`
`
`
`
`MATTHEW HOPKINS,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Plaintiff, by his undersigned attorneys, for this complaint against defendants, alleges upon
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 1 of 10
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE
`SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
`
`Case No. ___________
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`BIOHAVEN PHARMACEUTICAL
`HOLDING COMPANY LTD., VLAD
`CORIC, IRINA A. ANTONIJEVIC,
`GREGORY H. BAILEY, JOHN W. CHILDS,
`DOUGLAS GRAY, JULIA P. GREGORY,
`MICHAEL T. HEFFERNAN, ROBERT J.
`HUGIN, and KISHEN MEHTA,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`personal knowledge with respect to himself, and upon information and belief based upon, inter
`
`alia, the investigation of counsel as to all other allegations herein, as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`On May 10, 2022, Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. (“Biohaven”
`
`or the “Company”) announced that it will be acquired by Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) (the “Proposed
`
`Transaction”).
`
`2.
`
`On May 9, 2022, Biohaven’s Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Individual
`
`Defendants”) caused the Company to enter into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger
`
`Agreement”) with Pfizer and Bulldog (BVI) Ltd. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement,
`
`Biohaven’s stockholders will receive $148.50 in cash for each share of Biohaven common stock
`
`they own.
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 2 of 10
`
`
`
`3.
`
`On July 1, 2022, defendants filed a proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) with
`
`the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the
`
`Proposed Transaction.
`
`4.
`
`The Proxy Statement omits material information with respect to the Proposed
`
`Transaction, which renders the Proxy Statement false and misleading, in violation of Sections
`
`14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the claims asserted herein pursuant to Section 27
`
`of the Exchange Act because the claims asserted herein arise under Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the
`
`Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9.
`
`6.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over defendants because each defendant is either a
`
`corporation that conducts business in and maintains operations within this District, or is an
`
`individual with sufficient minimum contacts with this District so as to make the exercise of
`
`jurisdiction by this Court permissible under traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a portion of the transactions
`
`and wrongs complained of herein occurred in this District.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff is and has been continuously throughout all times relevant hereto the
`
`owner of Biohaven common stock.
`
`9.
`
`Defendant Biohaven is a British Virgin Islands business company. The Company’s
`
`principal executive offices are located at 215 Church Street, New Haven, CT 06510. Biohaven’s
`
`common stock is traded on the NYSE, which is headquartered in New York, NY, under the ticker
`
`symbol “BHVN.”
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 3 of 10
`
`
`
`10.
`
`Defendant Vlad Coric is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
`
`Company.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant Irina A. Antonijevic is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant Gregory H. Bailey is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant John W. Childs is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant Douglas Gray is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant Julia P. Gregory is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant Michael T. Heffernan is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant Robert J. Hugin is a director of the Company.
`
`Defendant Kishen Mehta is a director of the Company.
`
`The defendants identified in paragraphs 10 through 18 are collectively referred to
`
`herein as the “Individual Defendants.”
`
`
`
`SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
`
`20.
`
`Biohaven is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company with a portfolio of
`
`innovative, best-in-class therapies to improve the lives of patients with debilitating neurological
`
`and neuropsychiatric diseases, including rare disorders.
`
`21.
`
`On May 9, 2022, Biohaven’s Board caused the Company to enter into the Merger
`
`Agreement.
`
`22.
`
`As set forth in the press release announcing the Proposed Transaction:
`
`Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd.
`(NYSE: BHVN) today announced that the companies have entered into a definitive
`agreement under which Pfizer will acquire Biohaven, the maker of NURTEC®
`ODT, an innovative dual-acting migraine therapy approved for both acute treatment
`and episodic prevention of migraine in adults.
`
`Under the terms of the agreement, Pfizer will acquire all outstanding shares of
`Biohaven not already owned by Pfizer for $148.50 per share in cash. Biohaven
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 4 of 10
`
`
`
`common shareholders, including Pfizer, will also receive 0.5 of a share of New
`Biohaven, a new publicly traded company that will retain Biohaven’s non-CGRP
`development stage pipeline compounds, per Biohaven common share. The boards
`of directors of both Biohaven and Pfizer have unanimously approved the
`transaction. Pfizer will pay transaction consideration totaling approximately $11.6
`billion in cash. Pfizer will also make payments at closing to settle Biohaven’s third
`party debt and for the redemption of all outstanding shares of Biohaven’s
`redeemable preferred stock. The $148.50 cash consideration represents a premium
`of approximately 33% to Biohaven’s volume weighted average selling price of
`$111.70 over the three months prior to the announcement of the transaction.
`
`The proposed transaction includes the acquisition of Biohaven’s calcitonin gene-
`related peptide (CGRP) programs including:
`
`Rimegepant:
`
`Approved in the United States (U.S.) under the trade name, NURTEC® ODT, for
`both the acute treatment of migraine and preventive treatment of episodic migraine
`
`Approved in the European Union under the trade name, VYDURA®, for both acute
`treatment of migraine and prophylaxis of episodic migraine
`
`Zavegepant:
`
`On track for a 2Q2022 acceptance (based on March 2022 submission) in the U.S.
`as an intranasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine and in development as an
`oral soft gel for chronic migraine prevention
`
`A portfolio of five pre-clinical CGRP assets
`
`“Today’s announcement builds on our legacy of delivering breakthroughs for
`patients living with complex pain disorders and diseases that disproportionately
`impact women,” said Nick Lagunowich, Global President, Pfizer Internal
`Medicine. “NURTEC® ODT, which is already the #1 prescribed migraine
`medicine in its class in the United States, coupled with Biohaven’s CGRP pipeline,
`offers hope for patients suffering from migraine worldwide. We believe Pfizer is
`uniquely positioned to help the portfolio reach its full potential given our leading
`scale and capabilities, including comprehensive field force engagement with
`Primary Care Physicians, specialists and health systems delivering the right
`information at the right time.”
`
`This agreement follows on the November 9, 2021 collaboration for the
`commercialization of rimegepant and zavegepant outside the United States, in
`connection with which Pfizer invested $350 million to acquire 2.6% of Biohaven’s
`common stock at $173 per share.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 5 of 10
`
`
`
`“We are excited to announce Pfizer’s proposed acquisition of Biohaven,
`recognizing the market leadership of NURTEC® ODT, our breakthrough all in one
`migraine therapy, and the untapped potential of our CGRP franchise,” said Vlad
`Coric, MD, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Biohaven. “Pfizer’s
`capabilities will accelerate our mission to deliver our migraine medicines to even
`more patients, while the new R&D company is well positioned to bring value to
`patients and shareholders by focusing on our innovative pipeline for neurological
`and other disorders. We believe this transaction represents significant future value
`creation for patients and our collective shareholders.”
`
`Following the closing, New Biohaven will continue to operate under the Biohaven
`name. New Biohaven will be led by Vlad Coric, MD, as Chairman and CEO, and
`include other members of the current management team of Biohaven. Biohaven
`common shareholders will receive, for each Biohaven share, 0.5 of a share of New
`Biohaven distributed via a pro rata distribution of SEC-registered, publicly listed
`shares. At distribution, New Biohaven will be capitalized with $275 million of cash.
`New Biohaven will also have the right to receive tiered royalties from Pfizer on any
`annual net sales of rimegepant and zavegepant in the United States in excess of
`$5.25 billion.
`
`Pfizer expects to finance the transaction with existing cash on hand.
`
`Pfizer’s acquisition of Biohaven is subject to the completion of the New Biohaven
`spin-off transaction and other customary closing conditions, including receipt of
`regulatory approvals and approval by Biohaven’s shareholders. The companies
`expect the transaction to close by early 2023.
`
`Due to the proposed transaction, Biohaven will not hold a conference call to discuss
`its first quarter 2022 financial results and will issue a press release and file a
`quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
`announcing those results on May 10, 2022.
`
`J.P. Morgan acted as Pfizer’s financial advisor for the transaction with Ropes &
`Gray LLP acting as its legal advisor. Centerview Partners acted as Biohaven’s
`financial advisor for the transaction with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP acting as its
`legal advisor.
`
`23.
`
`Defendants filed the Proxy Statement with the SEC in connection with the Proposed
`
`Transaction, which omits material information.
`
`Financial Projections
`
`24.
`
`The Proxy Statement omits material information regarding Biohaven’s financial
`
`projections, specifically: the line items underlying the financial projections.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 6 of 10
`
`
`
`25.
`
`The disclosure of projected financial information is material because it provides
`
`stockholders with a basis to project the future financial performance of a company, and allows
`
`stockholders to better understand the financial analyses performed by the company’s financial
`
`advisor in support of its fairness opinion.
`
`Financial Analyses
`
`26.
`
`The Proxy Statement omits material information regarding the financial analyses
`
`conducted by Centerview Partners (“Centerview”). When a banker’s endorsement of the fairness
`
`of a transaction is touted to shareholders, the valuation methods used to arrive at that opinion as
`
`well as the key inputs and range of ultimate values generated by those analyses must also be fairly
`
`disclosed.
`
`27.
`
`Regarding Centerview’s Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis, the Proxy
`
`Statement fails to disclose: (i) the individual metrics for the transactions utilized by Centerview;
`
`(ii) the closing dates of the transactions utilized by Centerview; and (iii) the total values of the
`
`transactions utilized by Centerview.
`
`28.
`
`Regarding Centerview’s Discounted Cash Flow Analysis, the Proxy Statement fails
`
`to disclose: (i) the terminal values utilized by Centerview; (ii) the individual inputs and
`
`assumptions underlying the discount rates and rate of free cash flow decline utilized by
`
`Centerview; (iii) the number of fully diluted shares utilized by Centerview; (iv) the risk-adjusted
`
`after-tax unlevered free cash flows utilized by Centerview; and (v) the line items underlying the
`
`unlevered free cash flows utilized by Centerview.
`
`29.
`
`Regarding Centerview’s Analyst Price Target Analysis, the Proxy Statement fails
`
`to disclose: (i) the price targets utilized by Centerview; and (ii) the sources of the price targets
`
`utilized by Centerview.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 7 of 10
`
`
`
`30.
`
`Regarding Centerview’s Premiums Paid Analysis, the Proxy Statement fails to
`
`disclose: (i) the transactions utilized by Centerview; and (ii) the premiums paid in the transactions
`
`utilized by Centerview.
`
`COUNT I
`
`Claim for Violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 Promulgated
`Thereunder Against the Individual Defendants and Biohaven
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges the preceding allegations as if fully set forth herein.
`
`The Individual Defendants disseminated the false and misleading Proxy Statement,
`
`which contained statements that, in violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-
`
`9, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, omitted to state material facts
`
`necessary to make the statements therein not materially false or misleading. Biohaven is liable as
`
`the issuer of these statements.
`
`33.
`
`The Proxy Statement was prepared, reviewed, and/or disseminated by the
`
`Individual Defendants. By virtue of their positions within the Company, the Individual Defendants
`
`were aware of this information and their duty to disclose this information in the Proxy Statement.
`
`34.
`
`The Individual Defendants were at least negligent in filing the Proxy Statement
`
`with these materially false and misleading statements.
`
`35.
`
`The omissions and false and misleading statements in the Proxy Statement are
`
`material in that a reasonable stockholder will consider them important in deciding how to vote on
`
`the Proposed Transaction. In addition, a reasonable investor will view a full and accurate
`
`disclosure as significantly altering the total mix of information made available in the Proxy
`
`Statement and in other information reasonably available to stockholders.
`
`36.
`
`The Proxy Statement is an essential link in causing plaintiff to approve the Proposed
`
`Transaction.
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 8 of 10
`
`
`
`37.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act
`
`and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder.
`
`38.
`
`Because of the false and misleading statements in the Proxy Statement, plaintiff is
`
`threatened with irreparable harm.
`
`COUNT II
`
`Claim for Violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act
`Against the Individual Defendants
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges the preceding allegations as if fully set forth herein.
`
`The Individual Defendants acted as controlling persons of Biohaven within the
`
`meaning of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as alleged herein. By virtue of their positions as
`
`officers and/or directors of Biohaven and participation in and/or awareness of the Company’s
`
`operations and/or intimate knowledge of the false statements contained in the Proxy Statement,
`
`they had the power to influence and control and did influence and control, directly or indirectly,
`
`the decision making of the Company, including the content and dissemination of the various
`
`statements that plaintiff contends are false and misleading.
`
`41.
`
`Each of the Individual Defendants was provided with or had unlimited access to
`
`copies of the Proxy Statement alleged by plaintiff to be misleading prior to and/or shortly after
`
`these statements were issued and had the ability to prevent the issuance of the statements or cause
`
`them to be corrected.
`
`42.
`
`In particular, each of the Individual Defendants had direct and supervisory
`
`involvement in the day-to-day operations of the Company, and, therefore, is presumed to have had
`
`the power to control and influence the particular transactions giving rise to the violations as alleged
`
`herein, and exercised the same. The Proxy Statement contains the unanimous recommendation of
`
`the Individual Defendants to approve the Proposed Transaction. They were thus directly involved
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 9 of 10
`
`
`
`in the making of the Proxy Statement.
`
`43.
`
`By virtue of the foregoing, the Individual Defendants violated Section 20(a) of the
`
`Exchange Act.
`
`44.
`
`As set forth above, the Individual Defendants had the ability to exercise control
`
`over and did control a person or persons who have each violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange
`
`Act and Rule 14a-9, by their acts and omissions as alleged herein. By virtue of their positions as
`
`controlling persons, these defendants are liable pursuant to Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. As
`
`a direct and proximate result of defendants’ conduct, plaintiff is threatened with irreparable harm.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for judgment and relief as follows:
`
`A.
`
`Preliminarily and permanently enjoining defendants and all persons acting in
`
`concert with them from proceeding with, consummating, or closing the Proposed Transaction;
`
`B.
`
`In the event defendants consummate the Proposed Transaction, rescinding it and
`
`setting it aside or awarding rescissory damages;
`
`C.
`
`Directing the Individual Defendants to disseminate a Proxy Statement that does not
`
`contain any untrue statements of material fact and that states all material facts required in it or
`
`necessary to make the statements contained therein not misleading;
`
`D.
`
`Declaring that defendants violated Sections 14(a) and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act,
`
`as well as Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder;
`
`E.
`
`Awarding plaintiff the costs of this action, including reasonable allowance for
`
`plaintiff’s attorneys’ and experts’ fees; and
`
`F.
`
`Granting such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-05988 Document 1 Filed 07/13/22 Page 10 of 10
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
`
`Dated: July 1(cid:22), 2022
`
`GRABAR LAW OFFICE
`
`By:
`
`Joshua H. Grabar (#5906953)
`One Liberty Place
`1650 Market Street, Suite 3600
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`267-507-6085
`jgrabar@grabarlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`10
`
`