`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`MARIAM DAVITASHVILI, et al.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`GRUBHUB INC. (d/b/a SEAMLESS), et
`al.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:20-cv-03000 (LAK)
` and consolidated case
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ ANSWERS TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
`Plaintiffs Mariam Davitashvili, Adam Bensimon, Mia Sapienza, Phil Eliades,
`
`Jonathan Swaby, John Boisi, Nate Obey, and Malik Drewey (collectively, “Plaintiffs”),
`
`individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Defendants Grubhub
`
`Inc., Postmates Inc., and Uber Technologies, Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants,” and
`
`together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel,
`
`hereby stipulate as follows:
`
`WHEREAS, on August 19, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint
`
`against Stipulating Defendants (Dkt. No. 28);
`
`WHEREAS, on March 30, 2022, the Court issued its Memorandum Opinion
`
`authorizing the case to move forward (Dkt. No. 46);
`
`WHEREAS, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants’
`
`Answers to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint are due on April 13, 2022;
`
`WHEREAS, Defendants seek a modest extension of their time to prepare and
`
`file their Answers to April 29, 2022; and
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document 47-1 Filed 04/07/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs consent to this extension;
`
`IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned
`
`counsel for the Parties, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
`
`1.
`
`All Parties agree that the Defendants shall file their Answers to
`
`Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint on April 29, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: _______________________, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED:
`
`________________________________
`Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document 47-1 Filed 04/07/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: April 7, 2022
` New York, NY
`
`/s/ Edward Normand
`Kyle W. Roche
`Edward Normand
`Stephen Lagos
`ROCHE FREEDMAN LLP
`99 Park Avenue, 19th Floor
`New York, NY 10016
`Tel.: (646) 350-0527
`kyle@rochefreedman.com
`tnormand@rochefreedman.com
`slagos@rochefreedman.com
`
`Gregory A. Frank
`Marvin L. Frank
`Asher Hawkins
`FRANK LLP
`370 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1706
`New York, New York 10017
`Tel: (212) 682-1853
`info@frankllp.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Eric S. Hochstadt
`David Lender
`Eric S. Hochstadt
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`eric.hochstadt@weil.com
`david.lender@weil.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant GrubHub Inc.
`(d/b/a Seamless)
`
`
`
`/s/ Stacey K. Grigsby
`Derek Ludwin
`Stacey K. Grigsby
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`dludwin@cov.com
`sgrigsby@cov.com
`Andrew A. Ruffino
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`aruffino@cov.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant Uber
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document 47-1 Filed 04/07/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`/s/ Karen M. Lent
`Karen M. Lent
`Evan Kreiner
`SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
`MEAGHER & FLOM
`One Manhattan West
`New York, NY 10001
`karen.lent@skadden.com
`evan.kreiner@skadden.com
`Steven C. Sunshine
`SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
`MEAGHER & FLOM
`1440 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`steve.sunshine@skadden.com
`
`Counsel for Postmates Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
