`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CORRINE ELLSWORTH-BEAUMONT,
`
`
`
`
`
`BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 12
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.:
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Plaintiff Corrine Ellsworth-Beaumont complains and alleges against Defendant Bristol-
`
`Myers Squibb Company as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Corrine Ellsworth-Beaumont (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is an individual
`
`residing in Bountiful, Utah.
`
`2.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
`
`(hereinafter “Defendant”), is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 430 E.
`
`29th Street, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This is an action for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.
`
`§ 101 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331. This Court
`
`also has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because there is complete diversity as
`
`between Plaintiff and Defendant, and the amount in controversy in this action exceeds $75,000.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 12
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant has its principal place of business in the
`
`state of New York and conducts substantial business in New York from which this action arises,
`
`in whole or in part, and is therefore subject to the jurisdiction of this Court.
`
`5.
`
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)(1) because
`
`Defendant resides in this district.
`
`ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
`
`The Dandelion Works
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff is a leading expert in breast health communication design. After losing two
`
`family members to breast cancer, Plaintiff struggled to find literature and resources to help increase
`
`her understanding of breast cancer.
`
`7.
`
`As a professional designer, Plaintiff knows the power of a good visual to simplify
`
`and explain complex subjects. Plaintiff’s research efforts inspired her to create educational
`
`materials to help patients and their family members better understand the symptoms of and
`
`treatments for breast cancer.
`
`8.
`
`Among other endeavors, Plaintiff started the non-profit organization Worldwide
`
`Breast Cancer, which she has used to educate millions of women around the world about breast
`
`cancer.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff has also developed various visual guides that explain concepts relating to
`
`cancer using common objects such as fruits and plants.
`
`10.
`
`One of these works uses a dandelion as the central metaphor. Plaintiff compares the
`
`different methods of treating a dandelion outbreak (e.g., using a general weed killer, using a
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 3 of 12
`
`targeted weed killer, digging the dandelions up, etc.) with different methods of treating breast
`
`cancer (e.g., chemotherapy, hormone therapy, surgery, etc.).
`
`11.
`
`Some examples from the Dandelion Works are shown below:
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff has authored several creative works using this dandelion metaphor
`
`(collectively, “the Dandelion Works”).
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff acquired copyright Reg. No. VAu 1-346-869 for some of the Dandelion
`
`Works. A copy of this copyright certificate and the materials it covers is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff also acquired copyright Reg. Nos. VAu 1-396-812 for some of the
`
`Dandelion Works.
`
`15.
`
`Since creating the Dandelion Works, Plaintiff has publicly displayed and published
`
`them at numerous cancer conferences since 2015. Defendant attended one or more of the
`
`conferences at which the Dandelion Works were displayed. The Dandelion Works are well-known
`
`in the pharmaceutical community that focuses on cancer treatments.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 4 of 12
`
`Defendant’s Infringing Works
`
`16.
`
`Defendant is an international pharmaceutical company that manufactures and
`
`markets a wide variety of drugs and medical treatments, including treatments for various types of
`
`cancer.
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff discovered that Defendant created derivative works of some of Plaintiff’s
`
`copyrighted materials and is using those works in Defendant’s own marketing materials to promote
`
`Defendant’s immuno-oncology treatments.
`
`18.
`
`For example, Plaintiff explains radiation treatments using images showing a
`
`magnifying glass that targets dandelions by increasing the power of the sun. Defendant uses
`
`materials similar to these, as shown below:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 5 of 12
`
`
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff explains surgery using images showing a garden trowel digging up a
`
`dandelion. Defendant uses similar visuals, as shown below:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 6 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Plaintiff explains chemotherapy using images showing a general weed killer
`
`applied to a dandelion and everything around it. Defendant also utilizes this visual, as seen below:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 7 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`21.
`
`Plaintiff explains targeted therapy using images showing a general weed killer
`
`applied to a dandelion and everything around it. Defendant also utilizes this visual, as seen below:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 8 of 12
`
`22.
`
`Viewing the work as a whole, Defendant’s publications show that Defendant used
`
`the creative expression in the Dandelion Works to make derivative works to advertise its
`
`immunotherapy offerings:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Think of a cancer cell as a dandelion that
`
`has turned to seed. The same ways we treat
`
`a dandelion are a lot like the options we
`
`have for treating metastatic breast
`
`cancer…”
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 9 of 12
`
`23.
`
`Prior to using Plaintiff’s Dandelion Works to make its derivative dandelion works,
`
`Plaintiff explained and visualized how immuno-oncology works as follows:
`
`24.
`
`In 2018, after the Plaintiff’s Dandelion Works became known in the oncology field
`
`Defendant changed its publication to explain immuno-oncology using derivative works of the
`
`Dandelion Works:
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 10 of 12
`
`
`
`25.
`
`On April 21, 2020, Plaintiff sent Defendant a letter informing Defendant that its
`
`materials infringe Plaintiff’s copyrights and demanding that Defendant cease using materials
`
`derived from the Dandelion Works. A copy of that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`26.
`
`Notwithstanding this notice, Defendant has refused to cease using Plaintiff’s
`
`copyrighted materials.
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiff has suffered damages, and Defendant has earned wrongful profits, in
`
`amounts to be proven at trial, as a result of the aforementioned conduct. Unless restrained and
`
`enjoined by this Court, Defendant will cause irreparable harm to Plaintiff, for which there is no
`
`adequate remedy at law.
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 11 of 12
`
`CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`COUNT I
`
`Copyright Infringement Under 17 U.S.C. § 501
`
`28.
`
`Plaintiff hereby realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of
`
`paragraphs 1–27 of this Complaint into this Claim for Relief as though fully set forth herein.
`
`29.
`
`The Dandelion Works were created by Plaintiff and constitute original works of
`
`authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression. Therefore, Plaintiff owns a copyright in the
`
`Dandelion Works.
`
`30.
`
`On August 7, 2018, Plaintiff’s Reg. No. VAu 1-346-869 was duly and legally issued
`
`by the United States Copyright Office. Plaintiff is the sole owner of this registration.
`
`31.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant has reproduced, prepared derivative works
`
`based upon, distributed, and publicly displayed the Dandelion Works or derivatives of the
`
`Dandelion Works without Plaintiff’s consent.
`
`32.
`
`Plaintiff has been damaged by Defendant’s copyright infringement, and Defendant
`
`has inequitably profited from its copyright infringement.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment as follows:
`
`A.
`
`For judgment holding Defendant liable for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C.
`
`§ 501;
`
`B.
`
`For a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunction
`
`prohibiting Defendant from infringing the copyright in Plaintiff’s Dandelion Works under 17
`
`U.S.C. § 502(a);
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-09868 Document 1 Filed 11/23/20 Page 12 of 12
`
`C.
`
`For an order requiring Defendant to destroy all copies of its infringing materials
`
`under 17 U.S.C. § 503(b);
`
`D.
`
`For an award of actual damages suffered by Plaintiff as a result of Defendant’s
`
`copyright infringement and of any of Defendant’s profits that are attributable to the copyright
`
`infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 502(a);
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`For an award of costs and attorney fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505;
`
`For an award of costs pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1); and
`
`Such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and appropriate.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`
`
`Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b), Corrine Ellsworth-Beaumont hereby demands a trial by jury
`
`on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` DATED: November 23, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Peter A. Gergely
`Peter A. Gergely
`New York Bar No. 5671458
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`767 Third Avenue, Suite 23C
`New York, New York 10017
`Telephone: (212) 223-6520
`pgergely@merchantgould.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff,
`Corrine Ellsworth-Beaumont
`
`12
`
`