throbber
Case 1:18-cv-06840-GBD-JLC Document 123 Filed 10/19/18 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`September 19, 2018
`
`
`SENT VIA EMAIL
`
`Honorable Magistrate Judge James L. Cott
`500 Pearl Street, Room 1360
`United States Courthouse
`New York, NY 10007
`Telephone: (212) 805-0250
`Facsimile: (212) 805-7990
`CottNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov
`
`
`Re: SEUGNE BOTHA v. APPLE INC. ET AL 18-CV-6840 (GBD) (JLC)
`
`
`Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and In Camera
`
`
`Dear Judge Cott,
`
`We represent plaintiff Seugne Botha (“Plaintiff” of Ms. Botha). We write to advise the Court that
`there was a recent breakdown in the relationship between our firm and Plaintiff, which we
`submit impairs our ability to continue to represent the Plaintiff in connection with this matter.
`Accordingly, we intend to file a motion seeking to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff.
`
`Because the basis for the motion includes sensitive information, we write to respectfully request
`that we be permitted to submit the motion under seal and in camera for the Court’s eyes only.
`This would cause no prejudice to Plaintiff or the public because, as will be set forth in the motion
`and supporting papers, the motion shall deal solely with the breakdown of our firm's relationship
`with our clients and will not address the substantive claims in this action. Caselaw in this Circuit
`supports a request for in camera review of such applications. “[I]t is appropriate for a court
`considering a counsel’s motion to withdraw to consider in camera submissions in order to
`prevent a party from being prejudiced by the application of counsel to withdraw.” See
`Weinberger v. Provident Life & Cas. Ins. Co., 1998 WL 898309, *l (S.D.N.Y. December 23,
`1998). “Documents in support of motions to withdraw as counsel are routinely filed under seal
`where necessary to preserve the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship between a party
`and its counsel, and ... this method is viewed favorably by the courts.” See Thekkek v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
`3958 Talah Dr., Palm Harbor, FL 34684
`www.digitalbusinesslawgroup.com
`Phone: 800-516-7903  Fax: 800-257-9128
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:18-cv-06840-GBD-JLC Document 123 Filed 10/19/18 Page 2 of 2
`
`LaserSculpt, Inc., No. 11 CIV. 4426 HB JLC, 2012 WL 225924, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2012)
`citing Team Obsolete Ltd. v. A.HR.MA. Ltd., 464 F.Supp.2d 164, 166 (E.D.N.Y.2006).
`
`
`We also write to respectfully request that the motion be filed by email to the Court by
`this Friday, October 26, 2018 with a copy to Plaintiff only (“Motion”). As you know, Plaintiff
`lives in South Africa, we propose that the Court allow responsive papers to be served thirty
`days (30) after the receipt of our Motion. Although we believe that Ms. Botha will be
`checking emails, this extended briefing schedule will allow her to submit her response, if any,
`in due course and with ample time. This would also allow time for a substitution of counsel if
`Ms. Botha retains new counsel during this interim period.
`
`We also request a sixty (60) day stay of any required signatures on the settlement
`agreement that Ms. Botha worked out with Defendants (except Musixmatch) in your
`settlement conference on September 28, 2018.
`
`
`We are available at the Court's convenience to discuss this further.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`Carlos A. Leyva, Esq.
`
`
`cc:
`
`Botha, File
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
`3958 Talah Dr., Palm Harbor, FL 34684
`www.digitalbusinesslawgroup.com
`Phone: 800-516-7903  Fax: 800-257-9128
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket