`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`-------------------------------------------------------x
`
`MLADEN PINTUR and PRESENTA NOVA
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`HELEN ROGIC and ONE INTERIOR LLC,
`
`
`
`-------------------------------------------------------x
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-v-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 16-CV-9696-LTS-KHP
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On September 26, 2017, Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker ordered Plaintiffs’
`
`counsel, Ms. Tamiko Franklin, to show cause as to why her admission to appear before this
`
`Court pro hac vice should not be revoked. (Docket Entry No. 55.) On October 24, 2017, Judge
`
`Parker issued a Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) recommending that Ms. Franklin’s
`
`pro hac vice admission be revoked and that Plaintiffs be directed to obtain new counsel within 45
`
`days, except to the extent that Plaintiff Mladen Pintur wishes to proceed pro se with respect to
`
`his individual claims. No objections to the Report have been filed by either party.
`
`
`
`
`
`When reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court “may accept, reject, or
`
`modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28
`
`U.S.C.S. § 636(b)(1) (C) (LexisNexis 2016). “To accept the report and recommendation of a
`
`magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself
`
`that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 F.
`
`Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
`
`ORDER ADOPTING R&R RE FRANKLIN PHV
`
`VERSION NOVEMBER 16, 2017
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-09696-LTS-KHP Document 61 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Parker’s thorough and well-reasoned Report,
`
`to which no objection has been made, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court adopts
`
`the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Ms. Franklin’s pro hac vice admission is revoked and
`
`Plaintiffs are directed to obtain new counsel within 45 days, except to the extent that Plaintiff
`
`Mladen Pintur wishes to proceed pro se with respect to his individual claims. If Mr. Pintur
`
`wishes to do so, he must file a notice of appearance on the public docket within two weeks of
`
`this order, or by Friday, December 1, 2017. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this
`
`action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. This Order resolves Docket Entry No. 60.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`November 16, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Laura Taylor Swain
`LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`ORDER ADOPTING R&R RE FRANKLIN PHV
`
`VERSION NOVEMBER 16, 2017
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
