`MIO- 468
`
`11 MISC. 00415 (LAP)
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`-----------------------------------------------------)(
`
`IN RE: IMPLEMENTATION OF
`PATENT PILOT PROGRAM
`
`-----------------------------------------------------)(
`
`It appearing that the Court has elected to participate in the Pilot Project for Patent Cases
`established pursuant to Pub L. No. 111-349, 124 Stat. 3674.
`
`Effective November 21, 2011, the Court's participation in the Patent Pilot Project will
`commence and shall include pro se cases. The Pilot program will be subject to the following
`procedures:
`
`(1) When a designated Pilot judge receives a patent case on initial assignment, the case
`shall be assigned to that judge for all purposes, without further notice to the
`Assignment Committee and the Case Assignment Unit.
`
`(2) When a judge not participating in the Pilot (non-designated judge) receives a newly(cid:173)
`filed patent case, the non-designated judge must decide whether to retain or offer the
`case to a Pilot judge within 30 days of assignment. If the case is not transferred
`within the 30-day period, that patent case will not be part of the Pilot unless the
`Assignment Committee directs otherwise. When transferring the case, the non(cid:173)
`designated judge will follow the standard procedures for transferring a case.
`
`(3) When a non-designated judge informs the Assignment Committee and the Case
`Assignment Unit that he or she wishes to offer the case to a Pilot judge, the case shall
`be wheeled out to a Pilot judge in the ordinary manner from the deck referred to
`below. That judge will have five business days in which to determine whether he or
`she will accept the case. If the first Pilot judge to whom a case is offered determines
`not to accept it, the case shall be wheeled out to another Pilotj udge for determination
`of whether to accept the case or not. This procedure shall be repeated until either (i)
`a Pilot judge accepts the case or (ii) all Pilot judges have determined not to accept
`it. In the event of (ii), the originally-assigned judge shall be informed that the case
`is not part of the Pilot project, and he or she shall retain the case.
`
`

`
`Case 1:16-cv-03852-JPO Document 18 Filed 05/27/16 Page 2 of 2
`
`.: t
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`To further ensure fairness in the distribution of workload among judges, the Office
`of the Clerk will use a separate assignment deck for cases transferred from non(cid:173)
`designated judges to Pilot judges. Each designated Pilot judge will have one card in
`the Pilot deck, and assignments of cases transferred to the Pilot deck will be made
`by lot.
`
`Equalization credit in the assignment category in which the patent case was initially
`assigned shall be provided to both the Pilot judge and the district judge from whom
`a case is reassigned.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`March ~'/ , 2012
`
`S~RED
`~~~~a____,_. r~
`
`(/}
`
`Loretta A. Preska
`Chief United States District Judge

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket