throbber
Case 1:20-cv-02970-MKV Document 18 Filed 09/30/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`SYNCHVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`
`FUBOTV INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`Defendant.
`
`09/30/2020
`
`1:20-cv-02970-MKV
`
`NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL
`CONFERENCE
`
`MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:
`
`The Court directs counsel for all parties to appear at an Initial Pretrial Conference on
`
`November 17, 2020, at 1:00 PM. The conference will be held telephonically. To join the
`
`conference, dial 888-278-0296 and enter access code 5195844.
`
`In advance of the Initial Pretrial Conference, and within 14 days of this Order, counsel
`
`must meet face-to-face for at least one hour to discuss the possibility of settlement.
`
`Counsel are further directed to submit a Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling
`
`Order, which is available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-mary-kay-vyskocil, and joint
`
`letter, as required by this Court’s Individual Rules of Practice. The documents should be filed on
`
`ECF and sent to this Court via email (in both PDF and Microsoft Word formats) one week prior
`
`to the conference date. The status letter may not exceed 6 pages and must include the following:
`
`1. A brief statement of the nature of the case, the principal claims and defenses, and the
`
`major legal and factual issues that are most important to resolving the case;
`
`2. A brief statement by the plaintiff, or by the defendant in removed cases, as to the basis
`
`of subject matter jurisdiction and venue, and a brief statement by each other party as to
`
`the presence or absence of subject matter jurisdiction and venue. Statements shall
`
`include citations to relevant statutes. In cases invoking the Court’s diversity
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #:
`
`
`
`DATE FILED:
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-02970-MKV Document 18 Filed 09/30/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`jurisdiction, the parties should state both the place of incorporation and the principal
`
`place of business of any party that is a corporation, and the citizenship of all members,
`
`shareholders, partners, and/or trustees of any party that is a partnership, limited
`
`partnership, limited liability company, or trust;
`
`3. A statement of procedural posture, including
`
`a. A brief description of any (i) motions that have been made and decided, (ii)
`
`motions that any party seeks or intends to file, including the principal legal and
`
`other grounds in support of and opposition to the motion, (iii) pending motions
`
`and (iv) other applications that are expected to be made at the conference;
`
`b. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and a brief
`
`description of any discovery that the parties intend to take in the future; and
`
`c. A statement describing the status of any settlement discussions and whether the
`
`parties would like a settlement conference; and
`
`4. Any other information the parties believe may assist the Court in resolving the action.
`
`Any request for an extension or adjournment shall be made by letter filed on ECF and must
`
`be received at least 72 hours before the deadline or conference.
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 30, 2020
`New York, NY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_________________________________
`MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket