`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Civil Action No. 1:21 Civ. 07201 (LGS)
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD. and NEODRON
`LTD.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GOVERNING THE PROCEDURE TO SEAL
`XXXXXXXXXXXX
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN DOCUMENTS FILED IN THIS CASE
`
`The Court, having ordered the Parties to propose an order governing the sealing of
`
`confidential information (Dkt. 9), and the Parties having conferred and proposed the following
`
`order, it is hereby
`
`ORDERED that the Parties may file documents in this proceeding under seal without
`
`further motions to do so, provided that within seven days the party filing a document under seal
`
`shall, for each document so filed, publicly file a (i) slip sheet indicating that the document shall
`
`be maintained entirely under seal; or (ii) version of the document with only confidential
`
`information redacted.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that unless the document the party is proposing to maintain
`
`under seal or the redacted portions of the document include only information previously sealed
`
`or redacted in this case, the parties must file with the slip sheet or redacted document a public
`
`motion or letter-motion articulating the basis for its new sealings or redactions and, in the case of
`
`redactions, providing a copy of the document with all redactions highlighted, which highlighted
`
`document may itself be filed under seal.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-07201-LGS Document 12 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party objecting to any sealing or redaction shall
`
`within seven days file a response stating its objection, to which the party propounding the sealing
`
`or redactions shall have seven days to respond.
`
`Dated: September __, 2021
`7
`
`New York, NY
`
`SO ORDERED:
`
`LORNA G. SCHOFIELD
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
