throbber
Case 1:22-cv-05187-JGK Document 11 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 3
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`United States Attorney
`Southern District of New York
`
`
`
`Letter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor
`New York, NY 10007
`
`January 9, 2023
`
`BY ECF
`The Hon. John G. Koeltl
`United States District Judge
`Daniel Patrick Moynihan
`United States Courthouse
`Southern District of New York
`500 Pearl Street
`New York, NY 10007
`
`Re: United States v. Meta Platforms, Inc. f/k/a Facebook, Inc.,
`
`22 Civ. 5187 (JGK)
`
`
`Dear Judge Koeltl:
`
`
`This Office represents the United States of America (the “Government”) in the above-
`referenced action. We write respectfully on behalf of both parties, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the
`Settlement Agreement and Final Judgment entered in this case on June 27, 2022, Dkt. No. 7 (the
`“Settlement Agreement”), and the Court’s December 30, 2022, Order, Dkt. No. 10, to respectfully
`advise the Court that the parties have reached agreement on the VRS Compliance Metrics and
`therefore the term of the Settlement Agreement will be the Extended Term, ending on June 27,
`2026.1
`
`The Settlement Agreement provides, among other things, that Meta will build a Variance
`Reduction System (“VRS”) to reduce variances in the delivery of housing ads that the United
`States alleges are introduced by Meta’s ad delivery system, for sex and estimated race/ethnicity.
`See Settlement Agreement ¶ 10(a). Pursuant to paragraph 10(b), the parties were required to meet
`and confer by December 16, 2022 “in good faith in an effort to agree on metrics for how much the
`VRS will reduce any variances” (“VRS Compliance Metrics”). Id. ¶ 10(b). If the parties reached
`agreement on those metrics: (1) Meta would implement the VRS by December 31, 2022 (“VRS
`Implementation Date”), id. ¶ 10(d); and (2) the parties would file a joint notice with the Court by
`December 31, 2022, and the term of the Settlement Agreement would extend from an initial term,
`ending on December 31, 2022 (“Initial Term”), through an extended term (“Extended Term”),
`ending on June 27, 2026, id. ¶ 5.
`
`As the parties advised the Court by letter on December 29, 2022, the parties met and
`conferred and reached an agreement in principle on the VRS Compliance Metrics. The parties
`requested, and the Court granted, an extension until January 9, 2023, to file the joint notice required
`by paragraph 5; an extension of the Initial Term through January 9, 2023; and a corresponding
`extension of the VRS Implementation Date to January 9, 2023. Dkt. No. 10.
`
`
`1 Capitalized terms are those defined in the Settlement Agreement, ¶¶ 3 & 10.
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-05187-JGK Document 11 Filed 01/09/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`Letter to the Hon. John G. Koeltl
`
`
`
`The parties have reached final agreement on the VRS Compliance Metrics and therefore
`the term of the Settlement Agreement shall be the Extended Term, ending on June 27, 2026.
`During the Extended Term, the VRS Compliance Metrics will be as follows for Housing
`Advertisements with US Ad Impressions, and variances will be measured using the Earth Mover’s
`Distance (“EMD”), otherwise known as the Wasserstein Metric:
`
`For Housing Advertisements with more than 1,000 Ad Impressions, which constitute the
`vast majority of Housing Advertisements on Meta Platforms, the VRS will reduce
`variances as follows:2
`
`•
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`•
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Variance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`≤10%
`
`≤5%
`
`≤10%
`
`≤5%
`
`Sex
`
`Estimated
`Race/
`Ethnicity
`
`
`Coverage
`
`
`By April 30, 2023
`
`
`
`By August 31, 2023
`
`
`
`By December 31, 2023
`
`82.6%
`
`73.2%
`
`72.2%
`
`54.3%
`
`87.2%
`
`79.1%
`
`76.1%
`
`57.5%
`
`91.7%
`
`84.5%
`
`81.0%
`
`61.0%
`
`
`For all Housing Advertisements with at least 300 Ad Impressions, the VRS will reduce
`variances as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sex
`
`Estimated
`Race/
`Ethnicity
`
`
`
`Variance
`
`
`By April 30, 2023
`
`
`By August 31, 2023
`
`
`By December 31, 2023
`
`≤10%
`
`≤5%
`
`≤10%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`80.6%
`
`68.5%
`
`69.7%
`
`≤5%
`
`48.5%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`84.8%
`
`73.4%
`
`74.0%
`
`52.6%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`90.2%
`
`78.3%
`
`80.1%
`
`56.8%
`
`
`2 As noted in the Settlement Agreement, measurements for estimated race/ethnicity will be based on
`information estimating race/ethnicity using a privacy-enhanced version of the Bayesian Improved Surname
`Geocoding (“BISG”) methodology. This use will be limited to aggregate measurements and subject to
`privacy protections to prevent individual identification. See id. ¶ 10(a)(v).
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-05187-JGK Document 11 Filed 01/09/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`Letter to the Hon. John G. Koeltl
`
`
`In sum, because the parties have reached agreement on the VRS Compliance Metrics, the
`term of the Settlement Agreement will be the Extended Term, ending on June 27, 2026.
`
`Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
` DAMIAN WILLIAMS
`United States Attorney
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cc: All Counsel by ECF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ellen Blain
`
`ELLEN BLAIN
`DAVID J. KENNEDY
`CHRISTINE S. POSCABLO
` Assistant U.S. Attorneys
`Tel.: (212) 637-2743
`E-mail:
`ellen.blain@usdoj.gov
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket