throbber
Case 1:21-cv-07201-LGS Document 76 Filed 03/01/22 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`------------------------------------------------------------
`
`LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`21 Civ. 5205 (LGS)
`21 Civ. 7201 (LGS)
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`X
`
`
`WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to seal portions of their
`
`memorandum of law in support of the motion to dismiss or transfer. (Dkt. No. 50 in 21 Civ.
`
`5205, Dkt. No. 19 in 21 Civ. 7201.)
`
`WHEREAS, on October 12, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of their
`
`memorandum of law in opposition to the motion to dismiss or transfer. (Dkt. No. 57 in 21 Civ.
`
`5205, Dkt. No. 36 in 21 Civ. 7201).
`
`WHEREAS, on October 22, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to seal portions of their
`
`reply in support of the motion to dismiss or transfer. (Dkt. No. 64 in 21 Civ. 5205, Dkt. No. 47 in
`
`21 Civ. 7201.) It is hereby
`
`ORDERED that, the motions to seal are GRANTED. The unredacted versions of the
`
`memoranda of law will remain sealed, and only the parties and individuals identified in the in the
`
`appendix at Dkt. No. 64 in 21 Civ. 5205, Dkt. No. 47 in 21 Civ. 7201 will have access. Although
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-07201-LGS Document 76 Filed 03/01/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`“[t]he common law right of public access to judicial documents is firmly rooted in our nation’s
`
`history,” this right is not absolute, and courts “must balance competing considerations against” the
`
`presumption of access. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119–20 (2d Cir.
`
`2006) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns., Inc., 435 U.S.
`
`589, 599 (1978) (“[T]he decision as to access is one best left to the sound discretion of the trial
`
`court, a discretion to be exercised in light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular
`
`case.”). Filing the above-referenced memoranda in redacted form is necessary to prevent the
`
`unauthorized dissemination of confidential business information. It is further
`
`The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Dkt. Nos. 50, 57, and 64
`
`in 21 Civ. 5205 and Dkt. Nos. 19, 36, and 47 in 21 Civ. 7201.
`
`Dated: March 1, 2022
`
`New York, New York
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket